EPA Rollbacks Mean More Pollution, Less Justice for Black Communities
In San Francisco, Kamillah Ealom's neighborhood has been the site of an environmental cleanup for decades, with the government regularly imposing fines on the worst polluters.
And in the Midwest's steel city, Gary, Indiana, Donna Jack and her neighbors have worked with the EPA to put polluters like Gary Works, the nation's largest steel mill, under court-supervised cleanup agreements that threaten businesses with closure if they don't change their ways.
During the presidency of Joe Biden, efforts to address environmental harms in communities of color underwent a significant expansion, offering neighborhoods that advocates said had been long-neglected a semblance of hope — and additional federal dollars — to combat pollution.
But with President Donald Trump's return to office, the future of a national campaign to focus on reducing pollution in Black communities is seriously at risk before its positive impacts could fully take hold. Through the first 60 days of his second term, Trump has dismantled anti-pollution programs, shut down regulatory offices, and begun sweeping rollbacks of environmental protections.
Now, environmentalists say, Black neighborhoods are being left vulnerable to the detrimental effects of industrial emissions, soil contamination, water pollution, and other hazards, while the president promotes an agenda that critics say prioritizes deregulation over public health.
In a little less than two months, advocates say, Trump's actions already threaten to undo much of the work of the EPA during its 55 years of existence.
'EPA is losing the E and the P from its name,' said Marvin Brown, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, one of the nation's largest environmental law organizations. 'It seems like the agency is really giving up on protecting the environment and human health. People will die from the unnecessary amounts of pollution.'
For one activist, Debra Ramirez of Lake Charles, Louisiana, the decimation of the EPA and its regulations comes as no surprise. In the 1990s, her community faced a cluster of cancer cases connected to contamination from a neighboring chemical plant.
'As far as people of color, Black people, we have been through it all our lives, so it's nothing new to us,' she said. 'Now everyone else will feel it, too.'
The Trump administration is rolling back more than 30 major environmental protections. In a statement, Lee Zeldin, the new EPA director, said officials plan to 'unwind' protections against air and water pollution, including limits on emissions from power plants, industrial facilities, and cars. According to EPA analyses, these rules prevented tens of thousands of premature deaths annually and saved Americans and the nation's health care system billions of dollars by limiting hospital and doctor visits.
In addition, the Trump administration has also shut down all environmental justice offices within the EPA, wiping out programs that have existed for decades. Many of those programs were created under Republican President George H.W. Bush to address high pollution levels. Under Biden, those programs had been expanded, with more funding and staff to directly support communities suffering from environmental hazards. The efforts promoted by Biden administration officials helped coordinate federal grants, partnerships, and regulatory actions aimed at reducing pollution in neighborhoods where Black residents have been breathing dirty air for generations.
But now, all of that is gone.
Zeldin, appointed by Trump, justified the cuts under an executive order titled 'Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing.' The administration has deliberately lumped environmental justice initiatives into its broader attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, framing the move as a way to reduce federal oversight.
'We are driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion,' Zeldin said during his announcement of actions that closely mirror Project 2025.
During the election cycle last year, critics of federal environmental regulations spent $445 million on lobbying Trump and Congress, including $96 million directly to the Trump campaign. Many deregulation advocates, including the American Petroleum Institute, directly called on Trump to repeal these initiatives and rules.
'These actions by Zeldin and Trump to demolish EPA protections, to quote Zeldin, will drive a 'dagger straight into the heart' of our health, drive up medical, energy, and disaster costs, and destroy our future,' said Leslie Fields, the chief federal officer for WE ACT for Environmental Justice, a Black-led national organization based in Harlem.
Read More on the EPA Moves That Got Us Here:
SCOTUS Allows 'Big Business' to Have Greater Say in Federal Regulations
Michael Regan Rebuilt the EPA, but Did It Deliver for Black Communities?
The Court Ruling That Guarantees a Future of Environmental Racism
Biden's EPA Has Resolved Only One Civil Rights Complaint Brought Since 2021
The Trump administration also plans to eliminate the EPA's scientific research arm, and have proposed firing up to 1,155 chemists, biologists, toxicologists, and other scientists. This move would dramatically shrink the EPA workforce and eliminate the Office of Research and Development, which provides scientific backing for policies aimed at clean water, air quality monitoring, and toxic site cleanup. Environmental activists warn that those cuts could severely compromise the EPA's ability to safeguard public health and fulfill its core mission.
Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, who was an EPA adviser during the first Trump administration, called the move 'a wrecking ball assault' on science.
Zeldin, advocates say, has made it clear that the EPA's new mission is to lower costs for businesses and consumers. The administrator said, 'These actions will create American jobs' and 'lower [the] cost of living for Americans.' Public health researchers warn that these changes will lead to higher pollution levels, worsening respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in places that were already struggling.
'In nearly every American county, more Black people die from air pollution,' said Fields, of WE ACT. 'Enabling this disparity is environmental racism, and these rollbacks will lead to continued increasing rates of cancer, lung and heart disease, illnesses, and premature death in our communities.'
Funding for grants to help local groups monitor air quality, clean up toxic sites, and fight industrial pollution, have also been cut. Without those programs, communities already hit hardest by environmental hazards are losing a critical lifeline, advocates say.
Read More: Will 'Biden's Billions' Deliver True Environmental Justice?
'The EPA is supposed to take care of any and every American. I don't care if there's only one house facing the impacts, they're supposed to take care of that family with everything they have to make it good for them with concerns to air contamination, water contamination, and soil contamination,' Ramirez said. 'Now it is like we as a people have to put up with this corporate businessman behavior without any pathways.'
Long before drivers reach the outskirts of Gary, they encounter a huge black cloud — the smoke emitted from the stacks of the nation's largest integrated steel mill, Gary Works.
According to the EPA's Environmental Justice Screening online tool to map polluted areas, which has been shut down in the wake of the EPA's environmental rollbacks, Gary's environmental hazards include high levels of exposure to particulate matter, proximity to Superfund sites, and air toxins.
Local environmental activist Donna Jack has seen and felt the effects of that pollution firsthand. Growing up between the Inland Steel mill in East Chicago and living less than a 10-minute drive away from Gary Works, Jack has spent a lifetime between two of the most polluted facilities in the region. She recalls working at Inland Steel's plant in soot-covered clothes to pay her way through college and showering feverishly to get it out of her skin.
'I am a child of the '70s. I've seen every kind of protest you could think of,' the 67-year-old resident said. 'If you live long enough, you will see a lot of it, over and over and over again. We're still fighting the same pollution fights. We're still fighting for the same civil rights. I hate that this generation is having to do what we did all of our lives, and it hasn't changed.'
The same week the EPA announced cuts to its programs, Indiana Gov. Mike Braun issued an executive order to remove environmental considerations in grants and permits, raising alarm among Gary residents and advocates, who warn that the move undermines protections from overburdened communities like Gary and deem them as 'sacrifice cities.'
'They want to make money and with impunity, without any responsibility, and places like Gary are where they like dumping,' Jack said. Instead, she said she wants to 'not be afraid' for the health of future generations, allowing them to run outside on fresh soil and to look up into clear, smokeless skies.
Read More: Toxic Air, Limited Care: The Risks of Pregnancy in Gary
About three blocks from the yellow shotgun home where Chris Jones and his family have lived for decades sits the ExxonMobil Refinery, one of the world's 10 largest facilities. Jones has spent years fighting for his neighborhood's survival in the plant's shadow.
Once a thriving Black community, it has suffered waves of displacement as the plant expanded. But Jones' environmental advocacy isn't only about the state of the land he lives on. Instead, he said, it's about the dignity and humanity of his community.
'We've been here longer than any of these companies,' he said.
With worsening pollution, residents face an impossible choice: stay and suffer or sell and watch history disappear.
Jones said the goal of his work is simple: he said that he wants to be able to sit in his front yard 'and breathe fresh air.' Now, the air that and his neighbors breathes carries a sulfuric stench, sewage spills onto streets, and refinery flares burn for days. In 2022, nearly 10% of his community had cancer, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. With fewer protections, he knows that it might get worse.
Read More: What Happens When a Black Enclave Is Built by Big Oil
For decades, residents in Bayview-Hunters Point have lived next to one of the nation's most contaminated sites, separated from the toxins by just a chain link fence. It is the only San Francisco neighborhood with a population that is more than 10% Black.
The EPA has long funded a long-term clean-up program to remove the chemicals; much of it nuclear waste at military installations dating back to World War II.
Environmentalists said that the EPA's clean-up plan was far from — it intended to pave over the contamination rather than remove it. A group of advocates took the agency to court over its proposal.
But the community now faces the prospect of not having any remediation efforts take place at all: The Trump administration recently rescinded much of the $1 billion funding allocated by the Biden administration for removing toxic waste.
Read More: The Last Black Neighborhood in San Francisco
Kamillah Ealom, who leads the environmental organization All Things Bayview, said it can be difficult to not feel a sense of helplessness.
'Our lives are capped off at 65 years old. So we're constantly going to funerals. I'm constantly giving rides to the emergency room,' Ealom said, referring to the premature deaths and health ailments among her neighbors — which they attribute to the lingering environmental waste in the community. 'But they mask it and blame it on us, so they can overlook the cancer, the environment, the respiratory issues, and the industrialized sites and redlining that's pushing us here.'
The post EPA Rollbacks Mean More Pollution, Less Justice for Black Communities appeared first on Capital B Gary.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada praises US stance on Ukraine security guarantees
TORONTO (Reuters) -Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Saturday welcomed what he said was U.S. openness to providing security guarantees to Ukraine under a peace deal to end Russia's war against Kyiv. "Robust and credible security guarantees are essential to any just and lasting peace. I welcome the openness of the United States to providing security guarantees as part of Coalition of the Willing's efforts," Carney said in a statement. "The leadership of President Trump and the United States is creating the opportunity to end Russia's illegal war in Ukraine."


USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches
President Donald Trump has offered his critics, the world and U.S. allies contrasting images on how America treats its friends and adversaries after failing to broker a ceasefire in Russia's unprovoked war to annex Ukraine. At the Alaska-based summit Russian President Vladimir Putin received a red-carpet welcome from the U.S. that included a B-2 bomber fly-by and a ride in the presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast" with video of him laughing with Trump. The two superpower leaders exchanged flatteries, with Putin saying the war wouldn't have started it Trump had been president in 2022. Andrei Gurulyov, a Russian parliament member and retired general, described it as a "breakthrough" moment that was played up heavily on Russian state television. Putin's foreign ministry said it marked an end to the foreign country's reported isolation. That showcase is in sharp contrast to a fiery exchange Trump and top administration officials had earlier this year with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the foreign ally's leader was told in the Oval Office he was being disrespectful to the U.S. and risking World War III. Zelenskyy was teased by Trump and others for his attire and eventually booted from the White House. Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., suggested Ukraine's president should either resign, change his tune or "send somebody over that we can do business with." The administration went as far to pause intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Ukraine after the incident, and while Trump has threatened to impose sharp economic penalties on Russian if an agreement to end the war wasn't reached, he suspended those sanctions after the Alaska sit-down with Putin. Now, Trump is poised to welcome Zelenskyy back to Washington on August 18 to discuss a peace agreement. Republican praise Trump's strength, Dems fret 'it was just theater' After being hyped by the administration and its congressional allies as an opportunity to end the more than three-year conflict in region, Trump's dealmaking skills are being tested in an international negotiation that could backfire on the country and globe. "The goal is always peace," the White House said in an Aug. 15 post on X, amid the talks. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in an Aug. 16 post on X that Trump "stood firm in defense of U.S. interests," and that the summit marks a critical first step to a "durable and stable peace that protects Ukraine's territorial and economic sovereignty." But Democrats and other detractors warn that the summit has largely benefited Putin, who is facing war crime charges from the International Criminal Court and seeking legitimacy on the global stage after starting a war that has resulted in more than 1.4 million casualties, according to studies. "Our fear is that the Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy—it was just theater," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in a post on X ahead of the talks. Trump seeks reset in pursuit of peace as Europe worries Trump returned to Washington on Aug. 16 carrying plenty of compliments from Putin, who said the war wouldn't have started if Joe Biden hadn't been in charge back in 2022. But without a deal the administration appears to be skipping cease-fire discussions altogether and pivoting quickly to reset its public relationship with Zelenskyy, who will be returning to the Oval Office on Aug. 18 for a talk that remains inconclusive to most observers. Trump began to tip-toe away from Putin and toward Zelenskyy in late April after Russia bombarded Kyiv with missiles. The president, however, is also reportedly considering land swaps including Ukraine areas not currently occupied by the Russians, according to the New York Times, something U.S. allies have opposed in the past. Zelenskyy said in an Aug. 16 post on X that he spoke with Trump and European leaders, adding that the "killings must stop" but that the battling must pause first before a larger peace agreement can be made. "The positions are clear," he said. "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions." In a joint statement, European leaders echoed that sentiment and expressed support for a Putin-Zelenskyy summit. "I'm disgusted that Donald Trump met with Putin on American soil and did so with no representatives from Ukraine," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a retired Army helicopter pilot, said in an Aug. 16 post on X. "Trump and his inflated ego may not realize it, but it's clear that Putin is not engaging in good faith to end this war."


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
How Trump's meeting with Putin pivoted from Ukraine cease-fire to full peace deal
WASHINGTON — President Trump made an abrupt announcement about two hours into his private, roughly three-hour meeting with Vladimir Putin Friday — declaring he wanted a full peace deal in Ukraine rather than a cease-fire, The Post has learned. Convinced there were relatively few matters left to resolve, and believing a truce would only prolong the war, Trump set aside his publicly stated goal of a temporary halt in fighting. 'Figuratively, the president sort of threw up his hands and said, 'I'm not interested in a cease-fire anymore,'' a source familiar with the discussion said. 5 President Trump said Saturday he's seeking a full peace deal rather than a truce after meeting with Vladimir Putin. GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/SPUTNIK/KREMLIN POOL/POOL/EPA/Shutterstock Trump expressed concern that the 'focus of the cease-fire' would be on 'how long the cease fire will be' and 'are they going to rearm?' The pivot yielded 'no pushback from the Russians,' leading Trump to exit Anchorage without a cease-fire in hand. Instead, he dialed up Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders to see if a full peace deal was within reach. The calls yielded a positive response, the source said, and Trump announced on social media that Zelensky would be at the White House Monday for talks. Putin insisted during the summit Ukraine hand over the remainder of the coal and minerals-rich Dontesk, a historically Russian-speaking region that had a Moscow-backed rebellion beginning in 2014. Russia claimed to annex the whole region in 2022. Zelensky has vehemently objected to giving up the northern third of the Donetsk region, arguing it would obliterate more than decade-old defense lines and allow Putin to launch further incursions into Ukraine. The matter may be addressed through an international peacekeeping deployment, the possibility of which was raised during the bilateral discussion in Alaska, with Putin open to a deployment of UK and French troops along the front lines to prevent a recurrence of fighting. 5 Trump left Anchorage without a cease-fire after a three-hour talk made him believe a final settlement could be reached. Trump has in principle accepted the deployment by its NATO allies as a de facto US 'security guarantee' to Ukraine, two sources told The Post. The move comes after Trump previously suggesting a US-Ukraine minerals deal would also effectively give Kyiv a measure of protection. In Anchorage, the Russian dictator floated an 'Article 5-plus' formulation for the peace-keeping force in which China would also send troops, but appeared to back away from the idea and settle on the possibility of NATO ally Turkey — a mediator for Moscow — instead sending soldiers to supplement the more openly pro-Kyiv bloc. European leaders appeared wooed by Putin informing Trump he was 'willing to stipulate' he would not attack additional countries in eastern Europe — though 'Europeans think in centuries' rather than US presidential terms, the source cautioned. 5 Putin accepted the idea of an international peacekeeping force in Ukraine, sources told The Post. AP 5 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will visit the White House Monday to discuss a possible deal. 'The president got Putin to say out loud and agree to, in some way, memorialize that. … He said, 'I will not attack a European country. … I have no interest in this,' and that has always been the fear on the part of the Europeans,' the source said. 'That went a long way in the calls last night with the Europeans.' In a rare move, Trump took no questions at a planned news conference Friday and boarded Air Force One early for a return flight to Washington, during which he spoke on the phone with Zelensky and various European leaders. Trump firmed up his conviction that a full peace deal was possible during a series of Friday night and Saturday morning calls aboard Air Force One to the European leaders, before announcing Zelensky's Monday visit to Washington. 5 csuarez Zelensky has claimed he cannot cede land without a national referendum, adding complexity to the final end-game if he's amenable to handing over the remainder of Donetsk in exchange for the peacekeeping deployment. 'Every issue is an ancillary issue, except Donetsk,' a source familiar with the Trump-Putin talks said. 'That's the ball game, right there the future of Donetsk.' Russia has made recent gains in Donetsk, including capturing two villages Saturday. The Kremlin additionally took Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and partially controls three other provinces in addition to Donetsk that it purportedly annexed. The Trump-Putin summit featured dramatic symbolism from the American hosts, with the US leader escorting the 25-year strongman down a red carpet as a B-2 bomber and fighter jets flew overhead, seeming to surprise the guest. Trump then asked Putin to join him in his Beast limousine to drive a short distance to the talks venue, during which they passed another B-2 parked on the runway — serving as a reminder of Trump using the aircraft for a surprise bombing of Iran on June 13 after Tehran balked at a deal with the US. 'The last thing [Putin] saw when he went in that room was a B-2 close up and personal,' a source remarked. Trump was joined in the meeting by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a well-known Russia hawk, and Steve Witkoff, the special presidential envoy who has met previously with Putin — offering additional strategic flexibility for the talks, though they remained led by Trump and Putin. Trump has openly expressed a desire for a three-leader summit between himself, Putin and Zelensky — and the White House currently is a top candidate for the venue.