Trump endorses Senate Republican he once called ‘jerk' for reelection
Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday that Rounds is an 'incredibly strong advocate' for South Dakota, also mentioning that he carried the state comfortably in each of his three presidential contests in 2016, 2020 and 2024.
'An America First Patriot, Mike is fighting tirelessly to Advance the Great Values of the Mount Rushmore State, Champion our Farmers and Ranchers, Strengthen the Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A., Ensure American Energy DOMINANCE, Help Secure our already Highly Secure Border, Support our Brave Military, Veterans, and Law Enforcement, and Protect our always under siege Second Amendment,' Trump said.
'Mike Rounds has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election – HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!' he continued.
The endorsement comes about three years after Trump slammed Rounds in 2022 over the senator's comments calling the 2020 presidential election 'fair.'
'The only reason he did this is because he got my endorsement and easily won his state in 2020, so now he thinks he has time, and those are the only ones, the weak, who will break away,' Trump said at the time. 'Even though his election will not be coming up for 5 years, I will never endorse this jerk again.'
With Trump's endorsement, Rounds will be a clear favorite to win reelection next year in the solidly conservative-leaning state.
Rounds told reporters that he got a call about Trump's endorsement 'out of the blue' but appreciates Trump's support. He hasn't formally announced that he's running for reelection but is planning to.
'I really appreciate the very gracious endorsement that he offered today, and like I told him, I said I haven't publicly announced yet, but I'm putting everything together to be able to do that in the near future,' he said.
Trump has regularly threatened to withhold his endorsement or back primary challengers to lawmakers who openly defy him, such as those who voted to impeach him following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
Rounds raised concerns about how Trump's rescissions package would impact tribal public media outlets, but ultimately voted for it after telling reporters that he secured commitments from the White House to fund the stations by other means.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shareholder warns Apple's $100 billion investment is more optics than impact
Apple (AAPL) is courting President Trump with a fresh $100 billion manufacturing push, but it's questionable whether the move will deliver real gains for shareholders. "I'd be very careful not to confuse good politics with what is actually going to happen in the operations of this business," Ann Berry, founder of Threadneedle and an Apple shareholder, said on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid. On Wednesday, the tech giant announced a $100 billion commitment to US manufacturing. CEO Tim Cook was in the White House for the unveiling, where President Trump also announced a 100% tariff on semiconductors produced overseas unless the company commits to building in the US. "The good news for companies like Apple is, if you're building in the United States, or have committed to build, without question, committed to build in the United States, there will be no charge," Trump said. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs Apple's shares rose by 3% on Thursday, although the stock has traded 12% lower year to date as investors remain concerned the company is falling behind in the AI race. Berry noted that Cook's political engagement benefits shareholders in that it's "fostering relationships with powerful decision-makers." But investors shouldn't confuse Cook's political goodwill with real impact. For investors, the key question is whether Apple's investment will meaningfully reduce its tariff risk. While Apple has moved some iPhone assembly to India and explored alternatives like Vietnam, the company's semiconductor packaging and most of its core hardware production still rely on Chinese factories. Berry emphasized that building out domestic capacity, especially at Apple's scale, will take years. The timeline to secure permits, construct factories, hire and train workers, and begin mass production likely exceeds the next three and a half years, she noted. Additionally, tariffs could shift within that period. "I highly doubt that Apple is going to start breaking ground on as much new kind of land," Berry said, which means it may not meaningfully change Apple's near-term supply chain exposure. Despite the cautious outlook, some on Wall Street cheered the news. Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan raised the firm's price target from $213 to $250, citing the upside potential if the company is exempt from tariffs. Mohan suggests that if the US government grants Apple an exemption, the company might reduce its projected fourth quarter headwinds of $1.1 billion, although the precise details remain undefined. This action could also bolster confidence in Apple's gross margin expansion, which Bank of America anticipates will reach 50%. The firm also notes that if rivals like Samsung (SSNLF) or Google (GOOG) face steep import tariffs while Apple remains exempt, it could tip US market share further in Apple's favor, potentially boosting iPhone sales. Francisco Velasquez is a Reporter at Yahoo Finance. He can be reached on LinkedIn and X, or via email at
Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years. Advertisement Here's what to know about the tuition breaks: Texas' program was blocked first Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. Texas now has about 73,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the most recent estimate from the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The latest estimate is an increase over earlier projections because of a change in its methodology for identifying qualifying students. Advertisement Texas has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities. The difference in tuition rates is substantial. For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000. Political pushback and a swift end Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.' The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote. But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced. In Oklahoma, which the Presidents' Alliance estimates will have about 2,700 students affected, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion. 'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement. Advertisement Campuses nationwide feel the impact At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Nationwide, the Presidents' Alliance estimates more than 510,000 students without legal resident status are enrolled in colleges and universities, about 85 percent of them in undergraduate programs. Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.
UPI
7 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump order to broaden how colleges report admissions information
President Donald Trump stands with Education Secretary Linda McMahon as he shows an executive order during in a ceremony at the White House in Washington, D.C. in March. File Photo by Jim Lo Scalzo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order Thursday that will widen the requirements for colleges to report their admissions information. The order is intended to guarantee that universities turn in the information necessary to show they aren't basing any admissions on race, according to a senior White House official. The directive will allow U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon to overhaul the collection of higher education data, deepen the federal government's reporting requirements and increase penalties for schools that submit inaccurate information. Additionally, the order will make the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System the main national source for information on colleges and universities easier to access and understand. Any defiance of the directive from Trump could impede schools from receiving federal financial assistance. Trump has already pulled billions of dollars in funding from schools over admission requirements and alleged acts of prejudice. The Trump administration also announced Thursday it is investigating Baltimore City Public Schools in Baltimore, Maryland for purportedly allowing "numerous incidents of anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment by teachers and non-Jewish students against Jewish students." Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor said in a press release Thursday that alleged acts of anti-Semitism in the Baltimore schools include a teacher directing a Nazi salute toward a Jewish student and non-Jewish students bullying and harassing Jewish students.
