Briones admits to watching e-sabong video during house session but denies gambling
In a press conference, Briones apologized for the incident but clarified that he was not participating in online gambling. He said the video was sent to him via Facebook Messenger and he only opened it briefly.
'Sa totoo lang, may nag message sa'kin sa Messenger. So, tinignan ko lang naman. Hindi ko naman akalain na meron palang magkukuha ng aking mga private messages. Nagulat na lang ako, dahil alam ko naman merong hindi dapat tinitignan. Pero okay lang 'yon, dahil malinis naman konsensya ko, 'di ako nagsasabong. 'Di mo ako makikita sa sabungan,' he said.
He also denied allegations that he transferred money online, calling the claims 'fake news.'
Briones said he does not use e-wallets or online payment platforms, describing himself as 'old school.'
The lawmaker said he has forgiven the person who took the video and spread the footage, but warned them not to repeat the act.
Briones expressed embarrassment over the controversy and apologized to House Speaker Martin Romualdez, saying the incident may have cast a negative image on the House of Representatives.
Earlier this week, Briones drew criticism after being caught on video watching an online cockfighting match while voting for the next House Speaker. His identity was initially unclear, as the footage only showed his back, but a closer shot revealed details of an e-sabong match with the text '1st Fight Left Side' and '2nd Fight Right Side.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
How California draws congressional districts
Seema Mehta, Tribune News Service The potential redrawing of California's congressional district lines could upend the balance of power in Washington, DC, in next year's midterm congressional election. The unusual and unexpected redistricting may take place in coming months because of sparring among President Donald Trump, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Redrawing these maps — known as redistricting — is an esoteric practice that many voters tune out, but one that has an outsized impact on political power and policy in the United States. Here is a breakdown about why a process that typically occurs once every decade is currently receiving so much attention — and the potential ramifications. What is redistricting? There are 435 members of the US House of Representatives, each of whom is supposed to represent roughly the same number of constituents. Every decade, after the US Census counts the population across the nation, the allocation of congressional representatives for each state can change. For example, after the 2020 census, California's share of congressional districts was reduced by one for the first time in state history. After the decennial census, states redraw district lines for congressional and legislative districts based on population shifts, protections for minority voters required by the federal Voting Rights Act and other factors. For much of the nation's history, such maps were created by state legislators and moneyed interests in smoke-filled backrooms. Many districts were grossly gerrymandered — contorted — to benefit political parties and incumbents, such as California's infamous "Ribbon of Shame," a congressional district that stretched in a reed-thin line 200 miles along the California coast from Oxnard to the Monterey County line. But in recent decades, political-reform organizations and some elected officials, notably former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, called for independent drawing of district lines. In 2010, the state's voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot measure requiring California congressional maps to be drawn by a bipartisan commission, which it did in 2011 and 2021. Why are we talking about this? President Trump recently urged Texas lawmakers to redraw its congressional districts to increase the number of GOP members of the House in next year's midterm election. Congress is closely divided, and the party that does not control the White House traditionally loses seats in the body two years after the presidential election. Trump has been able to enact his agenda — from deporting undocumented immigrants to extending tax breaks that largely benefit the wealthy to closing some Planned Parenthood clinics — because the GOP controls the White House, the Senate and the House. But if Democrats flip Congress, Trump's agenda will likely be stymied and he faces the prospect of being a lame duck during his last two years in office. What is Texas doing? Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called his state's Legislature into special session last week to discuss the disastrous floods that killed more than 130 people as well as redistricting before the 2026 election. Trump and his administration urged Abbott to redraw his state's congressional lines with the hope of picking up five seats. Abbott has said that his decision to include redistricting in the special session was prompted by a court decision last year that said the state no longer has to draw "coalition districts" that are made up of multiple minority communities. New district lines would give Texans greater opportunity to vote for politicians who best represent them, the governor said in interviews. Democrats in the Lone Star state's Legislature met with Newsom in Sacramento on Friday to discuss the ramifications of mid-decade redistricting and accused Trump of trying to rig next year's midterm election to hold onto power. Republicans "play by a different set of rules and we could sit back and act as if we have some moral authority and watch this 249-, 250-year-old experiment be washed away," Newsom said of the nation's history. "We are not going to allow that to happen." Democratic lawmakers in Texas have previously fled the state to not allow the Legislature to have a quorum, such as in 2021 during a battle over voting rights. But with the deadly flooding, this is an unlikely prospect this year. Why is California in the mix? The Golden State's congressional districts are drawn by an independent commission focused on logical geography, shared interests, representation for minority communities and other facets. If the state reverts to partisan map drawing, redistricting experts on both sides of the aisle agree that several GOP incumbents in the 52-member delegation would be vulnerable, either because of more Democratic voters being placed in their districts, or being forced into face-offs with fellow Republican members of Congress. There are currently nine Republican members of the delegation, a number that could shrink to three or four, according to political statisticians. Strange bedfellows These dizzying developments have created agreement among rivals while dividing former allies. Sara Sadhwani, a member of the 2021 redistricting commission and longtime supporter of independent map drawing, said she supports Democratic efforts to change California's congressional districts before the midterm election. "I stand by the work of the commission of course. We drew fair and competitive maps that fully abided by federal laws around the Voting Rights Act to ensure communities of colour have an equal opportunity at the ballot box," said Sadhwani, a politics professor at Pomona College. "That being said, especially when it comes to Congress, most certainly California playing fair puts Democrats at a disadvantage nationally." She said the best policy would be for all 50 states to embrace independent redistricting. But in the meantime, she supports Democratic efforts in California to temporarily redraw the districts given the stakes. "I think it's patriotic to fight against what appears to be our democracy falling into what appears to be authoritarian rule," Sadhwani said. Charles Munger Jr., the son of a late billionaire who was Warren Buffet's right-hand man, spent more than $12 million to support the ballot measure that created the independent redistricting commission and is invested in making sure that it is not weakened. "He's very much committed to making sure the commission is preserved," said someone close to Munger who requested anonymity to speak candidly. Munger believes "this is ultimately political quicksand and a redistricting war at the end of day is a loss to American voters." Munger, who was the state GOP's biggest donor at one point, is actively involved in the California fight and is researching other efforts to fight gerrymandering nationwide, this person said. The state Democratic and Republican parties, which rarely agree on anything, agreed in 2010 when they opposed the ballot measure. Now, Democrats, who would likely gain seats if the districts are redrawn by state lawmakers, support a mid-decade redistricting, while the state GOP, which would likely lose seats, says the state should continue having lines drawn by the independent commission once every decade. "It's a shame that Governor Newsom and the radical Left in Sacramento are willing to spend $200 million on a statewide special election, while running a deficit of $20 billion, in order to silence the opposition in our state," the GOP congressional delegation said in a statement on Friday. "As a Delegation we will fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections." What happens next? If Democrats in California move forward with their proposal, which is dependent on what Texas lawmakers do during their special legislative session that began last week, they have two options: • State lawmakers could vote to put the measure before voters in a special election that would likely be held in November — a costly prospect. The last statewide special election — the unsuccessful effort to recall Newsom in 2021 — cost more than $200 million, according to the secretary of state's office. • The Legislature could also vote to redraw the maps, but this option would likely be more vulnerable to legal challenge. Either scenario is expected to be voted on as an urgency item, which requires a 2/3 vote but would insulate the action from being the subject of a referendum later put in front of voters that would delay enactment. The Legislature is out of session until mid-August.
Zawya
9 hours ago
- Zawya
Nigeria: Reps probe $65mln CNG palliative fund, demand breakdown of $496mln private investment
The House of Representatives on Thursday reiterated its resolve to scrutinise the utilisation of ₦100 billion out ₦500 billion palliative fund under the public investment as well as ₦760 billion private sector investment for the implementation of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) policy. Chairman, Ad-hoc Committee on implementation of the Compressed Natural Gas policy, Hon. Ahmad Jaha who spoke during the flag-off of the investigative hearing, expressed concern over accessibility, sustainability and equity of Nigeria's CNG rollout. The lawmaker who described the policy as bold in ambition but beset by troubling realities that must be confronted if it is to serve Nigerians effectively, however, warned that the policy risks failure without urgent transparency and stronger oversight. Hon. Jaha said that following the removal of fuel subsidies in May 2023, Federal Government introduced the Presidential CNG Initiative (Pi-CNG) as part of its Renewed Hope Agenda with a view to cushion economic shocks, lower transportation costs, and advance clean energy goals. He, however, lamented that more than a year after its launch, major concerns remain unresolved. 'While the policy was envisioned as transformative, especially for low-income earners and commercial drivers, its implementation has raised serious questions about safety, access, affordability, and public awareness,' he said. According to Hon. Jaha explained that the Committee's core mandate is to investigate four key areas, namely: safety, viability, and sustainability of the CNG programme; the geographic equity in the distribution of conversion centres; whether the initiative aligns with global best practices; and whether Nigeria's legal and regulatory framework is adequate for overseeing such a complex transition. While reiterating the Committee's resolve to scrutinise the management of public and private investments, he requested for details on how ₦100 billion from the ₦500 billion palliative fund has been spent, the authenticity of a ₦760 billion private sector investment claim, and the level of distribution and accessibility of CNG infrastructure across the federation. Other issues highlighted include safety standards, availability of technical training, import duty waivers, environmental impact assessments, and whether the strategy aligns with the country's job creation and decarbonization goals. 'We are not here to obstruct progress or politicize a national policy. This is not a criminal investigation. But we must ensure that this policy works for the Nigerian people, efficiently, equitably, and sustainably,' he said. He said the committee expects detailed submissions from key MDAs, including the Ministries of Petroleum (Gas), Finance, Transportation, and Environment; regulatory agencies like the NMDPRA, NUPRC, FRSC, SON, and Customs; and transparency bodies like NEITI and the National Bureau of Statistics. Requested documents include the official CNG Policy, safety protocols, contractor lists, environmental assessments, and investment breakdowns. The committee also acknowledged responses from upstream oil and gas operators who clarified that they are not involved in CNG distribution or infrastructure. However, Hon. Jaha urged upstream, midstream, and downstream players to collaborate on a roadmap toward the local production of CNG and other clean energy alternatives. 'If this policy is falling short, this hearing must uncover why—and recommend how to fix it. If progress is being made, we will document and validate those gains,' Hon. Jaha said. He stressed the importance of candid, data-driven presentations from all stakeholders, asserting that Nigerians 'deserve answers, not abstractions.' In his keynote address, Speaker Abbass Tajudeen argued that the CNG Policy remains a key component to the nation's energy security, environmental sustainability, and economic diversification, and represents a strategic shift towards cleaner, safer, and more economically viable alternatives to conventional fossil fuels, especially in our transportation sector. Hon. Tajudeen who was represented by Hon. Sada Soli, said with Nigeria's abundant reserves of natural gas, the promotion of CNG as a motor fuel is not only logical but also vital to achieving our broader goals of energy security, environmental sustainability, and economic diversification. He said: 'Our concern is not just about the intentions of the policy, but the mechanisms of its execution — are the funds appropriated being judiciously utilized? 'Are Nigerians feeling the impact? Are safety and environmental standards being upheld? Are stakeholders adequately carried along? 'This hearing is, therefore, a platform to hear directly from the relevant MDAs, operators, industry experts, and the Nigerian people themselves. It is also an opportunity for accountability and for constructive dialogue on how to ensure the successful rollout of the CNG policy in the interest of national development.' While urging all participants to be honest, objective and patriotic in their submissions, the Speaker assured that the Forum for 'blame games, but for solutions. Let us put Nigeria first,' he said. In his presentation, FRSC Corps Marshal, Mr. Shehu Mohammed who declared full support for the implementation of Nigeria's CNG initiative, averred that the product is safe, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible alternative to traditional fuels. The Corps Marshal represented by Deputy Corps Marshal, Mr. Abiodun Akinlade, urged National Assembly to provide legislative and budgetary backing to strengthen regulatory enforcement and ensure the long-term success of the programme. While noting that the CNG Presidential Initiative aligns with global best practices in sustainable transportation and clean energy, he emphasised that with the right protocols, CNG adoption poses no significant safety risk to motorists or the public. 'CNG is not a threat, it is an opportunity,' the FRSC boss stated, adding that it is up to regulators, legislators, and stakeholders to ensure its proper integration into the transport system without compromising safety.'
The National
21 hours ago
- The National
Trump tariffs: Gulf countries among others in limbo as deadline approaches
Gulf Co-operation Council members were among dozens of countries waiting to find out whether the new tariff rate President Donald Trump was expected to enact on Friday would indeed go into effect. 'The trade team has been working around the clock to try to be in correspondence with as many countries as possible, but if they haven't heard from us yet, they will in the form of a letter or an executive order by midnight tonight,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday. Mr Trump had previously maintained that his 'reciprocal tariffs' – originally announced on April 2 – would be enacted on Friday after he previously delayed them. The UAE and Saudi Arabia were both hit with a 10 per cent tariff in April, which represented lower tier of the levies set by the President. Earlier this month, Mr Trump suggested he could send a letter to more than a 150 countries informing them of the tariff that they would be charged. 'They're not big countries, and they don't do that much business. Not like the ones we've agreed with, like China, like Japan,' he told reporters during a recent meeting with Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa at the White House. But he also said he was considering a baseline tariff rate of 15 to 20 per cent. Mr Trump's negotiations have primarily focused on the largest US trading partners. Total trade with the European Union, for example, was an estimated $975.9 billion last year, according to the Office of the US Trade Representative. US total trade goods with the UAE in 2024 was estimated at $34.4 billion. How will the Gulf Co-operation Council be affected? Economists have said the reciprocal tariffs will have a limited direct impact on Gulf economies because their trade with the US is relatively small. They have instead pointed to the indirect impact that tariffs will have on the region through global growth and its impact on oil demand. Tariffs are expected to have some inflationary effects while also dampening growth. Such prospects led the International Monetary Fund to project the global economy to slow from 3.3 per cent growth in 2024 to 3.0 per cent this year. The latest figure is an upwards revision from its April forecast owing to some easing in trade tension and tariff front-loading, the fund said. 'Despite these welcome developments, tariffs remain historically high, and global policy remains highly uncertain,' chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas told reporters. Who has Trump announced deals with? Among the major US partners Mr Trump has signed trade agreements with are Vietnam, South Korea and Japan. He also announced a trade deal on Sunday with the EU, in which the US would charge a 15 per cent tariff on European imports. Mr Trump placed the same levy on Japanese and South Korean goods. The UK, Pakistan and Indonesia have also reached trade deals. However, Mr Trump has yet to come to an agreement with three of the four largest US trading partners: China, Mexico and Canada. Mr Trump on Thursday said he and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum had agreed to extend a period in which Mexico would pay tariffs on fentanyl, cars, steel, aluminium and copper for 90 days as the two sides continue discussions on a trade agreement. Separately, he said Canada's plan to recognise the state of Palestine at an upcoming UN meeting would not be a deal-breaker in talks between Washington and Ottawa. He had previously said Canada's plan to recognise the state of Palestine would jeopardise discussions. Meanwhile, China is on a separate deadline of August 12 after Beijing and Washington previously agreed to reduce their escalatory tit-for-tat tariffs. China Vice Premier He Lifeng said the two sides had agreed to work on extending that deadline by 90 days after two days of talks in Stockholm this week, Reuters reported, citing a statement from China's Ministry of Commerce. Which countries have received trade letters? For those who have not struck a trade deal with the US, Mr Trump has sent their leaders letters outlining their tariff rate. Iraq and Tunisia were among roughly two dozen countries to have received a letter from Mr Trump. The letters, which were nearly identical except for the new tariff rate, had warned each country not to announce retaliatory measures. South Korea, which had also received a letter, later agreed to a deal that would lower the new US tariff rate to 15 per cent from 25 per cent. Mr Trump separately threatened to slap a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, accusing the government of enabling the war in Ukraine through its purchases from Russia.
