logo
Press club sues Los Angeles, police chief over alleged attacks on journalists

Press club sues Los Angeles, police chief over alleged attacks on journalists

Washington Post17 hours ago

The Los Angeles Press Club sued the city of Los Angeles and its police chief, Jim McDonnell, over alleged police violence toward journalists covering the ongoing protests of immigration raids in L.A.
The press club, which advocates for journalists in Southern California, filed its lawsuit Monday in federal district court in Los Angeles, saying that the defendants violated journalists' First Amendment rights by using 'excessive force' against them.
'Being a journalist in Los Angeles is now a dangerous profession,' the group wrote in its complaint. 'LAPD actions during the June 2025 protests in downtown Los Angeles reveal a brazen refusal to abide by the Constitution and state law and repeats the same conduct by the Defendant City repeatedly held to be unconstitutional by the federal courts for the past 25 years.'
Law enforcement at the protests have routinely shot less-lethal ammunition at protesters, in some cases hitting and injuring members of the press. Sergio Olmos, a reporter for CalMatters, told The Washington Post last week that out of hundreds of days of protests that he's covered in his career, he's never seen the police use so many less-lethal rounds.
Adam Rose, press rights chair of the L.A. Press Club, compiled a spreadsheet of more than 50 alleged incidents of potential police violations of journalists' rights covering this month's protests starting on June 6. This includes the case of Australian television correspondent Lauren Tomasi, named in the complaint, who was hit with a less-lethal round while broadcasting live on air. Olmos' case and The Post's reporting were also cited in the lawsuit.
'The Los Angeles Police Department has a long history of violating the rights of the press and public at protests. And we shouldn't have needed this lawsuit,' said David Loy of the First Amendment Coalition, one of the attorneys for the press club. 'But unfortunately, we see it as unfortunately necessary to go back to courts to protect the rights of the press to cover protests without fear of attack or assault.'
The LAPD said it 'does not comment on pending litigation.' McDonnell has defended the department's response to what it has called 'hostile and riotous' protesters. The Los Angeles mayor's office did not respond to a request for comment.
In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that the city and the LAPD violated journalists' rights under the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee the right to a free press and due process, respectively, as well as multiple California state statutes.
L.A. Press Club is joined by another plaintiff, Status Coup, an investigative outlet whose reporters say they were hit with less-lethal munitions while covering the protests.
Carol Sobel, a former ACLU lawyer acting as lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said that the LAPD hasn't followed the California legislature nor precedent from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which she says has clearly ruled that journalists have a right to access in protests. 'They just don't give a damn,' she said. 'And they act with impunity. So we're hoping that the federal courts will hold them accountable.'
LAPD is only one of many law enforcement agencies on the ground in Los Angeles, alongside the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the California Highway Patrol, as well as federal forces from the California National Guard and the Department of Homeland Security.
Sobel said she plans to sue other law enforcement agencies, too, starting with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bikers With Whips Rout Kenya Anti-Police Protesters; Dozens Hurt
Bikers With Whips Rout Kenya Anti-Police Protesters; Dozens Hurt

Bloomberg

time11 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bikers With Whips Rout Kenya Anti-Police Protesters; Dozens Hurt

Hooded motorcyclists armed with whips and clubs attacked crowds protesting alleged police violence in two of Kenya's biggest cities, in events that left at least 23 people injured. Police used teargas to disperse thousands of demonstrators in Nairobi and Mombasa, forcing many businesses to remain shuttered. Nearly two dozen people were reported injured, according to Grace Wangechi, executive director at Independent Medico Legal Unit, a human rights group.

Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days
Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days

Associated Press

time12 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days

NEW YORK (AP) — The possibility that music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs might testify at his federal sex trafficking trial all but vanished Tuesday after his lawyer predicted a defense presentation lasting as little as two days and a judge said jurors could begin deliberations as early as next week. Attorney Marc Agnifilo offered the hint when Judge Arun Subramanian asked him for an estimate on the length of the defense case, and the attorney said their presentation could last less than two days — but not more than five. If Combs testified, it was likely his testimony would take longer than a week. Testimony by two of his former girlfriends consumed two of the trial's six weeks. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges. He has been jailed at a federal lockup in Brooklyn since his September arrest at a Manhattan hotel. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey said prosecutors would rest as early as Wednesday and no later than Friday morning. The estimates were provided Tuesday after the irate judge scolded prosecutors and defense lawyers, saying information about a closed court proceeding involving a juror last Friday had leaked to a media outlet. The judge said he believed someone who was at the sealed court hearing violated his secrecy order. In the future, Subramanian said, he would hold Comey and Agnifilo responsible for any slipups, and any violations of his orders could result in criminal contempt penalties 'at the most extreme level.' 'This is the only warning I will give,' he said. Meanwhile, prosecutors resumed showing jurors evidence Tuesday of text messages, phone calls, hotel records to support charges that Combs oversaw a racketeering conspiracy that utilized his employees and associates and his stature in the hip-hop industry to help him control and abuse women, including two former girlfriends. Ex-girlfriends Casandra ' Cassie ' Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym ' Jane ' told jurors that Combs used threats and monetary incentives to coerce them into frequent multi-day sex marathons where Combs watched, directed and sometimes filmed them engaging with male sex workers. Defense lawyers say prosecutors were trying to criminalize consenting sex between adults by targeting Combs. Ventura's relationship with Combs lasted from 2007 to 2018 while Jane dated him from 2021 until his arrest last fall.

U.S. Steel-Nippon deal includes "golden share" giving Trump power to approve big corporate changes
U.S. Steel-Nippon deal includes "golden share" giving Trump power to approve big corporate changes

CBS News

time17 minutes ago

  • CBS News

U.S. Steel-Nippon deal includes "golden share" giving Trump power to approve big corporate changes

President Trump's executive order on Friday clearing the way for Japan-based Nippon Steel to potentially buy U.S. Steel comes with an unusual corporate twist called a "golden share." As part of the agreement, Mr. Trump will gain power to approve a number of major corporate decisions for the company, signaling that the president could potentially block the company from relocating U.S. Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, or transferring or relocating jobs outside the U.S. The details of the golden share were disclosed by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Saturday in a social media post, where he described the agreement as including "powerful terms that directly benefit and protect America, Pennsylvania, the great steelworkers of U.S. Steel and U.S. manufacturers that will have massively expanded access to domestically produced steel." What is a golden share? A "golden share" refers to special rights held by a government over a corporate entity. They are typically granted in relation to newly privatized businesses over which the government wants to maintain some control, according to legal research company Westlaw. Golden shares have been employed in countries ranging from the U.K. to China, although they are rare in the U.S. In the former case, the U.K. government held a golden share in the British Airports Authority, although it was ruled illegal by a court in 2003. In the latter, the Communist Party had taken a percentage ownership in private companies as well as control over government board seats and voting power, the Wall Street Journal reported in 2023. While presidents can indirectly influence corporate decisions through agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission, which reviews mergers for antitrust concerns, it's unusual for a commander-in-chief to exercise the level of control outlined by Lutnick regarding U.S. Steel. According to his post, U.S. Steel — which would keep its name and headquarters after the merger — also wouldn't be allowed to change its name from U.S. Steel without President Trump's approval. The president has the authority to name one of the corporate board's independent three directors and can veto the other two choices, the Associated Press reported, citing a person familiar with the terms of the agreement who insisted on anonymity to discuss them. The details of the board structure were first reported by The New York Times. "The Art of the Deal," Lutnick wrote of the agreement, referencing Mr. Trump's best-selling book about his business skills and negotiating techniques. Terms remain unclear Lutnick described the golden share in the U.S. Steel deal as "perpetual." The Commerce Department didn't return a request for clarification on if the golden share would transfer to subsequent presidents after Mr. Trump leaves office. The full terms also remain somewhat unclear. The companies have not made public the full terms of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel nor the national security agreement with the federal government. On Friday, the two companies announced in a joint statement that they had agreed to the terms of the government's national security agreement. They added the terms mandate $11 billion in new investments by 2028 and provides for "a Golden Share to be issued to the U.S. Government." The U.S. Steelworkers union told CBS MoneyWatch that it can't comment on the golden shares without seeing more information about the agreement. But it pointed to a June 15 statement that expressed the union's disappointment with the president's decision to move forward with the merger. "Details matter: Neither the government nor the companies have publicly identified what all the terms of the proposed transaction are," the union letter said. "And, while there is a claimed 'golden share,' what can we expect from Nippon's leadership in Japan which continues to build up overcapacity in steel globally and has been charged again with dumping by the Department of Commerce just weeks ago?" contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store