The anti-woke cardinal who conservative Catholics want as Pope
Cardinal Robert Sarah of Guinea is exactly the kind of 'anti-woke pope' that many conservative and traditionalist Catholics yearn for after more than a decade in which the progressive element of the Roman Church has been in the ascendant.
He has firmly adopted the conservative line on everything from same-sex marriage and gender ideology to the dangers of Western secularism, Islamic fundamentalism and the threat uncontrolled migration poses to European culture and values.
There was only one problem. Before Monday, few, not even most credible Catholic conservatives, thought he had the slightest chance. He was thought too outspoken, too conservative and, at 79, quite possibly too old to win sufficient support in the College of Cardinals, who will meet in conclave in the Sistine Chapel over the coming weeks to choose a new pontiff. Betting sites gave him just a 2 per cent shot at becoming the next pope.
Cardinal Sarah's chances however have been boosted somewhat by neatly packaged soundbites circulated rapidly around conservative social media spheres of influence.
An unattributed and rather grainy video interview with the cardinal warning of the dangers of migration to Europe also began to do the rounds on Monday as the Pope's death was settling in for many.
'My biggest worry is that Europe has lost the sense of its origins,' the footage shows Cardinal Sarah as saying. 'It has lost its roots… I'm afraid the West is dying… You are invaded still by other cultures, other people which will progressively dominate you by their numbers and completely change your culture, your convictions, your culture.'
The video was seized on with delight. Nick Sortor, a MAGA influencer and podcast host with 953,000 followers, posted: 'WOW! One of the frontrunners for Pope, Cardinal Robert Sarah, is a HARDLINER against mass migration.'
🚨 WOW! One of the frontrunners for Pope, Cardinal Robert Sarah, is a HARDLINER against mass migration pic.twitter.com/EJCbgofoXt
HUGE!
"I'm afraid the west is dying. You're being invaded by other cultures, other peoples...which will progressively dominate you by their numbers,…
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) April 21, 2025
Dominik Tarcsýnski, a Polish MEP from the populist Law and Justice Party, joined the clamour, calling the cardinal 'our hope.'
It was not just conservatives. Accounts known to promote pro-Russian narratives, like Radio Genoa and African Hub, with more than 2m followers, between them, joined in. 'Catholics worldwide want Cardinal Robert Sarah to be the next Pope,' African Hub posted.
More assertive statements on X, formerly Twitter, were soon declaring that, far from being an outsider, Cardinal Sarah was actually among the frontrunners.
Much of the initial impetus behind the frenzy appears to have been driven by a Catholic social media influencer from Kerala in India called Sachin Jose Ettiyil, who posted a list of candidates most likely to be elected pope to his 206,000 followers and placed Cardinal Sarah at the top. The post was viewed 1.6m times.
Mr Ettiyil has long been a fan of the Guinean, frequently posting quotes from the cardinal reflecting his conservative views on contentious issues, particularly on the rise of secularism in Europe. 'By losing its Christian roots, Europe loses its identity,' Mr Ettiyil quoted Cardinal Sarah as saying in one post, 'if Christianity disappears in Europe, the whole world is threatened,' in another.
It remains to be seen whether the online attention the cardinal has received translates into the kind of momentum that could propel him to the papacy. His odds have certainly significantly shortened in the past 24 hours, with William Hill quoting him at 14/1, making him the seventh favourite.
And a handful of conservative Catholic commentators have long predicted that he is a genuine 'Papabile', the Italian term used to denote a credible candidate for the Papacy.
In a 2020 article in Crisis Magazine, a Catholic publication, Michael Warren Davis, a prominent American conservative Catholic writer, argued that 'Cardinal Sarah is most likely to succeed Pope Francis' on account of his doctrinal soundness and liturgical positions.
That remains very much a minority view, however.
Cardinal Sarah has long defended himself against accusations of disloyalty to Pope Francis, telling Corriere della Sera in 2019: 'Those who place me in opposition to the Holy Father cannot present a single word of mine, a single phrase or a single attitude to support their absurd – and I would say, diabolical – affirmations.'
Such protestations, however, have done little to assuage concerns that the cardinal is too outspoken and too forthright to become the unifying figure the Roman Catholic Church needs following a papacy that divided the faithful.
His courage in standing up to two Guinean dictators, Ahmed Sékou Touré and Lansana Conté, coupled with his traditional views may win him support in African and US conservative circles but might not count for much in conclave, according to an African Catholic clergyman who says there is 'little likelihood' of the cardinal becoming Pope.
Many Catholic conservatives are instead pinning their hopes on Cardinal Peter Erdö, the Hungarian Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest.
He has also expressed concern about migration and is seen as a traditionalist who would restore the primacy of religious teachings after Pope Francis's reformist moves. However, he is also seen as a more accommodating figure than Cardinal Sarah, meaning he could potentially win over moderates at conclave.
William Hill has quoted Erdö at 8/1, making him fifth favourite — still a long way behind the leading contenders, the reformist Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle of the Philippines and Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican's softly spoken secretary of state under Pope Francis.
Papal elections are notoriously unpredictable, however — meaning that few would be willing entirely to write off Cardinal Sarah's chances. Pope Francis himself was considered a rank outsider: the bookies ranked him before his election in 2013 as the 15th favourite -- which goes to show how little, in ecclesiastical matters, the pundits really know.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Union calls for Doncaster council staff to have pay cut reversed
Doncaster Mayor Ros Jones is to meet with the GMB Union next month to begin discussions over pay restoration, union leaders have GMB have launched a campaign to have the City of Doncaster Council bring the salaries of its staff in line with rates paid by neighbouring Barnes, a local GMB organiser, said: "This campaign is about fairness. Our members have carried this council through austerity, through Covid, and now through a cost-of-living crisis. They deserve to have what was taken from them restored."Doncaster Council imposed pay cuts in 2012 which ranged between one and 2.5% for anyone paid over £14,733. The GMB has stated its campaign to have 2012 salary cuts reversed is gaining pace and "more and more workers" are joining the union every leaders have told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), Mayor Jones has agreed to meet them in September to begin discussions on GMB's LDRS understands the GMB would like to have an agreement worked into the budget discussions beginning in December members are calling on the long-term impact of the cuts to be reviewed, as well as for pay to be GMB has revealed it will be raising a question at the next full council meeting in September regarding spending on agency says the 2012 cuts have left council staff worse off year after year, especially with the cost of living continuing to leaders argue, while agency workers are being brought in at a premium cost, loyal council staff have yet to see their pay fully LDRS has approached Mayor Jones' office to confirm the meeting with the GMB. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
China to show off massive troops, high-tech weapons at WW2 parade
BEIJING, Aug 20 (Reuters) - China will stage a massive military parade next month in the heart of Beijing to commemorate 80 years since the end of World War Two following the surrender of Japan, mobilising tens of thousands of people and showcasing never-seen-before weapons. Hundreds of aircraft including fighter jets and bombers as well as high-tech armaments such as precision-strike weapons capable of travelling at five times the speed of sound, will be featured at the parade, military officials said at a press conference on Wednesday. The parade, the second such procession since 2015 to observe the formal surrender of Japanese forces in September 1945, will be a show of China's military strength as some of its neighbours and Western nations look on with concern over the projection of power by the People's Liberation Army in recent years. From trucks fitted with devices to take out drones, new tanks and early warning aircraft to protect China's aircraft carriers, military attaches and security analysts say they are anticipating a host of new weapons and equipment at the parade. Additions to its expanding suite of missiles, particularly anti-ship versions and weapons with hypersonic capabilities, will be particularly closely watched as the U.S. and its allies prepare to counter China in any future regional conflict. "(The weapons and equipment) will fully demonstrate our military's robust ability to adapt to technological advancements, evolving warfare patterns, and win future wars," Wu Zeke, deputy director of the military parade, told reporters. New armaments due to debut at the parade will account for a significant share of those on display, according to the military officials. The exact number of troops, weapons and equipment to be shown was not disclosed. The roughly 70-minute-long "Victory Day" parade on September 3, comprising 45 formations of troops, will be surveyed by President Xi Jinping at Tiananmen Square alongside a number of foreign leaders and dignitaries including Russian President Vladimir Putin, who also attended the 2015 parade. At the last World War Two parade, more than 12,000 soldiers, including diverse contingents from Russia and Belarus to Mongolia and Cambodia, marched through the city alongside veterans. Beijing had also mobilised over 500 pieces of military equipment and 200 aircraft. Many Western leaders had shunned the 2015 event, wary of the message that China would send with its exhibition of military might. Then Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe declined to attend. Foreign attendees at the time included former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. No information on participating foreign troops or attendance of foreign leaders was disclosed at the press conference. Authorities have stepped up security in downtown Beijing since the first rehearsals this month, setting up checkpoints, diverting road traffic and shutting shopping malls and office buildings. Beijing has so far conducted two large-scale rehearsals on the weekends of August 9-10 and 16-17, attended by 22,000 and 40,000 people involving troops, police and spectators. Preparations for the parade are basically completed, officials said on Wednesday.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
The bleak farce over Ukraine is a typical ‘great power' carve up
Standing on a stage emblazoned with a slogan that proclaimed they were 'pursuing peace', the two men announced – not the promised ceasefire, much less a permanent end to hostilities – but, rather, a vague insistence that progress was being made. This should surprise no-one. The war in Ukraine is not a war of liberation, but a proxy war between Russia and the nominal West (which is represented by Nato and, in particular, the United States). READ MORE: David Pratt: 'Art of the deal' fails again as Donald Trump is outflanked This is reflected in the fact that the Alaska discussions were conducted between Washington and Moscow, bypassing both the Ukrainian government and its European allies. The secondary talks in Washington on Monday – in which Trump hosted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, various European leaders and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – only served to underline the fact that the Ukraine war is an inter-imperialist conflict. In a proxy war, it is the puppet master, not the puppet, who ultimately calls the shots. The problem for Zelenskyy and his European allies is that the puppet master is Donald Trump, and he has decided to comprehensively shift American resources from Europe to East Asia, in an attempt to counter the rise of China. In doing so, Trump is extending the Obama-era policy of a 'pivot to Asia'. However, unlike his Democrat predecessors, the current incumbent in the White House has come to the conclusion that the US cannot counter China's threat to US global hegemony while maintaining its post-Second World War commitments in Europe. That – and not Trump's supposed 'pro-Russian' sympathies – is why the US president is seeking to bring the Ukraine war to an end. It is also why at the Nato summit back in June, Trump insisted that Nato's European members and Canada commit to increasing their military expenditure to 5% of their GDP. The direction of travel of the current diplomatic manoeuvres is towards a carve-up of Ukrainian territory agreed, first and foremost, between the Americans and the Russians. For the main European leaders – particularly French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer – this is a problem because it would mark a further step in the US's uncoupling from Europe. It would be naïve in the extreme to take at face value the European leaders' claims of 'solidarity' with Ukraine and concern for the country's 'territorial integrity'. Since the war began, the Western alliance's interest has been – not Ukrainian victory – but the slow, military diminution of Russia. That is why the Nato powers have provided Ukraine with just enough weapons to keep the conflict grinding on. In other words, Western governments have proven themselves very happy to continue fighting to the last drop of the Ukrainian people's blood. That strategy – which relied, as Nato itself relies, on US leadership and resources – is now in crisis. As Monday's meeting at the White House showed, Trump's policy of a step-by-step reduction in the American commitment to Europe has forced Zelenskyy and the European leaders into the role of supplicants. READ MORE: Nigel Farage claims court ruling removing asylum seekers from hotel as 'victory' The roots of this crisis date back long before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. That invasion was brutal and outrageous, but it was not – as many Western leaders and commentators insist – irrational. In 1990, US secretary of state James Baker assured Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev that Nato would not move 'one inch eastward' in response to the dismantlement of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. That was a deliberate, calculated lie. The subsequent, rapid eastward expansion of Nato and the European Union (which, significantly, have worked in tandem throughout) has taken the Western imperialist bloc right up to the borders of Russia. The West's attempt to exploit its perceived 'victory' in the Cold War has backfired catastrophically. Such an explanation of the origins of the Ukraine war is not – as pro-Nato commentators claim – an attempt to justify Putin's invasion. It is, rather, the only way we can understand both why the war started and the deeply unsatisfactory terms on which it is likely to end. It was ever thus with inter-imperialist rivalries. For example, the present cataclysm in the Middle East has its roots in the European powers' carve-up of the territory of the collapsing Ottoman Empire. In his fine stage show Nowhere (which is currently playing at the Traverse Theatre as part of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe), the excellent Scots-Egyptian actor and theatre-maker Khalid Abdalla talks about the Sykes-Picot Agreement. This was the secret arrangement, made in 1916, by which the British and the French drew a line across the map of the Middle East, dividing the Ottoman territories between themselves. The consequences were disastrous and manifold. They included the infamous Balfour Declaration of 1917, by which the British government declared its support for the partition of Palestine and the creation of the State of Israel. The Zionist movement's oft-stated dream of making a deal with the imperialist powers to enable it to drive the Palestinians from their land began to come to fruition. The subsequent British 'mandate' in Palestine, under the Sykes-Picot Agreement, laid the foundations for the Nakba ('Catastrophe') – the mass murder and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and the creation of the Israeli state – in 1948. READ MORE: It's interesting to see who the British state views as its enemies The rest – from the occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights in 1967 to the current genocide in Gaza – is, as they say, history. Such carve-ups – and their disastrous consequences for the peoples of the affected regions – are the inevitable consequence of inter-imperialist rivalries. The division of Africa – primarily between the British, the French, the Portuguese and the Belgians – had catastrophic consequences that the people of the continent continue to live with to this day. The same is true across Asia, the Americas and Oceania. The coming Russo-American carve-up of Ukraine is part of a long and terrible history of imperialist imposition. Until we break the cycle of nationalism, militarism and power bloc rivalries, we are doomed to repeat the dark farce of the current manoeuvres over Ukraine.
