Gaza city invasion ‘best way to end war', says Netanyahu
Israel's security cabinet on Friday approved a plan to seize control of Gaza city, escalating military operations in the devastated Palestinian territory.
The move drew renewed criticism at home and abroad, as concerns mounted over the nearly two-year-old war.
'This is the best way to end the war and the best way to end it speedily,' Mr Netanyahu told journalists. He added that 'our goal is not to occupy Gaza, our goal is to free Gaza'.
'Israel has no choice but to complete the mission and eliminate Hamas in light of the movement's refusal to lay down its arms,' he said.
The goal, he added is to disarm Hamas and 'establish a non-Israeli civil administration in Gaza, not led by Hamas or the Palestinian Authority.
'We do not want to see Hamas or the Palestinian Authority in Gaza, but rather a peaceful civil administration.'
The Israeli leader, who has been facing mounting pressure at home and abroad, said that the new operation set to be launched by the military in Gaza city will be on a 'fairly short timetable'.
'I don't want to talk about exact timetables, but we're talking in terms of a fairly short timetable because we want to bring the war to an end,' the prime minister said.
He hit back at the wave of criticism of the new plans, saying the country was prepared to fight without the support of others.
'We will win the war, with or without the support of others,' said the Prime Minister.
A top UN official said on Sunday that Israel's plans for the next military phase in Gaza will 'trigger another calamity' in the enclave.
If Israel's plans are implemented, the effects will reverberate 'across the region, causing further force displacement, killings and destruction, compounding the unbearable suffering of the population', Miroslav Jenca, UN assistant secretary general for Europe, Central Asia and the Americas, told an emergency meeting at the UN Security Council on Sunday.
Mr Netanyahu also said he had directed Israel's military in recent days to 'bring in more foreign journalists' – which would be a striking development as they have not been allowed into Gaza beyond military embeds.
He also promised that Israel 'will designate safe corridors for the passage and distribution of aid in the Gaza Strip.'
On Saturday, Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said he no longer had faith Mr Netanyahu was able to lead the army to a 'decisive victory' in Gaza, calling for the annexation of large parts of the enclave.
Mr Smotrich called on Mr Netanyahu to aim for a complete victory in which Hamas would either surrender and release all hostages or be defeated. This would include the 'annexation of large parts of the Gaza Strip and opening its gates to voluntary migration', he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
Israel can inflict even more damage if Hezbollah doesn't disarm
The Lebanese government's decision last Thursday to endorse the objectives of a US-drafted plan provoked a negative response from Hezbollah and, to an extent, its ally within the Shiite community, the Amal Movement. However, the two parties, realising the risk of isolating themselves further, did not withdraw their ministers from the government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. The document presented to the Lebanese cabinet by the interim US envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, outlined, among other things, a process for Hezbollah's disarmament. Prior to its Thursday session, the Salam government had ordered the Lebanese army to prepare a plan by the end of August. This plan would implement the decision taken by the state to secure a monopoly over weapons by the end of this year. The legal basis for this process is UN Security Council Resolution 1559, which calls for the disbanding of all militias in Lebanon, Lebanese and non-Lebanese; as well as Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 Lebanon war. Resolution 1701 had imposed a Hezbollah pullback to behind the Litani River, but also reaffirmed the provisions of Resolution 1559. It still remains unclear how the Lebanese government and army will be able to implement such decisions if Hezbollah continues to refuse to surrender its weapons. Both Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Mr Salam want to avoid violence at all cost, and seek to avert a rupture with the Shiite community, a majority of which supports Hezbollah and Amal. One aspect that has been left largely unmentioned in this context is what Israel might do if Hezbollah and Amal manage to derail the government's plan to disarm the party. Both parties, in their recklessness, have to grasp the real dangers if the Israelis resume their military campaign in Lebanon, especially given that they enjoy unconditional US support. Hezbollah finds itself very lonely in Lebanon today. Many people blame it for having carried the country into a war over Gaza that was unnecessary, highly destructive, and allowed Israel to reoccupy parts of Lebanon, after it had pulled its forces out of the country in 2000. Since last November, when the ceasefire was reached, Israel has continued to hit Hezbollah sites and target party officials, or alleged officials, almost on a daily basis. The Israelis also violated the ceasefire agreement by refusing to withdraw completely from Lebanon in January, as the agreement stipulated, a position supported by the Trump administration. Since last November, when the ceasefire was reached, Israel has continued to hit Hezbollah sites and target party officials, or alleged officials, almost daily A proposal by Mr Barrack subsequently tied an Israeli pull-out from the Lebanese areas that it still occupies to the demilitarisation of Hezbollah. By drawing this link, the US envoy effectively placed the burden of the continued Israeli presence on the party. The Israelis will certainly take this into consideration as they plan their strategy in Lebanon. If the Trump administration is willing to blame Hezbollah for the Israeli occupation, then this provides Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government several options for what to do next if the party continues to refuse to disarm. Israeli forces can occupy more Lebanese territory up to the Litani River, and proceed to destroy all Hezbollah infrastructure south of that – though this process has already begun under the Lebanese army. Israel's leaders can then make a condition for withdrawal that the Lebanese government disarm Hezbollah, or even sign a peace treaty with Israel. Barring Lebanese acceptance, an expansionist Israel could even permanently annex Lebanese land. A more ambitious plan would be for Israeli forces to occupy territory up to the Awwali River, at the level of the southern Lebanese city of Sidon, and make similar demands, or even contemplate annexation. This would empty the south of its Shiite population, while the ensuing humanitarian crisis would increase pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese state to comply with the Israeli government's demands. If the Lebanese fail to do so, Israel could use its new installations in southern Lebanon to mount a long campaign to destroy Hezbollah positions and arms depots around Lebanon, using aircraft, drones, or commandos flown in by helicopter, as they did against a Hezbollah missile factory in Masyaf, Syria, last September. Some observers feel that if the Israeli forces redeployed to southern Lebanon, this would provide a lifeline for Hezbollah, which could revive its resistance dimension by fighting the occupation. Perhaps, but the challenges are many. First, the party would be on its own in doing so, with many Lebanese wanting an end to the conflict with Israel. Second, without a regular arms supply line through Syria, the party's capacities to sustain such a military effort would suffer. And third, if Hezbollah tries to form a front against the Israeli presence, particularly along the Awwali, this would mean anchoring itself in non-Shiite areas, where local communities are deeply hostile to the group. Under such circumstances, Hezbollah would probably find it exceptionally difficult to mount an effective resistance struggle. The Shiite parties, above all Hezbollah, are certainly conscious of their vulnerabilities. Moreover, Hezbollah does not appear to have a credible plan B. It is now under direct Iranian control, since its leadership cadre was decimated last year, and has been reduced to trying to defend an untenable status quo. The possibilities open to Israel make such a strategy even less likely to succeed, while the potential outcomes are deeply alarming.
Middle East Eye
27 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: MPs urge UK to disclose if it holds spy plane footage of Israel's journalist killings
The British government faces mounting scrutiny over its military cooperation with Israel after the targeted killing of six journalists in an Israeli strike on Sunday. Anas al-Sharif, Middle East Eye contributor Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, who all worked for Al Jazeera, and freelancers Moamen Aliwa and Mohammed al-Khalidi were the latest among 238 journalists killed by Israel during its genocide in Gaza. Aircraft from Britain's Royal Air Force (RAF) have conducted hundreds of surveillance flights over Gaza in the last two years. Last week, it emerged that the UK has recently been spending taxpayers' money to hire American contractors for surveillance flights over Gaza. Scotland's The National reported on Wednesday that flight radar data shows a spy plane registered under the code N6147U was active at the RAF Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus two hours before the Israeli strike which killed the journalists on Sunday night. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But there is no visible flight path, indicating the plane's transponder was turned off when it flew over Gaza, which has been standard practice during British surveillance flights. Middle East Eye asked the Ministry of Defence (MoD) whether it holds information gathered by a spy plane over Gaza on 10 August, the day the journalists were killed, and if so, whether it would share that information with any international body investigating the killings. The MoD did not respond. "We cannot keep dodging questions about the use of spy planes," Labour MP Kim Johnson told MEE. "Transparency on such a serious matter is a democratic obligation," she said. "If these aircraft are gathering intelligence, the public has a right to know who it is shared with and why. Refusing to answer raises serious concerns about accountability and oversight." 'It is time for the truth' Independent MP Ayoub Khan told MEE: "Secrecy in the face of the killing of journalists is a disgrace. It is time for the truth. "The government must be absolutely transparent about any intelligence it gathered before and during the events of 10 August. Khan said that if the UK was sharing intelligence with Israel, "it raises profound legal, moral and political questions". Exclusive: UK won't say if spy planes captured footage of Israeli attacks on UK charity workers Read More » He added that the government was "hiding behind the veil of 'operational confidentiality' to withhold even basic information about surveillance missions". "The government's silence is not neutral; it actively enables the targeting of civilians and journalists." MEE revealed last week that the MoD refused to disclose whether it holds video footage taken by RAF planes of two Israeli attacks in Gaza on British citizens or volunteers working for British charities. The MoD cited national security and defence exemptions in its response to MEE. Officials at the ministry had previously confirmed they hold information gathered by spy planes on Israeli attacks. The MoD has been widely criticised for not disclosing such information. In April this year, the family of British aid worker James Kirby, who was killed by an Israeli drone strike in April 2024, slammed the government for refusing to release information about the attack gathered by an RAF spy plane. The MoD told The Times it had footage from a RAF spy plane that was flying over Gaza trying to locate Israeli captives on the day of the strike. The Kirby family questioned why they were not allowed to be informed about what was filmed. 'Secrecy in the face of the killing of journalists is a disgrace' - Ayoub Khan MP "I want to know who's made that decision not to make it public and why they haven't," Kirby's mother Jacqui Kirby said. The MoD has repeatedly insisted surveillance flights over Gaza are in support of "hostage rescue". Labour MP Johnson told MEE on Wednesday: "The UK must end all intelligence sharing with Israel while it carries out its genocidal actions that have caused mass civilian deaths and clear breaches of international humanitarian law. "Continuing this risks making the UK complicit in war crimes."
The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
The man tipped to lead Gaza from the ashes of Israeli bombardment
Civilian transitional rule in Gaza may last up to a year, Palestinian businessman Samir Hulileh told The National, confirming reports he has been lined up to govern the territory after the war ends. After his name surfaced in media reports as a possible post-war candidate, Mr Hulileh said: "This is a transitional phase which might last for six months or a year and it's not going to be long. "The question of whether I can put the conditions in place to make this project succeed is something I'm working on." The broader plan for Gaza, which the Arab League adopted during a summit in Cairo in March, is for a technocratic committee to take over governing for six months, with Hamas relinquishing its authority. Mr Hulileh said the proposal to have him lead Gaza was raised even before the summit, during the Biden administration in Washington, before he continued talks with the Trump administration. "It has been going on since July 2024," he said. " They wanted someone who does not represent a specific party, or interests, and has previous governance experience," said Mr Hulileh, who previously served as secretary general of the Palestinian government and held other positions in the Ministry of Economy. The now-retired official said his willingness to take on the role is based on his feeling of empathy towards the misery in Gaza and his inability to "remain quiet" over the unfolding situation. More than 61,722 people have been killed by Israeli fire and hunger-related deaths due to Israel's siege reached 235 this week, including 106 children. Most difficult part Following a report by Israeli outlet Ynet on Mr Hulileh's potential role, the official Palestinian news agency Wafa said a governor has yet to be appointed. "The only entity authorised to administer the Gaza Strip is the State of Palestine, represented by the government or its agreed-upon administrative committee, headed by a government minister," Wafa reported, citing an unnamed source in the Palestinian Authority (PA). "They have been hiding for two years," Mr Hulileh said in response to the question of why he had been approached instead of the Palestinian government. The main issues that stand in the way of a civilian government now are political and security-related, he said. Conditions for him to implement his rule include a comprehensive ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. The matter, currently being discussed in Egypt in co-operation with Qatar and the US, is being complicated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterating plans to reoccupy Gaza and "allowing" Palestinians to leave the enclave. The enclave has become uninhabitable, with the majority of it destroyed, while bodies remain unreachable by emergency and rescue crews, and tens of thousands of Palestinians need medical assistance. Mr Hulileh said when the environment is ripe, the real work can begin and in the meantime he is looking at plans for the day-after scenario. But that moment may be further delayed, with US President Donald Trump casting doubt on the prospect of any deal to end the war, saying he did not believe Hamas would release Israeli hostages unless the situation in Gaza changed. Still, Mr Hulileh said he is prepared for the challenges ahead. "The beginning will be the most difficult part." The first six months are likely to focus on providing the 2.2 million Palestinians of Gaza with sufficient food, water and shelter, he added, after more than 80 per cent of the strip has been destroyed, and Israeli shelling and starvation continue to claim lives every day.
