Mark Levine holds strong lead over Justin Brannan in NYC comptroller race
With 89% of the votes counted at 10 p.m. Tuesday night, Levine, Manhattan's current borough president and a former City Council member, led the race with 48% of the vote. Brannan had 36%.
With New York's ranked-choice voting, the primary will go to a second round of counting if Levine doesn't crack 50%. Two other contenders, Ismael Perez and Kevin Parker, had 18% of the vote between them.
Levine campaigned on a more moderate message in the primary, unlike Brannan, a progressive Democrat who was endorsed by the Working Families Party.
Still, the two candidates largely agreed on most issues during the campaign, including on the need to use the comptroller's office, which is responsible for auditing city agencies and overseeing the city's public pension funds, as a perch for counteracting Trump's efforts to cut federal funding for New York.
Levine received more institutional support than Brannan. That included Levine being endorsed by uptown Manhattan Congressman Adriano Espaillat, a powerbroker of New York politics.
Brannan, a City Council member representing parts of southern Brooklyn, did not immediately concede the race or offer remarks about Levine's win. As he is term-limited, Brannan will leave the Council at the beginning of next year.
With the Democratic nomination clinched, Levine is expected to breeze to victory in November's general election, as there's no Republican candidate in the race seen as competitive.
Brannan and Levine announced campaigns for comptroller after incumbent Brad Lander announced he wouldn't seek reelection and instead run for mayor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Issues Putin With Warning Before Meeting
Good morning. Donald Trump issues a warning to Vladimir Putin. Crypto hits a new high. And spare a thought for the residents of Manhattan as rents hit a record—again. Listen to the day's top stories.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Gold rush hits Trump-era Washington, from prices to the Oval Office
Donald Trump promised Americans a golden age. In one way, he's already delivered: gold is glittering like never before. Over the past year, the price of the precious metal has surged by roughly 35 percent, vastly outstripping gains in the overall stock market. Investors are increasingly turning to the metal — used as a safe financial asset for millennia — amid mounting economic uncertainty and heavy buying by central banks seeking to diversify their reserve holdings. The rally intensified last week, when gold futures in New York spiked after U.S. Customs and Border Protection unexpectedly said that certain widely traded gold bars, many from Switzerland, would be subject to Trump's new tariffs. The unexpected move pushed U.S. prices above the global benchmark set in London, easing only after Trump later announced on social media that gold would not be subject to tariffs. In Trump's Washington, the gold rush is more than a market trend — it's a decor choice. And business executives who know that come armed with gilded gifts, hoping to win the president over. The Oval Office now gleams with gold-colored drapes, medallions, frames, figurines, cherubs, eagles and moldings. Corporate executives who have recently visited the president for one-on-one meetings have described the office as overwhelmingly golden. When Apple CEO Tim Cook stopped by last week, he presented the president with a commemorative plate anchored in a 24-karat gold base. A day earlier, a Cabinet secretary took to X to share a video of himself autographing a gold-colored tractor on the National Mall. Meanwhile, the administration has promoted a $5 million 'gold card' aimed at wealthy foreigners. Known for private residences that celebrate opulence, Trump has transformed one end of Pennsylvania Avenue into an extension of the gilded style he's favored for decades at places like his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, with rooms full of gold touches. 'The Oval Office's transformation from drab and dull under Joe Biden to glittering and glamorous under President Trump reflects a nationwide transformation: a country that was dead and stagnant is now hot and thriving towards a new Golden Age,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. Outside the White House gates, gold is booming in more traditional ways. Dealers report a surge in activity as investors rush to cash in on the metal's rally. Some are selling inherited coins, jewelry or bars; others, including cryptocurrency holders, are converting digital earnings into bullion rather than fiat currency. Some see gold as a hedge against inflation or a safeguard against doubts over the long-term viability of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency. Mike Coan, a gold dealer who runs Marion Adam Rare Coins in Elletsville, Indiana, said his business is headed for a banner year. 'It's basically a runaway train with no conductor behind the wheel,' he said. 'I've not seen anything like it. I've been in business 21 years.' The surge is also showing up in financial markets. CME Group, an exchange operator, has seen record volumes across futures and options exchanges, according to a spokesman. Its 'micro' gold contract, which is a tenth of the size of its main contract, saw record year-to-date average daily volume of 214,000 contracts. The reasons for the run-up in gold prices are deeper than presidential decor, economists say. Nearly half the recent run-up in gold prices can be traced to an extraordinary spike in global economic uncertainty, particularly over trade policy, that has approached levels last seen during the early days of the pandemic, according to a recent analysis by EconoFact, a nonpartisan economics publication. Rising expectations for inflation — which often lead investors to buy gold as a hedge — contributed to the metal's climb, EconoFact's analysts said. For investors, gold offers no explicit yield, unlike bonds, which pay an annual interest rate, or stocks that pay dividends. But holding gold can still provide benefits in an investment portfolio. People will purchase gold when they expect the price of the metal to rise, allowing them to cash it in at a higher price — although there is also a risk of capital losses in the face of a price decline. 'This leap cannot be explained by a sudden increase in the demand for gold as jewelry or for its use in industrial production,' EconoFact wrote in March. 'Rather, it reflects the shifting demand for the yellow metal as a financial asset.' Another factor behind gold's surge: Central banks, including in China, ramped up purchases after European countries froze Russian assets in response to Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. By keeping the metal in domestic vaults, central banks keep it beyond the reach of foreign institutions and governments. Goldman Sachs says buying on London's over-the-counter gold market has since jumped fivefold. 'This changed the market structurally,' said Samantha Dart, Goldman's co-head of commodities research. 'We think of it as, 'Hey we need to just diversify a little bit more, increase the share of gold in our reserves, because a precedent has been set.'' Goldman expects gold to hit about $3,700 a troy ounce by year's end — up from roughly $3,400 this week — and $4,000 by mid-2026 as central bank buying continues. A troy ounce is slightly heavier than a regular ounce and is historically used to measure precious metals. The rally isn't confined to markets. The song 'Golden' by HUNTR/X, the fictional K-pop girl group featured in the popular animated Netflix film 'KPop Demon Hunters,' took the top spot on the Billboard Hot 100 this week.
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Adam Schiff, Letitia James and Trump's Payback Plan
President Trump's Justice Department recently reached a nadir when two prominent Democrats, New York's attorney general, Letitia James, and Senator Adam Schiff of California, were placed under criminal investigation for their personal financial dealings. They are the wrong targets chosen for the wrong reasons in a case supervised by the wrong prosecutor. But there's not much either of them can do about it. The process leading up to the investigation demonstrates how this president has eroded longstanding ethical norms governing the relationship between the White House and the Justice Department. As the head of the executive branch, the president has authority over all the agencies in his cabinet, including the Justice Department; but since the abuses of Watergate, all subsequent presidents have taken steps to remove themselves from individual prosecutorial decisions while still leading on policy matters. The Justice Department manual instructs that 'the legal judgments of the Department of Justice must be impartial and insulated from political influence. It is imperative that the department's investigatory and prosecutorial powers be exercised free from partisan consideration.' To that end, the manual sharply restricts contacts between prosecutors and the White House in criminal cases. With Mr. Trump using his social media megaphone, those limits don't exist. Ms. James earned the president's ire by accusing him and the Trump Organization with fraud in connection with the valuation of real estate and winning a $454 million judgment against them (Mr. Trump is appealing). Mr. Schiff was a leader, in his days as a member of the House of Representatives, of the investigation of Russia's efforts to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election, and he became the lead House manager in Mr. Trump's first impeachment. Among many other insults, Mr. Trump has reposted a call for Ms. James to be 'placed under citizens arrest' for 'blatant election interference and harassment,' and over the years he's denounced 'Shifty Schiff,' demanding that he be 'questioned at the highest level for Fraud & Treason.' If there were any doubt that these investigations amount to political hit jobs against two of President Trump's most indefatigable political adversaries, the issue was settled with Attorney General Pam Bondi's pick to lead the inquiries — Ed Martin, the Justice Department official who was so unqualified and partisan that he couldn't win confirmation in the Republican Senate to be the United States attorney in Washington. As a consolation prize for that failure, Mr. Trump appointed him to lead the so-called Weaponization Working Group, the Orwellian name for the prosecutorial payback operation designed to build cases against those who investigated Mr. Trump during the Biden administration. Some of Mr. Martin's first targets are Ms. James and Mr. Schiff. Far from displaying the open mind that honorable prosecutors should demonstrate, Mr. Martin said his goal was to 'stick the landing' against the two Democrats. But a president's critics, like the president himself, should not be above the law, so what, then, is the evidence against Ms. James and Mr. Schiff? For both, the issues relate to real estate and mortgages, and the facts about them seem already well established. The case against Ms. James has three parts, First, in 2023, she financed the down payment to help her niece buy a single-family home in Norfolk, Va. According to her attorney Abbe Lowell, Ms. James signed several documents that made clear that her niece, not Ms. James herself, would live in the house. But on one form, a power of attorney, she indicated that she herself would live there, which was obviously a mistake. In light of the other documents, the bank itself could not have been misled, and in any event, the mistake on the power of attorney brought Ms. James no monetary gain. In 2001, Ms. James bought a four-story brownstone in Brooklyn with separate apartments for herself, her mother, her brother and a family friend. On one form, filed 24 years ago, the property was listed as having five units, not four. At all other times, she correctly listed it as four units. Last, in 1983, Ms. James's father bought a house in Queens for the family. On the mortgage application, he mistakenly listed Ms. James, who was just out of college, as his spouse, not his daughter, although other documents listed their relationship correctly. Ms. James has denied any wrongdoing, and according to her lawyer, the accusation that she may have financially benefited is baseless. In a demonstration of the ferocity of the legal assault on Ms. James, her office was subpoenaed last week in a different criminal investigation, led by Justice Department prosecutors in upstate New York. This inquiry is apparently aimed at proving that Ms. James committed some kind of misconduct during the fraud investigation of Mr. Trump and his company, as well as in a separate lawsuit that her office filed against the National Rifle Association. The only basis for this case, it seems, is that the president was unhappy with the outcome of both cases, which Ms. James's office won. As for Mr. Schiff, the investigation of him is rooted in the fact that like many members of Congress, he owns two residences, one in his home state of California and another in the Washington suburbs. According to mortgage documents, Mr. Schiff listed both as his 'primary' residence, which, according to a social media post by the president, represented an effort to 'get a cheaper mortgage and rip off America.' At the time Mr. Schiff applied for the mortgages, he was already in Congress, so the banks knew he had two residences. There does not appear to be any deception by Mr. Schiff and he has publicly denied the claims. (In addition, Mr. Schiff apparently last applied for a mortgage in 2012, which means any possible crime would be outside the 10-year statute of limitations; that would probably apply to most of the charges against Ms. James as well.) For the moment, Ms. James and Mr. Schiff are essentially powerless. There is no remedy in federal law to stop even clearly meritless investigations. At best, the two elected officials can look forward to months of detailing their personal financial arrangements; in other words, they will be compelled to violate the political maxim that holds if you're explaining, you're losing. Worse yet, their legal fates are in the hands of a dedicated political enemy who will be able to present the case for indictment to a grand jury. There, in the famous utterance of Sol Wachtler, the onetime chief judge of New York's Court of Appeals, prosecutors can get a grand jury to 'indict a ham sandwich.' The two elected officials will be able to offer formal legal and factual defenses only after they are indicted — that is, when they are criminal defendants in federal court, which is, to put it mildly, hardly a welcome forum. President Trump has always been a master of projection. His accusations of misconduct nearly always replicate what he himself has done. So it is with 'weaponization,' which is how he describes the entirely legitimate efforts during the Biden years to hold him accountable for his financial chicanery and his efforts to overturn his loss of the 2020 election, among other misdeeds. Now, at his behest, his administration is turning that word against two of his most prominent critics. For Mr. Trump, there may be few spoils of victory sweeter than the ordeal that Ms. James and Mr. Schiff will soon endure. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
