logo
Lord Sawyer obituary

Lord Sawyer obituary

The Guardiana day ago
It is only the passage of time that has revealed the extent of the role played by Tom Sawyer, the former Labour general secretary, who has died aged 82, in the regeneration of his party before its triumphant return to power in the 1997 general election. He used his authority as a distinguished trade union leader and his credibility as a one-time stalwart of the left to show the Labour party membership a way out of the political wilderness.
It was his unseen hand that drew the route map. It was his work on the party's national executive committee (NEC) that secured a radical review of Labour's policies, specifically its previous commitments to unilateralism and opposition to Europe, after its humiliating third consecutive general election defeat in 1987. And it was he who recognised the need to modernise the party culture to reflect the politics of the time; he saw that this should address its approach to wealth creation and enterprise, and then effectively erected the scaffolding to remodel Labour's own constitution.
His aim was to present Labour as an attractive and credible future government, with a realistic agenda that came from a process of democratic policymaking, while simultaneously avoiding the constant political divisions that had historically been publicly aired at party conferences. This was the origin of what became known as 'partnership in power', for which Sawyer prepared the ground as chair of the NEC's influential home policy committee from 1987 and delivered when Tony Blair won the leadership in 1994 and appointed Sawyer general secretary.
He was a genial man who exuded the calm common sense for which he came to be lauded by successive Labour leaders and it was, perhaps, precisely because of his experience as a leftwing trade unionist, who had led his members out on strike, that he recognised the importance of consensus. He was close to Neil Kinnock and would quote the then Labour leader's salient comment that 'only people with very shallow convictions are afraid of compromise'. Sawyer's particular skill lay in persuading others to an agreed position without seeming to promote his own viewpoint. Kinnock regarded him as a bridge who could 'bring people over' and would quote him the Welsh proverb: 'A fo ben, bid bont' (He who would be a leader, let him be a bridge).
The wellspring of Sawyer's politics was a belief in social justice. He was born in Darlington, in the streets behind the town's one-time major employer, the Cleveland Bridge Manufacturing company – famed for building the Sydney Harbour Bridge – the son of a railway worker and a domestic cleaner employed by a local doctor. He went to Dodmire primary school, Eastbourne comprehensive school and attended Darlington Technical College aged 13 to 15. He then became a 'Stivvie', apprenticed to Robert Stephenson and Hawthorns, Darlington's famous locomotive builders, but was unemployed with a wife and son when the company closed five years later.
He moved his family to find work in the booming motor industry, with Lockheed Brakes in Leamington Spa, and most significantly for his career took an interest in trade unions, joining the Amalgamated Engineering Union (AEU). His mentor, Geoff Thatcher, was a shop steward who looked like Karl Marx and opened a door in the young Sawyer's mind by lending him books and political pamphlets. He was a shop steward himself within two years.
Returning to his home town for a job at Cummins' Darlington engine plant, he joined the Transport and General Workers' Union (TGWU) in order to secure union recognition for the white-collar workers. He became secretary of the Darlington Trades Council, met the local Labour MP and joined the Labour party in 1968; three years later he answered a Tribune advertisement for a post as a trade union official with the National Union of Public Employees (Nupe), taking a pay cut of a third of his £1,500 salary. He became deputy to his lifelong friend, Rodney Bickerstaffe, and in 1975 succeeded him as Nupe's northern region organiser. In 1981, he followed Bickerstaffe to London to become his deputy general secretary at Nupe headquarters, which in turn gave Sawyer his place on the Labour NEC.
Sawyer was already far-sighted as a young, leather-jacketed, leftwing activist, seeing the need to move trade unionism onwards from its cloth-cap image. He had become a night-time student with the Workers' Educational Association, was reading widely – cultivating an interest that would lead to a 5,000-book library and a fascination for antiquarian literature. As a union official he was involved in the 1973 ambulance workers' strike in County Durham, in the 1974 widespread industrial action that led to the 'three-day week' and the collapse of the Heath government, and in the 'winter of discontent' public sector strikes of 1978-79, which contributed to the fall of the Callaghan government.
But he had also developed a concern for society that stretched beyond pay and conditions. This he articulated in a speech at the 1987 Labour conference, when he spoke movingly about his vision of a society where skills and wealth were harnessed to social need, deference replaced with dignity and fear with a sense of security. By this time Sawyer had become a focal member of the party 'soft left'. He rejected the mindset of the union left, which had sought a general strike in support of the mineworkers' year-long action in 1984-85, categorising it as the 'worst kind of gesture politics', but the crucial issue for him became his membership of the party inquiry into entrysim by the Trotskyist group, Militant – notably in Liverpool. His own conversations in the course of the inquiry led him to form a radically differing view from his NEC leftwing former associates, and his was the majority casting vote in 1986 in favour of expulsion of Militant members.
Sawyer played an important role in the 1993 formation of Unison: the amalgamation of Nupe with the Confederation of Health Service Employees (Cohse) and the National Association of Local Government Employees (Nalgo) to form a 1.3 million-member giant. He left the union the following year to become Labour's general secretary, but first helped the Labour leader, John Smith, to deliver the one-member, one-vote reform at the 1993 Brighton conference.
He was interested in new methods of managing change in large organisations and took advice on the creation of Unison from Cranfield School of Management, a strategy he would subsequently extend to his Labour party constitutional reform during his four years as general secretary. On stepping down from that post in 1998, at Tony Blair's request, he became a life peer.
He did not take an active role in the House of Lords, but delighted in his post as a visiting professor at Cranfield School of Management from (1999-2013). He was chancellor of the University of Teesside (2005-17) and president of the William Morris Society (2018-23). He was a popular chair of the Notting Hill Housing group and a non-executive director of Investors in People UK (both 1998-2005). He was also a director of the Britannia Building Society (1999-2009), chaired the Reed Health Group (2001-03) and the Royal Mail Partnership Board (2001-07).
Tom Sawyer adopted the name of Mark Twain's fictional hero as a boy. In 1962 he married Sylvia Park and they had son, Mark; they later divorced. He is survived by Liz (Elizabeth), a former nursing sister and shop steward who became his second wife, their sons, Jack and Tom, and Mark.
Tom (Lawrence) Sawyer, Lord Sawyer, trade unionist and politician, born 12 May 1943; died 3 August 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sturgeon: I do not agree with Forbes being banned by Fringe venue
Sturgeon: I do not agree with Forbes being banned by Fringe venue

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Sturgeon: I do not agree with Forbes being banned by Fringe venue

Nicola Sturgeon has said she does not agree with Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes being banned from a major venue at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. The former SNP leader told reporters in Edinburgh that she disagreed with cancel culture. It comes amid a row over the Summerhall venue's decision not to have Ms Forbes back at any future events following a fringe show organised by The Herald newspaper. The venue has reportedly suggested that John Swinney's deputy posed a safety and wellbeing risk to its staff over her views on trans rights. Ms Forbes is a devout Christian and a member of the socially conservative Free Church of Scotland. She was criticised during her SNP leadership battle for her stance on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights. Ms Sturgeon, who appointed Ms Forbes as finance secretary while she was first minister, was asked whether she agreed with Summerhall's decision. 'I don't agree with cancel culture and I don't agree with that,' she said. She added that she took no responsibility for the venue's decision. Summerhall, which has received more £600,000 in government funding, previously held Herald Unspun live events with Mr Swinney and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, the latter of whom has U-turned over his stance on gender self-ID. Ms Forbes expressed disappointment at the venue and said she 'fervently' believes in freedom of speech. 'Any effort to cancel people, especially politicians, undermines democracy,' she said. 'Many people attended the Herald event and it is important that we could freely discuss and debate matters in a respectful manner. 'I respect and acknowledge the fact that, in a liberal democracy, there are people who will agree with me and others who will disagree with me. 'That is all the more reason to create events where the audience and journalists can question politicians openly, as the Herald did.' In a statement, the Summerhall venue said: 'This event was booked as a series of long-form interviews prior to the guest list being confirmed. 'Summerhall Arts primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again.' Shona Robison, who succeeded Ms Forbes as Finance Secretary, also defended her colleague, calling Summerhall's decision 'unwise and unnecessary'.

US vice president JD Vance's family visit Glasgow museum
US vice president JD Vance's family visit Glasgow museum

STV News

time29 minutes ago

  • STV News

US vice president JD Vance's family visit Glasgow museum

The family of US vice president JD Vance have paid a visit to the Riverside Museum in Glasgow. Security staff, including Secret Service personnel, guarded Usha Vance, the wife of JD Vance, and her family as they visited the museum on Friday. It is believed the second lady of the US and her children visited Pollok House and Kelvingrove Art Gallery as part of their trip to the city. It comes after Vance was seen playing golf at one of Donald Trump's golf courses on the first morning of his holiday in Scotland. James Chapelard James Chapelard James Chapelard James Chapelard He landed at Prestwick Airport in South Ayrshire on Wednesday evening before travelling to the luxury Carnell Estate near Kilmarnock. On Thursday morning he headed to the Trump Turnberry resort on the Ayrshire coast and spent time playing on the golf course. It comes after the US president's own visit to Scotland last month, when he split his stay between Turnberry and his golf resort in Aberdeenshire. Vance was greeted by dozens of pro-Palestine protesters when he arrived at the Carnell Estate on Wednesday. The demonstrators waved Palestine flags and shouted pro-Palestine chants. Airspace restrictions are in place around the estate until Sunday. Vance will reportedly spend five days in Scotland – the same amount of time his boss Trump did during his trip to the country last month. Police Scotland previously said they have plans in place for a 'significant police operation' during Vance's time in Scotland. Vance had been holidaying in the Cotswolds but travelled to foreign secretary David Lammy's Chevening House retreat in Kent on Friday and joined him for some carp fishing. On Wednesday, Vance described the UK-US relationship as 'a beautiful alliance' during a speech at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Britain is getting worse and the old politics offers no solutions
Britain is getting worse and the old politics offers no solutions

Telegraph

time29 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britain is getting worse and the old politics offers no solutions

Is life in Britain getting better or worse? Fraser Nelson has ignited a vigorous debate by positing that 'broadly speaking there has never been a better time to live in the UK'. As evidence, he pointed out that overall crime, according to surveys, is only a third of the level of 25 years ago; that crime had fallen while immigration surged; that air pollution was at historically low levels; and that carbon emissions were falling. His assertion feels implausible. Still, one cannot simply dismiss it with anecdotes, or just claim the data is wrong. Data does matter, and it's not necessarily mistaken to use it to question the popular mood. After all, with Nelson as editor, The Spectator persistently opposed lockdowns on the basis that Covid was neither as dangerous nor as fast-spreading as the government claimed. Hard information proved the policy wrong. So what is it that jars to so many of us – including this writer? Well, first of all, it's that if you are trying to assess the quality of life in Britain you must use all available information and analyse it properly. In fact, overall crime has stopped falling and is ticking up again. Crimes as various as sexual assault and shoplifting, crimes that matter to us day-to-day, are going up significantly. Moreover we are all adjusting our behaviour as shops, streets, and trains feel more threatening, and as the police seem ever less on the side of the law-abiding. The data doesn't catch everything. And crime is only one element of the picture. We've had a serious spike in inflation and we can see prices going up yet again under the very uncertain hand of the Bank of England. Vast numbers of Britons have given up working. And GDP per head has grown barely 6 per cent since its pre-crash peak in 2007 – 0.3 per cent a year. In this steady state economy, the only way you get richer is if someone else gets poorer. Look no further for the source of the social conflict of recent years. So the wider data certainly gives a gloomier picture. But personally I believe something even more important is also going on. People are sensing the country is reaching a tipping point and that the future is going to be different to the past. When this happens, existing data will, self-evidently, tell you nothing reliable about the future. What a growing number of voters now see is that for 20 years we have taken the easy way out. We haven't dealt with our problems and we have carried on living on tick. But now the various bills must be paid and it is not going to be fun. For 20 years we have robbed selected wealthy Peter to pay collective Paul – or rather not pay, because we haven't run a budget surplus in any of those years and now one government pound in every twelve is spent on financing debt. It's not surprising people worry another financial crisis is coming. For 20 years we allowed immigration to increase to its highest ever levels. The consequences are now visible well beyond our major cities and we have nowhere to put illegal migrants except in hotels in hitherto untouched communities. Is it any wonder that people are suddenly agitated about the scale of the problem? For 20 years we told people that wind and sun could power Britain. Now they see fields covered with solar panels, their energy bills going up, and heavy industry leaving the country. Is it surprising that suddenly people think they have been sold a pup and fear the consequences? Even in those fortunate parts of the country that remain relatively untouched by migration or crime, people are beginning to ask themselves 'how long can it last'? No-one seems to think the problems can be fixed. All they hope to do is insulate themselves from them as long as they can. That's why people are right to be unhappy. So why have so many voices embarked on the implausible task of telling people things are not so bad? It's because they have to. After all, if the last twenty years have not been spent on turning Britain into a close approximation of the Elysian fields, but rather on complacently storing up difficulties that are now bursting out, why should anyone have confidence in the political ideas of that period or the parties and politicians in charge during it? The answer is that people won't have such confidence and will turn to others. That's why the establishment are so keen to persuade you that things are not as bad as they seem. 'Trust us, it's not so bad, we'll put things back on track.' Trust me, they won't. The people who got us here, who tried to stop us leaving the EU, who told us we had to rely on immigration, who said we could safely run down our energy systems and outsource the consequences to China: these people won't get us out again. Whatever Britain's future, it can't be like the past. Change is needed and change is surely coming.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store