logo
The learning board: continuous education as a governance imperative

The learning board: continuous education as a governance imperative

IOL News4 days ago
The pace of change in technology, climate governance, geopolitical tensions, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory shifts demands more than static knowledge. It calls for a governance mindset that embraces learning as a strategic necessity.
Image: AI Lab
Nqobani Mzizi
In today's dynamic environment, a board's effectiveness is measured not just by what its members know, but by how deliberately they continue to learn. Directors may be appointed for their experience, but without renewal, that experience quickly becomes outdated. Yet in many organisations, director education is reduced to a box-ticking exercise, limited to induction packs, technical updates or ad hoc compliance briefings. This is governance at its most passive. In truth, boards should embody the traits of a learning organisation: adaptive, inquisitive, self-aware and committed to continuous renewal.
An informed board acknowledges that its fiduciary duties exist in a world of fast-moving risks and opportunities. The pace of change in technology, climate governance, geopolitical tensions, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory shifts demands more than static knowledge. It calls for a governance mindset that embraces learning as a strategic necessity. The proof is stark: a 2023 PwC South Africa Director Survey revealed that 68% of South African directors admit their boards are outmatched by technological disruption, yet a mere 31% invest in formal upskilling.
Directors cannot rely solely on legacy knowledge or past achievements. The role has evolved, and so must those who occupy it. In 2022, boards spent less than 5% of their time discussing climate risks. The KZN floods that year cost R50 billion. The gap between governance and reality is unsustainable. Boards that fail to learn, fail to lead.
The concept of a learning organisation, popularised by Peter Senge, rests on disciplines such as systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models and team learning. These principles are equally applicable to governance. Boards that model intellectual agility are better positioned to anticipate risk, adapt to change and shape resilient organisations. They do not wait for a crisis to revisit assumptions. They engage proactively, ask difficult questions and challenge entrenched thinking.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Yet becoming a board committed to continuous renewal does not happen by accident. It requires deliberate investment. Formal director development programmes are one part of the equation, but not the whole. Ongoing capacity building must be embedded into board culture and processes. It includes reflections after key decisions, cross-committee peer learning, exposure to external perspectives and periodic assessments of knowledge gaps. It also includes openness to uncomfortable truths, recognising when the board lacks diversity of thought or when market and strategy assumptions are no longer fit for purpose.
One of the clearest signals of a board's commitment to growth is how it allocates time. Agendas dominated by compliance reviews and operational reports leave little space for strategic thinking or capacity building. A forward-looking board agenda should reserve time for horizon scanning, scenario planning and trend deep dives, from generative AI and cybersecurity to climate disclosures, social unrest and institutional reputation. The question is not whether these issues are important, but whether the board is equipped to govern them well.
Governance frameworks codify this imperative. King IV in South Africa explicitly underscores the need for ongoing director development as integral to ethical and effective leadership. Principle 1 highlights the responsibility of the board to lead with competence and awareness, while Principle 7 calls on governing bodies to ensure that their composition, skills, experience and capacity align with the organisation's needs. Continuous learning is, therefore, not an optional extra, but a governance requirement rooted in accountability and future fitness.
Importantly, this learning orientation must go beyond individual directors. It must shape the board as a collective. The best boards are not echo chambers of technical expertise, but dynamic forums of inquiry. They welcome diverse viewpoints, interrogate blind spots and evolve with the organisation they serve. Adaptive boards are also better stewards of succession, identifying gaps and mentoring future leaders with clarity and foresight. They understand that board continuity is not just about filling seats but about transferring wisdom.
Some companies have introduced directors' retreats, not as ceremonial off-sites, but as serious opportunities for immersive engagement with new ideas. Others rotate committee chairs to foster cross-learning and reduce siloed thinking. A growing number of boards are also creating advisory panels with academics, technologists or emerging market experts who present independent insights and challenge institutional orthodoxy.
Boards that operate as communities of growth also tend to approach self-evaluation differently. Rather than relying on template-based questionnaires, they view assessments as opportunities to identify development areas, improve dynamics and deepen collective performance. The value lies not only in the review itself, but in the courage to act on its findings.
In an age of complexity and disruption, the evolving board is not a luxury. It is a governance necessity. It strengthens oversight not only through technical competence, but through curiosity, humility and responsiveness. It builds institutional capacity not merely to react, but to adapt and regenerate in the face of change.
To lead well in this environment is to remain teachable. An adaptive board recognises that effective governance is not about knowing everything, but about cultivating a posture of inquiry, one that seeks out what matters most before the next disruption makes it urgent.
Board effectiveness demands self-examination. Boards must ask:
Are we building knowledge renewal into our board agenda, or treating it as an after thought?
Do our development efforts build strategic agility, or simply refresh technical compliance?
Are we actively drawing on diverse, independent perspectives to challenge blindspots?
If our approach to knowledge renewal were visible to stakeholders, would it inspire confidence or concern?
Ultimately, a board's legacy will rest not on its past expertise, but on the learning culture it fostered and how well it prepared the organisation for the future.
Nqobani Mzizi is a Professional Accountant (SA), Cert.Dir (IoDSA) and an Academic.
Image: Supplied
* Nqobani Mzizi is a Professional Accountant (SA), Cert.Dir (IoDSA) and an Academic.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
BUSINESS REPORT
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

eNCA leads the conversation with The Brief, in strategic partnership with Sunday Times
eNCA leads the conversation with The Brief, in strategic partnership with Sunday Times

eNCA

timean hour ago

  • eNCA

eNCA leads the conversation with The Brief, in strategic partnership with Sunday Times

JOHANNESBURG – South Africa's leading independent news authority, eNCA, is proud to announce the launch of The Brief, premiering this Sunday at 8:30AM on eNCA (DStv Channel 403) a premium, fast-paced current affairs programme that brings together eNCA's broadcast power and the Sunday Times' editorial insight to deliver a bold new benchmark for Sunday morning journalism. "At eNCA, we pride ourselves on being the country's most trusted source for independent, impactful news," says Norman Munzhelele, Managing Director of eNCA."With The Brief, we are elevating Sunday viewing by combining our broadcast excellence with the Sunday Times' sharp editorial lens. It's a natural evolution in our mission to inform, engage, and lead." "We are proud to bring the excellence of South Africa's most influential Sunday read onto your screens," says Nwabisa Makunga, Managing Director News & Media, Arena Holdings. "This groundbreaking partnership with eNCA marks a significant step in our multi-platform strategy. It demonstrates our commitment to broaden our journalistic offering and to extend our trusted investigative voice." Designed for appointment viewing, The Brief blends real-time relevance with long-view insight. Each episode opens with rapid headline analysis – complete with live audience polling – before transitioning into deeper panel discussions between eNCA anchors and Sunday Times editors. The programme concludes with forward-looking perspectives and a weekly spotlight on high-impact South African stories. The collaboration amplifies eNCA's current affairs momentum, following its 2024 SAFTA win for Checkpoint as Best Current Affairs Programme – reinforcing the channel's leadership in investigative and analytical journalism. Together, the brands deliver more than 130 years of journalism expertise, eNCA's 17-year track record of credible, independent news coverage and the Sunday Times' 119-year legacy of holding power to account. The Brief also lives far beyond the television screen. Full episodes will be available on eNCA's YouTube channel, while highlight clips are tailored for social platforms. Viewers can engage with embedded content on TimesLIVE, and podcast versions will be available across major audio streaming services – creating one of the most dynamic and far-reaching news ecosystems in the country. In an era where trust, transparency, and truth matter more than ever, The Brief sets a new standard for South African journalism – powered by eNCA's commitment to lead.

Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs ‘tweaking'
Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs ‘tweaking'

The Citizen

time3 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs ‘tweaking'

Electricity minister said 'South Africa is not being targeted and isolated as a country'. Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has denied allegations that the United States (US) imposed a 30% tariff on South Africa due to its broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) policy. The tariffs on South African goods are set to take effect on 7 August, after the South African government failed to secure a trade agreement with the US ahead of President Donald Trump's deadline. In response, the government is preparing a support package for companies expected to be affected by the 30% tariffs. Experts have warned that the automotive industry, as well as citrus farmers, will be the hardest hit by the US tariffs. ANC NEC meeting focuses on economy, US tariffs On Friday, the ANC's national executive committee (NEC) commenced its much anticipated four-day meeting at the Lakewood Conference Centre in Ormonde, south of Johannesburg. The committee last met in February. Key issues on the agenda include the state of the economy, the functioning of the government of national unity (GNU), and preparations for the 2026 local government elections. The NEC is also set to receive reports from both the national working committee (NWC) and the integrity commission. The ANC's economic transformation committee (ETC) held a media briefing on Saturday to update the public on discussions thus far. ALSO READ: US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger Ramokgopa said there had been a focused discussion on the US tariffs, describing it as 'spirited and robust'. Given that the US remains South Africa's second-largest trading partner, Ramokgopa stressed the importance of maintaining the relationship. 'It has got huge economic implications to South Africa and the most direct is in relation the number of jobs that potentially could be lost as a result of these tariffs,' the ANC NEC member said. He said negotiations between South Africa and the US were ongoing, expressing hope that both countries would be able to 'find each other'. Ramokgopa highlighted the tariffs had accelerated South Africa's efforts to diversify its trade markets. Watch the briefing below: ANC defends B-BBEE Ramokgopa rejected suggestions that the US tariffs were a reaction to domestic policies such as B-BBEE or the Expropriation Act. 'South Africa is not being targeted and isolated as a country; there's over 90 countries that are subjected to these tariffs and some of them are historic.' The minister also emphasised that B-BBEE remains a core government policy, though he acknowledged it might require 'some degree of tweaking'. 'As is the case with any other policy, there are moments of reflecting on the efficacy of that policy and how we are discharging that policy. 'It remains a central pillar of our request to ensure that we fundamentally alter the economic relations of society. READ MORE: 'Is it greed or jealousy?': Ramaphosa fires back at critics of BEE, Transformation Fund 'It's a major part of that work, but we do accept that there is a case for us to rethink how it's going to be implemented going into the future, but we are not about to abandon it.' Ramokgopa added that B-BBEE has often been misinterpreted, which has led to exploitation. 'It's important that we are able to distinguish a criminal enterprise that abuses what we mean by black economic empowerment and the honest intentions of how we want to incorporate the participation of local communities.' Furthermore, he made it clear that economic growth and the implementation of B-BBEE were not mutually exclusive. 'You can achieve both.' ALSO READ: Government is failing to comply with its own B-B-BBEE policies Reserve Bank's 3% inflation target Ramokgopa also weighed in on the recent announcement by South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) Governor Lesetja Kganyago regarding a proposed inflation target of 3%. The proposal, made public on Thursday, drew swift criticism from Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana the following day. The finance ministry criticised Sarb for making what it described as 'unilateral announcements that pre-empt legitimate policy deliberation'. The ministry clarified that there had been no official change to the inflation target and that such decisions would not be made during the upcoming medium-term budget policy statement (MTBPS). The Ministry emphasised the need for broad consultation involving the National Treasury, Cabinet, the Reserve Bank and others. Minister of Finance, Mr Enoch Godongwana's Statement on Inflation Targeting.#NationalTreasury — National Treasury RSA (@Treasury_RSA) August 1, 2025 On Saturday, Ramokgopa reiterated that the current inflation targeting policy – within a range of 3% to 6% – remains in place. 'What the Reserve Bank has been doing historically since the introduction of the tariff ban was to pursue a mid-point of 4.5%,' he said. While acknowledging Kganyago's suggestion to shift the inflation target ceiling closer to 3%, Ramokgopa said the ANC welcomes the debate. 'I must say we did not have sufficient time to conclude on that because it's something that has become topical and the ETC never had an opportunity to discuss that in its completeness,' he said. He confirmed that the NEC has tasked the ETC with conducting a more in-depth discussion and formulating a recommendation. 'The NEC has assigned the ETC to have a much deeper conversation and provide guidance on how best we can respond to these proposals. Ultimately, it will the minister of finance, comrade Enoch, who will make that determination.' NOW READ: Reserve Bank cuts repo rate despite US Fed decision

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store