logo
Far beyond Harvard, conservative efforts to reshape higher education are gaining steam

Far beyond Harvard, conservative efforts to reshape higher education are gaining steam

Indian Express23-07-2025
Ken Beckley never went to Harvard, but he has been wearing a crimson Harvard cap in a show of solidarity. As he sees it, the Trump administration's attacks on the school echo a case of government overreach at his alma mater, Indiana University.
Beckley, a former head of the school's alumni association, rallied fellow graduates this spring in an unsuccessful effort to stop Governor Mike Braun, a Republican, from removing three alumni-elected members from Indiana University's Board of Trustees and handpicking their replacements.
No government effort to influence a university — private or public—has gotten more attention than the clash at Harvard, where the Trump administration has frozen billions of dollars in federal funding as it seeks a series of policy changes. But far beyond the Ivy League, Republican officials are targeting public universities in several states with efforts seeking similar ends.
'What's happened nationally is now affecting Indiana,' said Beckley, who bought Harvard caps in bulk and passes them out to friends. Officials in conservative states took aim at higher education before President Donald Trump began his second term, driven in part by the belief that colleges are out of touch — too liberal and loading up students with too much debt. The first efforts focused on critical race theory, an academic framework centred on the idea that racism is embedded in the nation's institutions, and then on diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Since Trump took office, officials in states including Indiana, Florida, Ohio, Texas, Iowa and Idaho increasingly have focused on university governance — rules for who picks university presidents and boards and how much control they exert over curricula and faculty tenure.
As at Harvard, which Trump has decried as overly influenced by liberal thinking, those state officials have sought to reduce the power of faculty members and students.
'They've realised that they can take a bit of a step further, that they can advance their policy priorities through those levers they have through the state university system,' said Preston Cooper, a senior fellow who studies higher education policy at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
In Indiana, Braun said he picked new trustees who will guide the school 'back in the right direction.' They include an anti-abortion attorney and a former ESPN host who was disciplined because she criticised the company's policy requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19.
Braun's administration has ramped up scrutiny of hiring practices at colleges statewide. Indiana's attorney general, Todd Rokita, has sent letters to the University of Notre Dame, Butler University and DePauw University questioning the legality of their DEI programs.
Butler, a private, liberal arts school in Indianapolis, was founded by an abolitionist in the decade leading up to the Civil War and admitted women and students of colour from the start.
'I hope that Butler will uphold the standards they were founded on,' said Edyn Curry, president of Butler's Black Student Union.
In Florida, the state university system board in June rejected longtime academic Santa Ono for the presidency at the University of Florida, despite a unanimous vote of approval by the school's own Board of Trustees. The unprecedented reversal followed criticism from conservatives about Ono's past support for DEI programs.
That followed the conservative makeover of New College of Florida, a small liberal arts school once known as the state's most progressive. After Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed a group of conservatives to its governing board, many faculty left, including Amy Reid, who now manages a team focused on higher education at the free-expression group PEN America.
'When our students started organising at New College, one of their slogans was Your Campus is Next,'' said Reid, who saw the gender studies program she directed defunded and then cut. 'So no, we're not surprised when you see other states redefining what can be in a general education class, because we've seen it happen already.'
The changes at several public universities are proceeding without battles of the kind seen at Harvard. In a standoff seen widely as a test of private universities' independence, Harvard has filed lawsuits against the administration's moves to cut its federal funding and block its ability to host international students.
In Iowa, new DEI restrictions are taking effect in July for community colleges. And the board that governs the state's three public universities is weighing doing something similar to Idaho, where a new law imposes restrictions on requiring students to take DEI-related courses to meet graduation requirements.
Historically, the Iowa board has been focused on big-picture issues like setting tuition rates and approving degree programs. Now, there's a perceived sense that faculty should not be solely responsible for academic matters and that the trustees should play a more active role, said Joseph Yockey, a professor at the University of Iowa College of Law and the former president of Iowa's faculty senate.
'What we started to see more recently is trustees losing confidence,' Yockey said. A new law in Ohio bans DEI programs at public colleges and universities and also strips faculty of certain collective bargaining rights and tenure protections.
There are few guardrails limiting how far oversight boards can change public institutions, said Isabel McMullen, a doctoral candidate at the University of Wisconsin who researches higher education.
'For a board that really does want to wreak havoc on an institution and overthrow a bunch of different programs, I think if a board is interested in doing that, I don't really see what's stopping them aside from students and faculty really organising against it,' McMullen said.
The initiatives on state and federal levels have led to widespread concerns about an erosion of colleges' independence from politics, said Isaac Kamola, director of the Centre for the Defence of Academic Freedom at the American Association of University Professors.
'They have to not only face an attack from the state legislature, but also from the federal government as well,' said Kamola, who is also a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut.
In Texas, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed a pair of bills in June that impose new limits on student protests and give gubernatorial-appointed boards that oversee the state's universities new powers to control the curriculum and eliminate degree programs.
Cameron Samuels, executive director of Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, an advocacy group, said politicians in the state are taking control of universities to dictate what is acceptable.
'When someone controls the dissemination of ideas, that is a really dangerous sign for the future of democracy,' Samuels said.
The 21-year-old who is transgender and nonbinary went to college in Massachusetts and got into Harvard for graduate school, but as the Trump administration began targeting the institution, he instead chose to return to his home state and attend the University of Texas in Austin. 'I at least knew what to expect,' he said
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump hits India with 25% tariff plus a Russia penalty
Trump hits India with 25% tariff plus a Russia penalty

Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump hits India with 25% tariff plus a Russia penalty

Even as India and the US negotiate a trade agreement, President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods from August 1, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia. In a post on social media platform Truth Social, Trump said India has 'the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country'. India's Commerce and Industry Ministry said the government had taken note of Trump's statement and is 'studying its implications'. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective. The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs,' the ministry said in a statement. The government will take 'all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK,' the ministry said. Hours later, Trump hardened the rhetoric. Speaking to reporters in the White House after his announcement, Trump also took note of India's BRICS membership, terming the bloc as 'an attack on the dollar and we are not going to let anybody attack the dollar'. 'Prime Minister Modi is a friend of mine, but they don't do very much business with us. They sell a lot to us but we don't buy from them…because the tariffs are so high. They have one of the highest tariffs in the world. Now, they are willing to cut it very substantially. But we will see what happens. We are talking to India now, we will see what happens. It doesn't matter too much whether we have a deal or whether we charge them a certain tariff. But you will know at the end of this week,' Trump said. The announcement of the 25 per cent tariff plus a 'penalty' comes ahead of the visit of US officials to India later next month on August 25 for the next round of negotiations over the proposed bilateral trade agreement. The fifth round of talks between India and US were concluded last week in Washington. Trump's decision to announce the tariff and penalty on Indian goods comes two days before his August 1 deadline, when the reciprocal tariffs announced on several countries will come into effect. The decision to announce the 25 per cent tariff is being seen as a way to pressure India into agreeing to the demands made by the US. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett was reported to have said on Wednesday that Trump has been frustrated with how the trade deal negotiations with India have gone and 'believes his 25 per cent tariff announcement will help the situation,' news agency Reuters reported. At 25 per cent, the tariff on India is just below the 26 per cent reciprocal rate Trump had announced in early April. However, it is higher than the levels agreed between the US and Asian countries such as Vietnam (20 per cent) and Indonesia (19 per cent). In his post on Truth Social, the US President also said that India would face a 'penalty' in addition to the 25 per cent tariff because of its imports of Russian energy items and defence equipment. The proposed 'penalty' for the import of Russian goods marks the first use of secondary tariffs by the US. 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST,' Trump said in his post. India's import of crude oil from Russia has surged in recent years, rising to 35-40 per cent of its total purchases from less than 1 per cent prior to the invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, which sent global crude oil prices sharply higher. After China, India is the second-largest buyer of Russian crude oil. Historically, India's oil purchases have primarily been from Iraq and Saudi Arabia. The size of the 'penalty' announced by Trump was not immediately known. According to Reuters, Kevin Hassett told reporters on Wednesday that Trump and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer 'will have more information 'shortly' on the additional penalty'. 'Massive trade deficit' In a second post on Truth Social minutes after he announced the 25 per cent tariff, Trump said the US has a 'MASSIVE TRADE DEFICIT WITH INDIA!!!' In 2024, the total goods trade between India and the US stood at $129.2 billion. While the US' exports to India in calendar year 2024 rose 3.4 per cent to $41.8 billion from 2023, its imports from India increased by 4.5 per cent to $87.4 billion, resulting in a goods trade deficit of $45.7 billion. The deficit was 5.4 per cent higher than in 2023. India's main exports to the US included drug formulations and biologicals, telecom instruments, precious and semi-precious stones, petroleum products, vehicle and auto components, gold and other precious metal jewellery, readymade cotton garments, and iron and steel products. Meanwhile, its main imports include crude oil, petroleum products, coal, cut and polished diamonds, electric machinery, and aircraft, among others. The US President has cited a deficit with its trade partners as a negative for the world's largest economy, calling for fairer trade relations. The Trump administration has hence aggressively pursued trade agreements with various countries, signing one with the European Union (EU) earlier this week. As part of the trade deal, imports from the EU into the US will face a tariff of 15 per cent and will see American goods get 'unprecedented levels of market access', according to the White House. Further, the EU will purchase $750 billion of US energy goods and invest $600 billion in the US by 2028. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More

Maybe they'll sell to India: Trump strikes trade deal, oil partnership with Pak
Maybe they'll sell to India: Trump strikes trade deal, oil partnership with Pak

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Maybe they'll sell to India: Trump strikes trade deal, oil partnership with Pak

Hours after imposing a 25% tariff along with additional penalties on Indian imports, US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the United States has struck a new trade agreement with Pakistan to jointly develop the country's vast oil reserves -- a move he says could eventually lead to Pakistan exporting oil to New Delhi.'We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves,' Trump said in a bold statement. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!'advertisementThis comes after Trump's declaration of a 25% tariff and extra penalties on goods imported from India, set to take effect on August 1. He pointed to India's persistent oil trade with Russia and existing trade restrictions as major factors behind the decision. The president shared on Truth Social that it had been a 'very busy' day in the White House, largely focused on trade negotiations. 'I have spoken to the Leaders of many Countries, all of whom want to make the United States 'extremely happy,'' he said. 'All of this will help reduce our Trade Deficit in a very major way.' Trump added that the administration is currently selecting an oil company to lead the US-Pakistan energy partnership. He did not name specific firms or provide a timeline for project week, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said the United States and Pakistan were "very close" to a trade deal that could come within days, after he met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday. The US State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said last week the two top diplomats stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and TO MEET SOUTH KOREAN DELEGATIONIn a separate development, Trump said he is preparing to meet with a South Korean trade delegation to discuss tariff reductions. 'South Korea is right now at a 25% Tariff, but they have an offer to buy down those Tariffs,' he noted. 'I will be interested in hearing what that offer is.'The president hinted that several other countries are also offering tariff deals, part of what he characterised as a broader effort to correct America's trade imbalance.'A full report will be released at the appropriate time,' Trump concluded. 'Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch

Trouble Brewing: Why a Brazilian Tariff May Cause Coffee Prices to Soar
Trouble Brewing: Why a Brazilian Tariff May Cause Coffee Prices to Soar

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trouble Brewing: Why a Brazilian Tariff May Cause Coffee Prices to Soar

President Trump's proposed 50% tariff on Brazilian goods is likely to lift the price of the preferred coffee for most U.S. consumers. Brazilian arabica beans are the source for roughly 35% to 40% of the coffee consumed in the U.S. and a pending levy on imports starting Aug. 1 would increase the price of coffee in cafes and grocery stores alike. Brazil is by far the leading producer of coffee worldwide, and is expected to produce a total of 65 million bags of beans in the 2025-2026 marketing year—more than double of the next-largest producer Vietnam—the Department of Agriculture estimates. In fact, at over 40 million bags, Brazil produces more arabica coffee than the next five leading producers in the world combined. This includes countries like Colombia and Honduras, where U.S. coffeemakers already buy a large portion of their output. 'We don't have an easy ability to replace Brazilian coffee,' said James Watson, senior beverage analyst with Rabobank. 'For the most part, most of what you drink is all arabica.' Vietnam is the next leading coffee producer in the world, but produces virtually no arabica coffee. The country is forecast to produce 30 million bags of robusta coffee in 2025-2026, robusta being a cheaper type of coffee that is more commonly used in instant coffees. A number of brands sold in grocery stores are made using a mix of both arabica and robusta. The ability of U.S. roasters—some owned by companies like JM Smucker and Kraft Heinz—to switch out Brazilian coffee for a different exporter is limited. Domestic production is small, with the U.S. importing 99% of its coffee needs through 2024. Hawaii, California and Puerto Rico are the only U.S. territories that produce any amount of coffee. That leaves coffee roasters with few options. Companies may look to alter their recipes for the blends they produce, or simply swallow higher prices coming from tariffs. Last month, JM Smucker—whose brands include Folgers, Dunkin', and Cafe Bustelo—said that it raised prices for its coffee in May, and will do so again in August. That call was held before the tariff on Brazil was announced by Trump. Those in the coffee supply chain are tentative about doing business without knowing for sure if the 50% tariff will be implemented. Traders have rushed to bring more coffee into the U.S. ahead of a tariff, directing it away from other countries, Citi Research said in a note. 'The real effect you're seeing is that supply chains are locking up,' said Tomas Araujo, a trading associate with StoneX Group. In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, Trump touted the August 1 deadline for tariffs as being 'strong' and not to be extended. Coffee futures trading on the Intercontinental Exchange had been on a downturn in recent months, coming off of a record high of $4.29 a pound hit in February. Coffee futures were among the top-gaining commodities in 2024, because of drought hitting Brazilian crops. But the weather has since improved, sending the futures contract down 35%. Prices started to rise again earlier in July as coffee started the new marketing year on the first of the month. If the 50% tariff on Brazil is implemented—which companies and traders are not convinced will happen, said Watson—then importers are expected to charge buyers more to ship the coffee, which in turn domestic roasters may pass on to consumers. But without tariffs, prices of coffee futures would otherwise be expected to slide. Coffee crops in Brazil have been receiving more rainfall, which is in turn boosting production estimates for the 2025-2026 marketing year, according to the USDA data. Retail prices for coffee run roughly six months behind the changes in futures prices. So consumers are still feeling the impact of futures rising to all-time highs earlier this year. Year-to-date, the average retail price for a cup of coffee in U.S. cities has risen 9% in 2025, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retailers were hoping to pay less for coffee as futures prices slid, said Watson. But if tariffs do come into play, then both futures and retail prices will likely see no respite. 'It takes a while from that decrease to come to the market,' said Watson. Write to Kirk Maltais at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store