Apple Changes App Store Rules in EU to Comply with Antitrust Order
Apple on Thursday changed rules and fees in its App Store in the European Union after the bloc's antitrust regulators ordered it to remove commercial barriers to sending customers outside the store.
Apple said developers will pay a 20% processing fee for purchases made via the App Store, though the fees could go as low as 13% for Apple's small-business program.
Developers who send customers outside the App Store for payment will pay a minimum fee of 5% and at most 15%. Developers will also be able to use as many links as they wish to send users to outside forms of payment.
The changes are aimed at trying to help Apple avoid a 500 million euro ($570 million) fine threatened by EU antitrust regulators in April.
"The European Commission is requiring Apple to make a series of additional changes to the App Store. We disagree with this outcome and plan to appeal," Apple said in a statement.
In a statement, the European Commission said it will now review Apple's changes for compliance with the Digital Markets Act.
"As part of this assessment the Commission considers it particularly important to obtain the views of market operators and interested third parties before deciding on next steps," the Commission said in a statement.
In a statement posted on social media site X, Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, which fought a protracted antitrust lawsuit with Apple, called Apple's changes "a mockery of fair competition in digital markets. Apps with competing payments are not only taxed but commercially crippled in the App Store."
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Sweeney's remarks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
3 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
UN Conference Seeks Foreign Aid Rally as Trump Cuts Bite
Spain will host a UN conference next week seeking fresh backing for development aid as swingeing cuts led by US President Donald Trump and global turmoil hinder progress on fighting poverty, hunger and climate change. French President Emmanuel Macron, South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa and Daniel Noboa of Ecuador will headline the around 70 heads of state and government in the southern city of Seville from June 30 to July 3. But a US snub at the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development underlines the challenges of corralling international support for the sector. Joining the leaders are UN chief Antonio Guterres, more than 4,000 representatives from businesses, civil society and financial institutions, including World Bank head Ajay Banga. Such development-focused gatherings are rare -- and the urgency is high as the world's wealthiest countries tighten their purse strings and development goals set for 2030 slip from reach. Guterres has estimated the funding gap for aid at $4 trillion per year, reported AFP. Trump's evisceration of funding for USAID -- by far the world's top foreign aid contributor -- has dealt a hammer blow to humanitarian campaigns. Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium are among the other rich nations that have announced recent aid cuts as economic and security priorities shift and national budgets are squeezed. From fighting AIDS in southern Africa to educating displaced Rohingya children in Bangladesh, the retreat is having an instant impact. The UN refugee agency has announced it will slash 3,500 jobs as funds dried up, affecting tens of millions of the world's most vulnerable citizens. International cooperation is already under increasing strain during devastating conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, while Trump's unpredictable tariff war plunges global trade into disarray. Debt burden Reforming international finance and alleviating the huge debt burden under which low-income countries sag are key points for discussion. The budgets of many developing nations are constrained by servicing debt, which surged after the Covid-19 pandemic, curbing critical investment in health, education and infrastructure. According to a recent report commissioned by the late Pope Francis and coordinated by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, 3.3 billion people live in countries that fork out more on interest payments than on health. Critics have singled out US-based bulwarks of the post-World War II international financial system, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, for reform. Seville represents "a unique opportunity to reform an international financial system that is outdated, dysfunctional and unfair", Guterres said. At a preparatory meeting at UN headquarters in New York in June, countries except the United States unanimously agreed a text to be adopted in Seville. The document reaffirms commitment to achieving the 2030 UN sustainable development goals on eliminating poverty, hunger and promoting gender equality. It focuses on reforming tax systems, notably by improving the Global South's representation within international financial institutions. The text also calls on development banks to triple their lending capacity, urges lenders to ensure predictable finance for essential social spending and for more cooperation against tax evasion. The United States said it opposed initiatives that encroach on national sovereignty, interfere with international financial institutions and include "sex-based preferences". Lack of ambition? While the European Union celebrated achieving a consensus, NGOs have criticized the commitment for lacking ambition. For Mariana Paoli, global advocacy lead at Christian Aid, the text "weakens key commitments on debt and fossil fuel subsidies -- despite urgent calls from the Global South". "Shielded by US obstructionism, the Global North continues to block reform. This isn't leadership -- it's denial." Previous failures by rich countries to keep their promises have eroded trust. After promising to deliver $100 billion of climate finance a year to poorer nations by 2020, they only hit the target in 2022. Acrimonious negotiations at last year's UN climate summit in Azerbaijan ended with rich countries pledging $300 billion in annual climate finance by 2035, decried as too low by activists and developing nations. Independent experts have estimated the needs upwards of $1 trillion per year. Spain will be the first developed country to host the UN development finance conference. The inaugural edition took place in Mexico in 2002, followed by Qatar in 2008 and Ethiopia in 2015.
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
After NATO deal, how far will EU go for trade peace with Trump?
BRUSSELS, Belgium: After satisfying Donald Trump's calls for Europe to ramp up defense spending in NATO, EU leaders in Brussels turned Thursday to the next big challenge ahead: how to seal a trade deal with the US leader. Time is running out. The European Union has until July 9 to reach a deal or see swingeing tariffs kick in on a majority of goods, unleashing economic pain. The European Commission, in charge of EU trade policy, has been in talks with Washington for weeks, and the leaders of Europe's two biggest economies France and Germany on Thursday urged Brussels to move fast in search of a deal. 'France is in favor of reaching a quick agreement, we don't want it to drag on forever,' President Emmanuel Macron told reporters after summit talks involving the bloc's 27 leaders and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen. While Macron said European nations 'do not want a deal at any cost,' Germany's chancellor has signalled he wants to close a deal fast — even if it means an unbalanced outcome with some level of US tariffs on EU goods. 'It's better to act quickly and simply than slowly and in a highly complicated way,' Friedrich Merz told a press conference after the talks. The EU has put a zero-percent tariff proposal on the table — but it's widely seen as a non-starter in talks with Washington. Von der Leyen said the commission had just received the latest US counterproposal, adding: 'We are assessing it as we write, speak right now.' 'Swiss cheese' option According to several diplomats, the goal at this point is rather to let Trump claim victory without agreeing a deal that would significantly hurt Europe. One diplomat suggested leaders would be happy with a 'Swiss cheese' agreement — with a general US levy on European imports, but enough loopholes to shield key sectors such as steel, automobiles, pharmaceuticals and aeronautics. This would be less painful than the status quo with European companies currently facing 25-percent tariffs on steel, aluminum and auto goods exported to the United States, and 10 percent on a majority of EU products. Merz had earlier this week taken aim at the EU's approach to talks as overly complicated, urging 'rapid, joint decisions for four or five major industries now.' The issue was the focus of Thursday's summit dinner, at which von der Leyen was able to test leaders' red lines in negotiations. If no agreement is reached, the default tariff on EU imports is expected to double to 20 percent or even higher — Trump having at one point threatened 50 percent. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday suggested the administration could extend the July deadline but said 'that's a decision for the president to make.' Avoiding escalation Unlike Canada or China, which hit back swiftly at Trump's tariff hikes, the EU has consistently sought to negotiate with the US leader — threatening retaliation only if no agreement is reached. 'We will not allow ourselves to be provoked, we will remain calm,' said Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, urging the EU to avert an all-out trade war with Washington. Talks between EU and US negotiators have intensified in recent weeks. Trump divides the Europeans. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni are both vocally supportive of Trump — while others are more wary. 'The problem is that on behalf of the United States, we have a heavyweight dealmaker — on our side, European Union, have light capacity and capability leaders to negotiate,' said Orban. Pro-trade countries in Europe's north are especially keen to avoid an escalation. The EU has threatened to slap tariffs on US goods worth around 100 billion euros, including cars and planes, if talks fail to yield an agreement — but has not made any mention of those threats since May. The United States is also using the negotiations to try to extract concessions on EU rules — particularly digital competition, content and AI regulations, which Washington claims unfairly target American champions such as Apple, Google, and Meta. Europeans are ready to discuss common transatlantic standards, but the EU's digital rules are a red line for Brussels.
Asharq Al-Awsat
9 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Apple Changes App Store Rules in EU to Comply with Antitrust Order
Apple on Thursday changed rules and fees in its App Store in the European Union after the bloc's antitrust regulators ordered it to remove commercial barriers to sending customers outside the store. Apple said developers will pay a 20% processing fee for purchases made via the App Store, though the fees could go as low as 13% for Apple's small-business program. Developers who send customers outside the App Store for payment will pay a minimum fee of 5% and at most 15%. Developers will also be able to use as many links as they wish to send users to outside forms of payment. The changes are aimed at trying to help Apple avoid a 500 million euro ($570 million) fine threatened by EU antitrust regulators in April. "The European Commission is requiring Apple to make a series of additional changes to the App Store. We disagree with this outcome and plan to appeal," Apple said in a statement. In a statement, the European Commission said it will now review Apple's changes for compliance with the Digital Markets Act. "As part of this assessment the Commission considers it particularly important to obtain the views of market operators and interested third parties before deciding on next steps," the Commission said in a statement. In a statement posted on social media site X, Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, which fought a protracted antitrust lawsuit with Apple, called Apple's changes "a mockery of fair competition in digital markets. Apps with competing payments are not only taxed but commercially crippled in the App Store." Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Sweeney's remarks.
