logo
Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution

Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution

Yahoo2 days ago
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a human smuggling case against him, saying the government was prosecuting the Maryland construction worker to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador.
Their motion filed in court said attempts to dismiss indictments on the grounds of 'selective or vindictive prosecution' are infrequent and rarely succeed, 'but if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case.'
The attorneys said senior cabinet members, Justice Department leaders and President Donald Trump mounted unprecedented public attacks on Abrego Garcia and that 'vindictiveness is clear from the record.'
Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia is in jail, said in an email prosecutors would have no other comment beyond what they file in response to the motion. No prosecutor motion was filed as of late Tuesday.
Abrego Garcia became a prominent face in the debate over Trump's immigration policies following his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador in March. Trump's administration violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shields Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador because he likely faces threats of gang violence there.
The administration claimed Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, although he wasn't charged and has repeatedly denied the allegation. Facing mounting pressure and a U.S. Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in June to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.'
Tuesday's motion alleged the government was trying to paint Abrego Garcia as a criminal to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador and to avoid 'the embarrassment of accepting responsibility for its unlawful conduct." The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia's deportation.
Abrego Garcia's attorneys asked the court at least to order a hearing on the government's motives.
The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on.
A federal judge in Maryland last month prohibited the Trump administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail. The judge ordered the government to provide three business days notice if Immigration and Customs Enforcement intends to initiate deportation proceedings against him.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Democrats, Gov. Gavin Newsom hit back after Texas passes Trump redistricting map
California Democrats, Gov. Gavin Newsom hit back after Texas passes Trump redistricting map

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California Democrats, Gov. Gavin Newsom hit back after Texas passes Trump redistricting map

California Democrats were set Thursday to pass a redistricting map to add up to five blue congressional seats after Texas Republicans rubber-stamped President Donald Trump's mid-decade gerrymander plan that would give the GOP a similar edge in the Lone Star State. Gov. Gavin Newsom is championing the aggressive high-stakes Democratic effort to strike back at Trump's Texas power grab as the two parties jostle for a political advantage in next year's midterms and beyond. The likely Democratic 2028 White House contender tweeted 'Triggered?' at Trump after the president accused him of 'destroying the great state of California' in a post on his social media site. California Democrats were poised to use their legislative supermajority to approve the new congressional map, which Newsom could then sign ahead of a Friday deadline. Then would then schedule a special election in November to ask voters to approve the map, which is aimed at flipping five GOP-held seats. With angry Democrats itching to fight back against Trump's second-term agenda, polls show broad early support for the effort, even though blue states have traditionally championed independent non-partisan redistricting efforts as a fair way to divvy up seats in the House of Representatives. Trump hailed the Texas House for finally approving what he calls a 'big beautiful map' on Wednesday. It chops up three Democratic held House seats in blue-leaning Texas metropolitan areas and makes two more seats in the Rio Grande Valley much tougher for Democratic incumbents. He quickly took aim at other red states like Indiana, Florida and Missouri, urging them to take similar action to bolster already outsized Republican edges in their House delegations. 'We're going to win the midterms … bigger and better than ever before,' Trump proclaimed Thursday. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, who is in line to become Speaker of the House if Democrats retake the House in the midterms, vowed to fight the Texas plan, which he says is unconstitutional and violates the Voting Rights Act. 'This corrupt power grab by desperate Republican hacks will be fought in the legislature and in federal court,' Jeffries tweeted. The escalating redistricting arms race is unfolding as Trump aims to hold onto control of both the House and the Senate in the midterms so he can keep pushing his right-wing policy agenda past 2026. Democrats hope to retake the House so they keep Trump in check. Propr to Texas' redistricting, history says Democrats would have had a great chance of flipping the handful of House seats needed to win the House in the midterms, especially with polls showing widespread public disapproval of Trump's policies. That's why Trump wants to change the script by pulling off the unprecedented effort to redraw the congressional maps in the middle of the decade. Newsom, on the other hand, appears to prove his mettle to the Democratic base, perhaps ahead of a 2028 presidential bid that many pundits believe he is certain to pursue. He's using his press office to troll Trump by imitating his social media style with cheeky all-caps messages that insult Trump and some of his loyal Republican acolytes. The tactic has won wide attention, even though some liberal pundits dismiss it as juvenile. 'MAGA HAVE NEWSOM DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!!! THEY SHOULD CRY HARDER! SAD!!!' Newsom tweeted.

Trump finally responds to Gavin Newsom's mocking – and busts out an old nickname to do it
Trump finally responds to Gavin Newsom's mocking – and busts out an old nickname to do it

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump finally responds to Gavin Newsom's mocking – and busts out an old nickname to do it

President Donald Trump has hit back at California Gov. Gavin Newsom for brutally mimicking his social media style, dusting off a familiar nickname to deride his West Coast imitator in the process. 'Gavin Newscum is way down in the polls,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Wednesday night. 'He is viewed as the man who is destroying the once Great State of California. I will save California!!!' The president repeatedly clashed with Trump in recent months, notably in January when devastating wildfires hit Southern California and again in June when Trump sent in the National Guard to suppress anti-ICE demonstrations in downtown L.A. This month, the governor has begun savagely parodying the commander-in-chief's idiosyncratic posting style through his GovPressOffice X account, blustering about his greatness in all-caps and inventing infantile slurs with which to attack hostile media personalities, just as Trump has done for years. Newsom's team took just nine minutes to respond to the president's 'Newscum' message, replying with three snowflake emojis. They have since reposted another highly characteristic Trump post, in which the president accuses MSNBC of experiencing poor ratings, with the outraged comment: 'TRUMP IS IMITATING ME! – GCN.' Newsom's new approach has seen Kid Rock and several Fox News presenters react angrily, with Dana Perino, Tomi Lahren, Raymond Arroyo, and Trace Gallagher, all taking the bait and engaging with the governor's arch-trolling. Perino hit out at the governor on Fox's The Five by urging him to stop for the sake of his assumed presidential ambitions and asking why his wife had not stepped in to prevent him from pursuing the pranks. 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' came the inevitable reply. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA – WHILE TRUMP CAN'T EVEN CONQUER THE 'BIG' STAIRS ON AIR FORCE ONE ANYMORE!!! TRUMP HAS 'LOST HIS STEP' AND FOX IS LOSING IT BECAUSE WHEN I TYPE, AMERICA NOW WINS!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' Lahren, meanwhile, berated Newsom and his 'team of losers' after they jokingly claimed to have confused MAGA activist Scott Presler with South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace, notorious for her anti-trans agenda. The broadcaster was accused of being 'woke' when she complained about the offense caused. Gallagher was also dispatched in ruthlessly faux-Trumpian style: 'BIRD-BRAIN TREY GALLAGHER (A SO-CALLED FOX 'NEWS' HOST THAT NOBODY HAS EVER HEARD OF) SAYS MY POSTS ARE 'CHILDISH' AND 'UNBECOMING' OF A LEADER – CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? MANY ARE SAYING FOX ('EDIT THE TAPES') NEWS SHOULD CANCEL HIS PATHETIC LITTLE 'BEDTIME SHOW' IMMEDIATELY. 'THEY ARE CALLING IT THE MOST BORING PROGRAM IN CABLE HISTORY. TOTAL SNOOZE FEST! SAD!!!' Mediaite's Colby Hall has said that Newsom is 'shooting fish in a barrel,' describing his feed as 'an X-ray of Trumpian excess' and praising him by saying he has not merely entered 'the arena of schoolyard retorts' but 'grabbed the microphone, turned it upside down, and made the absurd impossible to ignore.' Speaking for himself last week, the governor said: 'I'm just following [Trump's] example. If you have issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns with what he's putting out as president.'

Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule
Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule

In Annapolis, voters may soon get a bigger say in city elections. Members of the Annapolis City Council are considering adopting ranked-choice voting. It may sound new and complicated but it's actually quite simple and has been around since the 1850s, first originating in Denmark. Under ranked choice, voters have the chance to not only pick their top pick for office but to essentially rank their runners-up. How does this make a difference? Imagine a crowded primary race for mayor, for example, where no candidate is likely to win an outright majority of votes. Under the current system, that doesn't matter. The candidate who garners a plurality of votes still wins. But under ranked-choice voting, voters list their second, third, fourth and so on choices, too. And if there's no majority winner, these rankings are factored in — by eliminating the lowest polling candidate and redistributing that individual's second-choice votes and so on. That continues with bottom-listers dropping out until a candidate racks up a clear majority. What's the impact? Potentially profound. Suddenly, there's much less incentive to bad-mouth opponents or to follow party orthodoxy. Getting a shoutout from an opponent is actually helpful. Maryland doesn't have much experience with the system. Currently, Takoma Park is the only municipality where it's in use. But the state sure has a lot of experience with the downside of single voting: electing candidates with as little as 36.2% of the vote (the share Sarah K. Elfreth won in a crowded 22-person primary for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives vacated by U.S. Rep. John Sarbanes last year). Party loyalists aren't wild about ranked choice. They complain it's involved, it only helps the opposing party (whichever one that is) and can even leave the winner of a plurality in the dust if he or she doesn't fare well as a second or third choice in a crowded field. But given ranked choice is in use for statewide races in red-state Alaska as well as Takoma Park (AKA the 'People's Republic of Takoma Park' for its left-leaning politics), you have to wonder if fears of partisan disadvantage are overblown. The New York City mayor's race had ranked choice. It helped New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani win the primary, but he also had a plurality (43.5%), so it didn't change the outcome. What it did cause, observers say, was for Mamdani to 'cross-endorse' fellow progressive candidates. Such teamwork is uncommon but hardly undemocratic. New York didn't choose a socialist-leaning Democrat because of ranked-choice, but did it impact Mamdani's election strategy? Probably. Polls show it engaged his base and broadened participation. And that's somehow a bad thing? Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@ Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store