'I was in shock,' Kyiv resident says after deadly Russian strikes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
WASHINGTON (AP) — News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving to criminally investigate the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. Here's a look at what's known and not yet known about the latest Justice Department revelation:
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
WASHINGTON (AP) — News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving to criminally investigate the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. Here's a look at what's known and not yet known about the latest Justice Department revelation: A saga with a long backstory Perhaps no issue continues to aggravate President Donald Trump more than the assessment by intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf and the investigation by law enforcement into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow to tip the outcome of the contest. Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tapped as special counsel by Trump's first Justice Department to investigate, found that Russia had waged a multi-prong operation in Trump's favor and that the Republican president's campaign welcomed the aid. But Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. As president for a second time, Trump has made no secret of his desire to use the Justice Department as a weapon of retribution against perceived political adversaries he sees as having smeared him, including by calling for Obama-era officials to be jailed. And his administration, now more broadly and across multiple agencies, has been engaged in a effort to reopen the long-accepted conclusion — including among prominent Republicans — of Russian interference and to scrutinize the officials involved in reaching that assessment. A Bondi grand jury directive Bondi, a Trump loyalist, has directed Justice Department prosecutors to present evidence related to the Russia inquiry to a grand jury. Grand juries are tools used by prosecutors to issue subpoenas for records and prosecutors and to produce indictments based on the evidence they receive. The bar is low for an indictment given that the presentation of evidence by prosecutors is one-sided, though grand juries do have the option to decline to indict and have done so in the past. A person familiar with the matter confirmed Bondi's directive to The Associated Press but key questions remain. It was not disclosed, for instance, which prosecutors are pursuing the investigation, where the grand jury that might hear evidence is located and whether and when law enforcement officials might seek to bring criminal charges. The Justice Department, in an unusual statement last month, appeared to confirm the existence of an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director James Brennan but provided no details or specifics. Potential targets of probe remain unclear It's not clear who might be targeted in the investigation, but the Trump administration has been aggressively challenging intelligence community conclusions about Russia's actions and intentions that had long ago seemed settled. It's been a welcome diversion for the administration as it confronts a wave of criticism from Trump's base and conservative influencers over the handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. In the last month, Trump administration officials and allies have released a series of documents aimed at casting doubt on the extent of interference and at portraying the original Russia investigation as an Obama administration frame-job. The documents have been hailed as incontrovertible proof of a conspiracy, but a close inspection of the records shows they fall well short of that. Among the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, the administration's director of national intelligence, are emails from 2016 showing that Obama administration officials recognized in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in favor of Trump. But the absence of evidence that votes were switched — something the Obama administration never alleged — has no bearing on the ample evidence of other forms of Russia interference, including a hack-and-leak operation involving Democratic emails and a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and spreading disinformation. Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a previously classified annex of a 2023 report by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct in the Russia probe. The annex included a series of emails, including one from July 2016 that was purportedly sent by a senior staffer at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, that referred to a plan approved by then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to falsely link Trump to Russia. But Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation. Fresh scrutiny has also centered around the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference, which was published in January 2017. An annex in a classified version of the assessment contained a summary of the so-called Steele dossier — a compilation of opposition research that included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip about Trump and Russia. The latest in a series of investigations Just as Russian interference has been heavily scrutinized, so too has the U.S. government's response to it. Multiple government reports, including not only from Mueller but also a Republican-led Senate intelligence committee that included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have documented Russia's activities in sweeping details. To be sure, reports from the Justice Department inspector general and Durham also identified significant flaws in the FBI's Russia investigation, including errors and omissions in applications the Justice Department submitted to a secretive surveillance court to eavesdrop on a national security adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign. But Durham found no criminal wrongdoing among government officials, bringing three criminal cases — two against private citizens that resulted in acquittals at trial and a third against a little-known FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email. It is unclear if there is any criminal wrongdoing that exists that Durham, who launched his investigation in 2019 and concluded it four years later, somehow missed during his sprawling inquiry.
Vancouver Sun
5 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Putin's high-flying sexy secret daughter is now on Team Ukraine
He's gonna be Vlad as hell! The secret jet-setting daughter of Russian despot Vladimir Putin has allegedly turned back on the Motherland and is now supporting Ukraine in the bloody three-year conflict. European reports claim Elizaveta Rudnova has now ditched her 'beloved' St. Petersburg for Paris where she will no doubt continue flying to hot spots in private planes, cloaked in pricy designer wear and knocking back Champagne by the gallon. The Kremlin has always denied that Putin has any relation to 22-year-old Elizaveta Rudnova. In Paris, Putin's suspected princess works at two anti-war art galleries. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Now, she claims she is living in self-imposed exile, lamenting being unable to 'make an extra lap around my beloved St. Petersburg.' In one thinly veiled attack, she blasted the Vlad Hatter as the 'man who took millions of lives and destroyed mine.' She wrote: 'It's liberating to be able to show my face to the world again. It reminds me of who I am and who destroyed my life.' Russian sources say Rudnov was born in 2003, the result of one of Putin's numerous sexual assignations. Her mother is reportedly former cleaning woman Svetlana Krivonogikh, now in her 40s. She is now a multimillionaire, somehow owning a $100 million property empire and a stake in the Rossiya Bank. In addition, she owns a St. Petersburg sex club called Leningrad Centre and well known for its raunchy shows. Love child Rudnova was raised in luxury, often flaunting her staggering wealth and luxe lifestyle as the country grappled with poverty, the pandemic and the bloody war with Ukraine. And then she disappeared from social media, perhaps irking her father with her tone deaf posts. Like generations of Russian exiles, she reemerged in Paris. This time, she used the name Elizaveta Rudnova. Ukraine claimed she abandoned the patronymic Vladimirovna, which would confirm her father's name as Vladimir. She graduated from ICART School of Cultural and Art Management in 2024 and 'works' at two Parisian galleries — L Galerie in Belleville and Espace Albatros in Montreuil — both host anti-war and dissident exhibitions. Not everyone is pleased with the antics of the Russian princess, particularly ex-pats forced to flee the Russian strongman's wrath. To the exiles, she's like barf in the borscht. Artist Nastya Rodionova severed ties with the galleries when she learned of Rudnova's involvement. 'It is inadmissible to allow a person who comes from a family of beneficiaries of [Putin's] regime to come into confrontation with the victims of that regime,' she wrote on Facebook. 'My personal answer in this case is no.' One of the gallery directors told The Times : 'She looks like Putin but so do 100,000 other people. I haven't seen a DNA test.' Putin officially recognizes only two daughters from his previous marriage. He has never acknowledged Luiza — nor denied her. Also part of the Putin paternity patch is former gymnast-turned-media mogul Alina Kabaeva. She is reportedly the mother of several of his children, and again, the despot has not commented on the relationship or alleged children with Kaebeva. bhunter@ @HunterTOSun
