Less of the bombast, please
Everyone has an opinion on the merits or otherwise of their local authority, particularly when the rates go up or money is spent on a controversial project.
That concern does not often enough translate into bothering to vote in local elections, but that is another issue.
The country's local government network is made up of 78 councils, the largest group being the 61 territorial local authorities with its mix of city and district councils, 11 regional councils and six unitary authorities (these combine the functions of regional and territorial councils).
There has been some tinkering with local government since the major reform of local government in 1989 and some mergers of councils but no major national reorganisation since then.
In several areas, ideas of amalgamating some councils arise from time to time, but getting support for such changes is never simple.
Recently, we have had much noise and colourful language, as is his wont, from Regional Development Minister Shane Jones about what he sees as the need to get rid of regional councils.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon also says he wants to explore the possibility of scrapping New Zealand's regional councils as the government reforms the Resource Management Act.
Mr Jones, in a Facebook post promoting his plan to take a remit to the New Zealand First conference later this year on "rationalisation of local government" with a view to next year's general election campaign, describes himself as a doubting Thomas about regional government.
He goes on to say the reason for this is because Otago Regional Council is "opposed to my mining projects".
He accuses the council of destroying jobs and "conveniently" discovering a moth nobody had heard of to scuttle the expansion of gold mining.
Mr Jones says the country cannot have a system of regional government which refuses to rapidly allocate resource consents to drive growth and to effect better outcomes for employment. In the course of this he has also labelled the ORC the "Kremlin of the South Island" and accused it of being full of "KGB green zealots".
His over-the-top rhetoric is in response to the council's assessment of environmental effects from an application to expand the Macraes' gold mine.
While he portrays the council concerns as solely about a rare moth, the report recommending the application be declined in full also said the project would result in actual and potential effects on surface water quality, aquatic ecology, natural inland and ephemeral wetlands and lizard habitat.
The report said these effects would be "significantly adverse" and could not be avoided, minimised, remedied, offset or compensated for.
Mr Jones sounds more like a miffed pre-schooler after losing a tussle over a toy digger in a sandpit, than a government minister promoting a serious discussion about long-term change.
As ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson diplomatically put it, "name-calling" was unhelpful.
The Otago council remained focused on its responsibility to protect the environment while supporting sustainable economic development.
"That balance is not ideological — it reflects the law, and we believe it reflects the values of our region: caring for both our environment and our livelihoods."
She said the country's regional councils welcomed "meaningful dialogue" on how to best deliver the services they were intended to — flood protection, biosecurity, civil defence, environmental management and public transport.
As we saw with the Three Waters reform proposals before the last election, it is easy for fervour to be whipped up over issues involving local control, debates to become narrowly focused, and often not based in fact.
Those on either side of the argument quickly moved to talking, or shouting, past each other rather than working sensibly through the issues.
Mr Jones' bombastic outbursts are setting the scene for more of that.
If there is to be reform, it should not be achieved without proper meaningful input from those it will affect.
The government saying "jump", and expecting those in the regions to respond "how high?" will not work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
18 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Support grows for return of Southerner
Southern MPs Scott Willis (Green Party), Mark Patterson (NZ First) and Rachel Brooking (Labour) celebrate after a petition to restore the Southerner train service was accepted. PHOTO: GREGOR RICHARDSON Restoring the long-retired Southerner train service from Invercargill to Christchurch has moved a step closer to becoming a reality. Yesterday, supporters gathered at the Dunedin Railway Station to watch as New Zealand First MP and Regional Development Associate Minister Mark Patterson accepted a petition to restore the Southerner service as a regular public transport service from Invercargill to Christchurch. More than 12,000 people from Invercargill to Christchurch have signed the petition. Dunedin resident and former Hamilton city councillor Dave MacPherson said passenger rail was an issue that transcended political boundaries. "It doesn't matter whether you're progressive or conservative or Green or New Zealand First — there's definitely a place for tourist trains, but there's a lot of locals that also want to use this kind of service. The group, Save Our Trains, was asked by MPs to drum up a petition within about a month. "That was their challenge to us — they said, 'Look, we'll try and help you, but if you give us some sort of proof of the level of support you've got, that makes it easier for us'." That was at the end of May, he said. While the group was originally Dunedin-based, it now had support from Invercargill to Christchurch, and in many of the population centres along the proposed route. "We've got one woman from Oamaru who collected about 1500 signatures ... she did an amazing job. "It's a genuine regional thing, not just for Dunedin." They would like to see prices on the restored Southerner similar to routes in the North Island, about $60 to $70. Mr MacPherson, who was involved in getting the Te Huia line from Auckland to Hamilton running, said he had never had such an easy time collecting signatures. "There's a transport and infrastructure select committee they're planning to put [the petition] in front of, and hopefully that sparks a discussion. "It's not going to happen overnight, but the fact that there is government-supported long-distance passenger trains already under way up in the North Island, but nothing in the South Island, is a powerful reason for this getting done."
Otago Daily Times
19 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
ORC moving to system where no votes are ‘wasted'
An elections law specialist is urging people not to be too daunted by the Otago Regional Council's decision to switch to a single transferable vote (STV) system for this year's council elections. The councillors last year approved the shift from first past the post, bringing it in line with the Dunedin City Council, the only one of Otago's five territorial authorities to use the electoral system where voters rank their preferred candidates. University of Otago political science professor Janine Hayward said Dunedin had been using the system for several years with little difficulty. "I do think it's a great idea to give voters a little bit more confidence in how straightforward it is." Under STV, voters rank their preferred candidates from best to last, with "1" being the highest ranking, also known as first preference. Once the votes are collated, they go through a process called an iteration, where there is a quota each candidate has to reach in order to be elected. Anyone who reaches that quota is declared elected. "The least popular candidate drops out of the race and their votes are redistributed to the next preference of the people who voted for them. "If the person who got elected, or the people who got elected, had surplus votes, then those votes are redistributed as well. So what the STV process is ensuring is that there are no votes that are wasted." Prof Hayward urged people to be careful, if they particularly did not want a candidate to sneak in on redistributed votes. "Put simply, if you don't like the candidate, don't rank them. "After first past the post (FPP), there was a tendency among some people to rank every single candidate on the ballot sheet, but really that's unnecessary." STV avoided the premise of a "wasted vote", Prof Hayward said. "Votes get wasted in two ways. "When you're voting for multiple people, they get wasted because too many people vote for somebody, and they get more votes than they needed to get elected, or people vote for somebody who's really unpopular and was never going to get elected. "So the point about the transferring of the single transferable vote is to keep as many voter preferences alive, basically, as possible until the number of candidates required meet that quota that they're aiming for." It was also a good indication of the "depth" of someone's voter support, she said. "When you're doing something like electing Otago Regional Council, it's likely to see somebody or a couple of people elected on first preferences. "But having a large vote in your first preferences doesn't necessarily mean that you have enough support across the whole community to get elected, and I think that's the point about single transferable vote. "It really tests, beyond the first vote, whether somebody has the breadth and depth of support that they need to get elected." Council elections take place from September 9 to October 11.
Otago Daily Times
20 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council discards proposal for direct Dunedin to Oamaru bus service
Hopes of Oamaru getting a direct bus service to Dunedin have been dashed for now, after the Otago Regional Council last week discarded proposals to establish a link. Waitaki District Mayor Gary Kircher had lobbied strongly for the regional council to provide a bus service to Oamaru during its recent annual plan submissions but said he recognised the challenges of funding it. "There's a lot of calls from other areas wanting to expand their services. For us, obviously, it's about starting a service and it's really difficult if the co-funder, [NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi] NZTA, doesn't have the money there. "Fundamentally, that's the issue and it's something that the government has to address because it's causing issues not just with public transport, but with projects everywhere. "It would just be too expensive if ORC paid for the whole thing themselves without the co-funding. It would just be too costly on our ratepayers." Mr Kircher had also submitted to the regional council about providing a connecter service between central Oamaru and the North End. He said the service would need to be funded by ORC, not the district council. "Again, it would come at a cost and public transport doesn't cover its costs, unfortunately. So, there has to be some other money coming from somewhere and with all of the pressure on rates, that'd be a difficult thing for the [district] council to be able to underwrite. It is a regional council responsibility." Mr Kircher said he was meeting with regional council representatives and would be talking about what other opportunities there might be to "make something happen". ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson said the council remained committed to connecting Oamaru. "Some regional upgrades will not happen due to co-funding gaps, but we're committed to finding ways to improve connectivity options for Ōamaru, Balclutha and Central Otago," she said. Transport Minister Chris Bishop said public transport was funded from both public and private revenue sources, noting government funding for public transport in Otago has increased from $90 million to $125m. "Private share refers to the proportion of funding that comes from private sources, including fares paid by passengers, advertising on buses, bus stops, trains, train stations, as well as other commercial opportunities like renting or leasing commercial space," he said. "The Government Policy Statement on land transport 2024 [GPS 2024] sets the expectation that there will be increases in private share revenue to support the growing operational costs for public transport, as well as to reduce the burden on ratepayers and taxpayers. "Under the previous government the private share revenue dropped as low as 10%, meaning far more of the costs had to be covered by taxpayers and ratepayers. "To reach agreement on targets, NZTA asked PTAs [public transport authorities] to show they had considered methods appropriate to each region that did not drive adverse outcomes such as patronage decline."
