Human air traffic controllers keep flyers safe. Should AI have a role?
Human air traffic controllers keep flyers safe. Should AI have a role?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Why air traffic controllers are under more pressure than ever
Inside the growing stress in U.S. air traffic control towers.
Outdated technology and staffing shortages at Newark Liberty International Airport have led to ongoing flight delays and cancellations.
Experts warn that underfunding the FAA has prevented necessary technological upgrades and hiring of air traffic controllers.
The Transportation Secretary proposed a program to modernize the system and incentivize hiring, but Congressional funding is still needed.
Old technology is behind the recent ongoing delays and cancellations at Newark Liberty International Airport, but newer technology will be an important part of the solution.
To recap, on April 28, air traffic controllers handling inbound traffic at Newark experienced a brief radar and radio outage. Similar failures have occurred at least three times since then, and in response, the Federal Aviation Administration and airlines have reduced the number of flights operating in and out of the airport.
It's the kind of failure experts have been warning was inevitable for years.
'All these issues of staffing, all these issues of using copper wires instead of fiber optics, these have been there for a long time,' Sheldon Jacobson, professor of computer science at the University of Illinois' Grainger College of Engineering, told USA TODAY.
Jacobson said the technology in air traffic control towers is largely outdated, but like an old car, it worked well until it started breaking down.
'People are now paying attention," he said. 'They put more airplanes in the sky than the system can absorb, and what's happened is we've reached a tipping point. We have so much volume, and we have pretty much the same air traffic control technology for decades."
How did we get here?
The FAA's air traffic control issues didn't develop overnight, although the current headaches at Newark did catch many travelers by surprise.
Industry watchers have long warned that Congress was under-funding the FAA, preventing the agency from upgrading its technology and limiting its ability to hire and train new air traffic controllers.
According to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, the FAA is short about 3,000 air traffic controllers nationwide, and continues to rely on outdated technology like floppy disks to perform some crucial functions.
Cruising Altitude: Air traffic control keeps planes moving. So why does it cause delays?
Still, Jacobson said, that doesn't mean air travel isn't safe.
'The FAA, the airlines, and all of the supporting people have worked diligently to make air travel safer, and it's never been safer," he said. And that's part of the reason there are more delays and cancellations as air traffic control equipment falters.
"The only way to ensure the safety is to bring the volume down so we're not at that tipping point," Jacobson said.
What solutions have been proposed?
Successive administrations from both parties in Washington have promised fixes to the FAA's air traffic control program, but the solutions have been piecemeal so far.
Duffy recently announced a sweeping program to upgrade the agency's technology infrastructure, as well as hiring incentives to entice more would-be air traffic controllers.
However, a funding commitment from Congress was missing from his announcement. That hurdle has prevented previous administrations from implementing such overhauls.
Even if lawmakers fund the Trump administration's proposals, implementing the upgrades will likely take a long time.
'This isn't going to happen in three years. This is going to take several years,' Jacobson said. 'It's expensive and time-consuming.'
He also warned that it will add expense, complexity, and time because the upgrades will need to be rolled out without taking the current air traffic control system offline.
'You're trying to update a system while it's still working," he said.
Can AI help solve air traffic control issues?
Eventually, the FAA will roll out new technology for air traffic control, and while Jacobson said air traffic controllers won't ever be fully replaced by computers, he did acknowledge that new tech has a role to play in optimizing the nation's airspace.
'If we leave that off the table, we're forcing ourselves to use more manpower," he said.
Jacobson said that, since the FAA and airlines prioritize safety above all else, it doesn't make sense to remove humans from the air traffic control equation entirely. Pilots' unions have also long advocated the safety importance of having two highly trained aviators in the cockpit of every commercial flight, despite growing calls from some outside groups to explore flight control automation. However, using artificial intelligence and other technology to ease the controllers' burden could actually make the system safer.
'There are a lot of very perfunctory tasks that, working with ATC, an AI system could direct airplanes to," Jacobson said, like issuing initial clearance for pilots to push back from their gates, or guiding them to the start of the taxiway.
"You don't compromise safety, that is the most important objective, but you're giving them a little more breathing room or legroom to get their job done."
Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@usatoday.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
All-electric aircraft makes historic landing at JFK Airport
JFK Airport has its first ever all-electric aircraft landing JFK Airport has its first ever all-electric aircraft landing JFK Airport has its first ever all-electric aircraft landing History was made Tuesday at John F. Kennedy International Airport as an all-electric aircraft made a successful runway landing for the first time. The aircraft made a 45-minute journey from Suffolk County to Queens in a first-of-its-kind passenger-carrying demonstration flight. "So quiet, so efficient, so green" Beta Technologies, a Vermont-based start-up, is now the first United States company to land an all-electric aircraft at an airport in the New York-New Jersey region. The company's founder and CEO, Kyle Clark, piloted the Alia CX300 himself, landing successfully – and quietly. He says the historic flight showcases the future of urban air mobility amid a longstanding push for electric aviation. "That flight we just took from East Hampton to here was like $8 in electricity," he said. Clark says the company's all-electric aircraft have undergone years of rigorous safety testing. "It's super meaningful to bring an aircraft of new technology through six years of development and testing to the point that we can actually put passengers in it," Clark said. Joining him on Tuesday's flight were four passengers, including Andrew Kimball, CEO of NYC Economic Development Corporation. "So quiet, so efficient, so green. Really will transform the industry," Kimball said. "It was terrific. It was quiet," another passenger said. Beta Technologies aims to fly commercial passengers by 2026 Clark says the goal for such electric aircraft is to ease congestion, reduce emissions and increase accessibility for all. He hopes to be flying commercial passengers by 2026, although at this time, it's unclear exactly how much a commercial flight would cost. "Next year, we will achieve [Federal Aviation Administration] certification, we expect. It's gonna be a lot of hard work, more testing, so 18, 20 months from now, you can probably be flying one of these airplanes around New York," Clark said. "The airports have a big job to do in terms of establishing charging stations, developing areas where they can safely land and take off," said Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Executive Director Rick Cotton. In October 2024, the FAA finalized comprehensive training and pilot certification rules for flying such electric aircraft, calling it "the final piece in the puzzle for safely introducing these aircraft in the near term."

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom, Elon Musk and Marjorie Taylor Greene agree on this one thing
SAN FRANCISCO — California Gov. Gavin Newsom and fellow Sacramento Democrats are finding themselves in an awkward yet convenient alliance with MAGA-world figures against President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Just days after leaving the administration, Elon Musk took his opposition to the extreme over Trump's mega budget and reconciliation package, posting on X Tuesday that he 'just can't stand it anymore' with what he called the 'disgusting abomination' that is 'this massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' His outburst had Newsom, a frequent sparring partner, chiming in with agreement. 'Couldn't have said it better myself,' the governor responded to Musk. The vote of support from Newsom marks the latest turn in the rocky relationship between him and Musk, who enjoyed a favorable relationship with the governor while growing many of his companies within the state, but had become a regular target of criticism from the blue state leader during his time at the White House. Musk's post, meanwhile, encouraged Republican critics of the reconciliation package like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to quickly echo his outrage as well. But Newsom also found himself in agreement with conservative firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Tuesday over a particularly thorny provision of the bill: a 10-year ban on the enforcement of AI state regulation introduced by her fellow House Republicans. The Georgia lawmaker threatened to vote against the bill if it returns to the House with the moratorium still included — presenting a potential headache for GOP leadership, who could barely scrounge up the votes the first time. The package is being considered in the Senate, where the measure may not survive scrutiny under the upper chamber's Byrd rule, meant to strip out measures that have no impact or only a negligible one on the budget. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there,' Greene posted on X. 'We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous.' Newsom, who previously expressed fears about overregulating California's booming AI industry, has said he is concerned the moratorium will be 'overcorrecting in the other direction federally.' Four Democrats from the California Legislature joined a letter to Congress from state lawmakers on Tuesday morning to oppose the moratorium on state AI laws, only to see their criticisms echoed by Greene hours later. 'Given the long absence of federal action to address privacy and social media harms, barring all state and local AI laws until Congress acts threatens to setback policymaking and undermine existing enforcement on these issues,' they wrote as part of a bipartisan coalition of 260 state lawmakers. 'We respectfully urge you to reject any provision that preempts state and local AI legislation in this year's reconciliation package.'


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Gavin Newsom, Elon Musk and Marjorie Taylor Greene agree on this one thing
SAN FRANCISCO — California Gov. Gavin Newsom and fellow Sacramento Democrats are finding themselves in an awkward yet convenient alliance with MAGA-world figures against President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Just days after leaving the administration, Elon Musk took his opposition to the extreme over Trump's mega budget and reconciliation package, posting on X Tuesday that he 'just can't stand it anymore' with what he called the 'disgusting abomination' that is 'this massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' His outburst had Newsom, a frequent sparring partner, chiming in with agreement. 'Couldn't have said it better myself,' the governor responded to Musk. The vote of support from Newsom marks the latest turn in the rocky relationship between him and Musk, who enjoyed a favorable relationship with the governor while growing many of his companies within the state, but had become a regular target of criticism from the blue state leader during his time at the White House. Musk's post, meanwhile, encouraged Republican critics of the reconciliation package like Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to quickly echo his outrage as well. But Newsom also found himself in agreement with conservative firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Tuesday over a particularly thorny provision of the bill: a 10-year ban on the enforcement of AI state regulation introduced by her fellow House Republicans. The Georgia lawmaker threatened to vote against the bill if it returns to the House with the moratorium still included — presenting a potential headache for GOP leadership, who could barely scrounge up the votes the first time. The package is being considered in the Senate, where the measure may not survive scrutiny under the upper chamber's Byrd rule, meant to strip out measures that have no impact or only a negligible one on the budget. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there,' Greene posted on X. 'We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous.' Newsom, who previously expressed fears about overregulating California's booming AI industry, has said he is concerned the moratorium will be 'overcorrecting in the other direction federally.' Four Democrats from the California Legislature joined a letter to Congress from state lawmakers on Tuesday morning to oppose the moratorium on state AI laws, only to see their criticisms echoed by Greene hours later. 'Given the long absence of federal action to address privacy and social media harms, barring all state and local AI laws until Congress acts threatens to setback policymaking and undermine existing enforcement on these issues,' they wrote as part of a bipartisan coalition of 260 state lawmakers. 'We respectfully urge you to reject any provision that preempts state and local AI legislation in this year's reconciliation package.'