logo
Go time in the House

Go time in the House

Politico12-05-2025

Presented by
With help from Benjamin Guggenheim
LET'S DO IT: Here's some of the bad news for House GOP tax writers — they still need to bring down the cost of their tax bill ahead of a planned Tuesday mark-up, as Pro Tax's Benjamin Guggenheim noted over the weekend.
Now, for some good news for them: There are certainly feasible paths for House Republicans to bring the cost of the tax portion of their one large fiscal package to around $4 trillion over a decade — which is about where they'll need to land, given the amount of spending cuts they're poised to compile.
And then more bad news: Those paths might require difficult political decisions on ways to generate more cost-savings in the tax code.
JCT estimated over the weekend that the more bare-bones version of the Ways and Means tax plan, released deep into Friday evening, would cost around $5 trillion over a decade.
But by design, those 28 pages of text avoided hot-button issues like how Republicans might raise the $10,000 cap on state and local deductions, whether they'll seek to limit companies' ability to write off their SALT payments and how they might try to wring savings out of the green energy incentives passed by Democrats during the Biden administration.
House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.) is expected to release fuller details on the tax plan as soon today, ahead of that Tuesday mark-up. Smith will be hosting a briefing on the full tax bill this afternoon, along with his fellow House GOP tax writers.
All of that suggests that House Republicans likely have already made some of the hard choices they were faced with on the tax bill. Smith and the other Ways and Means Republicans largely have succeeded in keeping the details close to the vest, and they surely have incentive to keep that going as long as they can heading into the markup — to keep any opposition from mobilizing against their more controversial decisions.
So stay tuned also for more on how House Republicans plan to disperse further tax goodies, including President Donald Trump's favored tax relief ideas and restoring incentives prized by the business community.
And keep in mind: This is far from the final stage for a big GOP tax bill in 2025.
House and Senate Republicans also have stayed in close contact in recent weeks as the Ways and Means Committee was developing its tax bill.
Senate Republicans will face the larger procedural hurdles in trying to pass a large fiscal package by budget reconciliation. But by most accounts, top GOP tax writers in both chambers have tried to coordinate to avoid a particularly bumpy process if and when the House sends the one big, beautiful bill to the Senate.
MORE ON ALL THIS in a bit, after we welcome you to a mark-up week version of Weekly Tax. What's a better combo than Barcelona and Travis Scott, we ask? A winter coat and 1100 Longworth.
Is this part in the movie? Today marks 62 years since a then-unknown Bob Dylan declined to appear on 'The Ed Sullivan Show,' after lawyers at CBS raised concern that the singer-songwriter's number 'Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues' might open the network up to a defamation suit.
The tax times definitely are a changing. Tell us about it.
Email: bbecker@politico.com, bfaler@politico.com, bguggenheim@politico.com and teckert@politico.com.
You can also reach us on X at @berniebecker3, @tobyeckert, @brian_faler, @ben_guggenheim, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
LET'S DIVE IN FURTHER: Perhaps the most contentious issue still facing House Republicans is what to do on SALT deductions for individuals.
And we know this is an issue where the GOP still needs to find some common ground: House GOP leaders, tax writers and blue-state Republicans are set to huddle again this morning to work toward a solution.
It's not just a political issue for House Republicans, either. They need a SALT deal because the House has to have the revenue to make the math work. (Even a SALT cap a fair bit higher than $10,000 would raise hundreds of billions of dollars against the budget baseline the House is using.)
Negotiations over the last week or so underscored that Republicans from California, New Jersey and New York aren't totally on the same page on what kind of SALT cap might be acceptable.
And there's also some debate over just how much leverage the truly committed members of the SALT caucus have. More hardline SALT Republicans have said they're willing to tank an entire GOP tax bill over the issue.
But would they follow through? Allowing the temporary provisions of the 2017 Trump tax cuts to expire would mean a net tax increase on the vast majority of residents in even those wealthier blue-state districts.
The waiting is the hardest part: The business community has made it clear for weeks that they're worried that House Republicans might eat into their SALT deductions.
Probably with good reason, too — there's still chatter that Republicans are eyeing that area for fresh revenues.
Business advocates argue that such a move would amount to keeping companies from deducting ordinary expenses — a long-accepted part of the tax system. (They'd also say it's a false symmetry to say that business SALT should be capped because individual taxpayers face SALT limits.)
'Business SALT is an important tax tool used by companies of all sizes across the country, and capping it is a backdoor corporate rate increase that would reduce the ability of retailers to invest in their workers, operations, and communities,' Courtney Titus Brooks, the vice president for tax at Retail Industry Leaders Association, said over the weekend.
How about some immediate benefits: House Republicans did fiddle around with some of those expiring parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, at least in part to offer some added benefits to voters before next year's midterms.
That includes a temporary boost to the Child Tax Credit, which would max out at $2,500 (instead of the current $2,000) for the current tax year. The standard deduction would increase by $2,000 for married couples for this year, as well for taxpayers to claim in the 2026 filing season.
Still, progressive advocates knocked the House GOP's proposed CTC expansion, arguing that it gave more assistance to better off families than to those who need it the most.
Around 17 million children currently live in families where the parents don't earn enough to get the maximum $2,000 credit, and the new House bill doesn't give them a boost. 'Republicans' new Child Tax Credit proposal pushes MORE children into poverty,' said Adam Ruben of Economic Security Project Action.
The House GOP proposal also requires that both parents have a Social Security number to claim the CTC, something that could make around 4.5 million children who were born in the U.S. or are legal permanent residents ineligible for the credit. But it's probably not too big of a surprise that House Republicans went in that direction, given the party's current stance on immigration.
And how about one more: The House GOP proposal also makes some changes to the current 20 percent deduction for pass-through businesses — boosting it to 22 percent, while also making a variety of eligibility changes.
That change comes as business lobbyists are pressing Republicans to make sure that they extend the expiring TCJA provisions for good, as well as taking care of the pass-through deduction and lower rates on the foreign income of multinational corporations, among other things.
'For the past two years, we've worked in lockstep with Congress to ensure the success of this bill,' said Stef Webb of the National Association of Manufacturers, which sent a letter on the matter to Smith and Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday.
Around the World
Bloomberg: 'Nigeria Overhauls Colonial-Era Tax Rules in Pro-Business Push.'
Financial Times: 'Uber wins multimillion-pound reprieve on disputed UK tax payments.'
Reuters: 'Congo gold miner halts operations in tax dispute with M23 rebel administration.'
Around the Nation
Atlanta Journal-Constitution: 'Georgia's tax-cutting binge may come with a cost.
Alabama Reflector: 'Gov. Kay Ivey signs grocery tax cut into law.'
Alaska Beacon: 'Dunleavy administration is blocking billion-dollar audit of oil tax disputes, legislators say.'
Also Worth Your Time
The latest on DOGE: 'Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from laying off federal employees.'
Washington Post: 'Even as pope, Leo XIV might have to deal with U.S. tax returns.'
Financial Times: 'US military leaders wade into fight over tax breaks for critical minerals.'
Did you know?
Tedham Porterhouse and Blind Boy Grunt were among the various aliases used by Bob Dylan over the year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio
Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio

Gina Ortiz Jones, a lesbian and military veteran who served in President Joe Biden's administration, has been elected mayor of San Antonio, the second-largest city in Texas and seventh-largest in the U.S. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Jones beat Rolando Pablos, a former Texas secretary of state, in a runoff election Saturday. The margin was 54.3 percent to 45.7 percent, according to Ballotpedia. They advanced to the runoff because no candidate out of 27 in the May 3 general election received a majority of the vote. In the general election, Jones led with 27.2 percent and Pablos came in second with 16.6 percent. The current mayor, Ron Nirenberg, could not run again due to term limits. Races for mayor and other city positions in San Antonio are officially nonpartisan, but this election was partisan in practice. Jones emphasized her affiliation with the Democratic Party, while Pablos, who was elected secretary of state as a Republican, highlighted his ties to leading Republicans such as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. RELATED: Jones was undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration; she was the first lesbian, second member of the LGBTQ+ community, and first woman of color (she's Filipina American) to serve in the post. She twice ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. House as a Democrat. She was an intelligence officer in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq during the war there, serving under 'don't ask, don't tell.' After leaving the Air Force, she worked for the federal government as an adviser on intelligence and trade, with agencies including the Defense Intelligence Agency and Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. She left government service six months into Donald Trump's first term. In the mayoral race, 'she campaigned on her plans to expand early-childhood education to more children and increase affordable housing and work programs for unskilled workers,' The New York Times reports. 'San Antonio showed up and showed out,' she told supporters Saturday night after the results came in. 'We reminded them that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind. … So I look forward to being a mayor for all.' RELATED: Lesbian Gina Ortiz Jones Wants to Be Texas's First Out Congress Member Two other cities among the largest 10 in the nation have had LGBTQ+, specifically lesbian, mayors. Annise Parker was mayor of Texas's largest city, Houston, from 2010 to 2016. Until recently, she was president and CEO of the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund. Houston is the fourth-largest city in the U.S. Another lesbian, Lori Lightfoot, was mayor of Chicago, the third-largest, from 2019 to 2023. Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson hailed Jones's victory, releasing this statement: 'Every one of us deserves leaders who value equality and will fight to ensure that we can live freely without fear of discrimination. Gina Ortiz Jones is that leader. That's why HRC was proud to make calls and knock doors to help mobilize Equality Voters in San Antonio and put her over the finish line. Her win isn't just exciting, it's historic; as the first ever openly LGBTQ+ mayor of San Antonio during a time of ceaseless attacks on our community, Gina is emblematic of the resilience, strength, and joy that our community has already used to thrive in challenging times. We can't wait to see her get to work tackling the problems that are impacting our neighbors, families and coworkers and standing up for the rights and safety of every San Antonian.' Evan Low, president and CEO of LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, which endorsed Jones, issued this statement: 'Gina Ortiz-Jones is LGBTQ+ Victory Fund family, and we are proud to see her rise to lead America's seventh-largest city as mayor. As a veteran, her service reflects the estimated 1 million LGBTQ+ veterans who have contributed to our nation with honor, distinction, and an unyielding warrior spirit. San Antonio voters made the right call by sending Gina to City Hall, not only making history but selecting a candidate who is driven to make lives better in her hometown.' Jones will be sworn in June 18 for a four-year term.

Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0
Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0

Axios

time28 minutes ago

  • Axios

Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0

Sen. Adam Schiff has some advice for President Trump when attempting to demean him: Pick one nickname. Why it matters: Schiff rose to cable TV stardom as an anti-Trump foil while leading the first impeachment. "Shifty Schiff" or "Watermelon Head" learned to give as good as he got. Trump called Schiff names. Schiff ensured he was impeached — twice. "[T]he cardinal rule of nicknames is: Just stick with one," Schiff told Axios in an interview. Schiff translated his MAGA notoriety into a safe Senate seat, first battling through a tough, expensive primary. Now he's ready for round two with Trump. "I've been thrust back into a lot of that responsibility again because what he's trying to do in the second term is even worse than what he tried to do in the first term," Schiff said. Zoom out: Before Trump dominated the national conversation, Schiff considered himself a fairly nonpartisan national security expert. He endorsed Jim Mattis for Secretary of Defense in 2016 when other Democrats didn't. Schiff had hoped for another rebrand in the Senate. "I was expecting a Biden or a Harris presidency, and the ability to just focus exclusively on what positive things I could get done," he told Axios. What to watch: He is enjoying visiting redder areas of the state after spending years representing just a slice of heavily Democratic Los Angeles. He shared about one such visit in the state's northeast. "I knew I had made progress when one of the farmers looked at me and said, 'I don't know why he calls you watermelon head. You have a perfectly normal-sized head.'" But it's doubtful he'll revert back to a less partisan posture, given the direction of Trump's second term. Driving the news: Two days after our interview, Trump deployed National Guard troops to tamp down on ICE protests in Los Angeles in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.). "This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation," Schiff posted on X on Saturday. He also repeatedly called for violence to stop at protests. "Assaulting law enforcement is never ok," he posted Sunday. Zoom in: Schiff tried to pass a resolution shortly before our interview to stop the administration from stripping civil rights leader Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship. He has demanded financial disclosures from the White House, written letters to stop DOGE from shutting down USDA offices and tried to block the repeal of EV rules. "Most of my days are spent trying to walk this line between stopping the administration from violating the law and ignoring the Constitution on the one hand," Schiff said, "and continuing to deliver for Californians..." Schiff recognizes that his clashes altered his career trajectory. "I have my brand pre-Trump and my brand post-Trump," Schiff told Axios. Between the lines: Schiff's leadership in the House's first Trump impeachment made him a mortal enemy to Trump and his allies, leading to a "weirdly personal" dynamic, Schiff said.

Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts
Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts

Axios

time28 minutes ago

  • Axios

Democrats target farmers on Trump's DOGE cuts

Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) will hold a "shadow hearing" Thursday to draw a direct link between President Trump's plans to cut foreign assistance and the farmers that sell their crops to the programs. Why it matters: Democrats are looking for ways to make Trump's DOGE and budget plans uncomfortable for farm state Republicans and want to appeal directly to their constituents. The Trump administration has called for deep spending reductions for international food programs run by the United States Agency for International Development and the Department of Agriculture. Those programs buy agricultural products from U.S. farmers to the tune of $2 billion a year, according to Shaheen. Some farm state Republicans have questioned administration st officials about programs like Food for Peace. Zoom out: Democrats are trying to broaden their case against the Trump administration's budget, which will receive its first official vote this week, when the House brings up Trump's rescissions package, which cuts funding for NPR, PBS and USAID. Zoom in: On Thursday, Shaheen, the ranking member on the foreign relations committee, and Klobuchar, the ranking member of the agriculture subcommittee on nutrition and forestry will host a group of experts to detail the effect of the cuts to foreign aid on U.S. farmers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store