logo
Eric Adams supports new finding that Rikers jail won't close by legal deadline

Eric Adams supports new finding that Rikers jail won't close by legal deadline

Politico19-03-2025

NEW YORK — A commission that supports closing the jail on Rikers Island acknowledged Wednesday the decrepit facility will not be shuttered by the 2027 deadline — and Mayor Eric Adams expressed vindication with the news.
The Independent Rikers Commission nevertheless outlined how the city could fully transition to four under-construction jails, despite the detainee population exceeding capacity at the planned facilities.
The 114-page report, produced at the behest of City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, urged City Hall to speed up construction of the four jail projects across the city. The commission also called for transferring mentally ill inmates to psychiatric facilities and expanding alternative-to-incarceration programs.
'For decades, Rikers has been marked by dysfunction, violence and neglect — failing not only incarcerated people, but the staff and the entire city. Our blueprint lays out a clear path for Rikers to be closed safely, as is required by law,' said commission chair and former New York Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman. 'With strong leadership by New York's current and future officeholders, and the urgency that has been sorely missing, we can end the stain of Rikers forever.'
Closing the notorious jail complex became a rallying cry among left-flank Democrats after documented incidents of mistreatment, most notably the case of Kalief Browder. The Bronx teenager was detained on Rikers for three years — much of it in solitary confinement — and killed himself after his charges were dropped and he was released.
Under the leadership of then-Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, the body voted to shutter the facility in 2019 — a move she and former Mayor Bill de Blasio celebrated at the time, even though the mayor was initially a skeptic.
Things have not gone according to plan ever since.
Eric Adams — a former NYPD captain with a conservative bent — has long been cool to closing the detention complex and overruled a bill Adrienne Adams' championed to limit the practice of solitary confinement.
His administration estimates the replacement jails in Queens and Manhattan could take until 2032 to complete — five years after Rikers' legally mandated closing date. Costs to build the four new jails have ballooned from $8.7 billion to $15.5 billion, and the jail population is 6,800, which is 2,300 more than the total capacity of the planned facilities.
Those headwinds have further pitted Eric Adams, who has called the original plan unworkable, against Adrienne Adams. The speaker, who is running to unseat him in June, has the power to amend the 2019 law but has lambasted the administration for delays in increasing off-site mental health bed capacity and instituting alternatives to incarceration that could reduce the population.
'We are glad that the Lippman Commission is finally recognizing what we have been sounding the alarm on for years — the plan for Rikers was flawed and did not offer a realistic timeline,' the mayor said in a statement.
He called on the council to amend the 2019 law and allow the city to unlock emergency capital funds.
'To leave the plan as is and deny us these funds hurts our staff and is inhumane to those in our custody,' he added.
The speaker, however, said the council would not pursue any modifications until it had secured new commitments from City Hall.
'Our city's mayoral administration must be willing to take concrete action steps and dedicate resources required to implement this blueprint, so another viable plan does not go unfulfilled,' she said. 'There is no shortcut to the work ahead, and there can be no discussions about the legal closure date without these types of commitments from the Administration.'
The main problem with the current plan, according to the report, is the mismatch between the detainee population and the capacity of the four planned jails, which are currently under construction in every borough except Staten Island. And a major contributor to that is the court system.
About 84 percent of the people detained at Rikers are awaiting trial, according to the report. And the average wait for a day in court is almost nine months.
The New York State Office of Court Administration is pursuing changes to how it handles certain types of cases, according to the commission, which predicted those reforms would reduce the Rikers population by up to 1,600 people or more within three to five years.
By using more alternatives like pretrial electronic monitoring and supervised release, the report argued the daily Rikers population could be reduced by another 750 people. Together, those changes are expected to bring the headcount down to 4,500.
The original Rikers plan called for creating nearly 400 secure hospital beds for detainees with severe mental illness. The commission is demanding the city to make good on its commitment — after a severely delayed rollout — and create another 500 beds to create more capacity in the system.
The report also calls for the city to speed up construction on the replacement jails by a year by allowing vendors to do some construction tasks simultaneously rather than in series and by bringing in experts to eyeball the projects. It's a tall order in the world of New York infrastructure projects, which routinely come in late and over budget.
While the commission said external factors like crime rates and Covid have contributed to the difficulty with the 2027 deadline, the report also blamed elected officials for a lack of urgency and action.
To that end, it suggested placing one senior official each at City Hall and the Department of Correction to get the closure goal accomplished.
The new jails would allow families of detainees to more easily visit since Rikers is geographically isolated. And purveyors of the plan argued it would ultimately save the city money by razing Rikers and investing in more easily managed modern correction facilities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What exactly does Donald Trump think the federal government is supposed to do?
What exactly does Donald Trump think the federal government is supposed to do?

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What exactly does Donald Trump think the federal government is supposed to do?

A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. There are some major contradictions in President Donald Trump's view of what government should do to help and protect Americans as expressed this week. He promised to 'wean' the country off federal disaster relief and wind down FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Cleaning up after hurricanes, wildfires and earthquakes should be a state function, he said. 'A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor,' Trump told reporters on Tuesday. Trump seized control of California's National Guard from Gov. Gavin Newsom, federalizing troops and putting them on the streets of Los Angeles over the objections of local and state leaders. He has threatened to send troops to other cities throughout the country. Critics, including Newsom, accused Trump of an illegal authoritarian overreach. California has sued the administration to end the callup of Marines and National Guard. Trump's actions had the effect of inciting more unrest instead of quieting it, according to the state's leaders. 'These are the acts of a dictator, not a president,' Newsom said on social media. He is primed to roll back California's looming ban on the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, at least according to Rep. Kevin Kiley, a California Republican. Expect lawsuits. California's Environmental Protection agency has enacted its own climate change policy because the federal government, which has switched from Democrats to Republicans in recent elections, has been unable to stick to one. Trump is also trying to dismantle climate change efforts enacted by Democrats under President Joe Biden. Trump is trying to end the Department of Education in part because he says he wants to return more power over education to the states. At the same time, he's threatening state universities and school systems that want to prioritize a diverse environment. Trump has done all he can to strong-arm American institutions into ending diversity programs that are a reaction to the country's complicated racial past and is instead treating the inclusion of trans women in gendered sports as a major civil rights issue. The standoff between Trump and Newsom is in some ways the inverse of relationships between past Democratic presidents and Republican governors. While Trump is foisting troops onto Los Angeles over Newsom's objections, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, launched Operation Lone Star, which mobilized his state's National Guard to patrol the border and set up obstructions in spots when he felt federal authorities under Biden were not doing enough. Biden officials never threatened to arrest Abbott, however. Trump officials have warned mayors and Newsom against impeding federal immigration authorities. Abbott, for his part, took the initiative to put the Texas National Guard on standby as anti-deportation protests spread around the country. For instance, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders — who was Trump's first-term press secretary — was denied a request for tornado relief funds earlier this year. Sanders was ultimately able to obtain the funds by publicly lobbying and then calling Trump with a direct and personal appeal, as CNN's Gabe Cohen wrote. It would be interesting to see whether Newsom, a Democrat who has previously tangled with Trump, would be as successful. Trump has a history of denying assistance to California. He did it during his first term. In April, CNN reported that when billions of dollars in disaster funding were stalled, Republican governors had better luck at unfreezing them. The White House may already be cutting FEMA out of the equation, according to Cohen's report. He wrote that there have been multiple instances this year when FEMA has not been immediately notified that the White House had approved disaster relief packages, which led to delays in getting the funds out. Regardless, FEMA's normal way of doing business — approving aid based on nonpartisan formulas and the extent of damage — has been replaced by Trump's preferences. If a version of Trump's sweeping policy bill passes through Congress this year, it will also rewrite the social contract by which the federal government helps the lowest-income Americans. States would have to spend more to help provide health insurance through Medicaid programs, but they would also have to impose new work requirements, and millions of Americans would lose health insurance. Spending on food stamps, now called SNAP benefits, would be cut. Trump clearly wants the government to do less. Less foreign aid. Less scientific research. Less income taxes. Less responsibility to fund the social safety net. Except where he wants more. More defense spending. More tariffs (which are actually taxes). More military parades. More deportations.

Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'
Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Three prominent Democratic U.S. governors face a grilling on Thursday from a Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives panel over immigration policy, as President Donald Trump steps up a crackdown on people living in the country illegally. The governors of New York, Illinois and Minnesota are due to testify to the House Oversight Committee following days of protests in downtown Los Angeles over the Trump administration's aggressive ramping up of arrests of migrants. Tensions escalated as Trump ordered the National Guard and Marines into California to provide additional security. Trump's immigration crackdown has become a major political flashpoint between the White House and national Democrats. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, seen as a contender for the party's presidential nomination in 2028, in a Tuesday night video speech accused Trump of choosing "theatrics over public safety." Minnesota's Tim Walz, who ran unsuccessfully for vice president last year; Illinois' JB Pritzker, also seen a 2028 hopeful, and New York's Kathy Hochul, walked a careful line in their prepared testimony for Thursday's hearing, voicing support for immigration enforcement, if not Trump's tactics. "If they are undocumented, we want them out of Illinois and out of our country," Pritzker said. At the same time, Pritzker lashed out against "any violations of the law or abuses of power" and said, "Law-abiding, hardworking, tax-paying people who have been in this country for years should have a path to citizenship." Reuters/Ipsos polls show Trump getting more support for his handling of immigration than any other policy area. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz proclaimed, adding that state officials cooperate with federal immigration authorities, while noting that it offers "respect" to cities and counties that choose to give no more than the legal minimum support to the Department of Homeland Security.

Why ‘Hellcats' could be the answer to Democrats troubles
Why ‘Hellcats' could be the answer to Democrats troubles

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why ‘Hellcats' could be the answer to Democrats troubles

When Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the New Jersey gubernatorial primary on Tuesday, the 'Hellcats' group chat of aspiring female congresswomen lit up in celebration. All four women in the "Hellcats" chat — named after the first female Marines who served in World War I — have military experience and are running for Congress in 2026. Sherrill, as a former Navy helicopter pilot, offers some much-needed inspiration for the party's next generation of candidates. Democrats, looking to turn around their struggling brand and retake the House in 2026, point to Sherrill and presumptive Virginia Democratic gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger, a former congresswoman and CIA officer, as reasons the party will do well. Sherril and Spanberger are held up as the model for how the party might turn the tables — running moderate, former veterans and national security officials in tough districts who can say they 'have put their country ahead of their party,' said Dan Sena, who served as the executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2018. 'Candidates with records of service showed in 2018 their ability to win in the most challenging districts and states in the country,' Sena added. 'This cycle, the same dynamics are playing out with those kinds of candidates.' Democrats say these House candidates can point to their political aspirations as an extension of their public service that began in the military or national security realm, and bristle at Republicans claiming MAGA is equivalent to patriotism. 'Right now, especially as this administration continues to create more chaos and dismantle our democracy, you're seeing veterans continuing to answer the call to serve their country,' said JoAnna Mendoza, a retired US Marine who served in combat, now running to challenge Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.). Mendoza is a member of the 'Hellcats' group chat, along with Rebecca Bennett, a former Navy officer who is taking on Rep. Tom Kean (R-N.J.), Maura Sullivan, a former Marine looking to replace Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) and Cait Conley, an Army veteran and former National Security Council official, who is up against Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.). Democrats say these candidates bring in necessary enthusiasm that translates to fundraising. In Pennsylvania, Ryan Croswell, a Marine and federal prosecutor who resigned when President Donald Trump pressured him to drop charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, raised more than $215,000 in the first 48 hours after announcing his campaign on Monday, one of the biggest launch hauls that the party has seen this cycle. Spanberger posted a selfie on X just minutes after her one-time Washington roommate Sherrill won her primary race in New Jersey on Tuesday. The pair is using their profiles as a springboard to higher office, after many of them helped Democrats flip the House in 2018. In Michigan, former CIA analyst Sen. Elissa Slotkin fought off GOP Rep. Mike Rogers, himself an Army veteran, in a state that Kamala Harris lost in 2024. New Jersey Sen. Andy Kim, a former Department of State adviser on Afghanistan, easily won his election for the seat once held by former Sen. Bob Menendez, who was convicted of federal corruption charges. 'Patriotism is a value that the Democrats shouldn't be afraid to talk about,' said Jared Leopold, a former communications director for the Democratic Governors Association. 'It is a productive conversation for Democrats to lead on as an entry point to the kitchen table issues of the day.' Democratic candidates with national security backgrounds mitigate one of the party's biggest liabilities — a perception that Democrats are weak. Democratic-run focus groups held after the 2024 election found voters across the spectrum saw the party as overly focused on the elite and too cautious. Voters regularly cite Republicans as the party they trust with national security issues in public polling, and the GOP bench of veterans elected to office runs deep. But serving in the military or for the administration in a national security capacity 'inoculates them from attacks that they're not tough,' said Amanda Litman, co-founder of Run For Something, a group that recruits young people to run for office. 'It helps them ward off that opposition without having to say it out loud,' Litman continued. 'Former Navy helicopter pilot, prosecutor — those are inherently tough, so that means women candidates don't have to posture, they can just be, because it's baked into their resumes.' Of course, Republicans have, at times, effectively turned it against them. Former Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, for instance, highlighted his military experience but also faced "swift boat" attacks. More recently, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz's military record came under scrutiny when he was elevated to the vice presidential nomination. Bennett, who is also a current member of the Air National Guard, believes her dual identity as a veteran and mother gives her a unique appeal to voters, and a natural way to discuss financial strains like high daycare costs. 'I truly led in some of the most challenging environments that exist in this world,' she said. 'And, I'm a mom too, and I fundamentally understand the issues and challenges that families are facing.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store