Quangos tasked with deciding farmers' futures allowing staff to work from other side of the world
Yet while hard-pressed farmers face an uncertain time thanks to Labour's inheritance tax plans, staff at three rural-focused quangos have been logging in to work from the other side of the world.
An investigation by the Daily Mail has discovered taxpayer-funded staff at Natural England, NatureScot and the Rural Payments Agency have worked from Asia, North America and even Australia.
Bosses at the three bodies – which employ about 6,000 staff and receive hundreds of millions of pounds of Government cash a year – have allowed employees to work abroad more than 300 times in the last three years, according to figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
Staff were allowed to spend at least 1,174 days working abroad, although the total figure is expected to be much higher given NatureScot refused to provide the full information.
Natural England, which added £100million to the bill for HS2, building a bat tunnel because the creatures are protected, was involved in 150 approvals, totalling nearly 1,000 days.
This included 20 separate foreign stints each lasting at least ten days – the equivalent to two working weeks – with one staff member logging in for 15 days from Egypt.
One employee at the York-based organisation was allowed to work from Australia for seven days, while Natural England also allowed eight staff to spend at least ten days working from Slovenia.
Another was permitted to spend ten days in France, Belgium and Germany and someone spent nine days in Japan.
The largest period of working away for a member of Natural England staff was a 28-day stint in Ireland.
That was a drop in the ocean compared with the time a member of staff with the Rural Payments Agency, the body repeatedly castigated for the failure to pay farmers the subsidies they were owed on time.
The body has a number of UK regional offices. Its data showed a geospatial services team member, who is listed as a senior executive officer, spent from August 5 last year to January 3 this year in Germany, accounting for 66 working days.
Another spent 14 days in Sweden. NatureScot, based in Inverness, would only reveal there were 137 approvals granted in the last three years.
This included nine trips to the US, two to Canada and India, and a stint in Chile.
Alex Burghart, shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said: 'One wonders how much work will get done on the beach.'
A Tory spokesman said: 'Those making peoples' lives a misery should at least live with the consequences rather than swan off to far-flung corners of the globe.'
A Natural England spokesman said: 'As the Government's adviser on the natural environment, we provide practical advice, grounded in science, on how best to protect and restore our natural world.
'On occasion, staff are required to work abroad for business reasons, including attending international conferences such as COP16.'
An RPA spokesman said: 'Staff are required to travel overseas for official government business – helping the RPA in its role to deliver a range of services to farming and rural businesses.'
This year, the Mail revealed a senior executive at crisis-hit Windsor council was working from Kyrgyzstan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Galleries warn they will be ‘crippled' by new policy which allows people to visit for free
Britain's leading heritage organisations have urged the government to close a 'loophole' in new consumer rights legislation, warning it could 'cripple them'. Heads of organisations including the National Trust, Tate, Historic Royal Palaces and Victoria & Albert Museum wrote to the government to highlight how the new rules could allow people to abuse their membership schemes. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA) will allow consumers a 'two-week cooling off period' after purchasing a charity membership scheme. This means they could obtain the membership, use its perks to enjoy paid-exhibitions or visits for free, before cancelling and getting a full refund days later. The letter, seen by The Times, asks the prime minister to ensure charities are treated differently to commercial businesses to protect this vital revenue stream. A National Trust spokesperson told The Independent: "Up to now membership has been treated as a charitable donation by law and this is part of a long-held recognition that UK charities are fundamentally different from commercial businesses. 'Charities are currently facing sustained financial pressures, due to the difficult economic climate. This legislation would add to that cost burden and see more charities having to reduce their vital services. 'Just last month the Government made a firm commitment through the Civil Society Covenant to support our sector: closing this loophole would be a clear demonstration of that commitment." The DMCCA was introduced by the previous Conservative government but has been put into place under this government. It is intended to protect consumers following growing concerns around 'subscription traps'. However, heritage organisations and galleries have become increasingly reliant membership schemes for vital funding in recent years. 'The proposed cooling-off period would create a loophole that could allow people to join charities as members and enjoy benefits, such as free entry to sites, for a two-week period before claiming substantial refunds for the rest of the year,' their letter to the government reportedly reads. 'This threatens to cripple the very future value of membership itself as a functional model of income generation for charities with visitor models — currently worth hundreds of millions [of pounds] to charities across the UK every year.' Under the rules, someone could hypothetically buy a National Trust family membership for £168.60 before visiting several sites within two weeks - which could cost upwards of £100 for the family. They could then cancel their membership, receiving a full membership refund, having not paid for their visits. A similar concern applies to galleries, who sometimes offer members free access to paid exhibitions. A government spokesperson said it was engaging with charities on the issue and added: 'The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act does not change the definition of what constitutes a consumer contract. 'Our plans to protect consumers from rip-off subscriptions will not unfairly affect charities, and we continue to engage closely with them to understand their concerns.'
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Michelle Obama opens up about raising her daughters
Michelle Obama revealed her youngest daughter Sasha was 'difficult' for her husband Barack to parent in the latest episode of her podcast. The former First Lady, 61, was discussing raising her daughters Malia, 26, and Sasha, 24, on the latest episode of IMO, the podcast she hosts with her brother Craig Robinson. And she was quick to take a dig at her husband, the former President of the United States, as rumors continue to swirl over the state of their marriage. The mother-of-two opened up about their children to her guests Gabrielle Union and Dwyane Wade, where she alluded to her husband finding one daughter easier to raise than the other. Michelle and her guests were discussing the dynamics between siblings and parents, when she shared an anecdote from when the power-couple were raising their then-teenage girls in the White House between 2009 and 2017. She explained that her eldest daughter Malia, now 27, would try appease her father while her youngest Sasha, now 24, did not. 'I'd say this to Barack when it comes to [our] oldest Malia, she is going to figure out who you are and what you like' and discuss it,' Michelle explained, admitting the perception was an 'unusual' trait in a teenager. 'When Malia was a teenager, it wasn't that she was going out any less or doing anything differently,' she continued,'[but] she would tell me "I'm going out this weekend, but I'm going to go in and give dad like 15 minutes."' 'She'd go into the treaty room and go, "tell me about Syria ?"' Michelle recounted. 'Then she'd be like "ok, we'll I'm gone."' 'Barack would come out of the treaty room going, "I just had an amazing conversation with Malia,"' and I'm like "ok,"' she said dryly. Meanwhile, she said her youngest Sasha was 'like a cat' and wasn't so much a people pleaser, which Barack struggled with. 'She's like, "don't touch me, don't pet me, I'm not pleasing you, you come to me,"' the former FLOTUS explained. 'Barack's like, well, "she's difficult," and I was like "no, the first one was a pleaser, right?" She added that her daughters still have the same 'temperament.' Both have kept an extremely low profile since leaving the White House and have not commented on their mother sharing family secrets. It's not the first time Michelle has discussed the differences between the couple's parenting techniques, often opening up on her podcast about their struggles. In July, she told guests Julia Louis-Dreyfus she had a stern conversation about what kind of father he was going to be immediately after he was elected President of the United States in 2009. She explained that she told her husband he had to get their daughters' school used to the President of the United States being at events - and that she wanted him to still be as engaged with this daughters' lives as he was before he took office. 'It was like, "no, you got to go to parent-teacher conference" - and he wanted to go,' Michelle told Julia and Craig. She stated that even if he was not necessarily required to go, she still expected him there. 'You have to get the school normalized to you being the type of engaged parent that you were before election night,' she recalled telling Barack. 'And you were the father that went to parent teacher conference, you were the father that would coach your girls' basketball game league,' she recounted. In June, the devoted mom took another jibe at her husband of 33 years, confessing that she was glad the pair never had a son because he would have been just like her husband. 'I'm so glad I didn't have a boy... he would've been a Barack Obama,' she joked to her brother, Craig Robinson and radio host Angie Martinez. Michelle previously opened up about her relationship with her two daughters admitting they started 'pushing away' from her and her husband when they were teenagers. The mother-of-two explained that she believes her daughters distanced themselves because they wanted to 'distinguish themselves' from their famous parents as they became adults. The remarks come amid swirling rumors about the state of the power couple's marriage. In July, the pair - how have been married since 1992, finally addressed the state of their marriage - after months of speculation that the couple's relationship is on the rocks. The Obama's wasted no time in addressing the rumors of their separation when he appeared on IMO. 'What, you guys like each other?' Robinson joked, before Michelle replied: 'Oh yeah, the rumor mill.' 'She took me back!' Obama light-heartedly chimed in, adding: 'It was touch and go for awhile.' But Michelle's continued outpourings about her husband and children have done little to quell the rumors.
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How Labour can build a stronger British economy
If Rachel Reeves is serious about ensuring that Labour's second year in power is all about a stronger economy that rewards working people across the country (In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain, 13 August), she needs to rethink what your editorial called the UK's 'broken growth model' (6 August). The growth that Britain needs is an increase in economic activity that improves social and environmental infrastructure nationwide. This involves a huge increase in secure, well-paid jobs to rebuild a more resilient future economy. The last thing that is required is Reeves's obsession with more deregulation of the City and pressuring savers into investing in the stock market. What is needed instead is a massive increase in a socially and green-oriented bond market that will provide secure returns for savers. This will require intense pressure to be put on Reeves to shift her emphasis away from global financiers to recognising UK savers as saviours. She should make clear that in return for the tax breaks that those investing in Isas and pensions receive, a considerable percentage of such savings would be invested in green and social infrastructure projects. This would help tackle the climate crisis and rebuild our economy as well as the crumbling cohesion of our society. Colin HinesConvener, Green New Deal Group Rachel Reeves wants to solve Britain's productivity problem by kickstarting economic growth. Four decades ago, Britain decided to become a consumer economy when others chose to be investment economies. The mistake in tackling the fallout of the global financial crisis after 2008 was to slash capital spending at a time when money was cheap. The chaotic governments of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss created damaging uncertainty for investors. The world has become more uncertain, but political decisions also mean growth each year was on average twice as strong in the 16 years before the financial crisis than in the 16 years since, taxation as a proportion of GDP has reached historic highs and productivity is painfully weak. The chancellor needs to be bold and ambitious for Britain's economy. We must exploit the opportunities of the digital revolution, advance our skills base, join up government so that departments are all focused on growth and become a true investment economy at Stephen BarberUniversity of East London Rachel Reeves claims to have fixed the country's financial foundations in Labour's first year in office, but I am certain that the 4.5 million children still living in poverty, an increase of 100,000 from the previous year, wouldn't agree. At the same time, UK billionaires' wealth increased by £35m a day to £182bn, with Britain having the highest proportion of billionaire wealth derived from monopolies and cronyism among G7 Michael SymondsEmeritus professor, University of Nottingham No, you haven't 'fixed the foundations', chancellor. Where are the Labour values in 'renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge'? Not a word about redressing the wealth gap between the rich and the poor; not a word about ending the two-child benefit cap; not a word about restoring the level of overseas aid. Rachel Reeves's article could have been written by George Osborne – and I for one fear what else that might entail for our dilapidated public space. It isn't good enough just to be wealthy – it's what you do with it and how fairly you spread it that counts. That is supposed to be the Labour D BryantPenarth, Glamorgan I find it disappointing that Rachel Reeves refers only to 'working people'. This indicates that she is not considering other groups such as pensioners, or those who cannot work either through disability or because of a lack of suitable jobs for which they are qualified. She refuses to target the super-rich, preferring to hit easy targets by keeping the two-child benefit cap, not raising tax thresholds (pushing more people into paying tax and higher tax) and targeting cash Isa allowances. Some people have had bad experiences with stocks and shares and are reluctant to risk their savings again. She has not learned at least two things from history: first, trickle-down economics does not work, as wealth floods into foreign tax havens, not to the less well off. And second, removing restrictions on the financial sector leads to people and financial organisations being overstretched and a banking EvesMold, Flintshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
