logo
Air Canada resuming flights after Ottawa forces binding arbitration with flight attendants

Air Canada resuming flights after Ottawa forces binding arbitration with flight attendants

Article content
Air Canada says it plans to resume flights today after the federal government stepped in and ordered binding arbitration to end a flight attendants' strike Saturday.
Article content
The Montreal-based airline says the first flights will resume this evening, but that it will take several days before its operations return to normal.
Article content
Air Canada says it has been directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board to resume operations and have flight attendants continue their duties by 2 p.m. ET.
Article content
Article content
Air Canada said on Sunday that the CIRB has ordered the terms of the collective agreement between the union and the airline that expired on March 31 be extended until a new agreement is reached.
Article content
The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents the flight attendants, has accused federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu of caving to Air Canada's demands.
Article content
Article content
Air Canada had previously asked Hajdu to order the parties to enter a binding arbitration process. But intervention was something she resisted until Saturday, when she said it became clear the two sides were at an impasse.
Article content
CUPE maintained it opposed arbitration, instead preferring to solve the impasse through bargaining.
Article content
The union accused Air Canada of refusing to bargain in good faith due to the likelihood of the government stepping in and imposing arbitration.
Article content
Article content
The union has said its main sticking points revolve around wages that have been outpaced by inflation during its previous 10-year contract, along with unpaid labour when planes aren't in the air.
Article content
Article content
CUPE announced it is calling a national day of action and will have demonstrators outside of the Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary airports this morning.
Article content
The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, announced its members were heading to the picket lines after being unable to reach an eleventh-hour deal with the airline, while Air Canada locked out its agents about 30 minutes later due to the strike action.
Article content
More than 700 Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights were cancelled amid the work stoppage, the airline said.
Article content
Flights by Air Canada Express, operated by third-party airlines Jazz and PAL, were not affected.
Article content
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CUPE says Air Canada strike to continue, defying order
CUPE says Air Canada strike to continue, defying order

Toronto Star

time2 minutes ago

  • Toronto Star

CUPE says Air Canada strike to continue, defying order

TORONTO - The Canadian Union of Public Employees says a strike by 10,000 flight attendants at Air Canada will continue, defying an order from the Canada Industrial Relations Board that it provide public notice by noon ET that it had ended the strike. The board had declared the strike unlawful after the federal government on Saturday used Section 107 of the Labour Code to force the two sides into binding arbitration.

Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67M in defamation case over bogus 2020 election claims
Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67M in defamation case over bogus 2020 election claims

Toronto Sun

time2 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67M in defamation case over bogus 2020 election claims

Published Aug 18, 2025 • 3 minute read News anchors work at Newsmax's booth during the second day of the 2024 Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, July 16, 2024. Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON / AFP via Getty Images DENVER — The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The settlement comes after Fox News Channel paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis had ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax in a new filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It said the deal was reached Friday. 'Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020,' the company said in a statement. 'We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.' A spokesperson for Dominion said the company was pleased to have settled the lawsuit. The disclosure of the settlement came as Trump, who lost his 2020 reelection bid to Democrat Joe Biden, vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the Republican president could achieve that. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The same judge also handled the Dominion-Fox News case and made a similar ruling that the network repeated numerous lies by Trump's allies about his 2020 loss despite internal communications showing Fox officials knew the claims were bogus. At the time, Davis found it was 'CRYSTAL clear' that none of the allegations was true. Internal correspondence from Newsmax officials likewise shows they knew the claims were baseless. 'How long are we going to play along with election fraud?' Newsmax host Bob Sellers said two days after the 2020 election was called for Biden, according to internal documents revealed as part of the case. Newsmax took pride that it was not calling the election for Biden and, the internal documents show, saw a business opportunity in catering to viewers who believed Trump won. Private communications that surfaced as part of Dominion's earlier defamation case against Fox News also revealed how the network's business interests intersected with decisions it made related to coverage of Trump's 2020 election claims. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. At Newsmax, employees repeatedly warned against false allegations from pro-Trump guests such as attorney Sidney Powell, according to documents in the lawsuit. In one text, even Newsmax owner Chris Ruddy, a Trump ally, said he found it 'scary' that Trump was meeting with Powell. Dominion was at the heart of many of the wild claims aired by guests on Newsmax and elsewhere, who promoted a conspiracy theory involving deceased Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez to rig the machines for Biden. The network retracted some of the more bombastic allegations in December 2020. Though Trump has insisted his fraud claims are real, there's no evidence they were, and the lawsuits in the Fox and Newsmax cases show how some of the president's biggest supporters knew they were false at the time. Trump's then-attorney general, William Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Trump and his backers lost dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud, some before Trump-appointed judges. Numerous recounts, reviews and audits of the election results, including some run by Republicans, turned up no signs of significant wrongdoing or error and affirmed Biden's win. After returning to office, Trump pardoned those who tried to halt the transfer of power during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and directed his Department of Justice to investigate Chris Krebs, a former Trump cybersecurity appointee who had vouched for the security and accuracy of the 2020 election. As an initial trial date approached in the Dominion case earlier this year, Trump issued an executive order attacking the law firm that litigated it and the Fox case, Susman Godfrey. The order, part of a series targeting law firms Trump has tussled with, cited Susman Godfrey's work on elections and said the government would not do business with any of its clients or permit any of its staff in federal buildings. A federal judge put that action on hold, saying the framers would view it as 'a shocking abuse of power. ' Columnists Columnists World Canada Sunshine Girls

Your letters for Aug. 19: Canada's fighter fleet goals grounded by reality
Your letters for Aug. 19: Canada's fighter fleet goals grounded by reality

Calgary Herald

time2 minutes ago

  • Calgary Herald

Your letters for Aug. 19: Canada's fighter fleet goals grounded by reality

I cannot fathom how badly the Canadian F-35 review missed the mark on affordability and Arctic readiness. The numbers make the failure painfully clear. To match NATO averages, Canada would need roughly 2,500 aircraft for territorial coverage or 5,000 to cover our coastline. The notion that we are building an effective fighter fleet is little more than a comforting fiction. The fighters planned would not even operate effectively without at least 20 more Forward Operating Locations, and three or four aircraft per site is almost meaningless for real defence. Article content Article content The RCAF seems captivated by the allure of a new, flashy plane instead of thinking strategically. A far smarter choice would be 250 Saab Gripens. These aircraft avoid the crushing infrastructure and maintenance costs of the F-35, and their lifetime upkeep is estimated at $6.6 million per plane, compared to the F-35's staggering $700 million. Article content Article content It is time for our political leadership to stop chasing prestige and start ensuring that Canada's defence dollars create real, operational capability instead of empty appearances. Article content Article content Article content Why aren't people reporting crime? That might be the better question. If you report a crime, and nothing happens, you still feel unsafe because the crime continues unaffected. Article content Article content Or worse yet, if you report the crime, and nothing happens, except the crime stats rise in your vicinity, your property value drops and your insurance increases because you are in a higher crime area. Why report the crime? Article content Article content Article content Dale Mcgonigal, Calgary Article content Article content ​ Summer of government discontent I was sitting here wondering how many people this provincial government would like to anger before the end of summer. First denying our disabled citizens their $200 cost of living increase from the federal government, yet thinking it was OK to give all of their MLAs a $200 a month cost of living raise this spring. Second, for every citizen who wants to get a COVID-19 shot in the fall, they are required to pay for it and it's now complicated to get. How many clinics are there in Alberta compared to pharmacies? Imagine the logistics to get everyone vaccinated in so few places! Next, all of the citizens who use are bike lanes. How happy are they that you are interfering in local politics? Lastly, using your power to deny anyone the opportunity to see how our politicians are using their expense accounts to spend taxpayers' money. This government makes it very difficult to feel like a proud Albertan. Government backs industry Once again, the federal government has shown whose side it's on. By forcing Air Canada employees back to work instead of allowing them to negotiate fair pay for boarding, taxing, and handling medical emergencies, they've made it clear: corporate profits matter more than workers' rights. Air Canada's CEO took home $12 million last year — yet the people doing the actual work aren't even paid for critical parts of their job. This isn't an isolated incident. The government has repeatedly intervened in labour disputes (Canada Post, dock workers) to protect big business while stripping workers of their bargaining power. If the government truly represented all Canadians, it would stay neutral or support fair negotiations — not legislate away workers' rights. How many more times will they side with CEOs over the people who keep these industries running?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store