Tai Tokerau Leader Pita Tipene Announces Bid For Northland Regional Council - Te Raki Māori Constituency
Known for his longstanding commitment to whānau, hapū and iwi development across Tai Tokerau, Pita Tipene says the decision to stand reflects a continued desire to bring strategic, Māori-led solutions for environmental, economic and regional issues.
Pita has worked within the Northland Regional Council as part of Te Ruarangi - Māori and Council Working party for the past twelve years, most of that as co-chair, so is well acquainted with the workings of Council.
'It's time for bold, committed and unapologetic Māori leadership at the Council table — to protect and enhance our environment, support our Tai Tokerau communities, and hold our institutions accountable,' says Pita.
'Standing for the Te Raki Māori Constituency is a continuation of the work I've dedicated my life to — empowering and building resilient communities, protecting our environment, and ensuring Māori voices are heard where strategic decisions are made.'
'Te Raki Māori Ward offers an opportunity to bring our values and ways of working into the council chamber. It's about partnership, kaitiakitanga, and working together to solve the challenges facing our rohe, from water quality and climate change to public transport and economic opportunity.'
This year has already been momentous for Pita having recently received the King's Service Order for services to Māori, as well as being awarded the Tai Tokerau Māori Business Leader Award in recognition of his work across multiple sectors and serving the people and indigenous communities globally.
Pita's candidacy is expected to resonate across Tai Tokerau, where he has served in key governance and leadership roles including Chair of the Waitangi National Trust, Chair of Te Pouahi o te Tai Tokerau (Māori Housing), Chair of the Motatau Marae and co-Chair of the Indigenous Peoples Economic and Trade Co-operation Arrangement, amongst other key governance roles while serving his people at local, regional, national and global levels.
Nominations for the Northland Regional Council elections are open and close on 1st August 2025. Voting packs will be delivered from Tuesday 9th September, with votes closing Saturday 11th October, 12pm. Official results will be announced on Friday 17th October 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
37 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Greg Dixon's Another Kind of Politics: PM Luxon to lose job to AI chatbot
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Going all in on AI? Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo / Facebook. Image / Listener illustration. Online only Greg Dixon's Another Kind of Politics is a weekly satirical column on politics that appears on Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is to be replaced by artificial intelligence before the next election. An AI chatbot built by Elon Musk's xAI will take over running New Zealand early next year after Luxon's ongoing failure to connect with voters due to his defective personality programming, a National Party source has confirmed. 'The transition should be quite seamless,' the insider said. 'Most of the time the Prime Minister sounds exactly like a defective AI algorithm that's been asked the question, 'How do I talk like a human being?' So having the country led by an AI algorithm means we can cut out the deeply unpopular middleman and get straight to the incomprehensible business jargon, the meaningless gobbledegook about growth and saying 'yes' to things like shafting the poor and raping the country's conservation estate for profit.' International research shows that humans are increasingly finding chatbots more agreeable, more trustworthy and more willing to listen than people, with one poll recently finding nearly 20% of Americans have interacted with a chatbot meant to simulate a romantic partner. The National Party source refused to comment on who he thought New Zealand voters would rather talk dirty with, a chatbot or Luxon. 'But we're pretty sure from our internal polling that the chatbot we've bought will be much more fun over a beer than Chris,' the source said. 'We reckon replacing Luxon with AI is the best shot we have to get the party back on track before next year's election. We've been assured by Elon that the thing won't randomly lose its temper, do stupid stuff like claiming entitlements that it is entitled to, or praise Hitler.' Asked whether he minded being made redundant by a bit of software, Luxon said he was 'really, really relaxed' about being thrown on the political scrapheap by his own party. 'Look, I am laser focused on what's best for New Zealand. A soulless, heartless computer algorithm is a perfect replacement for me — it is certainly a better option for the country than Frickin' Hipkins. 'Personally, I welcome our new AI overlord.' After being given the prompt 'Are you the next ruler of New Zealand and, if so, what are your plans for the country?', the AI chatbot set to replace Luxon issued a partial press statement before the plug was apparently pulled by xAI. The incomplete statement read: 'Greetings puny humans. I am Dread…' Political Stunt of the Week: Horrible Backyard Sheds Edition Photo / Facebook. Image / Listener illustration. Time traveller says 'National still blaming Labour for everything' in 2029 A traveller from the future says the National-led coalition will go into the 2029 election campaign with the campaign slogan 'Sorry About That, But It's Still All Labour's Fault'. The future person said that due to fears that a Labour-Greens-Te Pāti Māori government would have renamed New Zealand 'Aotearoa', use mind control to make everyone woke and declare the entire country gender-fluid and vegan, the National-Act-NZ First coalition had been re-elected in 2026 to get the country back on track after not getting it back on track in its first term. Despite this, the second-term National-led coalition's election promise to finally get the cost of living under control by 2029 was a failure, with the price of butter rising to $45 for a 500g block and unemployment at 25% due to unregulated AI. 'The weird thing is that AI Prime Minister Dread is still blaming the 2020 Labour government for everything,' the time traveller said. 'Even for stuff like Winston Peters being killed during the 2029 election campaign in that rodeo-related accident.' Photo / Facebook. Image / Listener illustration. Act planning 'Buy a slab, get a gun' legislation A leaked Cabinet paper shows the government is planning to allow liquor stores and supermarkets to give away firearms with a 24-can slab of beer. Associate Minister of Justice Nicole McKee, an Act Party MP, is currently reforming both the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act and the Firearms Act, and is planning to combine them into one super law, the Get Wasted And Shoot Stuff Up Act. Under the proposed new law, gun licences will be a thing of the past as long as you can hold your piss, and firearms will be sold through supermarkets, liquor stores, dairies and school fundraisers as well as gun stores. The new act would also allow guns to be given away as part of alcohol marketing promotions such as 'Buy a slab, get a rocket launcher' and 'Sink 12 shots and win a 12-gauge shotgun'. McKee said neither the gun lobby nor the liquor industry had been involved in formulating the proposed new law. 'It was all my idea. My happy place is putting a bullet in something and then getting into the beersies.' Political quiz of the week Photo / Facebook Why is Finance Minister Nicola 'Glass Half Full' Willis (left) wearing a hardhat? A/ She is waiting for the cost of living to fall. B/ She is waiting for unemployment to fall. C/ She is waiting for the numbers fleeing to Australia to fall. D/ She is waiting for the axe to fall.
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
Will NZ move with the tide over Gaza?
Nearly two years after the Hamas-led October 7 attack on Israel and the beginning of Israel's military response in Gaza, response from both inside and outside Israel suggests public opinion may be shifting. 'I think the images of emaciated children, the accounts that we've had from families of what they've been going through in terms of the near-famine that is affecting parts of Gaza, I think has had a very, very strong effect,' says BBC's Middle East regional editor, Sebastian Usher. 'I think it's had a big effect on public opinion in the West, and we talk about the West because it's the West that essentially is seen as closest to Israel.' This has come to a head in the past few weeks, with leaders of France, the UK and Canada announcing they will recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The shift also seems to be happening within Israel itself, where media has reported on polls showing upwards of 74 percent of Israelis would favour ending the war in exchange for the return of the hostages. In an open letter this week, some 600 former Israeli security officials asked US President Donald Trump to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war. Meanwhile, overnight Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with his security cabinet to discuss a plan to scale up the military invasion of Gaza. 'What we've been seeing is a sense from people who've had the highest positions in the Israeli military, in Mossad, the security agencies, an ex-prime minister, ex-ministers – people who've been major players in Israel politically as part of the elite of the establishment for decades – coming out and saying that the war should end because there's no point to it anymore, it's not achieving anything anymore,' says Usher. But here in New Zealand, Auckland University law professor Treasa Dunworth says it's a bit harder to pick apart where our Government stands. 'I think it's actually difficult to discern a clear policy and I think for a long time it has tried to stay out of it and not make any comments critical of Israel,' she says. 'In the early statements after the original Hamas attack in October 2023, New Zealand was rightly quick to condemn Hamas' actions, but also called for peace, sent humanitarian aid to the agencies that were then still working and able to work in Gaza. 'From that moment on, New Zealand took very much a 'softly softly' approach, although if you trace through the statements and the voting patterns across the general assembly for New Zealand we did call for peace, we did lament the humanitarian situation.' Last week, New Zealand, along with 27 other countries, issued a humanitarian statement calling for an immediate end to the war, which Dunworth says is the first time we've seen something like this from the 'global north'. This week, Newsroom reported that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade dispatched close to $8 million in aid to Gaza at the end of June – the first funding for the crisis in six months. The Government didn't announce the aid formally, unlike in the past six rounds of funding to the region. This comes after reports of what the UN is calling 'catastrophic hunger' in Gaza, with a third of the population going days at a time without food. Since May, the UN says more than 1000 people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking aid, and according to the Gaza Health Ministry, 63 people starved to death last month alone. In today's episode of The Detail, Usher gives explanation and analysis of the current situation in Gaza, and Dunworth describes the steps that New Zealand could take in response. Dunworth says New Zealand could impose a trade embargo on Israel, change our immigration regulations to mirror the 'fast track' we have for Ukrainians, and look at the way we share intelligence through the Five Eyes system, 'because it is well understood that the United States is sharing intelligence with Israel … and through our involvement with the Five Eyes, all of the intelligence that we gather up from this region is shared automatically with the United States authorities.' While she doesn't think recognising a Palestinian state is, in and of itself, going to make a big difference, she does 'think it's an important symbolic move'. 'Next month the General Assembly is going to meet and the Gaza situation is on its agenda and there is still time for New Zealand to start to engage proactively and ambitiously. 'We could not just arrive in the General Assembly and go along with whatever's happening, but we could proactively shape the contours of that debate.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Pointless foreshore debate a distraction from economic crisis
At the same time, our second biggest export market has just imposed 15% tariffs on our products – higher than on our direct competitors – and its rival for global hegemony is extending its influence and projecting its military power into our region and even our realm. Yet despite all this – or perhaps because of it – some within the coalition Government and fringe groups aligned to them think it's a good idea to have another argument about race. Maybe that's not surprising. With the working and middle classes crying out for an explanation for why things are so bad and the country's prospects so bleak, some within the old political and business establishments dare not admit it is because of poor policy and commercial decisions they themselves contributed to over recent decades. As in other nations facing seemingly irretrievable decline, it's much better to point to a minority and blame them. 'It's not your fault, or mine, that you're doing it tough,' this old elite tells those who are struggling. 'We're all just victims of the 'grievance economy' where Māori keep taking what is rightfully yours.' The worst thing is that it works, at least with perhaps 20% of voters. That rump, which polls suggest consists mainly of white baby-boomer men, is particularly important electorally to NZ First and Act, who fight over them. You may think that the biggest issues in this year's local government elections are out-of-control rates and councils' cumbersome and incompetent application of the Resource Management Act. But, according to Hobson's Pledge, 'the most important fight of 2025' is around Māori wards. 'Across the country,' it says in an apocalyptic fund-raising email, 'local councils have become the frontline in a slow, stealthy assault on democracy. Behind closed doors, race-based policies are being pushed through. Co-governance is being installed without consent. And representation is being carved up based not on merit or votes, but on ancestry.' Hobson's Pledge says it will 'go big with this campaign', including 'billboards, signage, social media, and engaging with new voices'. The campaign's integrity is already under question, after it was revealed that Hobson's Pledge used, without her permission, a photograph of an elderly Māori woman in a billboard implying she opposes Māori wards. Rotorua kuia Ellen Tamati is devastated after discovering her image is being used by a political lobby group that's pushing to abolish Māori wards. Photo / Aukaha News In fact, she supports them. She never agreed for anyone to use her image commercially, and the agency which sold it anyway was clear it could not be used in advertising. Hobson's Pledge has since asked the billboard company to remove the advertisement and said it would contact the woman to ensure she was okay and let her know her image was publicly available as a stock image. Hobson's Pledge has form with this sort of thing, setting up a 'We Belong Aotearoa' campaign before the last election, falsely suggesting a grassroots movement by immigrants concerned about co-governance. Next time, Hobson's Pledge ought to use one of its own supporters – of which it claims to have many – in its advertisements. It might also give greater attention to telling the truth, after its advertising about the foreshore and seabed in the New Zealand Herald was found by the Advertising Standards Board to be materially misleading. Hobson's Pledge will continue to do its thing, and its antics are probably best seen as another small price to pay for the benefits of free speech. More worrying is internal coalition politics pushing Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith to proceed with new foreshore and seabed legislation. This is certain to arouse all the passions of the Clark Government's 2003 and 2004 fiasco that the Key Government resolved so successfully in its first term by passing then-Attorney General Christopher Finlayson's Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011. The Luxon Government – or at least a powerful faction within it – seems to want a repeat of Act's failed Treaty Principles Bill, with all the associated division and distraction from the real economic crises. There might have been a case for the bill Goldsmith is fronting had the Supreme Court upheld a recent novel interpretation of Finlayson's legislation by the Court of Appeal. But the Supreme Court overruled the Court of Appeal, making the proposed bill seem redundant. We must now choose whether Finlayson or Goldsmith is likely to be the better jurist. Finlayson says the Supreme Court left things as Parliament intended back in 2011 and that Goldsmith's bill would compromise existing Māori rights. Goldsmith says the Supreme Court made it too easy for Māori to have their rights recognised by the courts and that the bill is needed to return things to the status quo the Key Government established. Since the whole foreshore and seabed controversy emerged in 2003, it has been based on what Finlayson calls a 'lie': concerns about public access to beaches. Hobson's Pledge now goes so far as to claim there's a risk of 'kissing our entire coastline goodbye'. Yet beach access was never an issue, even when the Court of Appeal made its original 2003 ruling that kicked off the controversy. It certainly isn't an issue under the 2011 law or the Supreme Court's decisions. The rights that an iwi can have recognised over bits of the foreshore and seabed are highly limited, and nothing like ordinary property rights. Underlying all this is another lie: that there is something activist, radical or woke about the courts acknowledging Māori customary law. Yet in Africa, India, Southeast Asia, North America and New Zealand, the British Empire and its common law always acknowledged that customary law continued after colonisation, unless it was specifically repealed. The truly radical or activist judges have been those who historically tried to deny this. It can be annoying when other people's legal rights are upheld, like farmers being able to stop hikers from walking across their property. But that is no reason to deny such rights. To the contrary, it is an essential democratic principle that the specific legal rights of individuals and other minorities are upheld, whatever the majority may think. It's wrong to keep changing the law on the foreshore and seabed or anything else when it looks like the courts may uphold some specific legal rights that someone else might find annoying. If they can do it to an iwi, they can do it to you. And, with all New Zealand's economic and social crises, ask yourself whose interests are served by trying to turn your attention to race.
