logo
IAIA president reflects on 40-year career as retirement approaches

IAIA president reflects on 40-year career as retirement approaches

Yahoo27-04-2025

When Robert Martin took over as the president of the Institute of American Indian Arts in 2007, he said he was one of a small number of Indigenous educators with an advanced degree, meaning the pool of applicants for the job was not deep.
Now, 18 years later, as he prepares for retirement, the situation is quite different, he said, and the IAIA Board of Trustees should have plenty of well-qualified applicants to take over leadership of what he calls the nation's preeminent tribal university.
'I attribute a lot of this [change] to tribal leaders who have emphasized the importance of higher education as part of the warrior tradition,' he said, explaining textbooks have become the weapon of choice for those committed to fighting for tribal sovereignty.
'It's about controlling our own destiny,' he said. 'That's part of the tribal tradition, serving your nation and making sure the needs of your people are being taken care of.'
Martin, a member of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma who earned his bachelor's and master's degree from Appalachian State University and his doctorate from the University of Kansas, said he is confident he is leaving the institution in good hands.
'The next president will continue our development and take it to the next level,' he said. ' … The board is committed to bringing in a strong leader.'
Loren Kieve, who was part of the team that hired him in 2007, said he had seen Martin's vision for the school become a reality over his tenure.
'Its success and growth over these years is a visible testament to Bob's careful, collegial guidance,' he said in a news release announcing Martin's retirement.
Beverly Morris, who chairs the school's Board of Trustees, credited Martin with ushering in a number of improvements at the institution.
'Under his visionary leadership, the Institute of American Indian Arts has developed a world-class campus that significantly enhances the experience and quality of life for students, faculty and staff alike,' she said in the release.
Watching them blossom
Even though Martin has been planning his retirement for some time, that doesn't mean he won't miss his job. Although he has served in administrative positions at a variety of institutions, including Haskell Indian Nations University in Kansas, Tohono O'odham Community College in Arizona and the University of Arizona, he said he counts the time he spent at IAIA as the most memorable experience of his career.
'I enjoyed being here. I enjoyed seeing students blossom,' he said. 'To see their progress from their first year until they graduate is very rewarding.'
Martin acknowledged he didn't immediately warm to the idea of becoming president of IAIA, figuring he wasn't exactly suited for the role.
'When I was at the University of Arizona, we were very comfortable,' Martin said of his wife, Luci Tapahonso, and himself. 'But the Board of Trustees reached out to me. I told them, 'What you need is an administrator who is also an artist.' They told me, 'We have the artists. What we need is an administrator.' '
Eventually, after an hourlong, in-depth discussion with one of the school's trustees at a local park, Martin said he found himself talked into taking the job. It was Santa Fe that helped tip the scales, he said — he found the city much more manageable than living in much-larger Tucson, Ariz.
While the learning curve of taking over an institution known primarily for its arts programs was steep, Martin said he adapted.
'In any position, you have to learn about the mission and the programs,' he said. 'But, here, I discovered I also learned about the difference between contemporary Native art and traditional Native art. And, of course, the difference depends on who you talk to and what their definition is.'
When he joined IAIA as its president, Martin said his first order of business was to assemble the leadership team he believed he needed to be successful. It was a process that required patience, he said.
'That always takes some persistence,' Martin said, noting it took him four to five years before he felt like he had surrounded himself with the kind of folks he wanted.
A list of priorities
While he was doing that, Martin also faced the challenge of meeting the board's expectations. Before he even arrived on campus, the trustees had established several ambitious priorities — building out the campus, increasing the number of programs the school offers and increasing enrollment.
With the end of his tenure in sight — Martin will step down in July — those goals have been met, he said.
But it wasn't easy, he said. Presenting a winning argument about the need for new facilities — and the money that had to be raised to build them — took a lot of doing. Martin pointed out to doubters that building those facilities and adding new programs were the key to meeting the third goal, beefing up enrollment.
He remembered asking an IAIA alum for a donation for a new gymnasium and being met by a skeptical response.
'Why are you building a gym? This is an arts school,' the alum said.
Martin responded by citing the need for a variety of on-campus amenities. Not only did they help attract new students, he said, they furthered the institution's mission of providing a holistic, well-rounded education.
Eventually, five new buildings and family housing would be added to the IAIA campus on Avan Nu Po Road southwest of Santa Fe.
Establishing more degree programs was also a lengthy process, Martin said. But the school now offers a bachelor's program in performing arts and graduate programs in creative writing, studio arts and cultural administration. Martin is especially proud of the last, which primes graduates for careers at museums and cultural and art institutions.
Other programs are in the works. Soon, IAIA will launch programs in computer science and Native art history, he said.
To meet the cost of those additional programs, Martin said he and the IAIA Foundation's Board of Directors have turned much of their focus to raising money.
'There has to be a need for the programs' IAIA launches, Martin said. 'But we're unique, and we have a niche. What might work for mainstream institutions might not work for us.'
The launch of those new programs and the construction of the buildings that house them has helped the institution become a more popular destination for students as well. Martin said he would like to see enrollment continue to climb, but he noted it has nearly doubled during his tenure, from approximately 275 students in 2007 to 500 today.
A gathering storm?
As Martin prepares to leave office, there are some dark clouds on the horizon, namely in the form of potential federal cuts to Native programs under the Trump administration.
Those issues are very much on Martin's mind, but he said it does little good to fret.
'There is a level of uncertainty, and we have to be more vigilant,' he said. 'Hopefully, the rest will take care of itself. But so much chaos and uncertainty creates anxiety. I think so many people in the current administration, that's what they want to engender.'
Despite that atmosphere, Martin said he is encouraged by the fact strong bipartisan support for American Indian programs exists among members of both parties in Congress.
And he said the value of what institutions like IAIA offer is evident to anyone willing to take a look.
'We have a profound impact not only on Native art but on the economy in New Mexico,' he said, pointing out the number of IAIA graduates who are featured at events such as the Santa Fe Indian Market.
Nor does IAIA serve only Indigenous folks. Contrary to popular belief, the institution is open to anyone, he said — 20% of the school's enrollment is classified as non-Native.
'Of course, our programs are offered from an indigenous perspective,' he said. 'That's not going to change.'
Martin said the most rewarding part of his experience at IAIA is and always has been his interaction with alumni. He said he is always gratified when a former student approaches him in public and, unbidden, begins to describe how much his or her time at the school meant to them.
'They'll say, 'IAIA made such a difference in my life,' ' Martin said. 'Even if they were here in the '60s, '70s or '80s, this was usually a very positive experience they've had here.'
Many of the more recent alums are struck by the additions to the campus, he said, especially when they recall how small it was before.
'They'll say, 'When I came here, there was no bookstore, and we didn't have the nice facilities we have now,' ' Martin said.
But one thing, he said, hasn't changed over the years.
'We always have had a faculty and staff dedicated to the mission,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ken Martin privately expressed doubt about ability to lead DNC, blaming David Hogg
Ken Martin privately expressed doubt about ability to lead DNC, blaming David Hogg

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Ken Martin privately expressed doubt about ability to lead DNC, blaming David Hogg

Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin told party leaders in a recent private conversation that he's unsure about his ability to lead the party because of infighting created by Vice Chair David Hogg. 'I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' he said in a May 15 Zoom meeting of DNC officers, according to a recording obtained by POLITICO. In the recording, an emotional Martin describes being deeply frustrated by the fallout over Hogg, who has ignited a firestorm in the party by vowing to spend $20 million in safe-blue primaries to oust incumbent Democrats he believes are ineffective. Martin paused twice while appearing to choke up. The intraparty feud, Martin said on the recording, is making it more difficult for the party to do its work — and had ruined his ability to demonstrate leadership. 'No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin said, addressing Hogg. 'And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating.' It was an extraordinary admission from the chair of the Democratic Party, just a few months after being elected to lead the party through its post-2024 crisis. The nearly two-minute clip does not include the entire conversation, including how Hogg and others may have responded to Martin. Asked for an interview, Martin, 51, sent a statement through a spokesperson. In it, he said, 'I'm not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he added. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Hogg, 25, did not respond to a request for comment. The Zoom meeting took place a few days after a DNC panel recommended holding new elections for the seats held by Hogg and another vice chair, Malcolm Kenyatta, on procedural grounds. DNC members will decide whether to do so in a vote set to begin on Monday. Roughly 10 people attended the May 15 Zoom meeting, including DNC officers and staff, according to two people familiar with the call who were granted anonymity to describe the private conversation. Asked for comment, party leaders rallied behind Martin, expressing confidence in his leadership. In a statement, DNC Associate Chair Shasti Conrad, who attended the Zoom meeting and was briefly mentioned on it, said Martin 'showed vulnerability in a private conversation' and 'stood up' for the Democratic Party. 'He shows up with authenticity. Always,' she said. 'That's what you'll hear on the tape.' Jane Kleeb, president of the Association of State Democratic Committees, was on the call and said she was 'proud of' Martin and the work the party is doing. Kenyatta, who was also at the meeting, similarly stood by Martin: 'Breaking news: a human being had a frustrating day at work. That's all Ken expressed on that call.' After POLITICO reached out to Martin and the DNC, three party officers who were on the call but not contacted by POLITICO sent statements of support for Martin: DNC Associate Chair Stuart Appelbaum, DNC Secretary Jason Rae and Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), a DNC associate chair and former chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. Martin, who won a contested election to be DNC chair in February, formerly led the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party for about 14 years. He was also previously president of the Association of State Democratic Committees. When Martin campaigned for the DNC post, he called for a 'massive narrative and branding project' to boost the party's image. As chair, he has traveled the country for canvassing, fundraisers and other events to rally Democrats, including on Saturday in New Jersey. But that work has been overshadowed in recent months by the intraparty dispute that Hogg and Martin have been locked in. Many Democrats said party officers shouldn't take sides in primaries, and Martin proposed requiring party leaders to remain neutral in them. Hogg had pitched a compromise, suggesting an internal 'firewall' that would bar him from access to sensitive information in primaries his group, Leaders We Deserve, were involved with. But Martin rejected that deal. 'Party officers have one job: to be fair stewards of a process that invites every Democrat to the table — regardless of personal views or allegiances,' Martin said, urging Hogg to stay neutral. As the controversy played out, Hogg's position in the party was separately challenged by Oklahoma DNC member Kalyn Free, who filed a complaint in February that Hogg's and Kenyatta's election in February didn't follow DNC rules and made it harder for a woman to be elected vice chair. After the DNC panel's vote in support of another election, Hogg said in a statement that it is 'impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party which loomed large over this vote' and that the 'DNC has pledged to remove me, and this vote has provided an avenue to fast-track that effort.' The tension within the DNC comes as Democrats grapple with the best way to regroup after devastating electoral losses in November. Hogg, a survivor of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, frames his efforts as a way to reinvigorate the party. Hogg previously told POLITICO 'we have a culture of seniority politics that has created a litmus test of who deserves to be here' and 'we need people, regardless of their age, that are here to fight.' He has won some influential supporters, including longtime Democratic strategist James Carville and radio host Charlamagne tha God. But an intense backlash from other Democrats has accused Hogg of hurting, not helping, the party. Several of the Democratic Party officers leveled that criticism at Hogg in their statements supporting Martin. 'Instead of helping to rebuild the party he's supposed to serve, he's attacking it for personal gain,' said Kleeb. 'That might boost his PAC's fundraising, but it erodes trust in the very institution we're trying to reform and strengthen.' Others emphasized that Hogg is an outlier among party officials, and both Appelbaum and Beatty used the word 'distraction' in their statements. 'The stakes are so high right now that we can't afford distractions like the ones that David is creating,' Appelbaum said. In the Zoom meeting, Martin appeared to acknowledge complaints some had with how the party had operated, but told Hogg the 'fight' was getting in the way. 'It has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again,' he said in the recording. 'I deeply respect you, David. I, too, was looking forward to working with you, but this has created a situation.'

Ono's rejection is classic example of GOP power grab
Ono's rejection is classic example of GOP power grab

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ono's rejection is classic example of GOP power grab

If Florida citizens haven't noticed, you best should. There is a concerning trend affecting almost every corner and aspect of Florida governance. It's called 'power grab' and it is evidenced most recently by the Florida Board of Governors' rejection of Santa Ono, the University of Florida's President-elect chosen by its board of trustees. You may believe - or not - Ono's self-distancing from DEI policies he once embraced at the University of Michigan from whence he came. His beliefs (like President Trump's ever-changing views and policies) are not the point. What is germane are the facts of how the situation was decided: Fact 1: The folks who stand closest to the situation and who would be most adversely affected should their choice for president go wrong, the UF Board of Trustees, made a choice - Santa Ono. Fact 2: They were overridden by the Florida Board of Governors, who rejected Ono, sending trustees 'back to the drawing board.' (Chalk up the 'sunk costs' - time and money for the search). What's wrong with this picture? First, it violates every rule of efficient and effective decision-making. Decision making is delegated downwards to those nearest the situation and most exposed to the effects of bad results should something go south. This is a key tenant of Fredrick Taylor's 'Theory of Scientific Management' and Kaizen, an offshoot of Edward Deming's Quality Management theory. Second, the US fought a Civil War in small part over the policy of 'state's rights' - states asserted the federal government was going and deciding where it shouldn't. What happened with Ono - as it has with many issues in Florida lately (education and municipal prerogative especially) - is that the 'higher authority' who by constitutional law, case law, common law, civil codes and historical tradition should not be interfering with lower policy makers, is taking proper and legally delegated authority away from duly authorized decision makers. Why is this wrong? More: Santa Ono barred from UF presidency amid mounting pressure from GOP officials First, it is not the 'American Way.' Second, it is not legally sound. Third, (and for Democrats the laugh provoking reason) it sets Republicans against Republicans. They really do 'eat their own.' As laughable as the Republican intra-party battles may seem to Democrats, the centralizing power grab is a dangerous policy. It becomes an inefficient way to make decisions with potential large and expensive negative outcomes on not just the 'argument principals' but a wide swath of Florida's population. We at the local level are losing legal rights to a Tallahassee group, a dominant segment of the Republican Party, whose aim is to grab power - and perpetually keep it. Neil C McMullen is a retired United Methodist Church minister living in Clearwater, Fl. JOIN THE CONVERSATION Send letters to the editor (up to 200 words) or Your Turn columns (about 500 words) to letters@ Please include your address for verification purposes only, and if you send a Your Turn, also include a photo and 1-2 line bio of yourself. You can also submit anonymous Zing!s at Submissions are published on a space-available basis. All submissions may be edited for content, clarity and length, and may also be published by any part of the USA TODAY NETWORK. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Ono's rejection is classic example of GOP power grab | Opinion

UNC trustees' explanation for tenure delay is troubling and ‘chilling'
UNC trustees' explanation for tenure delay is troubling and ‘chilling'

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UNC trustees' explanation for tenure delay is troubling and ‘chilling'

John Preyer, chairman of the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees, finally has explained why the board delayed voting on 33 faculty tenure applications for months before hurriedly approving them this week with an email vote between its regular meetings. 'Deferring the tenure vote was the responsible thing to do given the lack of clarity at that time on the state budget,' Preyer said in a statement to The News & Observer on Friday. 'Our concern was to wait and see what amount of money is coming from the state of North Carolina before we act on tenure, and it would be reasonable and responsible to get that information. The board will always try to be a good steward of state dollars provided to the University.' The explanation is unlikely to reassure faculty. Many were alarmed by the board's breaking with the usually routine approval procedure and its withholding action on all but one tenure application from faculty in the College of Arts and Sciences. Tenure approvals for faculty in health sciences were not delayed. Tenure-track faculty typically complete a six-year probationary period at the university and then expect to be approved for tenure or leave. To be approved for tenure, a candidate's work must pass an extensive review, including assessments by outside experts. Faculty leaders said leaving tenure applications hanging at the last step of approval was unfair and added uncertainty about the process that could make it difficult to recruit faculty for tenure-track positions. Belle Boggs, president of the North Carolina chapter of the American Association of University Professors, said trustees should not be suspending tenure applications that have passed several levels of the university. 'The Board of Trustees is not expert in any of these fields,' she said. 'It goes beyond inappropriate. This is an egregious abuse of their power.' Comments made by trustees in emails obtained by Inside Higher Ed and The Daily Tar Heel indicate that the delay reflected not only funding concerns but opposition to tenure itself. Apparently the trustees were prepared to deny tenure to save money if the next state budget reduces the university's funding. The board relented after an outcry by faculty leaders. Trustee Jim Blaine said in an email that the board should have waited until its meeting at the end of July to vote on the tenure applications, despite the faculty protests. Blaine wrote: 'The optics on this are terrible and make the administration look weak and irresolute. The reversal of course appears responsive to public groaning and gnashing of teeth – bad behavior by a few members of the faculty.' Trustee Marty Kotis opposes the idea of tenure. He said in an email, 'I find it difficult to believe university professors uniquely require lifetime job security comparable to positions held by the Pope or Federal Judges.' But trustee Richard Allison said in an email that the board should respect the process despite fiscal concerns and philosophical objections. 'People on the slate did what was expected of them over an extended period of time under long-established rules. I just do not believe that we should change the rules on them at the final hour,' he said. The tenure issue is resolved for this round, but the delay has added to faculty concerns that political conservatives among the trustees are out to weaken the role and the job status of faculty members in the College of Arts and Sciences, which some on the right consider a liberal indoctrination center. For Victoria Ekstrand, a professor at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media, the tenure episode adds to fears that conservative political appointees want to intimidate and possibly dismiss faculty. 'The chilling effect on the campus in this past year has been extraordinary,' she said. 'People have been quite under the radar. They're afraid, especially at the junior (faculty) level.' Ekstrand said open and honest discussion between trustees, administrators and faculty could defuse the situation. 'When you create a chilling effect like this, people stop talking to each other. We lose the shared governance and the trust in each other,' she said. 'It doesn't have to be this way.' But with reactionary Republican lawmakers controlling university appointments and President Trump leading a war on universities, it looks like 'this way' is the way it will be. Associate opinion editor Ned Barnett can be reached at 919-404-7583, or nbarnett@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store