logo
The Black Cali Girl Who Went Missing For a Year was Finally Found But The Details are Disturbing...

The Black Cali Girl Who Went Missing For a Year was Finally Found But The Details are Disturbing...

Yahoo17-04-2025
Back in May 2024, the family of a 14-year-old Sacramento girl was in a panic after her sudden disappearance. Authorities confirmed the girl has been found and safe. However, preliminary investigation findings reveal disturbing information regarding her vanishing.
Local activist Berry Accius tells KCRA he led the movement toward finding the girl once she disappeared. When she first vanished, the state's Ebony Alert system for missing Black children and girls didn't pick up her profile to report her as missing. The girl's mother accused the police at the time of not taking the child's disappearance seriously, per FOX 40.
'I was told that she didn't fit the criteria, but when you look at the criteria based on her age alone, she did,' Accius told reporters at KCRA.
It took another two months for the California Highway Patrol to issue an Ebony Alert, the first to come out of Sacramento County. However, on April 10, they finally got their big tip that led them to the girl... all the way in Texas.
Deputies in Houston responded to the report of a suspicious person on the 100 block of Cold Snow Drive, per FOX's report. Officers say the caller reported a male and female inside his vacant residents. Upon arrival, the two tried to flee but were detained.
They then identified the female as the missing Sacramento girl, who is now 15. However, the male was identified as a man almost twice her age, 28-year-old Tarik Exavier Jammer. The investigation so far into the girl's disappearance revealed the two met through an online video game, per Harris County Constable Precinct 4.
Police now accuse Jammer of convincing the girl to run away with him. Deputies claim the two formed a 'sexual/dating' relationship despite state law ruling 14 years old to be under the age of consent. By California law, this is considered rape.
'Had anyone even cared, this whole thing would've been resolved months ago,' Accius told reporters. 'If it was not for some good neighbors who thought it was strange for folks to be living inside an abandoned home (she) would still be gone!'
The advocate has a point. Had she been a white girl, police may have moved quicker. Consider the fact that around the same time the girl was found, a white 10-year-old girl went missing in Southern California, per FOX's report. She was found hours after police reported her missing - also with a man police believe she met through a video game. Meanwhile, the Sacramento teen's search took an entire year.
Jammer was arrested and booked into Harris County Jail for sexual performance of a child but may face more charges as the investigation continues, the reports say. Police say the teen was transferred to a facility to be reunited with her parents.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods
Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods

NEW YORK (AP) — Court papers in a voting technology company's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News point to Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Jeanine Pirro as leaders in spreading false stories about election fraud in the weeks after Democrat Joe Biden's victory over President Donald Trump in 2020. Arguments for summary judgment by Smartmatic were filed in lightly redacted form this week at the New York Supreme Court. It's like a bad rerun for Fox: Similar revelations about its conduct following the 2020 election came in a lawsuit by another company falsely accused of doctoring votes, Dominion Voting Systems. Fox agreed to pay Dominion $787 million in a 2023 settlement after the judge found it was 'CRYSTAL CLEAR' that none of the claims against the voting system company were true. In short: Fox let Trump aides spread conspiracy theories despite knowing they were false because it was what their viewers wanted to hear. Fox was trying to hold on to viewers who were angry at the network for saying Biden had won the election. Fox said it was covering a newsworthy story. It accuses the London-based company, which had only Los Angeles County as a client for the 2020 election, of exaggerating its claims of damages in the hope of receiving a financial windfall. Pirro now working in the second Trump administration The focus on Pirro is noteworthy because the former Fox personality now serves in Trump's second administration as U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. Smartmatic, relying on emails and text messages revealed as part of the case, said Pirro was using her position as a Fox host in 2020 to help Trump and persuade him to pardon her ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted of conspiracy and tax evasion. Trump pardoned him before leaving office in 2021. In a text to then-Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel in September 2020, Pirro said, 'I'm the No. 1 watched show on news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and the party,' Smartmatic said in court papers. One of her own producers, Jerry Andrews, called Pirro a 'reckless maniac,' Smartmatic said. He texted after one of her shows in November that it was 'rife (with) conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television." The court papers said Pirro also suggested 'evidence' of supposed fraud to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell that she could use on a television appearance — material that also was spread by Bartiromo. Bartiromo still works at Fox, and in 2020 had shows on both the news channel and Fox Business Network. The court papers uncovered messages showing her desire to help Trump: 'I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence, I know you can,' she texted to Powell. Dobbs, whose business show was canceled by Fox in February 2021, texted to Powell four days after the election, saying 'I'm going to do what I can to help stop what is now a coup d'etat in (its) final days — perhaps moments," a reference to Biden's victory. Dobbs died in 2024. A central figure in Fox's 'pivot' Smartmatic portrayed Pirro as a central figure in Fox's 'pivot' to deemphasize Biden's victory because it angered Trump fans. Instead, the network found that ratings jumped whenever claims of election fraud were discussed, it said. As in the Dominion case, the discovery process helped Smartmatic find messages and statements that seem embarrassing in retrospect. For example, in early December, Fox's Jesse Watters texted colleague Greg Gutfeld that 'Think of how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.' Fox, in a response to the newly-revealed court papers, pointed to an ongoing corruption case involving Smartmatic and its executives, including a claim by federal prosecutors that it used money from the sale of voting machines to set up a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' Fox said. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' ___

D.C. Families Brace For Start of School Under Trump Takeover
D.C. Families Brace For Start of School Under Trump Takeover

Time​ Magazine

timean hour ago

  • Time​ Magazine

D.C. Families Brace For Start of School Under Trump Takeover

On a recent summer night, a 9-year-old girl in Northwest Washington, D.C. was having trouble sleeping. She heard on the news that speaking Spanish could draw the attention of federal agents, and she worried aloud to her Hispanic father that immigration officers might come for her classmates' parents. 'She kept asking, 'Can they come to people's homes? Can they come to our home?'' her father said. 'She was terrified.' Their family, longtime residents of the city and American citizens, are not at risk of deportation. But the girl's anxiety reflects a broader unease rippling through D.C. families as the city's public schools prepare to start a new school year on Monday, Aug. 25, under the shadow of President Donald Trump's takeover of the city's police force and a ramp up in federal immigration enforcement. Across the nation's capital, parents are setting up group chats on WhatsApp and Signal to coordinate carpools and walking groups. Some are pressing the city to relax attendance requirements, out of concern that some families might feel they have to keep their kids at home. 'We've got people volunteering to carpool other people's kids to school because the parents are afraid to try to get their kid to school on their own,' says Catherine Morgan, a D.C. resident whose child starts third grade on Monday. Since announcing in August that he would place the Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and deploy National Guard troops to patrol the streets, Trump has insisted his measures are necessary to curb what he has described as 'roving mobs of wild youth' and 'bloodthirsty criminals,' despite statistics showing violent crime in the city had hit a 30-year low earlier this year. His administration has also rolled back protections that once limited immigration enforcement around schools, allowing agents to conduct raids in neighborhoods and workplaces. The result, according to parents, educators and community leaders, is a climate of fear and confusion at the very moment when families are usually focused on first-day jitters, backpacks, and back-to-school clothes. Parents across the city interviewed for this story described adjusting their routines to shield their children from encounters with federal law enforcement whose mandate remains unclear. Marta Urquilla, a D.C. resident and mother of two teenagers, says she will not let her kids ride public buses to school. 'At this point, that's off the table,' she says. 'My kids present as Black, and that's just not something I am inclined to expose them to.' She says families in her neighborhood near Howard University have organized walking groups to the grocery store and that similar plans would be in place for school commutes. The federal occupation, Urquilla adds, has not been evenly felt across the city. 'The closer you get to where immigrants live, to where Black folks live and work, the more you see it,' she says. Rumors of ICE enforcement actions have swirled since Trump's inauguration in January, but have intensified over the past two weeks as ICE, FBI, Border Patrol, National Guard troops, and more have descended on D.C. streets. Videos have circulated of federal agents and local police arresting individuals in handcuffs and stopping others at various checkpoints. Across the country, school districts have been taking precautions to shield children from immigration enforcement. In New York, officials unanimously passed a resolution this year that prohibits ICE agents from entering schools or accessing student records without a judicial warrant. In Los Angeles, school leaders announced new 'safe zones' in areas targeted by ICE to protect students before and after school. D.C. parents, however, remain uncertain how much protection their schools can offer, given the city's lack of statehood and Trump's direct authority over its institutions. At a virtual information session for parents on Wednesday night, D.C. Public Schools officials attempted to address concerns about the increased law enforcement presence in the city, noting that they expect very little impact to schools. "Any law enforcement action on school grounds can only take place with a valid warrant or court order,' said Dr. Lewis D. Ferebee, the chancellor for District of Columbia Public Schools. He stressed that school resource officers are not performing any duties related to immigration or custom enforcement. DCPS also shared a few 'best practices' for parents to share with students, including to always travel in a group or with trusted adults, and to avoid distractions while traveling, such as being on a phone or using headphones. 'Please advise our young people to stay aware of their surroundings,' Ferebee said at the information session. D.C. police are currently enforcing a citywide juvenile curfew that begins at 11 p.m. for people under 17. In some targeted neighborhoods, juvenile curfews begin as early as 8 p.m. But some parents remain frustrated by the lack of communication from their schools about what many view as an unprecedented moment. 'We haven't been told a goddamn thing,' says Morgan when asked what her daughter's school in D.C. had communicated about the coming week. 'It makes us feel like, what are you going to do? Are you just going to let them come in and take these kids?' Jenn Kauffman is a mother of two who sits on the city's advisory neighborhood commission representing her neighborhood in Brightwood Park. She says parents are demanding stronger assurances from school leaders. 'I want bare minimum for the schools to kind of stand up and say what they will do to protect students,' she said. 'But in this climate, and you know, D.C. being a federal jurisdiction, I'm also afraid that still won't be enough.' Her 7-year-old, who attends a bilingual school, has already been discussing the situation with classmates. 'The kids have been talking about this and aware about this,' she says. 'But I think it's risen to a new level.' Parents say their children are absorbing the stress—and so are they. Lara Fife, whose 4-year-old started pre-K this month, says he has asked her why police are detaining people. 'I've been extremely stressed and not sleeping well at all,' she says. The White House insists the deployments are making Washington, D.C. safer, but most residents don't see it that way. A Washington Post-Schar School poll published Wednesday found roughly 80% of D.C. residents opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department, and 65% do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Residents warn that the show of force may deepen mistrust and drive children away from school. In Los Angeles, officials recently reported a 7% rise in online academy enrollment, attributing the spike in part to immigration fears. D.C. parents worry they may soon face the same difficult choice. 'Are we at a point where we need a virtual schooling option?' Kauffman asks. 'Because what's going to happen then is families are going to have to choose between risking their child, or being referred to Child Protective Services for truancy. And that's just immoral.' For now, families are bracing for Monday. Some will walk in groups. Others will drive in carpools. Still others may keep their children home. But the sense of unease remains. The Hispanic father with the worried 9-year-old daughter says his family plans to arrive at school extra early on Monday so he can warn other families if they notice ICE or other federal law enforcement in the area. 'I'm not hearing from any person of color or minorities that they feel safer or that they think that the police presence is here to quote, unquote, restore safety or security, right? It's quite the opposite,' he says.

Jussie Smollett revisits attack allegations in new Netflix documentary
Jussie Smollett revisits attack allegations in new Netflix documentary

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

Jussie Smollett revisits attack allegations in new Netflix documentary

Six years after claiming that he was the victim of a hate crime, actor Jussie Smollett is continuing to push back against the narrative put forth by Chicago officials that it was all a "hoax." In "The Truth About Jussie Smollett?", a new Netflix documentary that debuts Thursday, the former "Empire" star revisits the legal battle surrounding the alleged attack, which police and city officials said he orchestrated against himself. While the documentary's release comes just over three months after Smollett and the city of Chicago reached a civil settlement, the actor spends much of his interview segments defending himself and maintaining his innocence. "At the end of the day, it doesn't matter whether someone likes me or doesn't like me," Smollett said in the documentary, adding that "the fact is: I didn't do that. And that's all that matters." Smollett, who is Black and gay, first reported a hate crime committed against him in January 2019, alleging that two men confronted him with racial and homophobic slurs, wrapped a rope around his neck, and poured bleach on him. However, city officials sued Smollett and accused him of submitting a false police report on Jan. 29, 2019, saying he knew his attackers and planned the attack. The city's lawsuit sought $130,000 in expenses spent on the police investigation. Smollett countersued, denying that he orchestrated the attack. Brothers Olabingo and Abimbola Osundairo, who worked on the "Empire" set and authored a book titled "Bigger Than Jussie: The Disturbing Need for a Modern-Day Lynching," said they were paid by Smollett to stage the hate crime and testified against the actor during his trial. In addition to Smollett, the documentary features interviews with: Smollett's attorney; former Chicago police officials; the Osundairobrothers; their attorney; and journalists who covered the case. "I believe he wanted to be the poster boy of activism for Black people, for gay people, for marginalized people," "Bola" Osundairo said of Smollett in the documentary. "Ola" Osundairo said when Smollett asked them to "beat him up," he "thought it was crazy." "But at the same time, I'm like, 'It's Hollywood.' This is how it goes," he said in the documentary. Smollett was found guilty on five criminal counts of felony disorderly conduct in December 2021 and sentenced to 150 days in jail and 30 months' probation in March 2022. But the Illinois Supreme Court overturned the conviction in November 2024. The state high court ruled that Smollett should have never been charged in the first place after entering a nonprosecution agreement with the Cook County State's Attorney's Office. The years-long case captivated the country, with many speculating about what actually happened as Smollett continued to make headlines. In the documentary, Smollett said he was "playing whack-a-mole with rumors, with lies" throughout the investigation. But, "at a certain point, it's too many, and you can't catch them all," he added. The documentary, which is from the producers of 'The Tinder Swindler,' says in its promotional materials that it wants the 'audience to decide for themselves who is telling' the truth. Smollett has not commented on the documentary on his social media. He gave a lengthy interview to Variety ahead of its release, in which he touched on the overall impact the case had on him. "Every single other person's story has changed multiple times. Mine has never," Smollett told the publication. "I saw firsthand how narratives are built. I saw firsthand the way that someone can take the exact opposite of who you are and literally sell it." The actor is currently promoting his new R&B album and was recently announced as a contestant on the reality show, ' Special Forces: World's Toughest Test.' The show airs on Fox, the same network that canceled 'Empire' in the aftermath of the Smollett saga.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store