Prague zookeepers turn to puppets to parent baby vultures
Staff at Prague Zoo had to start hand-feeding the lesser yellow-headed vultures when their parents stopped nesting. After using the approach with other birds, they quickly made a hand puppet that looks like an adult vulture's head.
"If we raised (the bird) in direct contact with humans, it would become imprinted to humans, and then it would be difficult to breed that individual within the species," said Antonin Vaidl, Prague Zoo's curator of bird breeding.
Human imprinting increases the risk of a chick struggling to build a relationship with a mate in adulthood.
Hand puppets have previously been used with other bird species at the zoo including rhinoceros hornbills and Javan green magpies, with their design reflecting distinctive features such as a large colourful beak.
Prague is one of three European zoos to breed the lesser yellow-headed vulture, also known as the savannah vulture.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Alan Turing Institute accused of ‘mismanagement of public funds'
Staff at the Alan Turing Institute (ATI) have filed a whistleblowing complaint with the charity watchdog, alleging the 'mismanagement of public funds' amid a 'crisis' at the publicly funded research institution. The ATI, which last year was handed £100m in taxpayer funding, was accused of a 'failure to deliver on its charitable mission' in the filing with the Charity Commission, The Telegraph understands. The complaint alleges that public cash and donations have been spent on 'wasted resources' with 'no accountability' over how funds have been deployed. Established in 2015 as Britain's leading centre of artificial intelligence (AI) research, the ATI has been in turmoil amid questions over its effectiveness and internal anger from staff. Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, stepped in last month, writing a letter to the chairman of the ATI demanding 'reform' and that it change its focus to defence. Mr Kyle told Doug Gurr, the former Amazon UK boss who is chairman of the ATI's board of trustees, it must 'evolve and adapt' and warned long-term funding for Turing would be tied to new objectives prioritising 'defence, national security and sovereign capabilities'. In the whistleblowing complaint, staff warned that the threat to funding 'could lead to the Institute's collapse'. It is understood that the Charity Commission is in the early stages of examining the claims. As part of the complaint, staff claim that the ATI has shifted its priorities away from its stated charitable purpose, which includes research into 'data-centric engineering, high performance computing and cyber security, to smart cities, health, the economy and data ethics'. Questions for the ATI The ATI, which is named after the Second World War code-breaker Alan Turing, has since scrapped or paused a number of initiatives under its public policy programme, including initiatives to study women and diversity in data science and AI bias. It is not the first time the ATI has faced questions over its direction. A report last month from British Progress, a think tank, claimed it had a 'fragmented and thinly spread research portfolio' that had drifted toward 'work rooted in social and political critique'. The uncertainty at the research lab has been accompanied by the exit of senior researchers and executives. Turing's chief technology officer, Jonathan Starck, left the ATI just nine months after being appointed, while two senior scientists – Andrew Duncan and Marc Deisenroth – both also left earlier this year after originally being asked to lead a series of 'grand challenges' for the organisation. The ATI has been in the process of cutting dozens of jobs, while it has been grappling with plunging morale among staff after ending a number of projects. It is understood that a separate whistleblowing complaint, sent to the UK Research and Innovation funding agency, about the ATI was the subject of an independent investigation, which found no concerns. A spokesman for the Alan Turing Institute said: 'We're shaping a new phase for the Turing, and this requires substantial organisational change to ensure we deliver on the promise and unique role of the UK's national institute for data science and AI. 'As we move forward, we're focused on delivering real-world impact across society's biggest challenges, including responding to the national need to double down on our work in defence, national security and sovereign capabilities.'
BreakingNews.ie
8 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Alcohol and drug use in e-scooter injuries doubles since law change, research shows
The presence of alcohol and drugs in patients involved in falls and collisions from e-scooters has doubled while use of helmets has decreased since the use of e-scooters on public roads was legalised last year, according to the findings of new research. Doctors at one of Dublin's largest hospitals found there has been no significant reduction in injury incidence, severity or adoption of protective measures such as helmet use and avoidance of intoxicants since legislative reform allowing the use of e-scooters on public roads was introduced in May 2024. Advertisement Instead, overall injury rates are continuing to increase due to the growing popularity of e-scooters, although fewer related injuries have been recorded among young people under 16 years. The research by doctors at the National Maxillofacial Unit at St James's Hospital also revealed that alcohol or some other substance had been consumed by the victims of an e-scooter related injury in 36% of cases since the passing of the legislation compared to 18% beforehand. As a result of the study's findings, they recommended that mandatory safety training or educational modules should be implemented as a prerequisite for use of e-scooters. The study analysed patients presenting with e-scooter related facial injuries for two 10-months periods before and after the passing of the legislation which classified e-scooters as 'personal powered transporters'. Advertisement The law requires users to be over 16 years and to adhere to a maximum speed limit of 20km/h, although the use of helmets is not mandatory. The study, which is published in the Irish Journal of Medical Science, highlighted how e-scooter-related injuries rose from 1.7% of all facial trauma presentations at St James's Hospital to 2.5% since the use of e-scooters on public roads was legalised. Rates of admission to hospital of such patients have also increased from 31% to 36% with an associated rise in the number of related surgical procedures. The use of helmets by patients with e-scooter-related facial injuries declined from 23% to 18% over the same period. Advertisement Prior to the legislation being introduced, most injuries occurred between 4pm and 7pm. Since the passing of the legislation, however, more than half of all cases took place between 7pm and 6am, of which more than half reported having consumed alcohol at the time. In contrast, the lowest frequency of injuries occurred during the busy commuter period of 6am-9am. 'Alcohol use and poor helmet compliance in the later hours of injury incidence was a prevalent finding in both cohorts,' the study noted. Advertisement The researchers said such findings highlighted the critical need to tailor public health and safety interventions to periods of elevated risk. 'Infrastructure improvements—such as enhanced street lighting—and targeted public awareness campaigns focused on evening and night-time riders may offer substantial benefits in reducing both the frequency and severity of e-scooter-related injuries,' they added. The analysis showed 22 patients had presented with 26 maxillofacial injuries between May 2023 and February 2024, while 28 patients with 36 maxillofacial injuries were recorded between May 2024 and February 2025. Many of the same patients had also suffered injuries to other parts of their bodies. Advertisement The overwhelming majority of patients over both periods were drivers of e-scooters with only three of 50 cases involving pedestrians. The analysis also revealed that the proportion of patients with e-scooter-related injuries who were male increased from 59% to 71%. Non-Irish nationals account for almost half of all patients with such injuries with their share of total cases increasing from 41% to 46% over the two periods analysed. There was also a significant increase in the proportion of patients who live in Dublin which increased from 45% to 75%. The study said such figures suggested an increased uptake of e-scooter use within the capital. The average age of patients remained stable at approximately 33 years. Only one person under 16 years sought treatment for an e-scooter-related facial injury after the legislation was introduced compared to three in the period before they were legalised for use on public roads. However, the study found an increase in injuries among both the 16-34 and 35-44 age groups. Nobody over 60 years was reported as suffering from an e-scooter-related facial injury during either period. The study said there had been a shift in frequency and severity in facial fracture patterns since implementation of the new legislation. The most common facial fracture experienced by e-scooter users is to the cheekbone followed by the jaw. The authors of the study said their findings suggested that recent legislative changes had 'some modest impact' on e-scooter-related facial injuries due to fewer injuries among younger teenagers, while a decrease in head trauma incidents might be attributable to the introduction of a statutory speed limit. In addition, they claimed the increasing rate of facial injuries among e-scooter users was contributing to a rising burden on healthcare services. They also observed that a growth in the number of injuries of e-scooter users from Dublin coupled with the increased prevalence of alcohol consumption and night-time riding 'underscores a potential growing risk profile.' The study recommended that ongoing surveillance and policy evaluation were essential for having effective strategies to prevent injuries from e-scooters.
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Elderly people being excluded from medical research in UK, charities warn
People aged over 75 are being excluded from health research due to arbitrary age cut-offs, potentially stalling the development of life-saving treatments, leading charities and research institutes have warned. Some clinical studies restrict participation for older people due to concerns about the potential frailty of participants and a belief that age may reduce the effect of the drug or device being studied. Such restrictions are contributing to health inequity by excluding an important demographic from medical research, according to more than 40 charities and leading research funders, including the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Cancer Research UK, the British Heart Foundation, and the Medical Research Council. Their joint statement warned that these age restrictions are unethical and lead to 'research not being representative of the groups who have [the] most disease'. The statement added: '[These restrictions] can result in treatments that are less effective for the very people who most need support … These exclusions are rarely justified and fail to align with the principles of equity and scientific excellence.' One example of this exclusion is dementia research, where only one in 10 people living with the disease are offered the opportunity to take part, with participation one of the biggest barriers to progress in this area, according to the Alzheimer's Society. Prof Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer, has warned that older adults are being 'frequently left out of research that directly affects their care', despite 'often having the highest levels of need'. 'This exclusion can lead to gaps in evidence, less effective treatments, and care that isn't properly tailored to those who use services the most. As the population ages, it's essential that research reflects the people it aims to serve,' he said. Some clinical studies have imposed age restrictions out of a misconception that older people with multiple morbidities could skew research results, while some studies are not designed in a way to accommodate older people, for example by requiring frequent visits to test centres that may be far away from where the participants live. The NIHR, which is the biggest health funder in the UK, said that the low proportion of older adults participating in research is both a scientific and ethical concern. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion 'We should not assume that treatments that work in healthy, younger people will have the same effect in older adults,' said Prof Terry Quinn, the ageing lead at the NIHR. 'So excluding the predominant users of health and social care from research is at best inefficient, and at worst may produce misleading results.' The health minister Karin Smyth said: 'We know that older people are more likely to face long-term health conditions like cancer and dementia – yet recent data shows that only one in seven people taking part in vital medical research studies are over 75. 'If we want tomorrow's treatments to work for everyone today, older people must be part of the research that creates them. Through our 10-year health plan, we're turbocharging research and clinical trials – including by the NIHR launching a UK-wide recruitment drive for participants to get involved in research.'
