logo
Maxwell demands immunity after subpoena from House Oversight Committee

Maxwell demands immunity after subpoena from House Oversight Committee

Yahoo16 hours ago
An attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell said she would only speak with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if granted immunity — an idea the panel swiftly rejected.
The panel last week subpoenaed Maxwell, an associate of Jeffrey Epstein, compelling her testimony amid demands on the Trump administration to release files from the financier who killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, noted that she has filed an appeal before the Supreme Court and her testimony to the committee could jeopardize efforts to overturn her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking children.
'As you know, Ms. Maxwell is actively pursuing post-conviction relief — both in a pending petition before the United States Supreme Court and in a forthcoming habeas petition. Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool,' Markus wrote.
'Public reports—including your own statements—indicate that the Committee intends to question Ms. Maxwell in prison and without a grant of immunity. Those are non-starters. Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity.'
A spokesperson for the committee immediately ruled out any grant of immunity.
'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' committee spokesperson Jessica Collins said in a statement.
Markus had said Maxwell would testify 'if a fair and safe path forward can be established.'
Beyond a grant of immunity, Markus also asked for questions to be shared in advance and for any deposition to take place after the Supreme Court weighs Maxwell's petition.
'To prepare adequately for any congressional deposition—and to ensure accuracy and fairness—we would require the Committee's questions in advance. This is essential not only to allow for meaningful preparation, but also to identify the relevant documentation from millions of pages that could corroborate her responses,' he wrote.
The letter then made an indirect reference to a possible pardon, something Markus has said he has not yet sought from President Trump.
'Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing—and eager—to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C.,' Markus wrote.
Markus said without any of those arrangements, Maxwell would plead the fifth.
House Oversight Democrats did not respond to comment Tuesday but had backed the move from Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) earlier this month to subpoena Maxwell.
'Oversight Democrats just unanimously voted to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's partner,' House Oversight Democrats wrote on the social platform X after the vote.
'This is progress. We will not stop fighting until the Epstein Files are released. Trump and Bondi must stop blocking the American people from the truth,' they wrote, referencing Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Burchett said he understands the committee not caving to demands for immunity.
'Her attorneys are doing what her attorney's supposed to do, getting her the best deal,' Burchett told The Hill.
'They're trying to cut some time off her 20 years. But she is the gatekeeper, and she realizes it.'
He said he does not have concerns about her credibility, adding that there should be 'plenty of documentation to back up what she says.'
'A bunch of politicians calling somebody a liar is kind of rich. I mean, that's just the pot calling the kettle black, you know?… I mean, we're not a bunch of pedophiles, but we can't stand in judgment of anybody on the truth train,' he said.
Shortly after Burchett's motion, the same panel also voted to subpoena the Justice Department for the Epstein files, as well as several other figures from Democratic administrations: President Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General Eric Holder, former Attorney General Merrick Garland and former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller.
Epstein ran with high-powered figures, including those in politics as well as Trump. The Wall Street Journal reported that Bondi has told Trump that he is referenced in the Epstein files.
Republicans have mixed feelings about the value Maxwell's testimony would provide.
Some view the convicted sex trafficker as the key to unlocking additional information about the Epstein saga — such as revealing other high-powered abusers of young women who have not yet faced legal consequences for their crimes, or other arrangements Epstein had that enabled the abuse.
But others warn that Maxwell, who was complicit in the abuse and previously faced perjury charges (on which she was not convicted), is not a reliable witness and deserves no special treatment.
The Justice Department reignited the Epstein furor when it released a memo concluding the financier died by suicide and did not keep a client list.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week flew to Tallahassee, Fla., where Maxwell is serving her 20-year sentence, undertaking two days of questioning with her.
'This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead,' he said ahead of the meetings.
Updated at 3:55 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jacob Soboroff To Join MSNBC As It Builds News Division In Advance Of Comcast Split
Jacob Soboroff To Join MSNBC As It Builds News Division In Advance Of Comcast Split

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jacob Soboroff To Join MSNBC As It Builds News Division In Advance Of Comcast Split

Jacob Soboroff will be part of the MSNBC team as it splits from Comcast and sister network NBC News later this year. Soboroff will serve as senior national and political correspondent for the network. More from Deadline Charlamagne Tha God Responds To Trump, Calls Out His "Authoritarian Strategy," But Adds, "I'm Rooting For You, But I Need You Focused" Senate Confirms Jeanine Pirro To Serve As U.S. Attorney For D.C. In Reaction To Dismal Jobs Report, Donald Trump Says He's Ordered Commissioner Of Labor Statistics To Be Fired As NBC News political and national correspondent, Soboroff has covered presidential campaigns and elections, the family separation crisis of 2018, and appeared as a correspondent and fill-in anchor on Today. He covered the Los Angeles wildfires earlier this year, with personal accounts of its impact on his hometown. The fires will be the subject of an upcoming book, Firestorm, to be published on Jan. 6. Soboroff also has been reporting on the ICE raids in Los Angeles, building on his experience covering immigration. He wrote the book Separated: Inside an American Tragedy, and was executive producer of Errol Morris' documentary Separated, based on his work. Soboroff first joined MSNBC in 2015. He'll be part of the network's live event, MSNBCLIVE '25, on Oct. 11. MSNBC will be part of Versant, the newly named comoany that will include former Comcast cable channels and other assets. With NBC News no longer as a sister network, MSNBC has been building up its own news division. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More

Fmr. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross explains Trump's BLS suspicions
Fmr. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross explains Trump's BLS suspicions

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fmr. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross explains Trump's BLS suspicions

Tariffs on countries like Japan and Switzerland remain in place as Trump pushes to improve the US trade balance. Wilbur Ross, former US Commerce Secretary, joins Opening Bid to discuss trade policy and prospects for a China deal. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. So what's next on the trade deal front? Want to welcome back onto Opening Bid, longtime investor Wilbur Ross. Mr. Ross served as the U.S. Commerce Secretary in President Trump's first term and has had a close relationship with the president for decades. Mr. Secretary, always nice to get some time with you. Appreciate you coming on here. Um, before we get into the topic of trade, I'm sure you've seen what's been going on, uh, with the president, uh, dismissing or firing the BLS commissioner. You know, you're a longtime investor. Do you still believe that the economic data coming out of the government? Well, I think what is a little bit suspicious about the most recent BLS data is it came out shortly after the Fed FOMC meeting where Trump was hoping to get rates reduced. And clearly, if the two big revisions had come out before the meeting, it would have been more likely that the FOMC would cut rates. And that's the second time that that sort of suspicious behavior occurred. Remember, just before the presidential election, they also had two months of very good, uh, labor results, and then a day or two after the election, they made a massive correction in both months. Again, had that been out before the election, it would have been helpful to Trump. So, I can understand why he would be suspicious at least of the timing as to whether the underlying data themselves are correct. I I would really have no way to know. But it is a little spooky that there were two recent events, big numbers, big changes, uh, that could have helped Trump, had they been more timely. Do you believe, uh, Mr. Secretary, uh, before we get into the trade, I, like the president, noted on Friday after the numbers were hit, that this data is rigged, not only the jobs data, but perhaps other data that the government provides? Well, I think that's just speculation. Um, I certainly never tried to influence the data that came out of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which is part of Department of Commerce. We never had any problems like that during my term. But we also never had the kinds of events that I just described to you that naturally make one a little suspicious. Mr. Secretary, on the on the trade front, um, since we last talked, tariffs have stayed in place for many countries. I mentioned Japan at 15%, Switzerland now at 39%. Are tariffs the new normal for the duration of the president's, uh, second term here in your view? Or is there an opportunity to take these 15% tariff rates that that Japan is now paying and negotiate them down further? Well, I think the president has made clear that if there are further reductions by other countries, that he would take that into account. So, his target is really improving our balance of trade. That's one of his major objectives. And that can either be done by holding back the trade of foreign countries through tariffs or by everybody cutting it together. So, I think trade policy will continue to be a centerpiece of his administration, but that doesn't mean everything will be increasing. What gets, uh, a deal with China over the finish line? Well, China, as you know, is going to be having their big party Congress very, very shortly. And, as you may know, I've felt for some time that it was unlikely that they would make a radical change in policy before the Party Congress. They don't normally do that. And, uh, I think that Congress is either this week or next week. So, we should know pretty soon if anything different will come out of that. But certainly, the news that was out today about the critical materials, uh, being still restricted, that was not very encouraging. Uh, Mr. Secretary, the fact that China has not solidified a deal with the U.S. on trade, is it likely then that its tariff rate will be higher than what we saw, uh, from the likes of Japan and, of course, the European Union? Well, it's up pretty high right now. And it's, um, I I don't know whether he would make it even higher, but, you know, once you get to about 30 or so percent on the tariffs, it doesn't make too much difference if you go beyond because 30 odd percent is very, very hard for a country to absorb. And as a result, 30 or so percent is the demarcation between are you going to be doing trade with them or not. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump Media CEO Nunes loses defamation lawsuit over Rachel Maddow show
Trump Media CEO Nunes loses defamation lawsuit over Rachel Maddow show

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Media CEO Nunes loses defamation lawsuit over Rachel Maddow show

By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) -A federal judge dismissed a defamation lawsuit by Devin Nunes, the former California congressman and now chief executive of Trump Media and Technology Group, against NBCUniversal over a comment by Rachel Maddow about his dealings with a suspected Russian agent. U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel in Manhattan ruled on Friday that no reasonable jury could find Maddow demonstrated actual malice toward Nunes in March 2021 when discussing a package addressed to him from pro-Russia Ukrainian legislator Andrii Derkach on MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show." Nunes received the package in December 2019, when the Republican was the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Maddow told viewers that Nunes "refused to hand it over to the FBI, which is what you should do if you get something from somebody who is sanctioned by the U.S. as a Russian agent." Nunes said Maddow knew the package was turned over promptly. She and her executive producer, who were not defendants, claimed to rely on other sources when creating the segment. NBCUniversal is a unit of Comcast. In a 24-page decision, Castel said Nunes, a longtime supporter of U.S. President Donald Trump, failed to show Maddow was aware of a July 2020 article in Politico saying the FBI had received the package. The judge found no clear and convincing evidence that Maddow had a "high degree of awareness of probable falsity," or any evidence that "defendant's admitted political bias caused defendant to act with a reckless disregard of the truth." Nunes' lawyers and Trump Media did not immediately respond on Monday to requests for comment. Lawyers for NBCUniversal did not immediately respond to similar requests. The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned Derkach in September 2020 for trying to interfere in that year's U.S. presidential election to help Trump, who lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York charged Derkach in December 2022 with unrelated money laundering and sanctions violations. He remains at large. The case is Nunes v NBCUniversal Media Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-01633.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store