Boise paid teacher $400K, but West Ada wouldn't hire her. She claims defamation
A Boise teacher who resigned in a $400,000 settlement with the Boise School District last year applied to substitute teach in West Ada, only to be turned down over alleged lack of professionalism.
Laura Boulton, a former Timberline High School math teacher, filed claims against both school districts in May for allegedly defaming her during her application process.
According to a copy of West Ada's rejection letter obtained by the Idaho Statesman, West Ada denied Boulton employment because information in Boise's personnel file on Boulton indicated 'concerns regarding your professionalism with colleagues, specifically a history of targeting other teachers.'
Boulton, in her claims, argued that 'The opposite is true.'
'I taught at Centennial High School in West Ada School District, and Borah and Timberline High Schools in Boise School District, and I have an exemplary personnel record in both,' Boulton told the Statesman in an email.
Boulton also filed a second claim against the Boise district, saying officials violated her First Amendment rights by issuing her a trespassing notice after she attended a public meeting regarding a former Boise schools employee accused of possessing child pornography.
A West Ada spokesperson told the Statesman that the district, Idaho's largest, does not comment on personnel matters or pending legal claims. A Boise spokesperson said the district is required by state law to disclose personnel information to other school districts during the hiring process.
'As to trespassing, we take the safety and privacy of our students, staff and parents very seriously,' the Boise spokesperson, Ryan Hill, said. Idaho law and district policies 'allow us to reasonably restrict access to schools and other district properties,' he said.
Both claims are tort claims, which Idaho law requires before someone can sue a state or local unit of government. They came after Boulton and the Boise district in 2024 reached a tenuous peace, settling a year of tensions over Boulton's allegedly 'inappropriate' behavior and her contention that the district was failing victims of bullying and sex crimes.
Timberline suspended Boulton in 2023 over alleged inappropriate relationships with students and 'repeated attempts to undermine the academic environment with colleagues,' the Statesman reported. The suspension sparked student walkouts on Boulton's behalf and calls to reinstate her.
In a July 2024 settlement, Boulton agreed to resign, and the district agreed to pay her $400,000 and place her on a district committee on healthy relationships. Both sides agreed not to pursue any action against the other, the Idaho Statesman reported.
In November 2024, four months after the settlement, Boulton applied to substitute teach in West Ada as she pursued her doctorate in education, according to a tort claim filed on May 8 and provided to the Statesman by a West Ada spokesperson. The claim alleged that Boulton was rejected because of 'false and defamatory information' West Ada received from Boise that was then placed in Boulton's personnel file in West Ada.
The claim, which also named Boise's General Counsel Dan Skinner, seeks over $500,000 in damages for economic losses and emotional distress.
Boulton's lawyer, Andrea Rosholt of Boise, argued in the claim that 'there has never been a finding by the (Boise) trustees to substantiate' the statements about Boulton's professionalism. Rosholt cited the July 'amicable resolution' — a term the settlement required Boulton to use in future inquiries — and the fact that Boulton was placed on the 'prestigious executive level committee.' The committee sunset in December.
Boulton is also being represented by Boise laywer Eric Rossman.
On May 29, Rosholt filed the second claim on Boulton's behalf against Skinner and Boise schools. According to a copy of the claim Boulton provided to the Statesman, she attended a public meeting in January hosted by the district to discuss concerns surrounding Gavin Snow, a special education paraprofessional in Boise who died by suicide after being investigated for possessing children pornography.
According to the claim, Boulton was invited to attend by a Valley View Elementary School parent. On Jan. 30, Skinner sent Boulton a trespass notice. Skinner cited 'two prior ... investigations' into Boulton's conduct and said Boulton recorded the meeting and distributed commercial business cards. An amended trespass notice on Feb. 17 also accused Boulton of making threatening remarks.
The trespass notices, included in the claim, described 'requests from staff and families to avoid further contact with (Boulton) on our property or at school events' and instructed Boulton 'not to be physically present at any Boise School District property, or at any Boise School District event.'
Rosholt argued that the notices infringed on Boulton's constitutionally protected rights and were 'false and defamatory.' Rosholt said Boulton 'did not disrupt the meeting in any fashion' and denied that she recorded the meeting, handed out business cards or made any threats.
Rosholt also discounted the investigations cited in the trespass notice. 'Despite the 'investigation' you referenced, Ms. Boulton's employment with the district was not terminated,' she wrote. 'In fact, Ms. Boulton resigned and the district put Ms. Boulton on an executive committee with access to the district offices to address the issue that was the topic of the Valley View meeting.'
An email from Skinner included in claim said a 2018 investigation had found that Boulton violated the district's code of ethics 'by failing to provide appropriate supervision of her students' and 'using her institutional privileges to undertake political activities' — for which Boulton was reprimanded and transferred.
Skinner said a second investigation 'resulted from more than a dozen complaints of harassment and inappropriate behavior with students filed by her colleagues.' Skinner said the investigation concluded that Boulton violated the Idaho Code of Ethics for Idaho Professional Educators 'by targeting colleagues who had raised concerns about her professionalism, crossed professional boundaries with students by utilizing them in her efforts to target her colleagues, and was unprofessional with colleagues generally.'
The claim indicated Boulton's intent to sue for an additional $500,000 or more in damages.
Boulton told the Statesman in a text message that the trespass notice is in effect until 2027.
Rosholt did not respond to an email inquiry from the Statesman.
Boulton continues to live in Boise and runs a limited-liability company called Phoenix Advocacy, though her goal remains to work in Boise or West Ada schools, she told the Statesman. She said the company is nonprofit.
'I have called Boise my home and built a family here for nearly twenty years,' she said by email.
Boulton said her agency is aiding families in Boise, West Ada and nearby schools 'in matters of Special Education, English Language Learners, and victimised students' needs and services.'
She also said she is 'collaborating with the Boise Police Department and guiding my clients through the legal system as they find solutions and justice.'
Idaho man in viral arrest alleged 'excessive' force. What he could do next
Idaho teacher in classroom-sign furor quits. What she told school officials
What West Ada is doing to its controversial policy on classroom displays
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
10 hours ago
- Fox News
WATCH: Protesters at DC parade justify violent tactics 'as long as they don't hurt anyone'
Protesters outside Saturday's military parade in the nation's capital did not explicitly condemn the violent tactics used at anti-Trump protests across the country in recent days, with at least one saying he "fully support[s]" the recent tactics used by protesters in Los Angeles, such as throwing rocks. "I'm following my constitutional rights, I'm out here just simply saying what I want to feel. No one here is being violent. As you can see, there's been no conflict," said a college-aged protester who declined to identify himself but spoke to Fox News Digital. "But you're not worried about being conflated with those who are doing violence?" the activist was asked. "I mean if they want to violate the Constitution, that's on them. I can't worry about that," the protester responded. "I mean, maybe I should [be worried], but I believe in this Constitution, I'm going to live by it, I'm going to support my First Amendment." A separate protester in attendance outside Saturday's parade said he "fully supported" those activists who "want to throw rocks" as long as they don't hurt anyone in the process. "Honestly – they have a right to be angry. They have a right to do what they feel like they need to do to stop this issue, to stop fascism," he said. "And, honestly, I fully support that. I fully support if they're angry and they want to go out and they want to throw rocks. As long as they don't hurt anyone, you know, I can understand, I can honestly do." The anti-Trump protests that coincided with the military parade in D.C. on Saturday saw a few isolated incidents of violence but appeared mostly peaceful. However, the weekend was preceded by violent riots in Los Angeles that spread to other cities like New York and Chicago – reminiscent of the anti-police protests following the death of Minneapolis man George Floyd in the summer of 2020. Protesters in Los Angeles threw rocks at law enforcement and several fires across the city erupted amid the chaos. There were reports of damage to federal buildings, including both immigration and non-immigration-related offices, that included graffiti threatening the lives of federal officials. At least one community care office for veterans, run by the Department of Veterans Affairs, was forced to shut down and cancel hundreds of appointments amid the violence. Many were arrested for clashing with police and the reverberations of the rioting have resulted in other tense clashes between police and activists across the country. While no deaths have been directly attributed to political violence at recent protests across the country, including Los Angeles, fatalities have occurred at some protests around the country. In Utah, an innocent bystander was shot by a man who had been a part of the protest's peacekeeping team, according to reports, while in Los Angeles a man was found dead outside a looted T-Mobile store amid the anti-ICE chaos, according to reports. The peaceful protesters in D.C. suggested they were not in favor of any violence, but they did signal that they understood why protests in recent days across the country have been so intense that they lead to violence against police officers, property and sometimes more. "I mean, I personally won't do that, but I can understand after all of this, like, people are fed up. People are fed up with how the government has been treating people," a protester told Fox News Digital Saturday. "The Republicans, the people in Congress, they do not care about people here, and so I can understand why people are that angry to do something like that, so, yeah, I fully understand." "I think it's wrong to create violence, but, like, he said, I mean I think people have been angry for a long time," a second protester added, noting he thinks Trump is the reason to blame for all the aggressive tactics, like throwing rocks, setting fires and vandalism. "What Trump is doing, he knows the polarization and the anger he's causing, so this is all part of his game plan. The National Guard in L.A., he caused that. He said go out there without Newsom saying anything. I mean, he knows what he's doing, he wants to cause a rise out of people." Another protester present Saturday, who spoke to Fox News Digital, said she believed "being abrasive" is against the interests of those seeking to make change but that "history has proven that sometimes aggression is needed." "All respect to them, I think that they are doing what they think is right, but I think being very abrasive is against our interests, actually. I think it drives away a lot of people, it doesn't really foster the conversations that we need," a protester who identified herself as Sophie said. "I don't think being aggressive is the way to go, but I think history has proven that sometimes aggression is needed, so, but I don't want to be abrasive."
Washington Post
12 hours ago
- Washington Post
Press club sues Los Angeles, police chief over alleged attacks on journalists
The Los Angeles Press Club sued the city of Los Angeles and its police chief, Jim McDonnell, over alleged police violence toward journalists covering the ongoing protests of immigration raids in L.A. The press club, which advocates for journalists in Southern California, filed its lawsuit Monday in federal district court in Los Angeles, saying that the defendants violated journalists' First Amendment rights by using 'excessive force' against them. 'Being a journalist in Los Angeles is now a dangerous profession,' the group wrote in its complaint. 'LAPD actions during the June 2025 protests in downtown Los Angeles reveal a brazen refusal to abide by the Constitution and state law and repeats the same conduct by the Defendant City repeatedly held to be unconstitutional by the federal courts for the past 25 years.' Law enforcement at the protests have routinely shot less-lethal ammunition at protesters, in some cases hitting and injuring members of the press. Sergio Olmos, a reporter for CalMatters, told The Washington Post last week that out of hundreds of days of protests that he's covered in his career, he's never seen the police use so many less-lethal rounds. Adam Rose, press rights chair of the L.A. Press Club, compiled a spreadsheet of more than 50 alleged incidents of potential police violations of journalists' rights covering this month's protests starting on June 6. This includes the case of Australian television correspondent Lauren Tomasi, named in the complaint, who was hit with a less-lethal round while broadcasting live on air. Olmos' case and The Post's reporting were also cited in the lawsuit. 'The Los Angeles Police Department has a long history of violating the rights of the press and public at protests. And we shouldn't have needed this lawsuit,' said David Loy of the First Amendment Coalition, one of the attorneys for the press club. 'But unfortunately, we see it as unfortunately necessary to go back to courts to protect the rights of the press to cover protests without fear of attack or assault.' The LAPD said it 'does not comment on pending litigation.' McDonnell has defended the department's response to what it has called 'hostile and riotous' protesters. The Los Angeles mayor's office did not respond to a request for comment. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that the city and the LAPD violated journalists' rights under the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee the right to a free press and due process, respectively, as well as multiple California state statutes. L.A. Press Club is joined by another plaintiff, Status Coup, an investigative outlet whose reporters say they were hit with less-lethal munitions while covering the protests. Carol Sobel, a former ACLU lawyer acting as lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said that the LAPD hasn't followed the California legislature nor precedent from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which she says has clearly ruled that journalists have a right to access in protests. 'They just don't give a damn,' she said. 'And they act with impunity. So we're hoping that the federal courts will hold them accountable.' LAPD is only one of many law enforcement agencies on the ground in Los Angeles, alongside the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the California Highway Patrol, as well as federal forces from the California National Guard and the Department of Homeland Security. Sobel said she plans to sue other law enforcement agencies, too, starting with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
Press group sues LAPD, city over actions during anti-ICE protests
A press freedom group is suing the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the city itself over what the organization says is mistreatment of journalists covering the civil unrest there in response to President Trump's immigration initiatives. As part of a lawsuit filed Monday, the L.A. Press Club argued police officers trying to contain demonstrations across the city have 'responded with excessive force against both the press and public.' 'Journalists covering the protests have been shot with 'less-lethal munitions,' charged by horses, and forcibly prevented from filming,' the group argued in a statement on the lawsuit after it was filed. 'Our democracy depends on an informed public. When press rights are threatened, it's the public that suffers,' Carol Sobel, lead counsel for the L.A. Press Club, said. Cameras have caught tense interactions among press, protesters and police in recent days, including the brief handcuffing of a CNN reporter and video showing an Australian news reporter apparently being struck by a rubber bullet. The LAPD did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit. The suit comes just days after the First Amendment Coalition, Freedom of the Press Foundation and National Press Club wrote a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, expressing 'alarm that federal officers may have violated the First Amendment rights of journalists covering recent protests and unrest,' in the area.
