logo
Florida bill to change petition process decried as aiding special interests

Florida bill to change petition process decried as aiding special interests

Yahoo06-03-2025

TALLAHASSEE — Florida's Legislature is eyeing changes to the ballot initiative process after last year's intense fight over two proposed amendments on abortion access and recreational marijuana.
Opponents say the bill would consolidate more power in the hands of Tallahassee and monied special interests. Proponents say the changes ensure the integrity of the process and keep out-of-state special interests out.
Florida's ballot initiative process, a right guaranteed in the constitution, has long been used by groups to pass measures that have been otherwise stymied by state lawmakers. It's how Florida got a $15 minimum wage, medical marijuana and felon voter restoration.
The process is among the hardest of any of the 24 states that allow citizens to directly amend their laws or constitution. Legislative changes have made the process in Florida harder and costlier in recent years.
HB 1205 would continue that trend, about a dozen public commenters warned during the bill's first committee meeting Thursday.
They pointed to the bill's requirement that sponsors put up a $1 million bond before collecting any petitions, as well as its proposals to increase fines, add new requirements and tighten the window to return petitions.
But Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, R-Fort Myers, the bill sponsor, argued that her proposal was the way to keep the ballot initiative process so that 'only those with a stake in our constitution can change it.'
The legislation comes on the heels of two high-profile failed constitutional amendments heavily opposed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and state Republicans: Amendment 3, which would have allowed for recreational marijuana use, and Amendment 4, which would have protected abortion access and undone the state's six-week abortion ban.
When talking about her motivations for filing the bill, Persons-Mulicka pointed to a state report that alleged widespread fraud in the abortion amendment campaign.
Critics of the state's report accused Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration of applying uneven scrutiny toward a campaign he disliked.
Her bill changes the law to require that all petition collectors — both paid workers and volunteers — be Florida residents, citizens and not have certain felony convictions.
Persons-Mulicka's bill would also require that all petitions collected be turned into a supervisor of elections office within 10 days, down from the current 30-day window. Related fines for being late would be increased.
It also would allow fraud related to petitions to be prosecuted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, or RICO, Act.
Brad Ashwell, the Florida director of All Voting is Local, said the bill's proposals would have a 'pretty serious chilling effect' on an ordinary campaign's ability to move forward but could be easily overcome by well-off groups.
'It puts the process more firmly in the hands of those who have the resources, who have the wealth,' Ashwell said.
Rich Templin, political director for the Florida AFL-CIO, said that over the last two decades, Florida's petition process has become cost-prohibitive for grassroots efforts — which he said was the Legislature's design.
'These bills are only filed after something happens at the ballot box that the majority in the Capitol doesn't like,' he said.
Templin said the Legislature began making major changes after a 2004 minimum wage amendment passed. One of those changes required that signatures expire in a shorter time frame.
In order to get the nearly 900,000 needed petitions in a tight window, Templin said campaigns need to rely on paid circulators, rather than volunteers.
'If the petition process is broken, it's bills like this that broke it,' Templin said at Tuesday's committee meeting.
Changes to the petition process are one of DeSantis' priorities for this session. But his proposal, which would effectively dismantle petition circulation as it exists today, is significantly different from Persons-Mulicka's bill.
Persons-Mulicka said that she wanted to balance the integrity of the petition process while still ensuring citizens can petition to amend the constitution.
'That power belongs to the people, and I want to ensure that that power's protected,' she said.
Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, R-Spring Hill, has filed a sweeping election bill in the Senate that mirrors DeSantis' proposals, but the Senate's election committee is planning to put its own not-yet-revealed bill forward.
It's unclear what that bill will include. House Speaker Danny Perez, R-Miami, said Tuesday that he believed the House, Senate and governor were on different pages about how they should approach changes to the petition process. Perez and Senate President Ben Albritton said they are in support of taking action, though.
The Florida Supervisors of Election association is in support of the House bill but wants some changes, said lobbyist David Ramba, including requiring voters themselves to return petitions to elections offices instead of allowing the amendment sponsor to do so.
The proposed House bill would require election supervisors to notify a voter once their petition is verified as valid, and tell the voter they can revoke their petition if it was signed fraudulently.
Lauren Brenzel, the campaign director for Amendment 4, said there's no state where the petition process operates the way Ramba suggested.
Brenzel said that some of the bill's suggested fines, including a $500 fine for petitions sent to a different elections supervisor, could be incurred by a campaign for simple paperwork mistakes.
'I really do think it is so sad to see legislation like this that claims to be for the people that really is further alienating people from the process,' Brenzel said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andrew Yang reaches out to Musk to collaborate on new political party
Andrew Yang reaches out to Musk to collaborate on new political party

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Andrew Yang reaches out to Musk to collaborate on new political party

Former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang said he's reached out to Elon Musk in hopes of collaborating on the creation of a new political party, according to a Saturday interview with Politico Magazine. Yang, along with mutual friends, believes the Tesla CEO has what it takes to form a new faction that propels America's strongest leaders. When asked if Musk has responded to his inquiry, Yang told the outlet 'Not yet, but I assume he's been very busy.' 'We have been of the opinion that America needed a new political party for a number of years, and so waiting another 24 hours is nothing,' he added. Musk's push for a new political caucus emerged from his public feud with President Trump over the 'big, beautiful bill.' The tech giant strongly opposed the national debt increase after months of working with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut federal spending. Yang, the founder of 'The Forward Party,' said it's political outsiders like Musk who consider non-traditional approaches to the country's problems. 'I want to work with people that recognize that America's political system has gone from dysfunctional to polarizing to even worse. And at this point, the fastest growing political movement in the United States is independents,' Yang said. 'They feel like neither party represents them, and the two-party system is not delivering what they want to see,' he continued. Many people have recently left the Democratic party, including former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who announced she became an independent after seeing political polarization throughout the campaign trail. 'If you look at Musk's politics over the last number of years, he waited in line to meet Barack Obama, he endorsed me in a Democratic cycle, and even earlier in this cycle — 2024 — he was looking for an alternative to Trump,' Yang said. 'There are a number of things that I think Elon shares in common with a lot of other folks I talk to who want to see some kind of middle ground or balance. The problem is: In our two-party system, you get whipsawed either one direction or the other,' he continued. Last year, Musk was a major donor for Republicans but has supported a wide array of candidates like Yang in the past. Now that he's severed ties with the GOP, political hopefuls have been looking to capitalize on the billionaire's powerful funding reserve for future campaigns.

Bill Maher mocks Dems for trying to find ‘their Joe Rogan,' suggests figuring out how they lost him
Bill Maher mocks Dems for trying to find ‘their Joe Rogan,' suggests figuring out how they lost him

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Bill Maher mocks Dems for trying to find ‘their Joe Rogan,' suggests figuring out how they lost him

'Real Time' host Bill Maher mocked the Democratic Party's attempt to find 'their Joe Rogan,' pointing out the irony that the podcaster had leaned left until he became disillusioned with the party. The host explained, 'One idea that's getting a lot of attention is the Dems need to find their Joe Rogan, a liberal Joe Rogan.' Maher argued that rather than 'conjuring up a new Joe Rogan,' Democrats should be asking themselves how they lost him in the first place. Advertisement Rogan previously endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., in the 2020 election. It wasn't until 2024 that Rogan publicly endorsed President Donald Trump. The 'Real Time' host lampooned the idea that the real reason why former Vice President Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election is because 'Republicans have a podcast.' 'Okay, maybe. Or, you could consider this,' Maher jeered. 'Instead of conjuring up a new Joe Rogan, ask yourself why you lost the old one, because he used to be on your side.' In 2024, regarding the Democratic desire to find its own Rogan, the podcaster said, 'They had me.' 'I was on their side,' he added. Advertisement Maher noted that he's watched the political evolution of both Rogan and Musk and their party affiliations didn't switch 'overnight.' Youtube/Real Time with Bill Maher Maher compared Rogan's political transformation to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was also a liberal who ended up being 'driven to the other camp by bad attitudes and bad ideas.' Maher noted that he's watched the political evolution of both Rogan and Musk and their party affiliations didn't switch 'overnight.' Maher referenced a 2022 post on then-Twitter from Elon Musk in which he shared a chart depicting his feeling that the Democratic Party had moved too far to the left for him, rather than his ideology moving to the right. Advertisement Rogan previously endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., in the 2020 election. Rogan said that Democrats have moved so far that it 'left a basically liberal centrist like him — now labeled a conservative,' adding that he related to Musk's post. Maher also highlighted attempts by the left to cancel Rogan and Musk as a key reason they abandoned the party. Advertisement 'They tried real hard to cancel Rogan a few years ago — and when Elon hosted 'Saturday Night Live' in 2021, well before he was a Trumper — some of the cast gave him the cold shoulder for the sin of being rich,' he recalled. 'You think people don't remember when you do this s— to them?' The late-night host asserted that while he's never left the party, Democrats need to work hard to get 'all the guys in America like Joe and Elon' back on their side, but assured them that it's still possible.

Illinois congresswoman says Sikh man praying on House floor was ‘deeply troubling'
Illinois congresswoman says Sikh man praying on House floor was ‘deeply troubling'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Illinois congresswoman says Sikh man praying on House floor was ‘deeply troubling'

The Brief U.S. Rep. Mary Miller (R-Illinois) said in a since-deleted post on X that a Sikh chaplain leading a prayer in Congress was "deeply troubling." She initially misidentified the man as Muslim, according to multiple reports. Miller's comments have received backlash from several fellow members of Congress. WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Republican congresswoman representing parts of downstate Illinois is getting heat for saying in a since-deleted social media post on Friday that it was "deeply troubling" to her that a Sikh man led a prayer in the House of Representatives, after misidentifying the man as Muslim. What we know According to multiple reports, U.S. Rep. Mary Miller wrote on X: "It's deeply troubling that a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning. This should have never been allowed to happen. "America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it. May God have mercy!" Miller then edited the post to reflect that the man was actually Sikh, but later deleted it entirely. Still, Miller's post garnered criticism from multiple members of Congress, including Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat who represents parts of Chicago's northwest suburbs and is running for a U.S. Senate seat. He called Miller's comments anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim. "I am appalled by Rep. Mary Miller's comments—first misidentifying a Sikh chaplain as Muslim, then saying he should have 'never been allowed' to lead the House in prayer. Her remarks were both anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim, and they reflect a disturbing pattern of religious intolerance," Krishnamoorthi said. "The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion for all. The Sikh and Muslim communities have long contributed to the strength, service, and spirit of our nation. All Americans—regardless of party—must come together to reject these attacks and stand united against all forms of prejudice." Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York), the minority leader in the House, also reacted to Miller's comments saying, "It's deeply troubling that such an ignorant and hateful extremist is serving in the United States Congress. That would be you, Mary." The Congressional Asian Pacific Americans Caucus, which includes Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinois) and Krishnamoorthi, said on X that it condemned Miller's anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim bigotry." "Sikhs and Muslims practice two separate and distinct religions, and conflating the two based on how someone looks is not only ignorant but also racist," the CAPAC added in its post. A request for comment to Miller's campaign was not immediately responded to on Saturday. The backstory It's not the first time Miller has drawn ire for controversial comments during her tenure in Congress. Just a few days into her first term in 2021, Miller apologized for knowingly quoting Adolf Hitler during a rally outside of the U.S. Capitol. While discussing the need for the Republican Party to appeal to young people, she said, "Hitler was right on one thing. He said, 'Whoever has the youth has the future.'" She made that comment on Jan. 5, 2021, the day before supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. Miller apologized for the comment and said some were trying to "twist" her words to "mean something antithetical to my beliefs." She added she was "passionately" pro-Israel and "will always be a strong advocate and ally of the Jewish community." In 2022, in response to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the constitutional right to an abortion, Miller said at a rally the decision was a "victory for white life." A spokesman said Miller meant to say the decision was a victory for a "right to life," and that her comment was a "mix-up of words."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store