GOP Sen. Ron Johnson wants to hold hearings on 'what actually happened on 9/11'
"There's an awful lot of questions," Johnson, the chair of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, said Monday in an interview on the conservative activist Benny Johnson's podcast.
'What actually happened on 9/11? What do we know? What is being covered up?' Johnson said of the 2001 attacks. "My guess is there's an awful lot being covered up in terms of what the American government knows about 9/11."
Asked if he planned on holding hearings, Johnson said, "I think so."
"There are a host of questions I will be asking," the senator said.
Asked for further details, a spokeswoman for the senator told NBC News on Wednesday that a 'potential hearing will depend on what information/documentation is obtained by our office.'
Johnson's comments focused on a long - debunked claim about a building in the World Trade Center complex that collapsed hours after the Twin Towers were brought down by airliners.
The Wisconsin senator, who has a history of amplifying conspiracy theories, said in the interview that the investigation into the building that came down, Building 7, was 'corrupt' and suggested its collapse was the result of a 'controlled demolition.'
Rep. Mike Lawler, a New York Republican, sharply criticized Johnson's comments.
"Respectfully, Senator Johnson should stop peddling conspiracy theories about the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history and one that forever altered the lives of so many of my fellow New Yorkers," Lawler wrote in a post on X. "Crap like this dishonors and disrespects the innocent lives lost, our brave first responders, and all families and survivors who still carry the pain of 9/11 each and every day."
John Feal, a demolition supervisor at Ground Zero in New York and longtime advocate for first responders, called Johnson's remarks "silly and pathetic."
"If Ron Johnson really wants to know what happened on 9/11, I can meet with him," Feal told CNN in an interview Wednesday. "I'll let him know that innocent lives were lost on 9/11. Heroes died racing towards those innocent lives, and subsequently, 137,000 people are now sick because of the aftermath of 9/11."
Feal said he'll be in D.C. on Tuesday to advocate against the Trump administration's cuts to the World Trade Center Health Program, and said that's what Johnson should be questioning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
44 minutes ago
- Spectator
The uncomfortable history of Narva
The Alaska talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin might have happened on American territory, but the symbolism of their location is a win for the Russian President. Alaska is considerably closer to Russia than it is to the rest of mainland America, and it was once a Russian territory. Putin was returning to a land previously conquered by his people. On Russia's opposite border, to the west, it is Russia's imperial past, and Putin's twisted view of shared history, that worries Europeans. Narva, Estonia's third largest city, is a strange place, and seems even stranger since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Narva river – from which the city gets its name – separates Estonia from Russia; two fortresses stand across each other imposing on the landscape, the 13th century Hermann Castle on the Estonian side and the 15th century Ivangorod Fortress on the Russian side. Two other symbols of Russian influence are hard to miss in the town: the Orthodox Church, and a now abandoned 19th century textiles factory that suffered in the years following the collapse of the USSR. Over 90 per cent of Narva's population speak Russian. This worries many Estonians, who think Putin could invade under the pretext of protecting this minority. For years, Estonia's Russian minority wasn't considered problematic. That has changed since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Estonia has begun phasing out Russian as a first language in education and it plans to remove the voting rights of foreign citizens in local elections. In Narva, long queues now form at the aptly named 'Friendship Bridge' – a 162 mile Soviet-era bridge that links Estonia to Russia. Vehicle travel was banned in 2024, and it can take hours to cross now. In recent weeks, Estonia has begun installing metal gates on the bridge for further deterrence. One-hundred-and-thirty miles away in Tallinn, Estonia's modern, bustling and charming capital, opposition to Russia is hard to avoid. The Russian Embassy is in the centre of town and the makeshift riot fences, protecting the building from protestors, are plastered with posters. 'Putin is a Killer' stands out among a sea of red handprints and pictures of the late Alexei Navalny. A smattering of protestors gather every week outside the embassy to protest. This isn't new. It started in 2008 following the Russian invasion of Georgia, but has grown in size since. There are many reminders of Estonia's Soviet past. One of the most imposing buildings on the Tallinn skyline is the high-rise Hotel Viru. The rectangular 1970s block is a prefab building built in 1972 that stands imposing on the outskirts of the old city walls. The hotel is still in use, but it's more popular for the secrets held on its top floor – once upon a time it was the unofficial headquarters of the KGB in Estonia. The floor was out of bounds and, with only foreign dignitaries and visitors allowed to stay in the hotel. It was an open secret that rooms were bugged. In the confusion of the early 1990s as the USSR fell, KGB operatives slowly snuck out of the hotel. Locals were so terrified that it was weeks before they accessed the top floors to discover the spying devices and records left behind. Earlier this year when I toured the building, my Estonian guide told me he felt he could say 'with certainty' that 'the USSR is back'. It sounded like hyperbole, but only this week Estonia declared a Russian diplomat persona non grata. The Baltic memory of Russian espionage runs deep. Estonia became an independent sovereign nation in 1991 for only the second time in its history; both times bookended by Russia, with the former being the collapse of the Russian Empire in 1919. The pattern is the same for its Baltic neighbours Lithuania and Latvia. This history of Russian interference in the Baltics is why Estonians are still uneasy. The Baltic governments of the post-Soviet era were determined not to repeat the mistakes of their first period of collective independence. The countries were swallowed up by the USSR during the second world war and debate still rages between the Baltics, who view it as an occupation, and the Russians, who argue they protected them from the Nazis. The violence and oppression across the Baltics at the hands of the Soviets was so bad that many citizens quietly celebrated when the Nazis occupied them for several years in the middle of the war, though this isn't something many would be keen to highlight. The post-war period heralded almost half a century of Soviet occupation. Once the USSR fell, the Baltic nations lobbied, and fiercely planned, to turn west – and, less than a decade later, they joined both the EU and Nato on the same day. This is what has set the three nations apart from other former parts of the USSR which have faced continuous Russian interference – namely Ukraine and Georgia. The Russian threat for the Baltics remains, however. Estonia and Latvia are vulnerable across their eastern borders with Russia; Lithuania's longest border is with Belarus; and the exclave of Kaliningrad (between Lithuania and Poland) is just 40 miles from the Russian-backed autocracy. An incursion across this strip, the Suwalki Gap, would cut the Baltic nations off from the rest of Europe in one fell swoop. Half a century of Baltic history was determined by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, the carving up of Europe between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Many Europeans have long feared that Putin will seek to do similar with Trump. For Estonians, suddenly Alaska doesn't seem so far away.
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
US envoy says Putin agreed to protections for Ukraine as part of Trump summit
'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato,' he said on CNN's State Of The Union. Mr Witkoff said it was the first time he had heard Mr Putin agree to that. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a news conference in Brussels with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, said that 'we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, and the 'Coalition of the willing' – including the European Union – is ready to do its share'. White House envoy Steve Witkoff (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) Mr Witkoff, offering some of the first details of what was discussed at Friday's summit in Alaska, said the two sides agreed to 'robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing'. He added that Russia said that it would make a legislative commitment not to go after any additional territory in Ukraine. Mr Zelensky thanked the United States for recent signals that Washington is willing to support security guarantees for Ukraine, but said the details remained unclear. 'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine,' he said. 'But there are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, Europe's role will be and what the EU can do, and this is our main task, we need security to work in practice like Article 5 of Nato, and we consider EU accession to be part of the security guarantees.' Mr Witkoff defended Mr Trump's decision to abandon his push for Russian to agree to an immediate ceasefire, saying the president had pivoted toward a peace deal because so much progress was made. 'We covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal,' Mr Witkoff said, without elaborating. 'We began to see some moderation in the way they're thinking about getting to a final peace deal,' he said.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Drama explodes over controversial ranking of prominent politicians' podcasts: 'Thanks for playing'
Out of all the politicians who have journeyed into the world of podcasting, there is one heavyweight who is the clear number one. And he's not accepting the award with humility. Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz 's podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' boasted nearly 1.5 million estimated downloads in July, according to a recent analysis by political media analyst Kyle Tharp. According to the report, Cruz's strategists disclosed that the podcast hit 2 million downloads in March of this year. The show is so popular that the money generated from its ad revenue prompted a complaint from a watchdog group alleging Cruz wrongly directed nearly $1 million in payment related to the podcast, the Texas Tribune reported. The complaint was later dismissed. With 440,000 estimated downloads, the second most popular show was 'This is Gavin Newsom,' a talk show with the 57-year-old Democratic California governor. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, another Texas Republican, was in third place with his show 'Hold These Truths,' which pulled in 365,000 estimated downloads last month. The audience of the pair of Texas Republicans far overshadowed that of Newsom and the other Democrats. 'Thanks for playing, @GavinNewsom,' Cruz wrote on X alongside a picture of his podcast downloads and a link to his show, adding 'Tune in.' Texas Republicans Ted Cruz and Dan Crenshaw had two of the top downloaded podcasts among politicians in July Social media erupted after seeing how many tuned in to hear the politicians address the news of the day. 'I can't figure out who would ever suffer listening to Ted Cruz blather,' another X user, Andrea Gail posted. Eric Strobel wrote on X: 'A Newsom pod?? Sounds like cruel & unusual punishment to me.' The California governor has hosted several episodes of his podcast featuring prominent MAGA figures, including Charlie Kirk and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon. As of Friday, Cruz's podcast was ranked #36 in the U.S., and Newsom's was ranked #58 on Apple's top podcast charts. The quick ascent of Newsom's show is significant considering how long it has taken the Republican senator to climb the charts. Unlike Newsom, who began podcasting in March of this year, Cruz has been hosting his show since 2020. Ben Ferguson, a political commentator and Cruz's co-host, has helped the senator with the program for over five years. The senator regularly dissects the news and pertinent political debates from a conservative perspective alongside his co-host. There are over 600 episodes of 'Verdict,' and it's often produced three times a week. iHeartMedia picked up Cruz's podcast and now syndicates it to its vast audience. The group has also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to pro-Cruz political efforts. Other politicians' attempts to break into the podcasting mainstream have remained stalled, to say the least. Outside of Cruz, Newsom and Crenshaw, the remaining most downloaded shows hosted by other politicos receive a measly 11,000 downloads combined, according to the analysis. Democratic Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, 47, has a show that garnered 7,300 estimated downloads in July, the analysis reveals. Kentucky Republican Rep. Tim Burchett has the next most popular podcast, with just under 1,100 monthly downloads. The remaining group of politicians-turned-podcasters have too pitiful of audience sized to be mentioned, ranging from a few hundred to a paltry 68 downloads for Rep. Troy Carter's 'What Makes America Tick?'
