Speaker Johnson swipes at GOP's Massie: ‘Bless his heart'
The acrimony comes as Massie continues to push for a vote on his bipartisan resolution calling for the release of documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case, a measure that many Republicans are opposed to. Massie is vowing to use a discharge petition to force a vote on the measure, something rarely used by a member of the majority.
Massie is also awaiting a primary challenger for his re-election bid next year, after drawing the ire of President Trump for his criticism of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and his opposition to the party's 'big, beautiful bill,' among other stances. Trump allies are pouring money into an effort to oust the congressman.
Pressed on Tuesday if he would support Massie or his primary opponent, Johnson demurred, but did not hide his frustrations.
'As the leader of my party I lead the incumbent protection program,' Johnson told reporters at a press conference in the Capitol. 'That's my job, I go all around the country, I travel endlessly, incessantly, I've raised over $300 million to do that, and we want everybody to come back.'
'And some people, I try to protect them from themselves, you know,' he added. 'They kick and scream and bite their own colleagues. Some people seem to enjoy trying to inflict political pain on their own teammates. I'm not gonna address anybody individually but I'll tell you that some here are much more frustrated than others. There's a small, small, tiny handful.'
Johnson continued, singling out Massie.
'One in particular just gives me lots of consternation. I don't understand. I don't understand Thomas Massie's motivation, I really don't,' Johnson said. 'I don't know how his mind works, I don't know what he's thinking.'
The current point of contention between Massie and Johnson is the Kentucky Republican's ongoing effort to force a vote on his resolution that would compel the publication of documents associated with the Epstein case. Massie, along with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), have accumulated a number of co-sponsors — including at least 10 Republicans — and they are vowing to try and bring the measure to the floor through a discharge petition.
Based on procedural rules, the legislation will not be ready for a vote until September.
Discharge petitions are procedural tools that can force legislation to the floor, despite opposition from leadership, if it garners at least 218 signatures — half the chamber.
Massie for weeks has pushed for transparency in the matter. On Tuesday, he told reporters 'I don't think this issue is going away over August,' adding 'people have wanted these files for years; the president promised these files would come out and now he's calling it a hoax.'
The House is set to break for the weeks-long August recess on Wednesday, one day earlier after the House Rules Committee came to a standstill over the Epstein saga. Democrats vowed to continue forcing votes on amendments in the panel to stage a vote on the Massie-Khanna resolution on the floor, which Republicans, apprehensive of angering the MAGA base, did not want to vote down.
Those dynamics have brought the House Rules Committee to a pause.
Johnson on Tuesday criticized the timing of Massie's discharge petition, questioning why he did not move to release the files during the Biden administration. Capitol Hill is currently inundated with the Epstein controversy after the Justice Department said it would not release more files related to the Epstein case.
'Thomas Massie could have brought his discharge petition any time over the last four and a half years. Over the last four years of [the] Biden administration. He could have done that at any time. And now he's clamoring as if there's some sort of timeline on it,' Johnson said. 'It's interesting to me that he chose the election of President Trump to bring this, to team up with the Democrats and bring this discharge petition.'
'So do I have some concern about that? I do,' he added. 'But you know, me and my way, I try to follow Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment: Never speak evil of another Republican. My gosh, it's hard to do sometimes around here. I also try to follow the Scripture, you know, it says, Bless those who persecute you. So let me just say about Thomas Massie, could you just accept my southern, bless his heart, okay. I don't know what else to say about it. We're for maximum transparency, we're engaging in that right now, and we don't need political games.'
When asked about Massie's claims that his discharge petition will come to bite GOP lawmakers later in the year, Johnson turned it back on the Kentucky Republican, responding: 'Thomas Massie is the one trying to bite Republicans, okay, I'm not quite certain what his strategy is.'
Johnson's criticism of Massie comes as Trump allies are planning an effort to oust the Kentucky Republican from his seat, which he held since 2012. A pro-Trump PAC, led by Trump 2024 co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita, launched its first ad against Massie last month.
Trump has since continued to slam Massie.
'Thomas Massie, the worst Republican Congressman, and an almost guaranteed NO VOTE each and every time, is an Embarrassment to Kentucky. He's lazy, slow moving, and totally disingenuous – A real loser! Never has anything positive to add. Looking for someone good to run against this guy, someone I can Endorse and vigorously campaign for!' he wrote on Truth Social on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
House Democrats launch bid to subpoena Justice Department for Epstein files
WASHINGTON — House Democrats launched a bid Wednesday to subpoena President Donald Trump's Justice Department for files in the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, goading GOP lawmakers to defy Trump and Republican leadership to support the action. Democrats on a subcommittee of the powerful House Committee on Oversight made a motion for the subpoena Wednesday afternoon, just hours before the House was scheduled to end its July work session and depart Washington for a monthlong break. The subcommittee's Republican chairman, Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana, postponed a vote on the matter until the end of the meeting. While several Republicans on the panel are members of a right-wing faction and have called for the release of the files, it was not clear whether they would vote for the subpoena. During a brief break in the meeting, Higgins told reporters he expected the motion for the subpoena to pass with some changes. 'If the Republican Party, if our colleagues on this committee don't join us in this vote, then what they're essentially doing is joining President Donald Trump in complicity,' Rep. Summer Lee, the Pennsylvania Democrat who made the motion for the subpoena, told reporters outside the hearing room. The move by Democrats showed how they were doing practically everything in their power to force Republicans to act on the Epstein files. House Speaker Mike Johnson — caught between demands from Trump and clamoring from his own members for the House to act — has resisted calls for action and prepared to send the House home a day early. Johnson told reporters earlier Wednesday there was no need to vote on legislation calling for the release of the Epstein files this week because the Trump administration is 'already doing everything within their power to release them.' Yet Democrats have delighted this week in pressing Republicans to support the release of the files. Their efforts halted the GOP's legislative agenda for the week and turned attention to an issue that Trump has unsuccessfully implored his supporters to forget about. 'They're fleeing our work, our job and sending us back home because they don't want to vote to release these files. This is something that they ran on. This is something that they talked about: the importance of transparency, holding pedophiles accountable,' Lee said. Democratic leaders are hoping to make the issue about much more than just Epstein, who died in his New York jail cell six years ago while he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. 'Why haven't Republicans released the Epstein files to the American people? It's reasonable to conclude that Republicans are continuing to protect the lifestyles of the rich and the shameless, even if that includes pedophiles,' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries at a news conference. 'So it's all connected.' It comes as both parties are gearing up to take their messaging to voters on Trump's big multitrillion-dollar tax breaks and spending cuts bill. For Republicans, it's 'beautiful' legislation that will spark economic growth; for Democrats, it's an 'ugly' gift mostly to the richest Americans that undermines health care for low-income people. Yet as furor has grown on the right over the Trump administration's reversal on promises related to Epstein, several Democrats have seized on the opportunity to divide Republicans on the issue. 'This goes to a fundamental sense of, 'Is our government co-opted by rich and powerful people that isn't looking out for ordinary Americans? Or can we have a government that looks out for ordinary Americans?'' said Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who has put forward a bipartisan bill meant to force release of the files. Republican leaders accuse Democrats of caring about the issue purely for political gain. They point out that the Department of Justice held on to the Epstein investigation through the presidency of Democrat Joe Biden. Trump's Justice Department is also seeking the release of testimony from secret grand jury proceedings in the Epstein case, though that effort is unlikely to produce new revelations. The House Oversight Committee, with support from Republicans, also advanced Tuesday a subpoena for Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, for a deposition. However, those lawmakers who want Congress to take a stronger role in the Epstein files have cautioned that Maxwell, who is serving a prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, may be an unreliable witness. 'It's a good idea, but it's not enough. It's not nearly enough,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has pushed the bipartisan bill to pry the records from the Justice Department.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth Signal messages came from email labeled ‘SECRET': report
Messages relayed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over a March Signal chat regarding the U.S. plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen came from a email labeled 'SECRET/NOFORN,' according to the Pentagon's independent watchdog. People familiar with the report told The Washington Post that the attack plans had initially been shared with more than a dozen defense officials via a classified email sent over a classified system by U.S. Central Command head Gen. Michael 'Erik' Kurilla. Hegseth then posted the details in the unclassified Signal group chat directly before Washington launched its attacks on March 15. He also shared the information in a separate chat that included his wife, brother and personal attorney. The military labels material 'SECRET' if unauthorized disclosure could potentially cause serious damage to national security, while 'NOFORN' means the email was not meant for anyone who is a foreign national. The findings from the Defense Department Inspector General's office seems to contradict the Trump administration's repeated, adamant claims that no classified information was shared in the Signal group chats, which were revealed after the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic was inadvertently added to one. The DOD IG's office began to look into the incident in April after Republican and Democratic members of the Senate Armed Services Committee requested it do so. The revelation also offers a new headache for Hegseth, who has faced mounting criticism over the leaked Signal chats, his management style, and his reported decision to pause military aid to Ukraine without President Trump's approval. Numerous Democrats and at least one Republican have called for Hegseth to resign or be fired over the leak scandal. In a statement to The Hill on Wednesday, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell doubled down on the claim that no classified information was shared on Signal, calling the 'narrative' 'old and worn out.' 'The Department stands behind its previous statements: no classified information was shared via Signal. As we've said repeatedly, nobody was texting war plans and the success of the Department's recent operations–from Operation Rough Rider to Operation Midnight Hammer–are proof that our operational security and discipline are top notch,' Parnell said, touting the military campaign against the Houthis in Yemen and U.S. strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities last month. The Post reported that Kurilla sent his sensitive message over a classified system known as the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet). He included a rundown of strike plans for March 15, including when bombing was expected to begin and what kind of aircraft and weapons would be used. Two people told the Post that they were not aware of any discussions for Hegseth to declassify and downgrade the information Kurilla sent – as government regulations can allow – before he sent it to the Signal chats. Former White House national security adviser Michael Waltz, who created the Signal chat, was removed from his job two months after the scandal broke but has since been nominated to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. At his nomination hearing last week, Waltz also insisted that 'no classified information was shared.'
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump illegally held up funding for Head Start preschool program, watchdog says
The Health and Human Services Department disputed the findings. WASHINGTON – The Trump administration spent three months illegally holding up federal funding for Head Start, a preschool and early childhood education program that hundreds of thousands of low-income families rely on, according to an independent government watchdog. The conclusion came in a July 23 decision from the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan oversight group. The GAO found that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees Head Start, broke the law by withholding previously approved funds for the program between January and mid-April. In doing so, the administration violated the Impoundment Control Act, which requires presidents to spend money allocated by Congress. Read more: A 'constitutional crisis?' Democrats, Republicans spar over Donald Trump's spending order HHS slashed Head Start's funding by more than $825 million compared to the same period last year, the GAO said, amounting to a 65% funding cut. It's the third such violation uncovered by the watchdog since the start of President Donald Trump's second term in the White House in January. In April, the Trump administration was considering zeroing out funding for Head Start altogether for the next fiscal year, USA TODAY first reported. After nationwide backlash and legal challenges, HHS reversed course on the budget proposal in May. Read more: Dem AGs sue White House to counter cuts to Head Start, Medicaid for immigrants Andrew Nixon, the chief spokesman for HHS, said the agency disputes the GAO's findings but did not explain why. "HHS did not impound Head Start funds," he said in a statement to USA TODAY. Despite the earlier issues, recent disbursements for Head Start have improved and are now comparable to the same time last year, said Yasmina Vinci, executive director for the National Head Start Association. In a statement, she did not comment directly on the GAO's impoundment accusations. "We're grateful that so many are standing up for Head Start, recognizing the vital role it plays in communities across the country," she said. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
