Sanctioned Russian ship intercepted by Coast Guard after docking in Louth
Coast Guard
and gardaí in the early hours of Wednesday morning after docking in a harbour in Co Louth.
The Shtandart is subject to European sanctions imposed following Russia's 2022
invasion of Ukraine
, preventing it from doing business with EU countries or visiting their ports.
The vessel is a replica of Russia's first naval flagship, commissioned in 1703 by Tsar Peter the Great, and operates as a training ship in European waters. It has only been able to dock a handful of times in the last year.
The ship drew significant attention on Monday when it arrived in Killiney Bay off south Dublin and laid anchor a few hundred metres from the shore. Crew members and supplies were ferried from the shore on dinghies.
READ MORE
On Tuesday the Shtandart was approached by Irish Naval Service ship LÉ Aoibhinn which interrogated its captain, Vladimir Martus, over its intentions.
Mr Martus said on Tuesday he had not applied for permission to dock in Ireland as he knew it would be denied. However, he said he may have to dock somewhere soon to take on fresh drinking water.
[
'We do not support Putin': On board the sanctioned Russian ship in Killiney Bay
Opens in new window
]
The ship departed Dublin waters around 3pm on Tuesday before sailing north. Shortly after midnight it docked at Port Oriel, a small fishing harbour in Clogherhead, Co Louth, according to ship tracking software.
The Irish Coast Guard had been tracking the movements of the vessel and sent a unit to the scene. A Garda unit also attended.
Coast Guard personnel boarded and checked the ship's papers. The Shtandart departed several hours later at 6am.
It sailed north and left Irish waters on Wednesday afternoon.
The Department of Transport, which regulates marine traffic, said the Coast Guard was engaged in 'routine remote monitoring' and 'observed the progress of an alleged sanctioned Russian vessel through the Irish waters'.
'When it appeared that the vessel had entered Port Oriel, Co Louth, the Coast Guard informed An Garda Síochána and other relevant agencies.'
The department said it understands the vessel docked at 'an unmonitored pier' at about 1.30am and that no permission was sought or received.
Asked if the ship was in breach of sanctions by docking, the department said Port Oriel is under the remit of Louth County Council. 'The department is awaiting a report from Louth County Council on the matter so as to ascertain all the facts,' a spokesman said.
Contacted at sea on Wednesday evening, Mr Martus confirmed he visited the port and took on fresh drinking water with the help of some 'friendly fishermen'.
He said the Coast Guard boarded the vessel and were also very friendly. 'They took a very human approach. They could have made a problem but they didn't.'
Asked if he was breaching sanctions by docking in Co Louth, Mr Martus said he had been advised by Irish authorities that there would not be a problem.
Pro-Ukraine groups have accused the Shtandart as operating as a propaganda vessel for the Russian regime. The ship has also been accused of breaching maritime law, including by turning off its transponder signal to hide its movements.
Mr Martus has denied being a propaganda vessel and said he is against the Putin government and the war in Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
A letter from Michael O'Leary: ‘MetroLink is a mad, bad project'
Sir, – Unbelievable!! Only an Irish Times columnist (with no known experience in transport) could waste her half-page column, slagging off Dermot Desmond and myself for criticising the Dublin MetroLink, without once mentioning the projected cost of approximately €20 billion!! Being criticised by Irish Times columnists is always a great compliment. In what crazy country could we seriously consider wasting approximately €20 billion of taxpayer money on a railway line, serving a narrow strip of the north Dublin population from Swords to St Stephen's Green, all of whom are well served currently by bus connections? The cost/benefit of this insanity has never been published, because it cannot be justified. Dermot Desmond's transport view should carry significant weight, given his very successful rescue, redevelopment and sale of London City Airport for approximately $1 billion in 2006. My own, (less?) humble view is based on almost 40 years' experience of growing, what is now the world's largest passenger airline. READ MORE But sadly we are both guilty of 'being rich', so therefore dismissed by The Irish Times 'experts', who know so much more about transport. I wouldn't quibble with a MetroLink from Swords to St Stephen's Green if it was free, but there are far better uses of taxpayer funds, than this white elephant. Muddled thinking, free of any cost/benefit analysis, such as that displayed by Justine McCarthy, is how you deliver a children's hospital (which should have cost €200 million) at a final cost of €2.5 billion and rising. My criticism of the MetroLink is based on the fact, that very few passengers at Dublin Airport will ever use it. It takes passengers into St Stephen's Green, so some small minority of inbound visitors might use it, but the vast majority of Irish originating passengers, who need to get to Dublin Airport early in the morning, or are travelling to/from outside the D2 / D4 area, won't use it. Dublin Airport is just 9km from the centre of the city, and is well served by competitively priced bus connections, which takes passengers to the city centre, and to points all over Ireland at low fares. These passengers won't switch to a €20 billion metro. Your columnist claims that I 'opposed the second terminal at Dublin Airport in 2010. I didn't. Dublin needed a second terminal l and I offered to build it on the North Apron for just €200 million, as Ryanair had proposed. I simply pointed out that the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA), wasted €2 billion, building Terminal 2 in the wrong place (a cul-de-sac) and with no ability to future expand. Now that the second runway has opened on the north apron, the chronic congestion in the T2 cul-de-sac bedevils the T2 airlines on a daily basis. I note Ms McCarthy failed to offer her opinion on the Dublin Airport second runway (a project which I also supported), yet which the airlines and our passengers are prevented from using, by a 2007 (Road Traffic) Planning restriction. We elected a new government last November which promised to remove this cap 'as soon as possible', which would enable the airlines at Dublin to grow traffic, new routes, tourism and jobs. Sadly, eight months later the Government has failed to take any action to scrap this cap. More inexcusable delay and inaction from our political class. To summarise, both I and Dermot Desmond believe, wasting €20 billion on a Dublin Airport metro, is an unjustifiable waste of scarce taxpayer funds. I object because the majority of Dublin Airport passengers won't ever use this vastly overpriced service. Dermot correctly suggests that Al and electric road transport will solve the problem at a fraction of this €20 billion over the next decade. The fact that an unqualified Irish Times columnist considers that 'two rich men' are wrong, only renews my faith that this MetroLink is a mad, bad project. Add some more buses to service the citizens of Swords, Ballymun, Collins Avenue, and Glasnevin, and The Irish Times could save Irish taxpayers (me included!) about €19.9 billion rather than squandering these funds, as we have on the world's most expensive, and least efficient, Children's Hospital. If the next time Ms McCarthy wants to offer an opinion on government transport projects, perhaps she could address the cost benefit of the project, rather than slagging off two successful – albeit opinionated – business people. We won't always be right, but we will be right, far more often than the misguided, anti-business Irish Times 'chatterati'. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL O'LEARY. Chief Executive, Ryanair, Dublin.
Sunday World
6 hours ago
- Sunday World
Mary Robinson travels to Rafah Crossing and says Israel deliberately blocking Gaza aid
Robinson's visit comes following Tánaiste Simon Harris joint statement with EU counterparts Speaking to reporters on the Egyptian side of the closed border crossing point she said that some aid trucks are being rejected at the border 'for no reason at all'. A delegation from The Elders' a global organization advocating for peace â€' including Mary Robinson, former President of The Elders and former President of Ireland, and Helen Clark, Member of The Elders and former Prime Minister of New Zealand, during their inspection visit to the Rafah border crossing at the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza on August 11, 2025 in Rafah, Egypt. The Elders are an NGO of former statesmen, peace activists and human rights advocates, who were first convened by Nelson Mandela in 2007 (Photo by) The former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said: 'We have seen in the warehouse the tents that have not been delivered, the generators that have not been delivered, the wheelchairs, the crutches, the children's books and other things that have not been delivered. 'But some food is getting in, it was interesting to talk to a driver who was rejected for the second time because of minor problems, even though there is very good checking, as we know by the Egyptian Red Crescent and by the UN in collaboration.' "We know many are rejected often for no reason at all. Although people are working on this side, people are not working as hard on the other side,' she added. 'All of the obstruction is on the other side. It is devastating. It is utterly devastating to see the sheer volume of vital materials sitting [there]. Oxygen tanks, generators, wheelchairs, crutches, it's unbelievable.' Ms Robinson visited the crossing as a member of 'The Elders' – a group of former national leaders that once included Nelson Mandela – along with Helen Clarke, the former prime minister of New Zealand. In a statement afterwards, they described what was happening in Gaza as 'unfolding genocide and famine' and called for international sanctions on Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his country's security cabinet who have been responsible for planning the war which has killed 60,000 Palestinians. A delegation from The Elders a global organization advocating for peace â€' including Mary Robinson, former President of The Elders and former President of Ireland, and Helen Clark, Member of The Elders and former Prime Minister of New Zealand, with Major General Khaled Megaour, Governor of North Sinai, during their inspection visit to the Rafah border crossing at the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza on August 11, 2025 in Rafah, Egypt. The Elders are an NGO of former statesmen, peace activists and human rights advocates, who were first convened by Nelson Mandela in 2007 (Photo by) They called on other countries to halt shipments of weapons to Israel, among other measures, including the suspension of trade agreements, including with the EU. "The uncomfortable truth is that many states are prioritising their own economic and security interests, even as the world is reeling from the images of Gazan children starving to death,' they said following their three-day visit. Ms Robinson and Ms Clark also expressed their 'shock and outrage at Israel's deliberate obstruction of the entry of life-saving humanitarian aid into Gaza, causing mass starvation to spread'. 'The targeted killing of journalist Anas al-Sharif and four of his colleagues in Gaza is an attempt to silence the truth,' they said. 'What we saw and heard underlines our personal conviction that there is not only an unfolding, human-caused famine in Gaza. There is an unfolding genocide.' Tánaiste Simon Harris has also signed a joint statement alongside the foreign ministers of 24 countries, in which they say 'unfolding before our eyes'. The joint statement comes a day after Mr Harris, who is also Foreign Affairs Minister, spoke with his EU counterparts about the situation in Gaza. 'The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes,' the statement said. 'Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised. 'However, due to restrictive new registration requirements, essential international NGOs (non-governmental organisations) may be forced to leave the OPTs (Occupied Palestinian Territories) imminently, which would worsen the humanitarian situation still further.' AL-ARISH, EGYPT - AUGUST 11: Mary Robinson, former President of The Elders and former President of Ireland, inspecting an aid warehouse in Al-Arish near Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza on August 11, 2025 in Al-Arish, Egypt. The Elders are an NGO of former statesmen, peace activists and human rights advocates, who were first convened by Nelson Mandela in 2007 (Photo by) United Nations agencies and International NGOs, including partners of Irish aid agency Trócaire, also released a statement last week in which they condemned the new registration requirements imposed by Israel. They have warned that unless there is a policy change introduced 'most international NGO partners could be de-registered by 9 September'. 'Immediate, permanent and concrete steps must be taken to facilitate safe, large-scale access for the UN, international NGOs and humanitarian partners,' the signatories added. 'All crossings and routes must be used to allow a flood of aid into Gaza, including food, nutrition supplies, shelter, fuel, clean water, medicine and medical equipment. 'Lethal force must not be used at distribution sites, and civilians, humanitarians and medical workers must be protected." The foreign ministers also thanked the US, Qatar and Egypt for their efforts in pushing for a ceasefire and pursuing peace. They also called for a ceasefire that will bring an end to the war, the release of hostages and for aid to enter Gaza unhindered. The statement has been signed by the foreign ministers of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK. The EU high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas, as well as the EU commissioner for the Mediterranean and the EU commissioner for equality also signed the document. However, a number of EU member countries, including Germany and Hungary, did not add their signatures.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Ireland's AI future: the clock is ticking
Given the scale of the claims being made for artificial intelligence, it is striking how slow the Oireachtas has been to give the subject sustained attention. AI is routinely described as having the potential to transform society, disrupt the global political order and even alter what it means to be human. Yet it was only this year that the Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence began its work, holding its first public session in June. This week its chair, Fianna Fáil TD Malcolm Byrne, set out his thinking on what must happen next. Byrne believes Ireland could position itself as 'the AI island' but warns that the opportunity will be lost without swift and decisive action. He says he would be disappointed if both a new AI office and an AI observatory are not operational by next year. The office will be tasked with implementing the EU's AI Act, while the observatory will assess the technology's effects, from employment disruption to identifying future skills needs. In Byrne's view, those who embrace AI will displace those who do not, whether they are doctors, architects or lawyers. He welcomes the Government's plan for an AI summit during Ireland's EU presidency in 2026 and argues for clear ethical frameworks in education, where students are already using AI tools. He also points to the technology's current uses in Ireland, from automating recycling processes to analysing tax data. Such calls for urgency are sensible and overdue. But preparing the State for the changes ahead will require far more than offices, observatories and summits. The debate is complicated by the sweeping and often speculative claims surrounding AI, from the elimination of entire job categories to science-fiction visions of superintelligent machines destroying the human race. This discourse is unfolding against the backdrop of a global investment surge, with leading AI companies commanding extraordinary valuations and data centres proliferating at breakneck speed. History suggests such frenzies rarely end without turbulence. READ MORE Byrne's proposals are shaped by the EU's AI Act, which will impose a detailed regulatory roadmap over the coming years. That approach contrasts sharply with the let it rip stance favoured by Donald Trump's administration in the US, and with the UK's less prescriptive, more innovation-oriented strategy. Which philosophy will prove more effective is an open question but the divergence will have real consequences for competitiveness. If Ireland is serious about becoming 'the AI island', it must reckon with the reality that others are moving faster and with considerable resources. Ambition is necessary, but so too is a clear-eyed appraisal of the scale of the challenge and the pace of change. Without that, the island will be an observer, not a leader, in the age of AI.
