'Pam' swaps bird for Spider-Man as more charges laid
Jack Gibson-Burrell performed as Spider-Man in front of media outside Melbourne Magistrates Court on Thursday, climbing up walls and waddling into a gutter as he left.
The 21-year-old, who is accused of being behind the infamous "Pam the Bird" tag, declined to speak during the spectacle, which carried on down the city-centre pavement towards a train station.
"Why Spider-Man? Are you protecting the neighbourhood?" a television reporter asked as he left.
Gibson-Burrell, who changed back into a shirt and pants to face court, was facing 60 charges when he last appeared in February but is now charged with 208 offences.
He is accused of breaking into Victorian train stations, abseiling off buildings and scaling heritage-listed sites to spray-paint "Pam the Bird".
Alongside co-accused Matthew Raoul White, 39, Gibson-Burrell allegedly trespassed into Flinders Street Station in July 2024 and abseiled onto the clock tower to paint the bird.
Gibson-Burrell also allegedly graffitied Footscray's heritage-listed Uncle Toby's factory in June, Channel Nine's Melbourne headquarters in September and the "Cheese Stick" column on CityLink road in October.
Police previously estimated the damage bill for Gibson-Burrell's alleged vandalism at more than $100,000.
He's further accused of stabbing a man in West Footscray, punching a worker in the face at Emporium Melbourne, stealing multiple cars in Torquay and ram-raiding a Nando's restaurant in Footscray.
Prosecutor Brayden Sharp confirmed additional charges had been filed against Gibson-Burrell since the last hearing, bringing the total up to 208.
Details of the additional 148 offences were not aired in court.
Defence lawyer Micky Milardovic said the police investigation was conducted over a "significant period of time" and some of the charges included previous proceedings.
The court was told the case will go to a committal hearing in February with six witnesses to be called, including police and a civilian.
Mr Milardovic said co-accused White had made a plea offer to prosecutors for them to consider, which was why his case had been separately adjourned to a committal mention in August.
Magistrate Michelle Mykytowycz adjourned Gibson-Burrell's case for a two-day committal hearing and approved defence's application to cross-examine the witnesses.
A committal allows evidence to be tested before a magistrate decides whether to commit the case to trial in a higher court.
Gibson-Burrell is yet to enter a plea to any of the offences.
His bail was extended to the committal hearing, which will begin on February 2, 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Even for less than honourable professions, this was way out of bounds
It is a serious allegation which, if proven under Victorian law, would make Sam Groth, a parliamentarian with ambitions to lead his party and the state, guilty of a sex crime against a minor. The Herald Sun investigation did not substantiate the allegation, which on Wednesday was denied by Groth. Instead, it has created a likely test case for Australia's strengthened privacy laws, which include a new statutory tort for serious invasion of privacy. The paper's interest in the Groths' sexual history was piqued by the Groths' comments in previous interviews when they said the first met in 2011 at the Templestowe Park Tennis Club. This would make Brittany 16 or 17 years old and Sam Groth either 23 or 24. Drill reported that unnamed Liberal Party colleagues raised the issue with Groth amid concerns it could be weaponised by his political opponents. This suggests Groth's enemies within the Liberal Party fuelled this grubby exposé. Groth says the matter was never raised with him by a colleague. He also says neither he nor Brittany – the only two people who know the circumstances of when their sexual relationship started – spoke to the Herald Sun about the story before publication. The Groths' lawyers, defamation expert Patrick George and barrister Sue Chrysanthou, SC, are the team which successfully sued former Liberal leader John Pesutto on behalf of colleague Moira Deeming. On Wednesday morning, their legal letter landed in the inbox of Herald Sun editor-in-chief Sam Weir. Loading If this case progresses to trial, it will be nervously watched by rival media organisations including Nine, the publisher of this masthead, which lobbied for years against the introduction of a statutory privacy tort. The concerns notice seen by this masthead makes clear that while the defamatory imputations are against Sam Groth – the most serious being that 'he sexually assaulted Brittany when she was under 18' and 'committed a crime of sexual assault against a minor in his care or supervision' – the most egregious invasion of privacy was against Brittany Groth. Any woman, even one married to a politician, should be safe in thinking their teenage sexual history is off-limits to political skulduggery and newspaper snooping. The concerns notice describes the decision to 'name and shame' Brittany Groth as an alleged victim of child sexual assault as a 'grotesque act'. 'There was no basis to allege that any relevant sexual misconduct took place merely because our clients are said to have met when Mrs Groth was 17,' the notice read. 'Mr Groth has not been charged with any crime, or even investigated or questioned by police.' The privacy laws recognise media freedom as a countervailing public interest. The Herald Sun, which is standing by its reporting, will seek to test the strength of this provision. The outcome of any trial could have far-reaching implications for journalism and the politicians we report on. But at its heart, this story turns on questions that, frankly, feel wrong to ask. Are any of us entitled to know when and in what circumstances a politician and their partner consummated a loving, ongoing relationship? To return to Ferguson's observation about journalists, we're not awful people, really.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Even for less than honourable professions, this was way out of bounds
It is a serious allegation which, if proven under Victorian law, would make Sam Groth, a parliamentarian with ambitions to lead his party and the state, guilty of a sex crime against a minor. The Herald Sun investigation did not substantiate the allegation, which on Wednesday was denied by Groth. Instead, it has created a likely test case for Australia's strengthened privacy laws, which include a new statutory tort for serious invasion of privacy. The paper's interest in the Groths' sexual history was piqued by the Groths' comments in previous interviews when they said the first met in 2011 at the Templestowe Park Tennis Club. This would make Brittany 16 or 17 years old and Sam Groth either 23 or 24. Drill reported that unnamed Liberal Party colleagues raised the issue with Groth amid concerns it could be weaponised by his political opponents. This suggests Groth's enemies within the Liberal Party fuelled this grubby exposé. Groth says the matter was never raised with him by a colleague. He also says neither he nor Brittany – the only two people who know the circumstances of when their sexual relationship started – spoke to the Herald Sun about the story before publication. The Groths' lawyers, defamation expert Patrick George and barrister Sue Chrysanthou, SC, are the team which successfully sued former Liberal leader John Pesutto on behalf of colleague Moira Deeming. On Wednesday morning, their legal letter landed in the inbox of Herald Sun editor-in-chief Sam Weir. Loading If this case progresses to trial, it will be nervously watched by rival media organisations including Nine, the publisher of this masthead, which lobbied for years against the introduction of a statutory privacy tort. The concerns notice seen by this masthead makes clear that while the defamatory imputations are against Sam Groth – the most serious being that 'he sexually assaulted Brittany when she was under 18' and 'committed a crime of sexual assault against a minor in his care or supervision' – the most egregious invasion of privacy was against Brittany Groth. Any woman, even one married to a politician, should be safe in thinking their teenage sexual history is off-limits to political skulduggery and newspaper snooping. The concerns notice describes the decision to 'name and shame' Brittany Groth as an alleged victim of child sexual assault as a 'grotesque act'. 'There was no basis to allege that any relevant sexual misconduct took place merely because our clients are said to have met when Mrs Groth was 17,' the notice read. 'Mr Groth has not been charged with any crime, or even investigated or questioned by police.' The privacy laws recognise media freedom as a countervailing public interest. The Herald Sun, which is standing by its reporting, will seek to test the strength of this provision. The outcome of any trial could have far-reaching implications for journalism and the politicians we report on. But at its heart, this story turns on questions that, frankly, feel wrong to ask. Are any of us entitled to know when and in what circumstances a politician and their partner consummated a loving, ongoing relationship? To return to Ferguson's observation about journalists, we're not awful people, really.
The Age
9 hours ago
- The Age
Overseas criminal suspects linked to synagogue firebombing probe
Police are examining exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem 'Kaz' Hamad as part of investigations into whether offshore criminals worked with Victorian associates to firebomb the Adass Israel Synagogue. The overseas investigations were confirmed after the Victorian Joint Counter-Terrorism Team (JCTT) on Wednesday arrested a Werribee man, 21, as part of an ongoing investigation into the firebombing in Ripponlea on December 6, 2024. Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett said investigators were working with Australia's Five Eyes security partners to ensure 'our collective powers and capabilities are drawn upon', but would not answer questions about which countries they believed the attack's masterminds were based in. 'Our investigation is not limited to Australia. It involves exploring criminals offshore, and we suspect these criminals worked with criminal associates in Victoria to carry out the arson attack,' Barrett said. Five Eyes is a multinational intelligence-sharing network which includes Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Barrett also said authorities were investigating links to exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem 'Kaz' Hamad. 'That is a name that has come up in our investigation, and that remains one of our ongoing lines of inquiry,' she said. Hamad was deported to his home country Iraq in July 2023. He has been a central figure in Melbourne's so-called tobacco wars and spent extended time in prison. Victoria Police alleges the 21-year-old Werribee man was one of three individuals who broke into the Ripponlea synagogue and set the fire, but would not divulge if they believed he was involved in orchestrating the attack, or if he was a low-level criminal hired to carry it out.
