French TV channel shutdown causes outcry on the right
PARIS, Feb 20 (Reuters) - France's top administrative court has upheld a decision to shut down popular TV channel C8 for repeated failures to respect human rights and protect minors, causing an outcry among some right-wing politicians who alleged an assault on free speech.
The C8 channel is part of the Canal+ group owned by conservative billionaire Vincent Bollore's media conglomerate Vivendi. The channel will go off air on March 1, after French media watchdog Arcom decided not to renew its 10-year licence and handed it to another bidding channel.
That decision was upheld late on Wednesday by the highest administrative court, which said Arcom had lawfully removed the licence, given C8's repeated failure to meet its contract obligations to respect people's rights and protect minors, but also its failure to turn a profit.
Right-wing politicians, including far-right opposition leader Marine Le Pen but also - more unusually - ruling conservatives were strongly critical.
Le Pen called it a "worrying decision that rules in favour of the Ayatollahs of group think".
Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, a conservative who is seen as having presidential ambitions, said C8 had "found an audience," and its removal was depriving it of a "space to express itself".
The court's ruling comes as Europe's policing of what can and cannot be said - either online or on TV - has been questioned by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration.
Vice-President JD Vance and billionaire Elon Musk have framed European attempts to place safeguards around an increasingly vitriolic and polarised media landscape as an attack on free speech.
Canal+ said it deplored the court's decision. Some 400 staff members and suppliers were likely to lose their jobs and C8 had proved its "liveliness" and popularity with more than 9 million viewers every day, it said in a statement.
"A whole ecosystem is being sacrificed," the group said.
Arcom imposed a record fine of 3.5 million euros ($3.66 million) on C8 in 2023 after its star show host, Cyril Hanouna, called a left-wing lawmaker a "piece of shit" and a "jerk" in 2022 for mentioning on its show the activities in Africa of C8's owner Bollore.
One of the warnings C8 received was over a decision to invite on the show a 17-year-old to talk about his parents' recent career move into pornography, which the regulator said could lead to the child being stigmatised in future.
Over the past few years, Bollore's media outlets have taken an increasingly right-wing turn, focusing on crime and immigration, as well as giving ample air time to politicians from Le Pen's party.
Media historian Alexis Levrier noted the court decision was based on a 1986 law passed by the conservative government of the day to regulate the media landscape.
"At the time, the moderate right knew that you can't allow everything on licences that belong to the state," he said on X.
($1 = 0.9565 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
8 hours ago
- ITV News
Jersey becomes first non-member of United Nations to host humanitarian aid meeting
Jersey has become the first non-member of the United Nations (UN) to host international talks, addressing humanitarian aid for those in crisis. The island was selected to co-chair the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Pooled Fund Working Group (PFWG) to discuss how smaller donors can reach the most severely affected countries through a coordinated approach. Officials from across the globe have joined discussions which include key decisions on how taxpayers' money in Jersey can provide life-saving support. Edward Lewis, Executive Director of Jersey Overseas Aid, explains: "Jersey is seen in the international sector; they wouldn't come here if they didn't think we had something to say and something to contribute. "The whole idea is widening the donor base and getting a broader constituency, which is really important in terms of having an effective response. "And for the next couple of days at least, Jersey is going to play a leading role." Currently, the island allocates approximately 0.3% of its budget to overseas aid - more than £17 million. Jersey Overseas Aid has also sent more than £7 million of aid to countries including Sudan, Syria, and Ukraine since 2016. David Throp, Chief of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), says: "The system as a whole has been going through financial difficulties. "We have seen cuts from big players, such as the Americans and other big European countries; every pound helps us save another life. "By putting the money together, we can do something bigger, better, more thought-out, and more influential on the beneficiaries and populations we're trying to assist. "Jersey has been very good at bringing leadership to the discussions. The island has been punching above its weight in guiding us." Alice Armanni-Sequi, one of the senior UN officials, says she's enjoyed the talks in Jersey so far, adding that getting the pooled funds right is vital for those in need. She explains: "We cover a range from food, shelter, health services, water, which is so critical and nutrition. "The list goes on, but the formula will depend on the location, so the great thing about the pooled funds is that we can really come up with the right recipe at the local level that really represents what people need." David adds: "Most of the funds, in particular the larger funds, are located in some of the more protracted emergencies. "We do have countries like the democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Afghanistan, the occupied Palestinian territories, where it is not a sudden onset and a quick finish - a more fundamental structural problem in the society. "The good thing about the model is that we can put these funds in place and phase them out as and when needed, depending on the changes in the situation." Mazen Fadhl Maddi represents the Field Medical Foundation (FMF) Yemen, and knows first hand how overseas aid is a lifeline for those who need it. He explains: "It saves lives. I have seen it personally - I have gone to the camps. "We are also giving communities resilience. The money translates into a lot of sectors, a lot of assistance, such as food assistance and nutrition. We have huge numbers of acute malnutrition in Yemen." Chair of Jersey Overseas Aid Commission, Carolyn Labey, says that while Jersey's contribution increases in line with the island's GDP, contributions can go further. She says: "We have connected our budget to GDP, so when the economy grows, our budget grows. "Our budget is currently fixed at 0.3% of GDP, and that isn't quite the OECD average, which is 0.36%. "The overall aim is to reach 0.7%, but there is a way to go there." The States of Guernsey aims to allocated 0.2% of its budget to overseas aid by 2030, however it is not part of the Pooled Fund Working Group, hence why no officials are attending this weeks meeting.
The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Two Israeli ministers sanctioned by UK for ‘inciting extremist violence'
The UK is taking the action to ramp up pressure on Israel alongside Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. Mr Lammy said the two Israeli ministers had been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months, they have been encouraging egregious abuses of human rights'. In a joint statement with foreign ministers from the four other countries who have announced sanctions, the Foreign Secretary said the two senior Israelis had also incited 'serious abuses of Palestinian human rights'. The statement added: 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account.' Downing Street said the two ministers had been sanctioned in their 'personal capacities'. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the two Israeli ministers had been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months' (Carlos Jasso/PA) Mr Smotrich and Mr Ben-Gvir both belong to right-wing parties which help to prop up Benjamin Netanyahu's fragile coalition government. Both have been criticised for their hardline stance on the war in Gaza. Mr Smotrich has campaigned against allowing aid into Gaza, and also supported the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law. Meanwhile, Mr Ben-Gvir has called for Gaza's people to be resettled from the territory. Asked if the Israeli government's actions in the Palestinian territories amounted to ethnic cleansing, Mr Lammy told reporters at the Foreign Office: 'I was clear to the House of Commons back in September that we did believe that there was a clear risk of a breach of international humanitarian law, and that's why we made a decision to suspend arms (sales). 'Today we are making a decision also to stand against those who encourage abuses of human rights, also to stand against those who encourage violence against Palestinian people.' The Foreign Secretary did not directly answer when asked why similar action had not been taken against Mr Netanyahu, and called on the Israeli government to 'disavow and condemn' the language used by the two ministers. Asked whether the UK would encourage Mr Netanyahu to sack the ministers, Mr Lammy said: 'The Israeli government will make their own determination.' But from the UK's perspective, he said: 'We have to be clear that we act when we see these egregious individuals encouraging – encouraging – abuses of human rights in this way.' A No 10 spokesman said the sanctions applied 'in their personal capacities, not their ministries and departments'. 'Ben-Gvir and Smotrich do not speak for all Israeli people … and have a long history of dangerous extremist and inflammatory views. 'As the Israeli ambassador to the UK has said in recent interviews, their statements in their ministerial capacities do not even represent government policy. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer wrote a joint statement with the French and Canadian leaders last month warning that Israel's leaders risked 'breaching International Humanitarian Law' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) 'Their agenda and actions undermine the interests of Israeli people, including security, many Israelis see this.' Israel's foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar said it was 'outrageous' that the UK had sanctioned the two ministers. He also said he had spoken with Mr Netanyahu and that an Israeli response would be decided at a 'special government meeting early next week'. Following the sanctions, Mr Ben-Gvir said: 'While the European colonial countries fantasise that we Jews are still their subjects, the streets of their famous cities are being taken over by radical Islam. 'But their campaign of appeasement for the Hamas terrorists will not save them. When they finally wake up, it will be too late.' The UK and its allies have increased pressure on Israel in recent months amid ongoing aid shortages in Gaza, as well as suggestions it could launch a new large-scale offensive into the territory. Reports suggest only scarce amounts of aid are making it into the hands of Gazans, amid a new aid initiative backed by the US and Israel, which has replaced the previous UN-run programme. The slow flow of food and medicines has prompted warnings of famine and starvation among the territory's population. In May, Mr Lammy paused negotiations towards a UK-Israel trade deal as the Government sought to pressure Israel to abandon its planned offensive into Gaza. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, France's President Emmanuel Macron and Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney also wrote a joint statement last month warning that Israel's leaders risked 'breaching International Humanitarian Law', and calling for more aid to be allowed into Gaza. Lord David Cameron said previously that he had considered sanctioning both Israeli ministers in his final days as foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's government (Ben Birchall/PA) Mr Netanyahu responded by claiming the three leaders were on the 'wrong side' of history. In September last year, the Government halted 30 out of around 350 arms sales licences to Israel, for fear they may be used for war crimes. Ministers insist that this means F-35 fighter jets used by Israel no longer receive replacement parts from the UK, and no British-made bombs or ammunition are used in Gaza. Lord David Cameron has previously said he considered sanctioning both Israeli ministers in his final days as foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government.
Fashion United
9 hours ago
- Fashion United
French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion
The French Senate is due to vote Tuesday on a bill to regulate the fast fashion industry, by sanctioning companies and banning advertisements. The bill is targeted at Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which has a reputation for selling lower quality clothes at a very low price. Easy to order and replace, fast fashion items are exported to France on a large scale, causing pollution and saturating markets. Adopted by the lower house National Assembly in March 2024, the bill will be voted on by the Senate later on Tuesday and is expected to pass, with backing from the government and widespread support in the chamber. The vote is not the final legislative hurdle: a joint committee of senators and lower house deputies is expected to meet from September to produce a joint text, prior to the final adoption of the law. The text plans to "reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry", said Anne-Cecile Violland, the centre-right member of parliament who proposed the bill. Fast fashion is a growing market in France and between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised products grew from 2.3 billion euros to 3.2 billion euros. Around 48 clothing items per person are released into the French market each year, and 35 are thrown away every second in the country, according to the state environmental agency Ademe. Fast fashion poses a "triple threat", said the minister for ecological transition, Agnes Pannier-Runacher. "It promotes overconsumption, causes ecological disaster and threatens our businesses," she said. Slamming an "invasion" of products that "do not last", the minister expressed hope it would help change things in Europe. Once adopted in France, the European Commission will be notified to ensure it complies with European law according to Pannier-Runacher. Targeting fast fashion The Senate, dominated by the right, modified the bill to target "ultra" fast fashion companies, such as Asian websites Shein ou Temu. The Senate's amendments plan to leave out French and European brands that may be affected by the bill, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. The fashion giants will still be obliged to notify their customers about the environmental impact of their products, according to the new bill. "I have no intention of making French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality pay a single euro," said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast fashion companies by scoring their "environmental communication". This "eco-score" will affect all fast fashion companies, Pannier-Runacher said. Those with the lowest scores will be taxed by the government up to 5 euros per product in 2025 and up to 10 euros by 2030. This tax cannot go beyond 50 percent of the price of the original product. Advertisement ban The bill would impose sanctions on influencers who promote such products and ban fast fashion advertisements. The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed with a "collective effort", and not by targeting "a single actor," Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on Monday. According to Ruffat, the law will add "a tax of 10 euros per sold item of clothing by 2030" and "impact the purchasing power" of French people. Environmental organisations are also worried that the law may be misinterpreted. Debates may amount to an interesting framework which still lacks substance, according to Green Senator Jacques Fernique. On Monday, the Textiles Industry Union (UIT) recognised the bill as "a first step" and hoped for its "rapid adoption ... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations".(AFP)
