Legal action to fight Kirklees Council care home privatisation
Campaigners have argued that while the decision was stated to have been made on a financial basis, there remained a lack of evidence to support this.Rebecca Chapman, the specialist public law and human rights lawyer representing the campaigners, said: "Local authority-run care homes provide vital care and support to a number of people, particularly those living with dementia."Many of those affected by the planned business transfer of Claremont House and Castle Grange have voiced their anger and disappointment at how they feel the council has acted throughout the process."We've heard first-hand accounts from families who say the decision will have a significant impact on their loved ones."
'Upset and distressed'
Ms Chapman said lawyers had previously written to the authority outlining their points but it had still decided to go ahead with privatisation.She added: "We've therefore now applied for a judicial review."Adrian Pygott said he was worried the disruption caused by privatisation would have "grave consequences" for his mother, 90-year-old Brenda Hughes, who has been cared for at Castle Grange for seven years.He said: "My mother has high emotional needs and can become upset and distressed at the slightest change in her routine. She also has a range of complex physical needs."The care provided by the staff at Castle Grange is exemplary and I'm greatly concerned at the thought of this being taken away from her or, even worse, her having to move homes."The latest development comes after campaigners previously fought off a plan in 2024 to close the homes as part of efforts to make almost £47m in budget savings.After that, councillors made the decision to transfer them to private providers but this was called in for review by eight opposition councillors.However, at a meeting in February, the council re-affirmed the decision to transfer.In response to the legal action, the council said throughout the process it had "prioritised the quality of care for residents".It added: "The decision is now subject to legal proceedings and it would be inappropriate to comment further, or explore alternative options, until we know the outcome of that process."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Sam Groth's wife Brittany publicly defends couple's relationship as they threaten legal action against minister
Brittany Groth, the wife of the Victorian Liberals deputy leader, Sam Groth, has defended the timing of her relationship with her former tennis star husband as the pair threaten legal action against News Corp and a Labor minister. On Wednesday, the couple's legal firm sent a defamations concerns notice to the Herald Sun, alleging two articles and social media posts by the publication were both a serious invasion of Brittany's privacy and harmful to Sam's reputation. The articles – which were condemned by the premier, Jacinta Allan, and the opposition leader, Brad Battin – claimed unnamed Liberal colleagues raised concerns over when the couple's relationship began, as they feared the issue could be weaponised by their political opponents. But in a statement distributed by the pair's legal team on Thursday, Brittany said the timeline suggested by the Herald Sun report was 'baseless and false'. She said she was in a 'relationship with someone else' when she first met Sam in September 2011, that he was not her tennis coach and he resumed his professional tennis career a month later, in mid-November 2011. 'We did not engage in any conduct that would even arguably fall within the provisions quoted by the Herald Sun,' Brittany said. She said never imagined she would be 'forced to defend myself or my family against outrageous insinuations and a public dissection of my private life by a newspaper'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'The Herald Sun's decision to speculate salaciously about my personal life from 14 years ago, when I was a teenager, is not journalism. It is a disgraceful smear campaign, devoid of fact, public interest or even basic decency,' Brittany said. She alleged the Herald Sun 'never once' attempted to contact her, deliberately published 'clickable' photos and allowed the publication on their platforms of 'hundreds of vile and defamatory comments' by members of the public about her family. 'You have now hidden them, but only after the damage was already done,' Brittany said. She alleged the publication's conduct 'has amounted to pressure on me to disclose intimate details of my personal and private life, including when I first had sex with my husband, to defend myself against fiction.' The legal letter to the Herald Sun demanded all the articles and posts be removed permanently by 5pm on Wednesday and the paper publish an apology. But the Herald Sun refused and published another report, claiming the Groths were attempting to 'shut down discussion' on a matter of public interest. Editor Sam Weir was quoted in the Herald Sun: 'We stand by our reporting on a matter of public interest, covering important issues which could have a major impact on Victorian politics in the lead-up to an election.' Brittany, however, disputed that her 'teenage private life' was in the public interest. 'There is no excuse for using the democratic process as a shield for harassment. There is no justification for attacking a woman's integrity, let alone her children, in the pursuit of gossip,' she said. 'I am the only person who owns my story. And I will not sit back while my family is dehumanised for headlines.' The couple's lawyers have also written to the health minister, Mary-Anne Thomas, asking her to publicly apologise for comments she made outside parliament on Tuesday about when the pair's relationship had begun. The letter accuses her of making comments that were both defamatory and 'highly inappropriate'. 'They appear to have been made by you without any personal knowledge or understanding of the background facts about Mr and Mrs Groth's relationship, without you having taken any steps to approach Mr Groth or his wife to discuss the situation with them,' the letter from Patrick George claimed. Thomas has been contacted for comment. The premier told reporters Thomas was 'asked a more general question' and noted the reporting was the result of 'deep division within the Victorian Liberal party'. 'I reiterate my view that families should very much be off limits,' Allan said.
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Vodafone CEO asked how she sleeps at night by ex-franchisee amid £120m legal action
The Vodafone chief executive has been asked how she sleeps at night by one of the 62 former store owners involved in a £120m legal action that claims the mobile operator 'unjustly enriched' itself at their expense. Donna Watton, one of the group of 62 franchisees that have taken their claim to the high court, challenged Margherita Della Valle at Vodafone's annual general meeting on Tuesday. 'I have a question for the chief executive,' said Watton, speaking at the sparsely attended meeting at Vodafone's headquarters in Newbury. 'I am a Vodafone ex-franchisee, and I am one of the group of 62 suing this company for £120m for what it did to us, and I want to know: Margherita, how do you sleep at night knowing Vodafone's actions left people suicidal, cost them their homes, and left them drowning in debt?' The legal case was launched in December, claiming Vodafone slashed commissions paid to franchisees operating the mobile phone company's retail outlets. Many have claimed the company's actions made them fear they would lose their livelihoods, homes or life savings after running up personal debts of more than £100,000. Jean-François van Boxmeer, the chair of Vodafone leading the meeting proceedings, stepped in to field the question on behalf of Della Valle. He said that it was right he field the question as 'the master of ceremonies here and also protecting the sleep of Margherita'. 'I understand your question and I am not saying I do not feel the pain that you might [be going] through,' he said. 'You are referring to a case which is a commercial case between Vodafone UK and a group of franchisees in the UK. That case has been through a mediation that has been unfortunately unsuccessful. It is now a matter in the hands of court. You will allow us not to comment on procedures that are in court. I will not in this general assembly make further comments on what is now in the hands of courts.' He said that Vodafone remains open to further mediation, a process that ended without resolution in May. Vodafone, which says the legal claim is worth £85.5m, has consistently said that it refutes the claims made by the franchisees in their legal action. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion One shareholder, who said they had travelled a great distance to attend the Newbury meeting, challenged why Della Valle was too 'shy' to address attendees. 'I don't come for the sandwiches, I come to engage with the board and management,' he said. 'I've gone to a lot of AGMs this year. [At] the other AGMs the chief executives were not so shy that we weren't addressed. I've come a long way, I've probably used a lot of petrol to come here. Surely as one of the seven shareholders that have turned out I deserve some sort of address from the chief executive. Is there nothing good to report, is there nothing bad to report?' Van Boxmeer responded that Della Valle would only offer replies to 'very concrete questions relating to how the business is going'.
BBC News
25-07-2025
- BBC News
Stoke Lodge campaigner pays Cotham School £85k in legal fees
A campaigner who fought for community access to a playing field has paid more than £85,000 in legal bills to the school that leases it. Cotham School in Bristol put up a 6ft high (2m) fence around Stoke Lodge playing field in 2019, which it said was for safeguarding reasons and due to out-of-control dogs and dog We Love Stoke Lodge member Kathy Welham, and Bristol City Council which leases the site to the school, wanted the local community to "go on sharing the land".Following multiple legal actions, the High Court ruled in June that the playing field did not have to be shared and later ordered Mrs Welham and the council pay the school's legal fees. In a statement, Mrs Welham thanked the local community for its "unwavering and generous support"."We are, as always, standing together and standing by our commitment and obligations. Recent events have only strengthened the community's determination to protect shared use of this precious green space for future generations," she added. The school was granted a 125 year lease to the field in 2011 due to lack of space at its inner city site three miles council had fought alongside Ms Welham after in 2023 it voted to give the field 'town green' status to make it into a shared following the high court ruling, Mrs Welham and her supporters have now paid the full £85,203, while the council was ordered to pay legal bills of £9,467. Mrs Welham said the Village Green application was made with "the objective of ensuring that all parties, including the school, could go on sharing the land as they have done for decades".But she added she hopes the money paid will "mitigate any detriment to Cotham School pupils" due to the legal actions that were paid for out of the school's reserves. In a statement following the decision on legal bills, Cotham School said: "We welcome the recovery of public funds that were necessarily expended in protecting the school's playing field."We Love Stoke Lodge said it now intends to apply to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal the recent High Court decision and that it has until mid-September to do City Council has previously declined to comment on the legal bills but said it would be complying with the court order.
