logo
Already binge-watched Sirens? Why our obsession with 'eat the rich' TV is the true recession indicator

Already binge-watched Sirens? Why our obsession with 'eat the rich' TV is the true recession indicator

Cosmopolitan28-05-2025

The storyline propelling Sirens, Netflix's hugely popular mini-series, unfurls quickly and with camp flourish. The five-part series follows Simone (Milly Alcock) as she assimilates into the picturesque New England elite alongside socialite Michaela Kell (an unsettling but chic turn by Julianne Moore). The plot dissolves into something equal parts preposterous and bingeable, which reveals that behind the shimmering facade… wealth can be little more than a gilded cage (yet one we may all hope to find ourselves in).
Sirens is just the latest iteration of glossy dramas that place a focus on seeing the moneyed misbehave and befall misfortune. Arguably the biggest television series of the year so far was The White Lotus, with the third season of Mike White's sun, sea and satire of rich guests at a luxury hotel attracting record audiences (the finale drew in 6.2 million viewers, a 30% increase compared to the previous series high of 4.8 million).
Meanwhile, Nine Perfect Strangers, which sees wellness guru Masha Dmitrichenko (Nicole Kidman, obviously) lead a transformative wellness retreat for the one percent, has just returned for round two.
But why are we seeing a glut of shows focusing on wealth beyond our wildest dreams right now, when most of us are feeling the pinch more than ever before? Since 2020, the wealth of the five richest billionaires has more than doubled - and during the same time, more than five billion people have become poorer.
For chartered psychologist Dr Manpreet Dhuffar-Pottiwal, our obsession with observing the lifestyles of the rich and the famous 'reflects a cultural preoccupation with extremes.
'This trend aligns with social comparison theory, wherein individuals evaluate their own circumstances against those perceived as socially or economically superior,' Dhuffar-Pottiwal continues. 'These shows offer aspirational escapism, allowing viewers to vicariously experience opulence.
'The rise of streaming platforms has also normalised binge-watching, creating a lucrative market for sensationalised, high-drama content that glamorises wealth. Clinically, I observe that clients from marginalised backgrounds often describe such shows as a form of 'mental holiday' from financial stress, though this escapism can fuel unhelpful fantasies of unattainable success.'
It seems almost paradoxical, particularly during an era of economic uncertainty, that we'd want to see the wealthy flaunt their wad. The ongoing cost of living crisis means people are now struggling to afford the basics; research from the Young Women's Trust revealed that 56% of young women described their financial situation as "uncomfortable" in 2023.
The rise in food, housing and energy prices are also seeing women disproportionately affected; a recent survey by Idealo found only one third of women (34 per cent) say they can afford to pay their bills and top up their savings.
However, Dhuffar-Pottiwal argues it's because of this economic uncertainty that we find ourselves beguiled on shows about elites.
'This is down to relative deprivation theory, where systemic inequality promotes resentment towards the wealthy while simultaneously heightening curiosity about their lives,' she says, 'Programmes like Succession exploit this tension, offering audiences a voyeuristic glimpse into a world of excess that feels both alien and magnetising.
'Neuroscientific and behavioural addiction research on media consumption suggests that the brain's reward pathways are activated by depictions of luxury, akin to the allure of gambling or compulsive shopping.'
Yep, it would seem that watching shows about the affluent is the true recession indicator; look at the popularity of Dynasty and Dallas, which hit screens following the severe economic recession of the early 80s.
Likewise, when the economy is good, the television shows we flock to are grittier, or grimier; consider mafia murder series The Sopranos and grotty house-share drama This Life, which hit screens in the nineties.
However, what differs in this new era of extreme wealth is the need to see the most loathsome, super-rich, characters fall from grace - and often spectacularly. After all, no-one is truly happy in Succession despite their proximity to millions, while The White Lotus always ends with (at least one) death - and Michaela in Sirens sees her life unravel at lightning speed.
'This reflects a societal demand for catharsis amid growing distrust of elites,' Dhuffar-Pottiwal says. 'Psychologically, this aligns with schadenfreude - the pleasure derived from others' misfortunes - which intensifies when the target is perceived as undeservingly privileged.
'The post-2008 political climate and critiques of 'the one percent' has normalised vilification of the ultra-wealthy. Audiences crave moral equilibrium; seeing the rich punished restores an illusion of fairness in an unequal world.'
However, there may be something sadly uncanny in seeing the mighty fall; watching Michaela fearing her husband cheating in Sirens, or the hotel guests of The White Lotus bitterly battling it out for dominance (the toxic trio from season three, we're looking at you), shows how wealth does not necessarily cocoon them from everyday struggles us mere mortals face.
'Material abundance cannot insulate against human fragility,' agrees Dhuffar-Pottiwal. 'Newer television shows about the super rich both simultaneously glamorise wealth and dismantle its mythos.'
In presenting us with entitled characters who we're supposed to loathe, while at the same time acknowledging that, deep down, we're not entirely unlike them, TV shows about the super rich are merely twisted, trick mirrors showing us back an ugly, magnified version of ourselves. And it seems we can't get enough.
Sirens is now streaming on Netflix
Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Review: ‘FUBAR' Season 2 wastes Arnold Schwarzenegger's star power
Review: ‘FUBAR' Season 2 wastes Arnold Schwarzenegger's star power

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Review: ‘FUBAR' Season 2 wastes Arnold Schwarzenegger's star power

When 'FUBAR' premiered on Netflix in 2023, its biggest draw wasn't the plot or action — it was Arnold Schwarzenegger. And for a moment, the novelty of watching the Governator tackle scripted television — like a blockbuster giant squeezing into a Roku-sized streaming box — was enough. Throw in Oscar-nominated Monica Barbaro for some snappy father-daughter banter, and it sounded like the makings of a compelling show. It wasn't. Now we're back for round two, and instead of evolving, creator Nick Santora's series doubles down on action movie cliches and strained punch lines. The result is a new season that plays like a B-movie but thinks it belongs in a big-budget franchise. With about 90 minutes of story sloshing around in an eight-hour bag, the show again proves nostalgia alone isn't enough. Schwarzenegger's Luke Brunner is still a CIA agent with a messy personal life, now under the same roof as his recon team and ex-wife Tally (Fabiana Udenio), with whom he's trying to rekindle a romance. But the relative peace is short-lived. Another global catastrophe looms, courtesy of Carrie-Anne Moss as a shadowy former flame of Luke's with unresolved business. It's a setup layered with intrigue and stakes, but the execution wobbles between sitcom shenanigans and save-the-world spectacle, landing uncomfortably in the middle. This tonal inconsistency is the show's fatal flaw. The eye-rolling quips and mid-tier gunplay could be forgiven if the story leaned into its absurdity or, conversely, its potential as an espionage drama. Instead, major action beats are consistently undercut by jokes, ensuring the threat level remains perilously low regardless of how many countdown timers or high-stakes missions are thrown into the mix. Where the show does flicker to life is in the chemistry between its cast. Schwarzenegger, well past his box office prime but still commanding with his signature steely charm and self-aware muscle, brings surprising pathos to Luke. There's a weathered quality here — not just age, but the burden of legacy. It's one of the few times the project understands the value of its star. Barbaro, meanwhile, remains a standout. The Bay Area native is effective with the action, yes, but even more so in the quieter moments. As Emma Brunner, her scenes with Schwarzenegger give the series rare flashes of emotional clarity, including an especially amusing one late in the season involving an adorable 'Sesame Street'-esque puppet of dad (trust me, it makes sense in context). Some of the side players earn their keep as well. Jay Baruchel and Andy Buckley, cast as Emma's boyfriend and Tally's boyfriend, respectively, are both used to delightful effect as everyday guys hopelessly adrift in the world of cloak-and-dagger chaos. Still, it's hard to escape the sense that 'FUBAR' is all concept, no conviction. 'I'll be back,' says Luke at one point, a meta wink at Schwarzenegger's most iconic catchphrase. It's a fitting reflection of the show as a whole: built on callbacks, but with little to call back to. Arnold Schwarzenegger headlining a TV series should've been an event — a streaming-era reintroduction of a cinematic icon — but it never finds something meaningful to do with him. After two seasons, the question isn't whether 'FUBAR' will come back, but whether anyone would even notice if it didn't.

How to cancel your Max subscription in 5 easy steps
How to cancel your Max subscription in 5 easy steps

Tom's Guide

timean hour ago

  • Tom's Guide

How to cancel your Max subscription in 5 easy steps

Streaming newcomer, Max, surfaced in Australia just under three months ago. Becoming the official home to HBO content, including Warner Bros. Discovery, TLC, HGTV and The Food Network, Max has a great back catalogue. And it arrived with a pretty appealing introductory offer, cutting subscription prices nearly in half for the first year of the service. However, that offer has come and gone, ending just a month after the streamer launched. That said, you may have subscribed to the new streamer just to find that you're not keen on the US TV giant's catalogue, or you're only interested in when new seasons of hit shows drop, like The Last of Us or The White Lotus. Given the price hikes that have hit many streaming services in the past 12 months, it's hard to justify holding onto some of your subscriptions — and we get it! So if you need help cancelling your Max AU subscription, we've got you covered in five simple steps. Do note, though, these steps don't fully delete your account, and you can always reactivate your plan at any time. If you want to cancel your Max account, you'll need to log into the streaming service using a web browser on a computer. Please note that you cannot cancel your Max account using the app on a mobile device or Smart TV. Hover your mouse over your profile icon in the top right corner of the homepage. A drop-down menu will appear under your profile icon. You'll need to select Subscription. On your Subscription page, you'll need to scroll down to the 'Current Plan' section. This is where you'll see your plan details, including your next billing date and payment information. You will see an option under this section that reads 'Cancel your subscription'. Click on this to proceed. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. A pop-up window should appear and ask you if you want to confirm your cancellation. Max will prompt you to look at other plan pricing as well and will also feature your next billing date and advise that your account will remain active until this date. After this date, your account will indeed be cancelled. You will need to select the 'Continue to Cancel' button at the bottom of the window to complete the cancellation process. You will also receive a cancellation confirmation email to the address registered on your account. Cancelling Max really does come down to whether or not you're getting enough value out of the platform. If you find yourself opting for a different streamer or find that Max's catalogue isn't worth your while, then cancelling your account may be your best option. It's worth noting that Max does offer cheaper subscription options, so if you find yourself paying too much, we'd recommend dropping down a tier. Otherwise, if you're looking for recommendations on what streaming services to try this month instead, here's what we suggest. Thinking of cancelling Max this month? Here's what we recommend instead. June is a stellar month to sign up for Disney Plus, thanks to a juicy EOFY offer that sees new and eligible returning subscribers score a four-month subscription for just AU$4.99p/m (the AU$15.99p/m ongoing). Disney Plus' blockbuster lineup includes a new season of FX's The Bear and a brand-new Marvel series, Ironheart, on June 25. You'll need to act fast if you want to nab this deal, though, as it will end on June 11, 2025. It's up to you on how you choose to spend your hard-earned cash, so if you're looking for ways to save on your streaming subscriptions, you can check out our streaming services price comparison hub.

Aimee Lou Wood & Adam Long Spark Dating Rumors Following PDA in London
Aimee Lou Wood & Adam Long Spark Dating Rumors Following PDA in London

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aimee Lou Wood & Adam Long Spark Dating Rumors Following PDA in London

Aimee Lou Wood, best known for her acting exploits, is making headlines once again, as photographs of her cozy outing with Adam Long surfaced online. They were spotted engaging in public displays of affection (PDA), sparking a wave of dating speculation among fans. Fans of The White Lotus star were quick to notice the chemistry between Aimee Lou Wood and Adam Long when the two were recently photographed enjoying a PDA-filled day in London. On Saturday, June 7, the 31-year-old actress and her 34-year-old Happy Valley co-star were seen kissing and embracing during a casual coffee date. The couple kept their attire laid-back. Long sported drawstring shorts and Levi's T-shirt, while Wood wore a trendy all-denim outfit paired with bold red flats. Their rumored romance began gaining traction while filming their upcoming BBC project Film Club, which Wood co-created. In the series, Wood plays Evie, who launches a film club with her best friend Noa. This new buzz around Aimee Lou Wood's personal life comes just after she and The White Lotus Season 3 co-star Walton Goggins denied speculation of an off-screen feud. In a recent interview with Variety, Goggins said, 'There is no feud. I adore, I love this woman madly, and she is so important to me… But she's special. She is love, and I know that I am that to her. We care about each other very deeply.' Wood echoed the sentiment, adding that she had grown tired of addressing baseless internet gossip. 'Eventually, I just started to sit back and watch these people making something out of absolutely nothing,' she stated. As of now, neither Aimee Lou Wood nor Adam Long has commented publicly on the rumored romance. The post Aimee Lou Wood & Adam Long Spark Dating Rumors Following PDA in London appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store