
Is Netflix's ‘iHostage' Based On A True Story? Inside The Real Apple Store Hostage Crisis
"iHostage" on Netflix.
In Netflix's gripping new film iHostage, a Dutch man storms an Apple Store in Amsterdam and demands a ransom of over $200 million in crypto, setting off a tense, hours-long standoff as negotiators race to ensure the safety of everyone involved.
Directed by Bobby Boermans and written by Simon de Waal, the thriller focuses on a Bulgarian man who finds himself in a life-or-death crisis after the gunman takes hostages inside the tech store. 'Through the eyes of the attacker, the hostages, and the first responders, iHostage delivers a tense and emotional tale of courage, survival, and the lasting impact of terror,' the synopsis reads.
Currently, the No. 1 movie on Netflix in the U.S., iHostage is based on the terrifying real hostage crisis that shook Amsterdam in 2022. But how accurately does the film follow what actually happened? Here's what to know while you're watching, including the changes made for the screen and the fate of the gunman.
Nederland, Katwijk, 13 maart 2024 Hostage Studio Apple Store foto: Elmer van der Marel
Yes, iHostage is inspired by a real-life incident that occurred in February 2022, when 27-year-old Abdel Rahman Akkad took a Bulgarian man hostage inside an Apple Store in Leidseplein, Amsterdam.
During the standoff, Akkad called the police, demanding €200 million in cryptocurrency (which was worth over US$226 million at that time) and a safe exit.
While most customers managed to flee the store once the gunman opened fire, four others were trapped inside for hours, hiding in a cupboard, according to the BBC. As he held the 44-year-old Bulgarian man hostage, the assailant sent photos to local news media that appeared to show explosives strapped to his body.
Police quickly arrived at the scene, where the gunman fired at least four shots in their direction. Fearing he was carrying explosives, authorities ordered a shelter-in-place for the surrounding area, per TIME.com.
Boermans, who lives near the Apple Store where the crime took place, told TIME that 'hostage situations like this are scarce' in the Netherlands. "That's what made this incident bizarre. A man, demanding 200 million in cryptocurrency, chose to take a hostage in broad daylight on one of the busiest squares in Amsterdam.'
"iHostage" on Netflix.
After nearly five hours, Rahman Akkad asked for water. Police used a robot to deliver a bottle, and as the hostage walked toward the store entrance to retrieve it, he made a run for it and escaped.
As the gunman chased after the fleeing hostage, a special unit vehicle accelerated and struck him. Though he was taken to a nearby hospital and initially survived, officials later confirmed he died from his injuries the following day.
'I can confirm that the man has died in hospital this evening,' Franklin Wattimena, an official from the public prosecution service, told The Guardian. 'More than that, we cannot say, but the investigation continues.'
However, the way police apprehended the gunman became a point of controversy across the country. 'The hostage incident sparked intense public debate in the Netherlands, mainly because of the unconventional way the police brought the situation to an end—by using a car," Boermans said.
The director continued, "It was a unique and highly decisive act of violence, the result of a split-second decision made by one of the special forces operators. A video of the final moments went viral almost immediately after, and the entire country began discussing it. Some people applauded the action, while others were more hesitant or conflicted about how it was handled.'
In response, Boermans said the "entire country" began discussing it. "Some people applauded the action, while others were more hesitant or conflicted about how it was handled," Boermans told TIME.com.
At the end of the film, it's revealed that, following a four-month investigation, the DSI (Department of Special Investigation) operator was found to have acted lawfully when striking the gunman.
"iHostage" on Netflix.
iHostage closely follows the real 2022 hostage situation that unfolded in Leidseplein, Amsterdam, but the director admitted to taking a few creative liberties. Among them was the decision to use fictional names for all the characters so 'they couldn't be traced back to the individual involved.'
In the film, the man held hostage is named Ilian Petrov; however, he is a fictional character. He is inspired by a real Bulgarian man who was taken hostage that day, but his true identity remains unknown. At the time, Amsterdam police chief Frank Paauw said the man played a 'heroic role by forcing a breakthrough,' according to BBC.
In real life, hundreds of people were involved in the standoff, but Boermans said the film centers on 'five main characters—each from a different background, each offering a unique perspective."
'While working on the script, we consciously focused solely on the night of the hostage situation," Boermans said. 'Of course, you have to condense time in any film, but most of the story beats you see on screen are based on things that actually happened.'
The film's co-creator and writer, Simon de Waal, also works as a detective near where the incident occurred and spoke with sources close to the case to ensure the film was as accurate as possible.
'I was able to speak with people from the police force who were directly involved,' de Waal told Netflix's Tudum. 'I wanted to know if they agreed with how things were portrayed, how events actually unfolded, how things were said … I wanted to stay as close to the truth as possible.''
iHostage is streaming on Netflix. Watch the official trailer below.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fact-Check: Is Flick Offers a Real Way to Make Money on Netflix—or a Scam?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors After a long day's work, it's hard to muster the energy to do anything other than heat up some food and binge your favorite Netflix shows like "Bridgerton" or "Stranger Things." But what if you could get paid just to watch Netflix? More Entertainment: Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein – Everything We Know, Trailer, Release Date Flick Offers claims just that. According to the website, people can sit at home and watch and review Netflix content while making $36 per hour on your own schedule with "no talking required." The job has since gone viral on TikTok, with multiple users claiming that they are now living the couch potato dream. But is this actually a dream job or just a scam trying to take advantage of the masses? Let's dive deeper. Above is a stock image of the Netflix logo is displayed on the screen of an Apple MacBook Pro on November 20, 2019 in Paris, France. The streaming giant has revealed the incoming and outgoing... Above is a stock image of the Netflix logo is displayed on the screen of an Apple MacBook Pro on November 20, 2019 in Paris, France. The streaming giant has revealed the incoming and outgoing shows and films for its August 2023 Flick Offers Netflix Review Job Site a Scam? Let's cut to the chase: is Flick Offers real or just a scam? To put it bluntly, this site and other sites like it are some of the biggest scams online right now. According to Scam-Detector, Flick Offers has a score of 6.9 out of 100, meaning it is one of the least trustworthy sites possible. To make matters worse, Scam-Detector states that there are massive risk factors related to phishing, malware, and spam if you were to click any of the links on their web page. Additionally, it appears that the site is not affiliated with Netflix in any way, despite slapping a big red "N" on their front page. This is a massive red flag when considering the legitimacy of any website like this. The fact of the matter is, if a company were going to pay you to review their content, they wouldn't do it through a website that isn't affiliated with them. How to Actually Get Paid to Watch Netflix So it appears that Flick Offers and sites like it are a massive scam. Is there a way to actually get paid to watch Netflix? Actually, there is! More Entertainment: Netflix Releases Mysterious Trailer For Next 'Knives Out' Film Known as a Netflix tagger, these individuals are paid to watch, analyze, and categorize content. According to taggers make about $54,000 per year, or about $25 per hour. This is far off from the promised $36 per hour promised by Flick Offers. What Jobs is Netflix Hiring For? If you are looking to get a job with Netflix, your best bet would be to do it through their actual jobs website. While it doesn't seem that any tagger jobs are open at the moment, there are well over 500 open positions at the time of writing that are waiting to be filled. However, if you are looking for a quick way to make a ton of money just for binging your favorite series, it is best to look elsewhere. More Entertainment: How 'Karate Kid: Legends' is Connected to 'Cobra Kai'—Which to Watch First Fact-Check: Is Netflix's 'Adolescence' Series Based on a True Story? For more streaming and entertainment news, head on over to Newsweek Entertainment.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Putin planning revenge for secret drone attacks, Trump warns
Vladimir Putin is planning revenge for Ukraine's drone strikes on Russia's bomber fleet, Donald Trump has warned. The US president said he had a 'good conversation' with his Russian counterpart, after an unexpected phone call, but that it was 'not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace'. Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social network: 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' His comments came after Putin finally broke his silence following Kyiv's coordinated drone assaults, to once again rule out a ceasefire in Ukraine. He said that Kyiv would exploit the break in the fighting to rearm and remobilise and carry out further 'terrorist attacks'. In a televised government meeting on Wednesday, Putin said: 'Why reward them by giving them a break from the combat, which will be used to pump the regime with Western arms, to continue their forced mobilisation and to prepare different terrorist acts.' Since March, Ukraine has fully backed a US-proposed unconditional and an immediate 30-day truce, pushing for it once again at peace talks in Istanbul on Monday. Despite Washington's pleading, Moscow has consistently refused. The Russian president had stayed quiet since Ukraine struck deep into the Russian heartland on Jun 1, damaging or destroying up to 20 of Putin's prized strategic bombers, according to Western intelligence estimates. The White House has insisted that it was not warned in advance of the attack. The coordination drone strikes are likely to have stoked fears in the Kremlin that Ukraine can strike its most prized military assets anywhere and unnerved Putin's projected image of invincibility. Russia's foreign ministry on Wednesday said all options are 'on the table' in response to Ukraine's attacks on Russian territory and accused the West of being involved in them. Sergei Ryabkov, Russia's deputy foreign minister said: 'We urge London and Washington to react in such a way as to stop further escalation.' Putin has not mentioned the assault, which Moscow has sought to downplay, claiming that only 'several' planes caught fire. Instead, the Russian leader questioned the point of peace talks as he accused Ukraine of being behind attacks on bridges in its border regions over the weekend that caused a train to derail, killing seven people. Putin claimed that the attack, which Ukraine has not claimed responsibility for, was 'directed at thwarting the negotiation process'. He said: 'How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?' The Russian president also dismissed Volodymyr Zelensky's calls for a meeting after the Ukrainian president argued that direct top-level negotiations were the only way to end the three-year war. Mr Zelensky told a briefing in Kyiv: 'My proposal, which I believe our partners can support, is that we agree a ceasefire with the Russians until the leaders meet.' He also called Russia's conditions for peace an 'ultimatum'. During the unsuccessful peace talks in Turkey, Russia presented a peace settlement that largely reflected Putin's goals from the outset of the invasion and which Kyiv said was tantamount to surrender. Moscow had listed maximalist demands including complete control over four partially-occupied Ukrainian regions and that international recognition of Russian sovereignty over them and Crimea must be granted. The sharply conflicting demands from both sides leave little hope for any quick progress in talks. Russia instead proposed on Monday a short two-three day ceasefire, which it said was a chance to let both armies collect the bodies of dead soldiers from the battlefield. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jamie Foxx Has One Question For Sean Combs in Midst of N.Y. Racketeering Trial: ‘Why You So Nasty, Diddy?'
Jamie Foxx is not pulling punches when it comes to his thoughts on the Sean 'Diddy' Combs' New York sex trafficking and racketeering trial. During a recent appearance at the Comedy Store in Los Angeles, the actor/singer lashed out at the disgraced former music mogul who he once honored at Diddy's 2008 Hollywood Walk of Fame induction ceremony. 'Diddy is fu–in' crazy, huh?' Foxx said in footage shared by Urban Hollywood. 'I don't know if he is going to jail, but he is a nasty motherf–er. Am I right? Especially for us… white people like, 'It's cool,' but for Black people… that was our hero. All that g–damn baby oil, boy! Why you so nasty, Diddy?' When officers raided Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami last March prosecutors said they found drugs as well as more than 1,000 bottles of lubricant and baby oil. More from Billboard 50 Cent Keeps His Promise by Posting the 'Really Bad' Things Diddy Has Said About Donald Trump Jessie J Reveals 'Early Breast Cancer' Diagnosis: 'Cancer Sucks in Any Form' Big Thief Announce New Album, 'Double Infinity' The comments from Foxx about the shocking testimony in the Combs trial in reference to the rapper's marathon 'Freak Off' sex parties is relevant because in 2023 rumors circulated that Combs allegedly poisoned Foxx, leading to the actor's hospitalization for what was later confirmed to be a stroke. Foxx opened up about the rumors surrounding his mystery illness last month in a chat with The Hollywood Reporter, shooting down the allegations that Diddy tried to have him killed via poisoning. 'I'm in f—ing perfect shape. [I saw things like,] 'Puffy tried to kill me.' No, Puffy didn't try to kill me. When they said I was a clone, that made me flip,' Foxx said. 'I'm sitting in the hospital bed, like, 'These b—h-a– motherf—ers are trying to clone me.'' While a spokesperson for Combs did not reply to Billboard's request for a comment on the allegations, his team has repeatedly said the rumor was false and unfounded. Foxx also addressed the allegations in his What Had Happened Was… Netflix special in December, in which he said, 'The internet said Puffy was trying to kill me, that's what the internet was saying. I know what you thinking, 'Diddy?' Hell no, I left them parties early. I was out by 9. 'Something don't look right… it looks slippery in here!' The Combs trial is in its fourth week and on Wednesday (June 4) Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Diddy's ex, prosecution star witness Cassie Ventura, alleged that Diddy dangled her over a 17th-floor apartment balcony in 2016 before shoving her into the balcony's furniture. Combs is facing five criminal counts of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion and transportation to engage in prostitution, charges that could land him in prison for the rest of his life; Combs has denied the allegations against him. Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart