
I spent a day on the dark web - these are the terrifying things I saw
Usually, our imaginations cook up scenarios that are a lot more dramatic than reality. But when it comes to this hidden corner of the internet that can only be reached using special software, it's pretty spot on.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
18 minutes ago
- Finextra
OpenEden selects BNY as custodian for tokenized T-Bills fund
OpenEden, a leading platform for the tokenization of Real-World Assets ('RWAs'), today announced the appointment of certain affiliates of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation ('BNY') (NYSE: BK), a global financial services company, as investment manager and primary custodian for the underlying assets of its flagship Tokenized U.S. Treasury Bills ('$TBILL') Fund, the world's first tokenized U.S. Treasury fund to receive an investment grade 'A' rating from Moody's. 0 The strategic relationship highlights OpenEden and BNY's shared commitment to shaping the future of financial infrastructure by facilitating regulated and institutional-grade assets on chain for global investors. Launched in 2023, OpenEden's $TBILL provides investors with direct exposure to a pool of short-dated U.S. Treasury Bills ('U.S. T-Bills') and overnight reverse repurchase agreements through the minting of the TBILL token. $TBILL has seen rapid and accelerating adoption, indicating the surging demand from investors for regulated, institutional-grade on-chain cash management solutions. BNY Investments Dreyfus is one of the largest liquidity managers in the industry with more than five decades of proven expertise and will manage $TBILL Fund on OpenEden's behalf as sub-manager. As part of its mission to build the financial infrastructure for the future, BNY will also serve as the primary custodian for the underlying assets, leveraging its established infrastructure that administers US$55.8 trillion of assets and its proven track record providing asset servicing solutions that enable the digital assets ecosystem. 'OpenEden's collaboration with BNY marks a critical milestone in our mission to deliver secure, transparent, and institution-ready tokenized financial products,' said Jeremy Ng, Founder and CEO of OpenEden. 'Combining our tokenization platform with BNY's global scale and deep fiduciary expertise enables us to create a new standard for trust and access in the digital asset space.' 'BNY plays a critical role in the digital assets ecosystem, serving as a trusted bridge between traditional finance and emerging technology for clients,' said Jose Minaya, Global Head of BNY Investments and Wealth. 'We are excited to extend our time-tested liquidity investment management capabilities and asset safekeeping services to enable $TBILL and are proud to collaborate with OpenEden as we jointly aim to support the end-to-end lifecycle of tokenized assets.'


Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Apple Watch vs. Whoop: Which One is Right for You?
Wearable technology has become an integral part of modern life, offering tools to enhance productivity, monitor health, and improve fitness. Among the leading options, the Apple Watch and Whoop stand out as two distinct devices, each catering to specific user needs. The Apple Watch provides a feature-rich, multifunctional experience with seamless integration into the Apple ecosystem, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. On the other hand, the Whoop is designed for fitness enthusiasts and athletes, offering advanced recovery and performance insights through a minimalist, distraction-free design. Choosing between these devices depends on your lifestyle, priorities, and how you plan to incorporate wearable technology into your daily routine. The video below from AppleDsign gives us a detailed look at these devices. Watch this video on YouTube. Design: Sleek Versatility vs. Minimalist Comfort The design of the Apple Watch and Whoop reflects their differing purposes and target audiences. The Apple Watch features a sleek, customizable design with a vibrant, high-resolution display. This allows users to interact with apps, notifications, and fitness metrics in real time. Its integration with other Apple devices ensures a seamless experience, making it an ideal choice for those already invested in the Apple ecosystem. The ability to personalize the watch with various bands and watch faces further enhances its appeal. In contrast, the Whoop takes a minimalist approach to design. It features a lightweight, display-free band that prioritizes comfort and durability. This makes it particularly suitable for athletes or individuals who prefer a distraction-free wearable. By eliminating a screen, the Whoop focuses on passive data collection, allowing users to concentrate on their performance and recovery without interruptions. Its simplicity underscores its purpose as a dedicated fitness and recovery tool. Functionality: Smartwatch Features vs. Athlete-Centric Insights The Apple Watch is a multifunctional smartwatch that goes beyond fitness tracking. It offers a wide range of features, including notifications, apps, timers, and real-time workout tracking. Additionally, it includes safety tools such as emergency SOS and crash detection, providing peace of mind in critical situations. These features make the Apple Watch a versatile companion for both everyday tasks and fitness activities. The Whoop, on the other hand, is tailored to athletes and fitness enthusiasts. It provides detailed health metrics, including heart rate variability, strain, and sleep performance. Advanced features like sport recognition and personalized recovery insights make it a valuable tool for optimizing training and performance. Unlike the Apple Watch, the Whoop avoids distractions such as notifications, focusing solely on health and fitness data. This athlete-centric approach ensures that users receive actionable insights to improve their overall well-being. Battery Life: Convenience vs. Endurance Battery life is a key factor when choosing a wearable device, and the Apple Watch and Whoop offer contrasting approaches. The Apple Watch typically lasts 1.5 to 3 days on a single charge, depending on usage and the specific model. While this is sufficient for most users, frequent charging may be necessary for those who use the device extensively. The Whoop excels in battery performance, offering an impressive 12 to 14 days of continuous use. Its innovative charging mechanism allows users to charge the device while wearing it, making sure uninterrupted data collection. This extended battery life is particularly beneficial for athletes and fitness enthusiasts who require consistent monitoring without the inconvenience of frequent recharging. Sleep Tracking: Basic Insights vs. Advanced Analysis Both devices include sleep tracking features, but their approaches and depth of analysis differ significantly. The Apple Watch provides basic sleep insights, such as duration and general patterns. These features are helpful for casual users who want a broad understanding of their sleep habits without delving into detailed metrics. The Whoop, however, offers advanced sleep analysis. It tracks sleep stages, provides personalized recommendations for improving rest, and includes journaling features to identify factors that may affect sleep quality. For users who prioritize recovery and performance, the Whoop's sleep tracking capabilities are unmatched, offering actionable insights to enhance overall well-being. Unique Features: Safety Tools vs. Fitness Metrics The Apple Watch distinguishes itself with life-saving features such as emergency SOS and crash detection. These tools can provide critical assistance in emergencies, making the device particularly appealing to safety-conscious users. Additionally, its integration with apps and other Apple devices enhances its versatility, making it suitable for a wide range of users. The Whoop, in contrast, focuses on fitness-specific metrics. One standout feature is the 'Whoop age,' which evaluates a user's fitness level based on collected data. This, combined with its emphasis on recovery and performance, highlights its athlete-centric design. The Whoop's unique features cater to individuals who are deeply invested in tracking and improving their physical performance. Pricing: Upfront Cost vs. Subscription Model The pricing structures of the Apple Watch and Whoop reflect their differing approaches to wearable technology. The Apple Watch requires a one-time purchase, with prices starting at $399 for the Series 10. This model appeals to users who prefer an upfront cost without ongoing commitments, making it a straightforward investment for those seeking a multifunctional device. The Whoop operates on a subscription-based model, with annual costs ranging from $199 to $365, depending on the plan and device. While the subscription model may deter some users, it reflects the continuous updates, advanced analytics, and personalized insights provided by the platform. This pricing structure aligns with the Whoop's focus on delivering in-depth health and fitness data. Choosing the Right Wearable for Your Lifestyle The Apple Watch and Whoop cater to different audiences, each excelling in its own domain. The Apple Watch is an excellent choice for those seeking a multifunctional smartwatch with seamless connectivity, active features, and life-saving tools. It is particularly well-suited for users who value versatility and integration with the Apple ecosystem. In contrast, the Whoop is ideal for athletes and fitness enthusiasts who prioritize detailed health and recovery insights. Its minimalist design, advanced metrics, and focus on performance make it a powerful tool for optimizing physical well-being. Ultimately, the decision between these two devices should align with your lifestyle, priorities, and how you intend to use wearable technology. Expand your understanding of Apple Watch vs Whoop with additional resources from our extensive library of articles. Source & Image Credit: AppleDsign Filed Under: Apple, Gadgets News, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


Geeky Gadgets
2 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Qwen 3 Code Budget-Friendly AI Coding : 2,000 Free AI Runs Daily
What if the future of coding wasn't just about speed or precision, but about accessibility? Imagine a world where even the most resource-constrained developers could harness the power of AI without breaking the bank. Enter Qwen 3 Code—a model that's redefining the landscape of AI-assisted programming by offering 2,000 free runs per day. In an industry dominated by premium tools like Claude Code, Qwen 3 Code dares to challenge the status quo with a bold promise: to make AI coding tools not just powerful, but truly inclusive. For developers navigating tight budgets or those just beginning their journey into AI, this model could be the fantastic option they've been waiting for. In this exploration of Qwen 3 Code, AI Labs uncover how it balances affordability with functionality, offering features like seamless integration with the Gemini CLI framework and compatibility with diverse platforms. But it's not just about what it provides—it's also about what it represents: a step toward providing widespread access to AI in software development. Whether you're curious about its standout features, intrigued by its limitations, or eager to see how it stacks up against premium alternatives, this deep dive will leave you with a clearer understanding of its potential. Sometimes, innovation isn't about having the most—it's about making the most of what's available. Affordable AI Coding Tool Qwen 3 Key Features and Accessibility Qwen 3 Code is designed with a focus on affordability and usability, making it an attractive choice for developers at all skill levels. Its most prominent feature, the 2,000 free daily runs, allows users to experiment with AI-driven coding tools without any financial commitment. This feature is especially beneficial for developers who are new to AI or working within tight budgets. Key features include: Integration with the Gemini CLI framework , providing a familiar and efficient environment for developers accustomed to similar tools. , providing a familiar and efficient environment for developers accustomed to similar tools. Secure access through OAuth authentication , making sure data protection while allowing seamless use of the free API tier. , making sure data protection while allowing seamless use of the free API tier. Flexible installation options, including npm installation or source setup, catering to developers with diverse technical backgrounds. Despite its advantages, Qwen 3 Code does have some limitations. It lacks certain advanced features found in premium alternatives, such as Claude Code hooks and sub-agents, which may restrict its functionality for more complex or specialized tasks. Integration and Compatibility One of the key strengths of Qwen 3 Code is its compatibility with a variety of tools and platforms, making it a versatile choice for developers who rely on multiple resources to optimize their workflows. This flexibility enhances its utility and ensures that it can adapt to diverse development environments. Key integration and compatibility features include: Support for the Claude Code Router , allowing developers to combine Qwen Code with other AI providers for enhanced functionality. , allowing developers to combine Qwen Code with other AI providers for enhanced functionality. Regional free API tiers, including platforms like Open Router and Model Scope , making sure accessibility for developers across different locations. and , making sure accessibility for developers across different locations. Integration with the Context 7 MCP server, allowing seamless incorporation of external documentation for more adaptable and efficient coding environments. These features make Qwen 3 Code a practical option for developers who need tools that work well within diverse ecosystems. Its ability to integrate with other platforms ensures that users can create a cohesive and efficient development process. Accessible AI Coding Starts with Qwen 3 Code Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in Qwen 3 AI. Performance and Limitations While Qwen 3 Code offers a cost-effective solution, it is not without its limitations. Performance testing, such as its integration with Daisy UI, revealed challenges in handling specific libraries. These limitations may impact its suitability for more complex tasks, such as advanced UI design or intricate backend development. Compared to premium models like Claude Code, Qwen 3 Code provides fewer features and reduced performance in certain scenarios. However, for simpler coding needs, it remains a reliable and practical choice. Its affordability and compatibility make it particularly appealing for developers who prioritize cost savings over advanced functionality. Use Cases and Target Audience Qwen 3 Code is tailored for developers seeking free or low-cost AI coding solutions. Its features and design make it an excellent fit for several specific use cases, including: Developers working within tight budgets who need a functional AI coding tool without incurring additional costs. Users exploring AI-powered coding for the first time, thanks to its straightforward installation process and user-friendly interface. Teams or individuals requiring integration with external tools or documentation, using its compatibility with platforms like the Claude Code Router and Context 7 MCP server. While it may not match the advanced capabilities of premium models, Qwen 3 Code serves as a practical starting point for developers looking to explore AI-assisted programming without significant financial investment. Its accessibility and ease of use make it an appealing choice for a wide range of users. Final Thoughts on Qwen 3 Code The Qwen 3 Code model represents a significant step toward making AI coding tools more accessible to developers worldwide. By offering 2,000 free runs per day, it provides an affordable and practical solution for those with limited financial resources. Although it lacks some of the advanced features and performance capabilities of premium alternatives like Claude Code, its affordability, compatibility, and ease of use make it a valuable option for budget-conscious developers. As the field of AI-assisted programming continues to grow, Qwen 3 Code highlights the potential for innovative and accessible solutions. Whether you're a developer exploring AI for the first time or seeking a supplementary tool for basic tasks, Qwen 3 Code offers a compelling and cost-effective choice in the evolving landscape of AI-powered development tools. Media Credit: AI LABS Filed Under: AI, Technology News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.