Automaker boss says road ‘slug' must be fair
Polestar's Australian boss Scott Maynard said the fuel excise gap created by EV adoption is an opportunity to consider the 'whole transport ecosystem' not simply a new charge targeting zero-emission drivers.
'Motorists are already subject to stamp duty, registration fees, fuel excise, Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT), Luxury Car Tax (LCT) in some cases, as well as tolls and parking space levies in the CBD,' he said.
Earlier this week the Productivity Commission suggested a per-kilometre charge for electric vehicle (EV) owners as the fuel excise revenue is shrinking as more Australians switch to EVs.
Maynard said the scheme, which Treasurer Jim Chalmers is fast-tracking, could be fair but only if it's applied equally across all vehicles and not used to squeeze money from drivers.
'Driving is an essential activity, so it's important the government has a clear understanding of what it would be seeking to achieve with a road user charge. Only when we understand that question can a framework be developed, and commentary applied,' he said.
The Swedish EV maker argued that revenue from any new scheme should be ring-fenced for road maintenance and infrastructure, unlike fuel excise which 'just goes into the pot of government spending'.
'Transparency is key,' he said.
Maynard also warned against a 'one-size-fits-all' approach that could penalise rural and regional drivers.
'We do need to be careful that people in regional and rural areas are not unfairly targeted given the long distances travelled to obtain services such as medical care, education, and household supplies,' he said.
'We don't want to have a situation where people who commute long distances from regional or rural areas are then at a disadvantage to drivers who can afford to live in the inner city.'
Maynard suggested Australia should look to 'best practice other markets' and consider both distance and weight to reflect road wear, focus on the biggest emitters, such as heavy vehicles, if cutting carbon is a primary goal.
'I don't think any driver – electric or otherwise – will have an issue with a road user charge system to replace fuel excise as long as it is fair and equitable,' he said.
Maynard added that the system should be designed on clear goals, whether reducing congestion, cutting emissions, of funding road maintenance - and if emissions reduction is the aim, 'targeting heavy vehicles with higher emissions should be a priority'.
'Australia will need to identify its goals with a road user charging system and establish a framework accordingly,' he said.
'There's a myriad of issues that need to be addressed before a road user charge can be applied.'
The Treasurer's office said that they 'will work with the states and territories on policies in this area, but we'll do it in a considered and consultative way and take the time to get it right'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Rooftop solar and home batteries could reduce the need for wind farms, research finds
At first blush, Suzanne Bradshaw and Greg Ash could be your typical household power consumers. They live in a house they built six years ago on a battleaxe block in the inner Perth suburb of Mount Lawley. Like so many households, theirs is one that increasingly relies on electricity — from the gadgets under their roof to the solar panels on top of it. But look a little closer and a different picture emerges. In a workshop attached to the house are a number of kilns — electric furnaces used by Ash to make glass. "I've been working on glass, this type of glass, for 23 years now," the 72-year-old says. "So they [the kilns] can consume a fair bit of power." Given their power needs, the couple have had to take steps to mitigate their exposure to the grid — and its associated costs. They were early adopters of solar power, forking out more than $20,000 for panels when the technology was still relatively expensive. In 2019, when they moved into their new house, they installed an even bigger system and followed it up with a battery a couple of years later. And to round it out, they have signed up for a type of dynamic pricing known as a time-of-use tariff, enabling them to draw dirt cheap power off the grid between 9am and 3pm every day. It costs them about nine cents for every kilowatt hour they buy from their retailer during those hours — but up to 45 cents per kilowatt hour at other times. "The good thing about that is if it's an overcast day and you're not getting as much solar coming in, you can top up your battery during the middle of the day," Bradshaw says. "That also means we're not using electricity during the peak… that other consumers need." The couple's circumstances are increasingly common among Australian consumers. Australia has long led the world in its adoption of rooftop solar and Western Australia is no exception. There are more than four million small-scale solar installations across the country's homes and businesses — equivalent to about one in three customers. It's a similar figure in WA, where about 400,000 small-scale customers have solar. And now, courtesy of generous subsidies led by the Commonwealth, uptake of batteries is booming, too. For the first time, registrations for batteries under the Federal Government's small-scale green energy scheme exceeded those for solar panels in July. A new report commissioned by the office of Brad Pettitt, the leader of the WA Greens, is urging the Cook Government to go much further. The report, written by green power advocates Sustainable Energy Now, suggests WA has barely scratched the surface of its rooftop solar capacity. It says "only 13 per cent of the potential capacity" for rooftop solar has been realised in WA's main grid, which spans the country's south-western corner. And it notes that of those customers who have solar, fewer than one in 20 have a battery as well. The lobby argues that better capitalising on WA's capacity for small-scale solar power and batteries could dramatically cut the need for large-scale projects required as part of the transition away from fossil fuels. "Fully utilising suitable rooftops" could slash the need for wind and solar farms while halving the requirement for new high-voltage power lines and saving billions, it argues. Crucially, it says small-scale solutions will also be much quicker than large-scale ones, a key advantage given the government's plan to get out of coal power by 2029. Pettitt says the state's current plan, which relies on large-scale projects, is off track. "The fastest and fairest way to decarbonise is actually utilising our rooftops," Pettitt says. "There are savings in the billions around needing less transmission. "We're saying 'let's get smart about this, using existing rooftops, we don't need to clear vegetation, we don't need to put in new transmission, we can do it now and we can do it quickly'." Not everyone supports the proposal. Greg Watkinson, the former chief executive of WA's economic watchdog and a director of Electricity Market Advisory Services, says there are risks for consumers in the plan. He says there are significant costs incurred by households and small businesses when they invest in solar panels and batteries and many can over-capitalise. By contrast, he says there are economies of scale when big businesses invest in large-scale projects such as major batteries and wind farms. What's more, he says those big businesses are sophisticated investors "who know what they're doing and it's their money to burn — if they waste it, it's on them". "The risk is that households end up spending too much," Watkinson says. "If we ended up having solar panels on everyone's roofs, maybe we'd be spending too much. "I expect we would be, so I don't think that's the way to go." WA Energy Minister Amber-Jade Sanderson declined a request for an interview. Instead, she issued a statement in which she said the government "recognises the importance of harnessing our vast rooftop solar resource". The Minister noted the government is helping up to 100,000 households to get batteries through its — albeit watered down — subsidy scheme. Glass artist Greg Ash thinks he's ahead of the game now he's got a battery along with his solar panels. "All you have to do is look at what's happening in the eastern states as opposed to here," Ash says. "We're better off with our power and gas than they are, but it will come back and bite us here, so people should be looking at solar and battery. "And hopefully that will get cheaper for the average person."

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Authors' exodus from Bendigo Writers Festival prompts warning to future organisers
An author who was among dozens who withdrew from this weekend's Bendigo Writers Festival says it is a warning to future event organisers who "try to restrict speech". The event in central Victoria has forged ahead despite more than 50 writers and hosts withdrawing by Friday afternoon, leading to 21 sessions being cancelled and a further eight affected. It followed organiser Greater Bendigo City Council sending a code of conduct to writers two days before the festival's now-cancelled opening night gala. Festival spokesperson Julie Amos said it was a condensed summary of the council's own code of conduct. The opening line of the missive set out an expectation to "avoid language or topics that could be considered inflammatory, divisive, or disrespectful". Author and investigative journalist Jess Hill was supposed to speak at a La Trobe University panel on Sunday and said this line was "totally subjective" and set a "dangerous precedent". She questioned why organisers would invite authors to speak if they did not trust they could engage in respectful debate. Ms Amos said the intent of the code of conduct may have been "lost in oversimplification". "All we wanted to do was to provide some parameters for people to have safe and respectful conversations," she said. The Australian Society of Authors (ASA) is concerned about increased use of codes of conduct, not only at writers festivals but across library, university and other speaking events. The society's deputy chair Jennifer Mills said the documents were designed to make authors "fearful and nervous". "It's not appropriate and I think these codes of conduct are trying to pre-emptively avoid, it seems, reputational damage." The ASA had been contacted by several writers about the Bendigo Writers Festival code of conduct by Friday afternoon. Corrie Perkin, organiser of Sorrento Writers Festival, said her event did not have a code of conduct and she would not consider using one. "[Writers festivals] are places where people are up for provocations and sometimes uncomfortable discussions," she said. Bendigo Writers Festival joins a string of arts and cultural events caught in controversy relating to the Israel-Gaza war, including recent Sydney and Melbourne writers festivals. Samuel Cairnduff from the University of Melbourne's School of Culture and Communication said it was a "really worrying trend". "I'm surprised they haven't learnt from the playbooks of all these other incidences that we've seen in the past couple of years," he said. Dr Cairnduff said by nature, writers festivals invited controversy and challenged people, but organisers should not bend to risk aversion. "Our courage and our confidence to bravely have these conversations with stakeholders in these situations is what needs to really come up a notch." A further line in the Bendigo Writers Festival code of conduct, referring to sponsor La Trobe University's panels only, called for compliance with the university's anti-racism plan, including contested definitions of antisemitism and Islamaphobia. La Trobe University said in a statement it supported a "diversity of perspectives and ideas". "As a sponsor of the Bendigo Writers Festival (BWF), which is hosted by the City of Greater Bendigo, La Trobe University supports the BWF to have measures in place to ensure respectful exchange of views as well as community safety, and notes that codes of conduct are not unusual at writers festivals," it said. Bendigo Writers Festival ticketholders have been told they will automatically be refunded for cancelled events. Rosemary Sorensen was the founding director of the festival for 15 years until it was taken over by Bendigo council in 2024. "The worst thing that could happen is for this to destroy Bendigo Writers Festival," she said.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Queensland's 'extreme' house price growth expected to continue amid new laws
Experts say south-east Queensland's "extreme rate" of property price growth is unlikely to be affected by new seller disclosure laws which came into effect in August. Under the new laws, sellers must provide a mandatory comprehensive disclosure statement before signing a contract. It must include any relevant information about land contamination, zoning, heritage listings, transport resumption plans and accurate rates and water charges. But with Brisbane leading the country in profitable property resales, Domain's Dr Nicola Powell said south-east Queensland remains a sellers' market. More than 99 per cent of properties on the market in Brisbane sold for a profit in the first six months of 2025, according to new data from Domain. The median profit from a house sale in Brisbane was $480,000 – up from $145,000 in 2019. "Brisbane's almost been in this kind of super cycle," Dr Powell said. "There are a lot of things happening economically for south-east Queensland and there's a lot of competition when you think about the lack of new homes being built." With the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games on the horizon, competition from the infrastructure sector will draw workers away from residential building, Dr Powell said. Real estate agents claim the changes have led to a 'bottleneck' in sales, but Dr Powell said the laws bring Queensland in line with other states and territories. "This is about strengthening the property sector," Dr Powell said. "It's about ensuring buyers have all of the information they need. "We have to remember most people's largest asset [is] their home. If you've got a seller trying to manipulate the system or hide something about the property, what this is trying to do is add that level of transparency." Dr Powell said the high costs associated with the property market means owners are holding on to their homes for longer. "Things like stamp duty, which are really a disincentive to move. They add tens of thousands of dollars to a property transaction," she said. A new rate cut from the Reserve Bank — the third so far in 2025 — will have a "short-lived" impact on the Brisbane market, Antonia Mercorella from the Real Estate Institute of Queensland (REIQ) said. "There tends to be a bit of a holding pattern that occurs around the time of the [rate cut] announcement," Ms Mercorella said. "It's probably not as significant as one might think simply because the demand for property here is just so incredibly strong." Ms Mercorella said she believes the "scarcity problem" will continue to drive prices up. "Even if people aren't getting those interest rate cuts that they're hoping for, they're still needing to secure that shelter, so that's ultimately what's the biggest factor at play," she said. While it might not impact prices, the new disclosure scheme could initially see some contracts delayed, Ms Mercorella said. "There are concerns that it will slow things down. As time marches on, we will get better at preparing these disclosure documents." For sellers frustrated by a new legislative hurdle, Ms Mercorella said preparation is key. 'The moment you are engaging a real estate agent that's when you should start thinking about the preparation of that seller disclosure statement so that it doesn't lead to delays when a buyer comes along,' she said. Ms Mercorella said the changes could also help sellers and potentially lead to fewer contract terminations. "There is an argument to be made that actually they may reduce the number of contract terminations because a buyer is entering into the contract with better knowledge about the key matters affecting the property." "It enables you to identify any issues affecting the property of a negative nature that could be addressed before putting it on the market."