
Israel army bulldozers plough through homes at West Bank camps - War on Gaza
The army gave thousands of displaced residents just a few hours to retrieve belongings from their homes before demolishing buildings and clearing wide avenues through the rubble.
The army said it would demolish 104 more buildings in the Tulkarem camp this week in the latest stage of an operation that it launched in January during a truce in the Gaza war.
"We came back to the camp and found our house demolished. No one informed us, no one told us anything," said Abd al-Rahman Ajaj, 62, who had been hoping to collect his belongings on Wednesday.
Born in Tulkarem camp after his parents fled what is now the Israeli city of Netanya, about 12 kilometres (seven miles) to the west, Ajaj said he had not foreseen the scale of the Israeli operation.
Thousands displaced
It began with a raid on the northern West Bank city of Jenin, and quickly spread to other cities, including Tulkarem, displacing at least 40,000 people, according to UN figures.
Vacating the camp after a warning of a raid, "we would usually come back two or three days later", Ajaj told AFP.
Now left without a house, he echoed the sentiments of Palestinians of his parents' generation, who thought their own displacement in 1948 would also be temporary.
"The last time, we left and never returned," he said.
In Tulkarem, the Israeli army's bulldozers ploughed through the dense patchwork of narrow alleyways that had grown as Palestinian refugees settled in the area over the years.
Three wide arteries of concrete now streak the side of Tulkarem camp, allowing easy access for the army.
Piles of cinder blocks and concrete line the roadside like snowbanks after a plough's passage.
'Eliminate the refugee issue'
Ajaj said the destruction had been gradual, drawn out over the course of the operation, which the army has dubbed "Iron Wall".
Beyond the military value of wide access roads, many residents believe Israel is seeking to destroy the idea of the camps themselves, turning them into regular neighbourhoods of the cities they flank.
Residents fear this would threaten their refugee status and their "right of return" to the land they or their forebears fled or were expelled from in 1948.
The current Israeli government -- and particularly some of its far-right ministers, who demand the outright annexation of the West Bank -- are firmly opposed to this demand, which they see as a demographic threat to Israel's survival as a Jewish state.
"The aim is clearly to erase the national symbolism of the refugee camp, to eliminate the refugee issue and the right of return," said Suleiman al-Zuheiri, an advocate for residents of nearby Nur Shams, Tulkarem's other refugee camp, where he also lives.
Zuheiri's brother's house was destroyed last week by the bulldozers.
"The scene was painful and tragic because a house is not just walls and a roof. It holds memories, dreams, hopes and very important belongings that we couldn't retrieve," he said.
Each demolished building housed at least six families on three floors, he added.
The land allocated to the camps was limited, so residents have had little choice but to build upwards to gain space, adding an extra storey with each new generation.
Explosions rock camp
Back at Tulkarem camp, 66-year-old Omar Owfi said he had managed to make two trips into the camp now occupied by Israeli soldiers to retrieve belongings on Wednesday.
He feared becoming homeless if his home was demolished.
"They don't care what the house is worth. All they care about is demolishing. We're the ones losing. We've lost everything," he told AFP.
"They want to erase the camp -- to remove as many buildings as possible and leave just streets."
He said he feared for his children and grandchildren, as they dispersed to live with various relatives.
The Israeli supreme court froze the military order for mass demolitions in Tulkarem camp on Thursday, giving the state two months to answer a petition against them, said the Palestinian human rights group Adalah, which filed it.
But the physical damage has already been done as the army's operations continue.
As residents retrieved mattresses, wardrobes and air conditioning units from the camp on Wednesday under the surveillance of Israeli troops, gunshots rang out through the streets.
A loud explosion echoed across the city, followed by a column of dust rising as another building was apparently blown up, sending the smell of gunpowder wafting in the wind.
Follow us on:
Short link:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East
37 minutes ago
- Middle East
OPEN // Cairo hosts Egypt-Qatar-Israel talks on Gaza aid, ceasefire
Cairo, July 15 (MENA) – Tripartite meetings involving Egyptian, Qatari and Israeli officials kicked off in Cairo on Tuesday to discuss the facilitation of humanitarian aid deliveries to Gaza, along with arrangements for evacuating patients and enabling the return of stranded Palestinians, AlQahera News reported. The discussions aim to overcome obstacles to reaching a ceasefire agreement and to ensure sufficient aid reaches Gaza residents. The channel noted that the meetings, set to run for two days, have seen progress and agreement on several humanitarian points tied to a potential truce. (MENA) M S H/


Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Cairo hosting trilateral talks on Gaza humanitarian aid, ceasefire - Foreign Affairs
Cairo is hosting delegations from Egypt, Qatar, and Israel for discussions on humanitarian aid for Gaza and efforts to secure a ceasefire, the Egyptian news channel Al-Qahera News reported on Tuesday. The tripartite talks are addressing the delivery of aid, the evacuation of patients, and the return of stranded individuals. The discussions are part of Egypt's ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Informed sources told the channel that the meetings have witnessed notable progress, with consensus reached on several humanitarian-related provisions within the proposed ceasefire agreement. The talks are scheduled to continue over two days. These consultations reflect Egypt's commitment to overcoming the obstacles hindering a comprehensive ceasefire and its determination to ensure the entry of sufficient and appropriate humanitarian assistance to residents of the strip, the sources added. On Monday, Al-Qahera News reported that Hassan Rashad, head of Egypt's General Intelligence Service, held talks on a Gaza ceasefire with Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, alongside Palestinian and Israeli delegations. Over the past week, indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas resumed in the Qatari capital. Despite international momentum, the two sides remain at odds over key terms. A Palestinian source told AFP that Israel's insistence on maintaining a military presence in Gaza has stalled a proposed 60-day pause in fighting. On the other hand, an Israeli official, speaking to AFP, accused Hamas of deliberately blocking a deal, as the group rejected new Israeli demands to retain forces in over 40 percent of Gaza. Hamas accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of being the main obstacle. Since October 2023, Israel's war on Gaza has killed 57,680 Palestinians — the majority women and children — and injured 137,409 others, according to the strip's health ministry. Egypt, alongside Qatar and the United States, has been a key mediator in efforts to end the war, now entering its 21st month. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Daily News Egypt
2 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
The Complicity of Major US Corporations in Sustaining the War on Gaza
As the war on Gaza rages on, leaving in its wake a trail of unspeakable devastation, shattered families, and erased futures, it is no longer possible—nor ethically tolerable—to speak only of military strategies and political calculations. A far more unsettling dimension of this protracted tragedy is now emerging: the role of powerful multinational corporations in not merely profiting from the conflict, but actively sustaining and enabling it. In a world where the language of human rights is too often weaponized and selectively invoked, the recent report presented by Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, demands our collective attention. Her findings, meticulously documented and courageously articulated before the UN Human Rights Council on 3 July 2025, lay bare an economic machinery behind the violence—one in which major American tech and defense companies play a central, deeply troubling role. Albanese's report, aptly titled 'From the Economy of Occupation to the Economy of Genocide,' moves beyond the well-worn diplomatic euphemisms and legal technicalities. It asserts, with formidable evidence, that the systematic targeting of Gaza's civilian population—through relentless aerial bombardments, mass displacement, and the destruction of vital infrastructure—constitutes not just a military campaign but a profitable enterprise. Among the entities named in the report are Microsoft, Amazon, Google's parent company Alphabet, IBM, and Palantir Technologies. These corporations are accused of providing advanced surveillance technologies, cloud computing services, AI-driven military systems, and digital infrastructure that facilitate Israel's military operations and the maintenance of its illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. For example, Palantir—a data analytics firm with longstanding contracts with US intelligence agencies—is alleged to supply the Israeli military with predictive policing tools and battlefield analytics. Microsoft and Amazon Web Services reportedly host vast data centers and cloud services for Israeli security institutions, enabling real-time intelligence sharing and operational coordination. Alphabet's AI and mapping technologies have similarly been implicated in aiding precision targeting systems—a deeply sinister irony given their public declarations of ethical AI commitments. Albanese argues that these corporations, far from being neutral service providers, are complicit in what she terms an 'economy of genocide'—a structure where violence against civilians not only occurs with impunity but generates financial dividends for global stakeholders. Unsurprisingly, the report provoked immediate outrage from both the Israeli government and its allies, particularly the United States. On 9 July 2025, the US government imposed unprecedented sanctions on Francesca Albanese, accusing her of antisemitism and alleged support for terrorism—a familiar tactic employed against those who challenge entrenched power structures. The move was widely condemned by human rights organizations and legal experts as a blatant assault on the independence of UN mandate holders. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, denounced the sanctions as 'politically motivated and legally baseless,' while organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch characterized them as a dangerous precedent for silencing international accountability mechanisms. But perhaps the most revealing aspect of this episode lies in the very ferocity of the backlash. If Albanese's claims were groundless—if her report lacked substance—it would have been easily discredited through facts and legal argument. Instead, her detractors resorted to personal vilification and punitive sanctions—a response that, in its very excess, affirms the threat her report poses to vested interests. History teaches us that those who dare to unmask the nexus between profit and atrocity often pay a steep price. Francesca Albanese now joins a long lineage of whistleblowers, dissidents, and principled international figures targeted for refusing to remain silent in the face of state violence. The sanctions imposed upon her are not merely punitive; they are a tacit admission of the uncomfortable truths her report exposes. The involvement of Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, IBM, and Palantir in sustaining a brutal war against an occupied people demands urgent scrutiny—not only within the walls of international courts but in the court of global public opinion. The real question is whether we, as a global community, will have the moral clarity and political will to confront these corporate enablers, or whether we will allow the machinery of war to continue enriching the few at the catastrophic expense of the many. For in the end, the silence of the world will echo far longer than the sound of the bombs. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University