
NASA's allocated budget proposal gets 25 per cent cut at $18.8 billion; Trump administration's decision to impact agency
Under President Donald Trump's proposed 2026 budget, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (
NASA
) will be prioritising human missions to the Moon and Mars. The US space agency will receive $18.8 billion—nearly 25 per cent less than the current $24.8 billion.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Pakistan reopens Attari-Wagah border to allow stranded citizens in India to return
Key Jammu & Kashmir reservoirs' flushing to begin soon
Air India sees Pakistan airspace ban costing it $600 mn over 12 months
Trump's proposal allocates over $7 billion for lunar exploration and introduces $1 billion in new Mars-focused investments, which aim to fulfil the President's promise to plant a flag on Mars.
Deep cuts to space science and technology
In accordance with a report in the New York Times, NASA's wider scientific portfolio will experience deep reductions while the moon and Mars programmes are becoming more prominent. The planned budget would reportedly cancel the Mars Sample Return mission and reshape the Landsat Next program.
GIF89a����!�,D;
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Victoria Principal Is Almost 75, See Her Now
Reportingly
Undo
Meanwhile, the space technology portfolio would be reduced by half, and unsuccessful space propulsion projects will be rejected, the NYT report said, adding that officials did not give details on the same.
NASA's research on aviation to cut greenhouse gas emissions will come to an end, according to the proposal, affecting climate science. The Space Launch System (
SLS
) and Orion capsule, the mainstays of the Artemis missions, will be retired after Artemis III in favour of cheaper commercial systems.
Live Events
Also Read :
Is Six Flags America closing? Theme park sets deadline, marking end of an era
International partnerships at risk
The proposal also cancels the
Gateway
, a small lunar space station planned in cooperation with Europe, Japan, Canada, and the UAE. This could also jeopardise international agreements and reduce global collaboration in future lunar missions.
NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, meanwhile, has expressed support for commercial solutions but emphasised the importance of maintaining international partnerships.
Cuts to the ISS and education
Operations on the International Space Station (ISS) would be reduced, with a lower crew and diminished research. The budget proposes to phase out the
ISS
gradually until 2030, focusing on commercial space stations. NASA's STEM Engagement programme, including Space Grant and EPSCoR, would be eliminated, with terms used by the budget to criticise them as "woke" and 'unproductive'—something Congress has opposed in previous administrations.
Concerns over American leadership in space
Reportedly, experts have cautioned that the budget would undermine America's leadership in space internationally. Planetary Society's Casey Dreier dubbed it as the largest single-year cut to NASA in American history and accused it of reflecting an abandonment of scientific leadership and global cooperation.
Also Read :
Great white shark rescue: Father-son duo's heroic act, with help from locals, saves shark on Australian coast
FAQs
1 . Why is NASA's budget being reduced?
The Trump administration contends that prioritising human exploration of Mars and the Moon is a better allocation of resources, although detractors caution that this is being done at the cost of scientific investigation and global collaboration.
2 . What becomes of programmes such as Artemis and the ISS?
The Artemis program would persist only up to Artemis III, before switching to commercial systems. ISS operations would be minimised, with a target of decommissioning by 2030 and being replaced by commercial stations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump ‘frustrated' with Musk but ‘doesn't want a long-term feud': JD Vance
Updated 12 Jun 2025, 05:55 AM IST US Vice President JD Vance on Wednesday explained that President Donald Trump was frustrated with billionaire Elon Musk but doesn't want a long-term feud with him. Speaking to reporters, Vance said he spoke both Musk and Trump to ensure the Tesla boss remains supportive of the president. He also noted that the Trump team appreciates Musk's early efforts to help streamline government operations. Meanwhile, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says, "The President acknowledged the statement that Elon put out this morning and he is appreciative of it and we are continuing to focus on the business of the American people" Musk on Wednesday said he regretted some of the social media posts he had made about Trump, saying they had gone "too far," a gesture the U.S. president described as "very nice," in the latest sign of a tentative reconciliation between the two.


Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Cannot have nuclear weapons': Donald Trump vows to stop Iran; US orders partial Iraq embassy evacuation
has reiterated his hard stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions, stating that the United States will not allow the Middle Eastern nation to possess nuclear weapons. His comments came just as the US ordered a partial evacuation of its embassy in Iraq, citing rising security concerns in the region. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to reporters at the Kennedy Center in Washington alongside his wife Melania, the US president said, 'They can't have a . Very simple. They can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that.' Trump's statement follows growing tensions amid failed diplomatic efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran. Despite five rounds of talks since April, no agreement has been reached, with uranium enrichment remaining the main point of contention. The MAGA chief told a New York Post podcast released on Wednesday that his hopes for a deal were fading. 'I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it,' he said, adding, 'Something happened to them. But I'm much less confident about a deal being made.' The US State Department confirmed on Wednesday that most American diplomats were being withdrawn from Baghdad and Erbil due to unspecified threats. 'President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies,' the department said. It added, 'Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq. ' US defence secretary Pete Hegseth has also authorised the voluntary departure of US military dependents across the Middle East, as reported by Politico. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Meanwhile, Iran's defence minister Aziz Nasirzadeh has warned of a strong military response if attacked. 'All of its bases are within our reach; we have access to them, and we will target all of them in the host countries with no hesitation,' he was quoted as saying to Radio Free Europe. On social media, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi acknowledged Trump's demand. 'That is actually in line with our own doctrine and could become the main foundation for a deal,' he posted on X, but insisted a 'mutually beneficial outcome' would require the continuation of Iran's enrichment programme under UN supervision and the lifting of sanctions. The next round of talks is scheduled for June 15 in Oman. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has rejected a recent US proposal, calling it '100 percent' against national interests. Separately, the US and European allies have submitted a resolution at the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors, potentially referring Iran to the UN Security Council. If passed, it would mark the first such move in two decades and could reimpose sanctions lifted under the 2015 deal that Trump withdrew from during his presidency. Iran has warned that if the resolution is adopted, it will further escalate its nuclear programme. The IAEA meeting concludes on June 13


India.com
16 minutes ago
- India.com
Elon Musk Dials Trump After Feud Explodes Online; What Happened Next Surprised Everyone
New Delhi: Elon Musk made a quiet phone call to Donald Trump on June 9. The reason? A string of pointed posts the Tesla CEO had fired off on social media against the US president just days before. What started as online jabs had quickly turned into a media frenzy. Now, Musk was stepping back and saying he had gone too far. According to reports, the call did not come out of the blue. There had already been pressure from Trump's inner circle. Vice President JD Vance and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles had both reportedly reached out to Musk privately. Their message was to dial it down. The spat had spiraled beyond politics, and the stakes were getting higher. By early June 11, Musk wrote a message of regret on X. He did not mention which posts specifically, but in recent days, his feed had included digs at Trump's past, policy choices and even his ties to the controversial Epstein files. One of those posts was eventually taken down. The tone had shifted from critique to something more personal. I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 Back at the White House, the olive branch was not ignored. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump appreciated Musk's message. There were no plans to revisit government contracts tied to Musk's companies – a signal that Washington is not looking to escalate things further. Trump, speaking later, sounded calm but mildly bruised. He said he was surprised by the attacks, but did not hold any grudges. 'No hard feelings,' he said in a podcast interview. Still, he admitted to being disappointed. The door to reconciliation is still open. But not swinging wide. The Musk-Trump feud was brief, loud and full of drama. It rattled supporters, confused pundits and stirred speculation. Musk, once seen as a wild card with Trump-leaning views, had taken a turn and then reversed it just as suddenly. Whether this is a temporary truce or the start of a larger break remains unclear. What is certain is that in the world of politics and tech, egos clash and headlines follow. This time, it ended with a phone call. But not necessarily with closure.