logo
Pathemata by Maggie Nelson review – a writer's attempt to describe chronic pain

Pathemata by Maggie Nelson review – a writer's attempt to describe chronic pain

The Guardian05-05-2025
In her landmark 1985 work, The Body in Pain, American essayist Elaine Scarry makes a case for the 'unsharability' of pain and its resistance to language. 'Physical pain,' she writes, 'does not simply resist language but actively destroys it.' Sixty years earlier in On Being Ill, Virginia Woolf made her famous claim about how language 'runs dry' when it comes to articulating illness. Both theories grapple with inexpressibility. Experiencing serious, persistent pain invokes many feelings: irritation, curiosity (what's causing it?), fear (of something sinister) and ultimately the desire to eradicate it. The search for a diagnosis can be as debilitating as the condition itself. In Pathemata: Or, the Story of My Mouth, Maggie Nelson tries to solve the mystery of a longstanding health issue. 'Each morning, it is as if my mouth has survived a war – it has protested, it has hidden, it has suffered.'
Nelson breadcrumbs backwards through teenage orthodontist visits, recurrent battles with tonsillitis and 'tongue thrust' in an attempt to find the source of the problem. She diligently keeps records of appointments, medications and scans, lugging files between GPs and several dentists whose waiting rooms show slick testimonial videos. Written during the pandemic, this short work is also testament to the apocalyptic uncertainty that infused that time. Her partner is in a separate support bubble and Nelson makes several attempts to get their son vaccinated, her frustration palpable. When the child complains about her anger, she confesses: 'I have never felt as angry as I've felt over the past two years.'
The locus of Pathemata (ancient Greek for 'sufferings') may be pain and the pandemic, but Nelson has never been a single-subject writer, even in books that professed to be singular, such as Jane: A Murder (the death of her aunt) or Bluets (the colour blue). In this thoughtful work, she excavates the duties of parenthood and care, bodies and ageing, loneliness and mortality. The narrative jumps in time, and the lines between reality, dreams and fiction blur.
Pain is as individual as a fingerprint, and yet Nelson wonders why 'some people with bites more fucked up than mine have no pain, just like two people could have identical back MRIs but one can't get out of bed and the other does CrossFit'. It is not lost on her that the mouth has a symbolic role in the life of the writer: someone whose job revolves round words, while the pain itself remains unamenable to language. Mandatory face covering during Covid brings a realisation of how many emotions are expressed with the mouth. Its visibility means it becomes a site of art: the rapidly moving lips of Beckett's Not I or The Scream by Munch.
Nelson succumbs to the Covid routines of doomscrolling the news and watching beloved TV shows, but in the midst of social isolation, there is loneliness at home, too. Her partner eventually returns to the house and 'each activity – popcorn popping, the clatter of violence on Netflix – floats into my bedroom – our bedroom – like a fresh abandonment'. The pandemic's forced confinement also means that she has to say goodbye to a dying friend by phone. Heartbroken, she can't stop hearing her friend's voice saying her name. 'No one will ever say my name like that again – no lover, no parent, no husband, no friend. The way she knew me died with her; from now on, I will be less loved, less known.'
In the search for answers, Nelson reads articles about how the pandemic has killed coincidence and moments of surprise. She feels that 'magic is seeping out of my life'. Understandable in a time of enforced lockdowns, but there is a palpable link to getting older; that there is less time ahead than behind. Nelson's work never does self-pity and she admits that this failure to summon magic 'is uniquely my own'. Nostalgia was a balm for many during Covid, and amid the possibility of a future full of fear, Nelson recalls her school days, her thesis on Anne Sexton and Sylvia Plath and a beloved feminist theory teacher.
Structured in short paragraphs, the narrative repeatedly circles back to the implications and consequences of pain, and the disruption it causes. 'Sometimes I wonder what I would have thought about all these years, if I hadn't spent so much time thinking about the pain. Then I remember that I thought about a lot of other things as well.' For Nelson, a life of pain must coexist alongside the other roles she inhabits: of mother, teacher, lover.
The book's full title comes from a phrase in ancient Greek meaning 'learning through suffering', which is not as simple as solving what Nelson calls 'the pain puzzle'. The pain endured by martyrs and saints suggests penance or ecstasy, but Nelson is neither religious nor seeking absolution. In trying to untangle the problem of her own pain and her experience of disconnection, she invites us to reflect on ours. In outlining her suffering, she prompts us to imagine our own. The singular as metaphor for the collective, urging us to fully inhabit the lives we have, in spite of bodily interruptions, or global distractions.
Sign up to Bookmarks
Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you
after newsletter promotion
Pathemata or, the Story of My Mouth by Maggie Nelson is published by Fern (£12.99). To support the Guardian order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US pediatric organization diverges from CDC in Covid-19 vaccine advisory for children
US pediatric organization diverges from CDC in Covid-19 vaccine advisory for children

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

US pediatric organization diverges from CDC in Covid-19 vaccine advisory for children

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is urging that children as young as six months and up to 23 months old receive the Covid-19 vaccine – a position that diverges from the current federal guidance given by the Trump administration's health agencies. The AAP released its updated childhood immunization schedule, which outlines recommendations for vaccines against Covid-19, influenza and RSV for individuals under 18. 'It differs from recent recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices of the CDC, which was overhauled this year and replaced with individuals who have a history of spreading vaccine misinformation,' the organization said in a statement. The announcement follows a decision from health and human services secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr in late May to halt CDC recommendations for healthy children to receive the Covid-19 vaccine. Previously, the CDC advised vaccination for everyone six months and older with the latest available dose. The CDC currently advises that Covid-19 vaccinations for children aged six months through 17 years should be determined through 'shared clinical decision-making'. The AAP recommends vaccination for anyone under 18 who is at higher risk of serious illness from Covid-19, resides in a longterm care or congregate living facility, has not previously been vaccinated, or shares a household with someone at elevated risk. 'The academy has been making pediatric immunization recommendations since the 1930s, that has not changed,' Dr Susan Kressly, president of the AAP, told ABC News. 'But what has changed is that this year, we're doing it in the environment of misinformation, which makes it more important than ever that we provide clear and confident guidance, because the majority of American families really depend on us for this guidance.' AAP says infants and toddlers between six and 23 months face the greatest risk for severe outcomes from Covid-19 and vaccination offers protection against serious illness. Even as medical groups continue to disagree with federal agencies, insurers often base coverage on guidelines from the CDC's advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). If ACIP declines to endorse a vaccine, families may have to pay out of pocket, and the shot may not be provided through the federally funded Vaccines for Children program. Kennedy's restructured vaccine panel has maintained support for annual flu shots but voted to limit them to single-dose formulations without the preservative thimerosal. The AAP, however, maintains that the preservative poses no risk and said physicians should administer any approved flu vaccine suitable for the patient.

Researchers discovered by accident a possible alternative to LASIK surgery
Researchers discovered by accident a possible alternative to LASIK surgery

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

Researchers discovered by accident a possible alternative to LASIK surgery

LASIK eye surgery has been performed successfully in the U.S. since the late 90s, helping nearly 40 million patients to improve their vision through a procedure that cuts into the eye using lasers. Some 600,000 of the Food and Drug Administration-approved surgeries are carried out on American adults each year. Now, researchers say they have come up with an alternative method that wouldn't need invasive incisions and could be cheaper. It uses a process called electromechanical reshaping, which helps to reshape the cornea using electrical current. The cornea is a dome-shaped, clear structure at the front of the eye that helps us to process images. Irregularly shaped corneas are the cause of nearsighted and farsighted vision and astigmatism, and LASIK fixes that by burning away tissue to reshape it. 'The whole effect was discovered by accident,' Brian Wong, a professor and surgeon at the University of California, Irvine, explained in a statement. 'I was looking at living tissues as moldable materials and discovered this whole process of chemical modification.' While the work is in its early stages, it could offer an alternative to LASIK. Although the surgery has been safely performed for nearly 30 years with rare complications, it has some limitations and risks. The surgeons say that cutting the cornea compromises the structural integrity of the eye. This procedure has yet to be performed in humans, but researchers previously used electromechanical reshaping to alter scars and skin in pigs and reshape cartilage-rich rabbit ears. Working with rabbit eyeballs, they constructed platinum 'contact lenses' that served as a template for the corrected shape of the cornea, placing them over a rabbit eyeball in a saline solution meant to mimic natural tears. After about a minute following a small electric charge to the lens, the cornea's curvature conformed to the shape of the lens. That happened in the same amount of time as LASIK, with fewer steps, no incisions, and less expensive equipment. Then, they repeated the step on 12 other rabbit eyeballs. Of those dozen, 10 were treated as if they had nearsighted vision, and the researchers found success. In others, they saw that their technique might be able to reverse some chemical-caused cloudiness to the cornea, which is currently only treatable through a complete transplant of the cornea. In the future, the researchers are planning tests on living rabbits, and looking at far-sightedness and astigmatism. Uncertainties in the team's scientific funding have put those plans on hold, but Michael Hill, a professor of chemistry at Occidental College, will present their findings this week at the fall meeting of the American Chemical Society. 'There's a long road between what we've done and the clinic. But, if we get there, this technique is widely applicable, vastly cheaper and potentially even reversible,' said Hill.

Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study
Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study

Covid may prematurely age blood vessels by around five years, according to a new study, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. Research published in the European Heart Journal revealed that a Covid infection could accelerate the ageing of blood vessels, particularly in women. Vaccinated individuals show less stiffening in their arteries and stabilised symptoms over time in comparison to those who had not been protected against Covid. Lead researcher Professor Rosa Maria Bruno, from Université Paris Cité, said: "We know that Covid can directly affect blood vessels. We believe that this may result in what we call early vascular ageing, meaning that your blood vessels are older than your chronological age and you are more susceptible to heart disease. 'If that is happening, we need to identify who is at risk at an early stage to prevent heart attacks and strokes." The new study tested nearly 2,500 people from across the world, categorising them based on whether they had Covid and whether they had been hospitalised for it, both in a general ward and in an intensive care unit. Tests were taken six months after an infection and again after 12 months. It measured each person's vascular age with a device that examines how quickly a wave of blood pressure travels between the artery in the neck and the legs. The higher the measurement meant the stiffer the blood vessels, indicating a higher vascular age. It found that all three groups of patients who had a Covid infection had stiffer arteries compared to those who hadn't been affected. The average increase in women was 0.55 meters per second for those who had mild Covid, 0.60 for those who had been hospitalised, and 1.09 for those in intensive care. According to researchers, an increase of around 0.5 meters per second is "clinically relevant" and equivalent to ageing around five years. It also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, like heart attack, stroke or sudden cardiac arrest, in 60-year-old women by 3 per cent. The difference between men and women could come down to immune systems, Prof Bruno added. She said: 'Women mount a more rapid and robust immune response, which can protect them from infection. However, this same response can also increase damage to blood vessels after the initial infection.' She said the virus acts on specific receptors in the body that are in the lining of the blood vessels. The virus will use these receptors to enter and infect cells. Last month, it was reported that a new strain of Covid had spread across the UK, accounting for the highest proportion of cases - around 30 per cent. Experts warned the Stratus strain was resisting immunity and had a unique symptom of giving people a hoarse voice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store