logo
Locals Challenge Puketāpapa Local Board And Auckland Council's On-Leash Policy Change For Monte Cecilia Park

Locals Challenge Puketāpapa Local Board And Auckland Council's On-Leash Policy Change For Monte Cecilia Park

Scoop7 days ago
Dog Lovers of Monte Cecilia Incorporated (DLMC), an advocacy group representing over 500 dog owners and allies, has filed a judicial review in the High Court challenging Auckland Council (AC) and the Puketāpapa Local Board's (PLB) decision to change dog access rules at Monte Cecilia Park.
DLMC is also seeking an interim order from the Court to restrain Auckland Council and the Puketāpapa Local Board from enforcing the On-Leash Policy until the judicial review is resolved.
The group alleges that the PLB's decision to impose an on-leash rule for the park's popular off-leash 'Bowl' Area was made without sufficient evidence, failed to consider alternative solutions, and disregarded overwhelming public opposition.
DLMC further contends that the decision was inconsistent with the Auckland Council Policy on Dogs 2019, predetermined by the PLB, and in breach of the Local Government Act 2002. Notably, 88% of public submissions opposed the change, and a petition with over 1,000 signatures was submitted to the Council in support of maintaining off-leash access.
'This decision unfairly penalises responsible dog owners and undermines the well-being of both dogs and the wider community,' DLMC said in a statement. 'We are committed to ensuring that Monte Cecilia Park remains a safe and welcoming shared space for all Aucklanders.'
DLMC is seeking to overturn the on-leash decision and reinstate the previous off-leash rule. The group underscores the importance of evidence-based and community-driven decision-making, and remains hopeful that the Court will recognise the merits of the case and uphold the rights of dog owners in Monte Cecilia
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Auckland Council votes in favour of amendment to helipad ban Notice of Motion
Auckland Council votes in favour of amendment to helipad ban Notice of Motion

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

Auckland Council votes in favour of amendment to helipad ban Notice of Motion

Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe Auckland Council have voted in favour of an amendment to councillor Mike Lee's Notice of Motion to ban the private use of helipads in residential areas. The amendment requests staff seek a determination through the Environment Court through the Resource Consent Appeal Process or a declaration from the Environment Court on the activity status of private helipads. The amendment was put forward by councillor Richard Hills and labelled as a "stitch up" and "ambush" by councillor Lee. This in relation to the Auckland Unitary Plan. Councillors are yet to decide on the Hauraki Gulf Islands Section of the Auckland Council District Plan. The meeting has been ongoing since 10am on Wednesday. It comes after Waiheke locals said Auckland Council was ignoring the wants of the communities by allowing a proliferation of private helipads. Last month, independent hearing commissioners appointed by the council approved rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams's request for a private helipad at their Westmere property, despite overwhelming public opposition . At the council's Policy and Planning Committee on Thursday morning, Kim Whitaker from Quiet Sky Waiheke was one of several speakers calling on the council to decline private helicopter resource consents in residential areas. He said the constant flow of helicopters was incredibly frustrating and disruptive for residents. "You can demonstrate that this committee is made up of people who believe in democratic principles and are not going to enable a small minority of people to literally fly roughshod over a majority." He said there were nearly 70 private helipads on Waiheke. RNZ contacted Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray's lawyer for comment ahead of the motion of notice and the appeal in the Environment Court. While there was no response, the couple have said in the media that they were deeply disappointed with the legal challenge and the cost to public resources it will use. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Have Your Say On The Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill
Have Your Say On The Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Have Your Say On The Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill

The Governance and Administration Committee is calling for submissions on the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill. The bill would seek to reduce pressure on council rates by: refocusing the purpose of local government; and better measuring and publicising council performance; and prioritising core services in council spending; and strengthening council accountability and transparency; and providing regulatory relief to councils. The Bill proposes a range of amendments to the Local Government Act 2002 to meet its policy objectives. Tell the Governance and Administration Committee what you think Make a submission on the bill by midnight on 27 August 2025.

Auckland councillor tries again to ban helicopters in residential areas
Auckland councillor tries again to ban helicopters in residential areas

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

Auckland councillor tries again to ban helicopters in residential areas

Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe Residential helipads will once again be the topic of conversation at Auckland Council. Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee has confirmed he'll be putting forward a Notice of Motion to ban helicopters in residential areas at Wednesday's Policy and Planning Committee. It follows news this week that Auckland billionaire couple Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' approval to build a helipad at their Westmere home, will be challenged at the Environment Court. This is the second time Lee has tried to prohibit helipads in residential areas, his motion last year losing by two votes. "Well, it'll be a close-run thing, and so who knows what the outcome really will be." "In some ways, the odds are rather stacked against getting any change, because not only will we have to persuade the elected members, the members of the governing body, the councillors, to agree with us. "Unfortunately, we'll be having to deal with the senior planning staff who are opposed to any change to the system, particularly adverse to the idea of making helipads in residential areas a prohibited activity. "So we're going to have our work cut out for us, but we have the community, the overwhelming majority of the community, supporting this," Lee said. But he said "staff advice" would be the biggest obstacle in getting his motion across the line. "The biggest challenge will be the council officers, the council planners, who seem to have a philosophic opposition to prohibited activity. "Prohibited activity for certain activities are in the Auckland Unitary Plan. Helipads, for instance, in Sydney are a prohibited activity in all residential zones and business zones. Prohibited activity is in the Resource Management Act, it's been there since 1991. "Despite all the reforms, upteam reforms of RMA, that virtually every government since 1991 has undertaken, prohibited activity, Section 87D, remains in the Act for very good reason." He said all three local boards in his ward (Waitematā, Waiheke Island and the Aotea, Great Barrier Island local board areas) backed the move. Lee will also have the support of Whau councillor Kerrin Leoni who said she believed public sentiment from Aucklanders was predominately in their corner. For example, according to Auckland Council, of 1397 written submissions made on the helipad application by Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams, most - 1227, or 87 percent - opposed the helipad on Rawene Avenue in Westmere. One-hundred-and-eight were supportive, and 12 were neutral. "I think we need to make a strong stance on that and I'm definitely supporting Mike Lee's notice of motion," Leoni said. "Rich people that are coming into our city and treating it like it's a playground. I mean, it's just unacceptable. "We just can't let our city be seen as a playground for the rich listers to come in and do as they please, there should be some rules around that. "Apparently there are public helipads within 15 minutes or I think half an hour at least from everyone's address across the city. So why can't we use those instead of everyone having to have private ones? "I know there's definitely a lot of support and I'm sure there'll be a lot of people there to support the notice of motion and in the galleries as well." Among them will be members from Quiet Sky Waitematā who this week filed an appeal to the Environment Court in an attempt to block Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams from flying a private helicopter from their multi-million-dollar Westmere property. That's despite independent hearing commissioners appointed by Auckland Council approving the couple's controversial resource consent application for a private helipad in June. "We will have representatives from Quiet Sky who will be presenting a petition of over 4100 signatures to the councillors, letting them know about how Auckland feels about banning private use helicopters in residential areas," said spokesperson Elena Keith. "Paris, Los Angeles, New York, Sydney, Melbourne, none of them allow private helicopters in the city. "This is a very backward move. It's not the city that we want. I don't think it's a city that Auckland ratepayers want," Keith said. RNZ contacted Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray's lawyer for comment ahead of the motion of notice and the appeal in the Environment Court. While there was no response, the couple have said in the media that they were deeply disappointed with the legal challenge and the cost to public resources it will use. Lee said part of the reason behind his motion was to provide more certainty for people like them. "Under the law, the way it is now, they have every right to apply for a helipad and obviously they've spent a lot of money through this process. "Clearly they're extremely disappointed that the local residents are going to appeal. They're disappointed, but they shouldn't be surprised."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store