logo
Indian Prairie School District 204 board hopefuls talk safety, diversity and budget priorities at candidate forum

Indian Prairie School District 204 board hopefuls talk safety, diversity and budget priorities at candidate forum

Chicago Tribune07-03-2025

On Thursday, five candidates for the Indian Prairie School District 204 Board of Education presented their platforms as they vie for four four-year spots on the district board in the April 1 election.
The candidates at the forum were current board president Laurie Donahue, current board vice president Susan Demming, current secretary Supna Jain, current board member Allison Fosdick and resident Allison Albert.
At the virtual event on Thursday, hosted by the League of Women Voters of Naperville and the Indian Prairie Parents' Council, the five candidates answered questions about topics ranging from school safety to block scheduling in the district.
The Indian Prairie Parents' Council fielded questions from the school community to create questions for the forum, Shelby Schultz, the president of the Executive Committee of the council, said at the forum Thursday. It was moderated by Jan Dorner from the League of Women Voters of Elmhurst, and did not include debate or comments from the public.
Donahue is a retired senior director in the telecom industry, who said at the forum she has subbed at least once at 30 Indian Prairie schools.
Demming, the current board vice president, is a public relations, marketing and workforce development consultant, according to past reporting, who has been involved in the district since her children began school there in 2001.
Jain works as a senior lecturer for North Central College, and Fosdick is an adjunct professor of English at Aurora University. At Thursday's forum, both Jain and Fosdick also noted having children in the district.
Albert, the only non-incumbent, said at Thursday's forum that she is a business owner, former teacher and parent.
The first question asked of candidates was about digital literacy and technology use.
Donahue noted how technology can allow students to get extra support on lessons, but cautioned that content needs to be moderated on school computers. Fosdick and Jain said they want the district to ensure students know how to differentiate between biased and unbiased information, between accurate news and misinformation. And both Demming and Albert talked about digital literacy as a critical workforce skill.
The district's bond sale referendum in November came up in discussions of school safety, with candidates emphasizing improving safety as a top priority and lauding the improvements the referendum is set to pay for – like stronger security at the entrances of school buildings. Jain also noted the district's strong relationship with local police.
Possible changes to district programs and operations were also up for discussion – namely, the future of the district's Project Arrow program – a program for academically talented students – and possible changes to the district's school day schedule.
In terms of Project Arrow, the current board members emphasized that the district is auditing the plan to determine if it was having a positive impact and whether changes should be made going forward.
Albert noted a need for more transparency about the program.
'Educating parents more on Project Arrow and how it is that children are selected for that program … will allow more parents to advocate on behalf of their student for entry into that program, for access to those opportunities,' Albert said at the forum.
The group was split, but largely opposed, when asked whether the district should consider a modified block schedule and an altered school start time schedule like the one recently proposed in Naperville District 203.
Albert and Fosdick said they were not supportive of a change to block scheduling and shifting start times so high school students started later at this point. Families rely on their older children to get their younger siblings to school, both candidates said, and it could pose transportation issues. Fosdick also said it might not be best for students who struggle to focus for extended periods of time.
Jain also noted concerns about transportation, but said that block scheduling might allow classes to dive deeper into subject matter and better prepare students for college classes. She said she would be open to a pilot program.
Demming and Donahue said the district would need to do more research on the possible benefits and downsides before trying to implement a similar change.
Conversations about diversity and inclusion in the district also factored into candidates' answers about the district's Equity Belief Statement, mental health resources for students and budget and staffing priorities.
All of the candidates were supportive of the district's statement, and several of the candidates were involved in its crafting.
'We are one of the first … districts at the state to make sure that that equitable lens was at an administrative level,' Demming said, noting that District 204 presented its statement at the state level to other districts.
Albert said the district should do more.
'We've had a persistent, consistent achievement gap that has not … decreased over a long period of time,' Albert said. 'The actions need to match the statement.'
In discussing mental health challenges for students and staff, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, both Jain and Demming noted their interest in maintaining equitable access to mental health resources by removing cost and transportation barriers. The district spent time pursuing grants to offer free counseling sessions for students. Several candidates also pointed to the district's mental health symposium on March 8.
As for budget and staffing priorities, Fosdick, Demming and Donahue said staff to assist English Language Learners was a major concern.
'Unfortunately, our infrastructure isn't set up to support that,' Fosdick said at the forum. 'I know that we will need to find a way through probably some creative budgeting as we've done in the past.'
She suggested that using the bond sale referendum money for capital projects might free up operating fund dollars to use for staffing needs.
Not limited to ELL support, candidates said they hoped to prioritize smaller class sizes and more teaching staff.
'I want teachers and other staff before I want more administrators,' Donahue said, noting that she hoped to encourage the district to pursue outside grants to supplement their budget.
The district is currently funded at 85% adequacy based on the state's evidence-based funding model, according to the Illinois State Board of Education.
Having a more diverse teaching staff was also a top priority for several candidates.
Albert noted the importance of attracting high-quality teachers, and said that as a board member, she would be interested in supporting alternative licensing programs which might allow, for example, community members who do not have traditional educational backgrounds but who want to become educators to do so at a lower cost and in a faster timeline.
Indian Prairie is more than 50% minority-identifying students, according to 2024 data from the Illinois State Board of Education, but its teaching staff is nearly 90% white. Jain said students' experiences would be improved by having their identities be represented in the teaching staff.
'I'm a big believer … that, if possible, the staff should reflect the community that they are serving,' Jain said. 'I constantly ask our administrators to look for staff and educators that reflect our students.'
A recording of the forum is available at the League of Women Voters of Naperville's YouTube Channel. And the Indian Prairie Education Association and Indian Prairie Classified Association's candidate questionnaires, which discuss the candidates' views on and priorities for the district, can be found at https://www.ipsd.org/site/default.aspx?PageType=3&DomainID=4&ModuleInstanceID=4426&ViewID=6446EE88-D30C-497E-9316-3F8874B3E108&RenderLoc=0&FlexDataID=14797&PageID=1.
Both DuPage County and Will County have early voting options by mail, and in-person starting March 17. A list of all early voting locations and how to vote can be found on the DuPage County and Will County Clerk's Office websites. The election will be held on April 1.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds
North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds

The North of England would have received an extra £140 billion in transport investment under the previous government if funding levels had been the same as in London, research has claimed. Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power. It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period. While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said. The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively. This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis. The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person. Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023. Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes. Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review. It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire. Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit. 'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens. 'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right. 'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders. 'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.' Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment. 'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm. 'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.'

Dozens protest outside Detroit ICE field office against Los Angeles immigration raids
Dozens protest outside Detroit ICE field office against Los Angeles immigration raids

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dozens protest outside Detroit ICE field office against Los Angeles immigration raids

Demonstrators gathered outside the ICE field office in Detroit to protest against ICE raids in Los Angeles. Jun 8, 2025 | Photo by Erick Diaz Veliz Dozens of people carrying immigrant support signs gathered outside the ICE field office in Detroit on Sunday afternoon to protest against ICE raids in Los Angeles, which sparked violent demonstrations. A raid by ICE agents this weekend at a Home Depot in Los Angeles sparked clashes between ICE agents, local police, and protesters, resulting in injuries and property damage across the city. The federal government deployed 2,000 of the California National Guard ear;ier Sunday to take control of the streets, as protests continue to erupt throughout Los Angeles. 'We're here because protests are happening in L.A against ICE. We stand with them. We wanted to hold an emergency protest here to show our support,' said Kasandra Rodrigues, 25, a member of the Detroit Community Action Committee. The protesters gathered on the sidewalks at the intersection, waving and holding up their signs with slogans in Spanish and English toward passing cars. While some drivers honked in support, the protesters chanted against ICE and Trump. At least four Detroit police vehicles monitored the area. Rodrigues emphasized his support for the Hispanic community living in Detroit, emphasizing that the protest was held in support of them. 'I think the Latino community in Southwest is very scared. However, they have a lot of strength and drive for this struggle. So, we're here supporting them,' Rodrigues said. Around 3 p.m., the protest dispersed without incident. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Consultation to consider extending ban on destructive bottom trawling fishing
Consultation to consider extending ban on destructive bottom trawling fishing

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Consultation to consider extending ban on destructive bottom trawling fishing

Destructive bottom trawling fishing, which involves dragging large nets along the seafloor, could be banned across more vulnerable areas of English seas under new Government proposals. Marine and fisheries stakeholders are being asked to take part in a consultation on the prohibition of destructive bottom-towed fishing gear that could affect approximately 30,000 km2 across 41 marine protected areas (MPAs). Environment Secretary Steve Reed says 'urgent action' is needed to protect seabeds and nature before irreversible damage is caused. The UK is under pressure to step up marine protections as the third UN Ocean Conference begins in France on Monday. Governments, business leaders, scientists and campaigners are gathering for the environmental summit in Nice where the spotlight will be on the commitments individual governments make to reduce the impact on their territorial waters, such as banning the damaging fishing practice of bottom trawling in MPAs. The consultation, led by the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) and Defra, runs for 12 weeks from Monday to September 1. The proposed measures would add to the approximately 18,000 km2 of English seabed already protected from bottom-towed fishing gear. MPAs are areas of the ocean established to protect habitats and species essential for healthy marine ecosystems, allowing vulnerable, rare and important marine life to recover from damaging human activities. Bottom trawling and other forms of destructive fishing are permitted in UK waters but conservationists have long been campaigning for a full ban across all marine protected areas. There are 181 MPAs, including three highly protected marine areas (HPMAs), covering 93,000km² or 40% of English waters. The measures aim to protect marine habitats ranging from subtidal sandbanks to gravels to muds, and support important marine species such as lobster, clams, soft corals and langoustines. A ban on bottom trawling in these areas could help conserve valuable and rare marine life, and allow seabeds to recover from damage caused by destructive fishing practices. It could lead to healthier marine ecosystems across English waters, support greater biodiversity and help preserve vulnerable underwater life. New management measures for fishing in 42 MPAs in English waters – a ban on bottom-towed fishing in 41, and the prohibition of fishing using traps in a specified area – are among the proposals. Mr Reed said: 'Bottom trawling is damaging our precious marine wildlife and habitats. 'Without urgent action, our oceans will be irreversibly destroyed – depriving us, and generations to come, of the sea life on which we all enjoy. 'The Government is taking decisive action to ban destructive bottom trawling where appropriate.' Ariana Densham, head of oceans at Greenpeace UK, said the consultation is 'ultimately a long-overdue completion of a process started by the previous government' and added that bottom-trawling in the protected sea areas is 'like bulldozing national parks'. She said: 'The Government should now strengthen the ban to cover all parts of our marine protected areas, and other types of destructive industrial fishing like supertrawlers and fly-shooters. 'Only this will ensure our marine ecosystems are protected in reality – not only on paper. 'The goal to protect at least 30% of the ocean by 2030 is global, and while the UK must do its part at home it also has a critical role to play in protecting the high seas far from our shores.' Tom Brook, ocean conservation specialist at WWF, said 'done right, these protections can be a win for people, nature and the climate' and 'this is exactly the kind of leadership we need if the UK is to deliver on its promise to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030'. Joan Edwards, The Wildlife Trusts policy and public affairs director, hoped the consultation would see the measures introduced 'rapidly to enable recovery of these sites, a win-win for both nature and the climate.' Oceana UK executive director Hugo Tagholm described the proposals as 'a golden opportunity to safeguard these vital marine sanctuaries from the most damaging fishing practices.' He added: 'If these whole-site bans are fully implemented, this could provide an invaluable and urgently needed lifeline for England's seas, which are so crucial for wildlife and climate resilience.' The consultation comes after Ocean With David Attenborough, released in cinemas to mark the renowned naturalist and TV presenter's 99th birthday last month, showed new footage of a bottom trawling net blasting through silt on the seafloor and scooping up species indiscriminately. The world will also be watching at the summit in Nice to see which countries ratify the UN High Seas Treaty – a pact to establish protected areas across international waters. The ocean treaty, which was agreed by 193 countries two years ago, will not come into force until ratification by 60 countries but just over half of that number have done so. The UK Government is among those that have been criticised by environmentalists for not yet ratifying the treaty or at the very least announcing a timetable to introduce the legislation required. Asked last week whether there has been any progress, nature minister Mary Creagh told the PA news agency: 'We need a legislative slot in Parliament's timetable. 'Any international treaty has to be done by the Foreign Office. We have had discussions with Foreign Office ministers. 'I am confident the treaty will be ratified but it will be ratified in due course.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store