Working from home? Discover which expenses you can claim as tax deductions
Image: Image: Unsplash
With the 2025 tax filing season looming, many South Africans working from home are asking what home office expenses they can claim as tax-deductible items and how to do it correctly.
This question is especially relevant for the growing number of South African employees working remotely for global companies who are increasingly turning to tax practitioners for guidance, says Thokozile Kumalo, Tax Consultant at Tax Consulting South Africa.
'While home office deductions may seem straightforward, the Income Tax Act includes specific provisions regulating these claims. Commission earners generally have more flexibility, but salaried employees working from home often face challenges because of the more restrictive rules applying to them,' Kumalo said.
According to Fine & Country Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), what began as a temporary shift during the pandemic has evolved into a long-term lifestyle for millions, and the ripple effect was being felt across the real estate sector, where demand is growing for homes that seamlessly support this new way of living: flexible, tech-savvy, and lifestyle-enhancing.
'The future of work is hybrid, flexible, and mobile – and the homes we live in need to reflect that,' said John Herbst, the CEO of the luxury property for sale and expert service provider, earlier this year.
'We are seeing a clear shift in what buyers and renters are looking for – from built-in workspaces and tech to locations that offer not just beauty and tranquillity, but the infrastructure and services to support productive remote work,' Herbst said.
She said that if you earn only a fixed salary, work from home full time, and use a dedicated space solely for work, there may be grounds for claiming home office expenses, provided you meet the strict requirements set out in law.
The tax practice said the three key sections of the Income Tax Act that govern these deductions are: Section 11(a) – General deduction formula, Section 23(b) – Use of home for trade and Section 23(m) – Limitations for salaried employees.
It said Section 11(a), often referred to as the 'general deduction formula,' allows a taxpayer who is "carrying on a trade" to deduct 'expenditure and losses incurred in the production of income, provided such expenses are not of a capital nature.
In the context of a salaried employee, it said 'trade' includes employment.
'Therefore, an employee who earns remuneration is regarded as carrying on a trade in the form of employment. If a salaried employee incurs home office expenses in the production of employment income, those expenses will conceptually fall within the scope of Section 11(a).
"It is important when claiming home office expenditure that Section 11(a) is applied in conjunction with the limitations imposed by Section 23.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The tax consultant said Section 23(b) imposes a specific prohibition against claiming deductions for expenses related to premises used for "domestic or private" purposes.
She said there is, however, an exception where there is a dedicated area used for the purposes of employment, that area is specifically equipped for such employment and the area is regularly and exclusively used for employment.
For salaried employees (not commission earners), Kumalo said it is required that more than 50% of their duties must be performed in the home office and the home office must be a clearly defined and exclusive workspace.
She said for full-time remote workers with a defined, exclusive home office, this meant they may qualify-in theory. Many salaried employees meet the conditions under Section 11(a) and 23(b), which often raises hopes for a successful claim, Kumalo said.
She added that the biggest hurdle comes in Section 23(m), which disallows most deductions under Section 11 for employees who earn remuneration (i.e., salary) and do not earn more than 50% of that income as commission or variable-based remuneration.
Tax Consulting South Africa said that for taxpayers who earn a fixed salary only, Section 23(m) prohibits deductions for most expenditure, losses or allowances that would otherwise be allowable under Section 11(a).
It said only expenses directly tied to the use of the premises, such as rent, electricity, and cleaning, may be considered and only under very specific conditions.
In short, Kumalo said, while Section 11(a) allows the deduction of qualifying expenses, Section 23 (b) adds strict conditions for home office use, and Section 23(m) disallows most deductions for salaried earners.
'In practice, this means that even if the general and home-office-specific conditions are met, fixed-salary earners are still barred from deducting most business-related expenses, including internet and cell phone costs, accounting fees, and stationery.'
Sharing a professional tip, the consultant said if one is a fixed-salary earner working from home full-time and wish to claim deductions, they must ensure that their employer provides a formal letter confirming remote work, they have a dedicated, exclusive workspace, more than 50% of the duties are performed in that space and the claim is limited to premises-related expenses.
Even then, Kumalo said SARS may still challenge deductions beyond the narrow exemptions outlined above. She said that, therefore, the onus is on the taxpayer to prove that the deduction should be allowed.
The firm said that in preparation for the 2025 Tax Filing Season, taxpayers must be reminded that SARS applies the rules around home office deductions strictly and conservatively, particularly for salaried employees.
Taxpayers are advised to consult a qualified tax practitioner before submitting any home office-related claims to avoid audit risk, disputes, and potential penalties, it warned.
In May, Nomie Nxumalo, the executive head for people and transformation at Miway, said the integration of workspaces into personal residences brings about certain dynamics to home usage. She said many homeowners have invested in expensive office equipment, increased their reliance on home internet, and even started running businesses from their residences.
However, failing to inform insurers about these changes could lead to gaps in coverage or even rejected claims in some cases.
'Most standard home insurance covers are structured around personal use of the home. Whether you're running a business or working remotely, it's crucial to declare to your insurer if a portion of your home is being used for business purposes,' Nxumalo said.
'Not doing so could result in your claims being declined or certain losses not being covered.'
Independent Media Property
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
US tariff pause ends on 9 July: Tau says what happens now
South Africa, along with other African countries, is still seeking an extension beyond 9 July to submit a new deal proposal in response to US tariffs. With the United States (US) tariff pause of 90 days coming to an end on 9 July, there seems to be nothing happening now, but Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau says South Africa is one of the countries that is asking for an extension because there is so little time left. US President Donald Trump instituted tariffs on goods imported into the US in April, marking the day as 'US Liberation Day'. South Africa got slapped with a 30% tariff, but Trump decided to pause the tariffs for ninety days until 9 July. President Cyril Ramaphosa paid a quite acrimonious visit to the White House for a meeting with Trump, followed by trade talks between South African ministers and their US counterparts. Tau said afterwards that the South African delegation submitted a proposal to the US regarding a framework agreement, focusing on issues related to trade and investment. The proposal identified areas for increased trade and access to each party's markets, while illustrating the benefits of keeping channels as open as possible. ALSO READ: Will Trump's tariffs have major negative effect on South Africa's economy? Talks about US tariffs in Angola last week Last week, Zuko Godlimpi, deputy minister of trade, industry and competition (DTIC), met with the US trade representative responsible for Africa, Connie Hamilton, on the sidelines of the United States of America-Africa Summit in Luanda, Angola. According to a statement from the DTIC, the meeting followed South Africa's submission of a proposed Framework Deal with the US on 20 May 2025, which outlines measures to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations with the US. The submission was immediately followed by Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump on 21 May. The Framework Deal addresses US concerns relating to issues such as non-tariff barriers, the trade deficit and commercial relations through two-way procurement or importing strategic goods. It also aims to resolve long-standing market access issues of interest to both sides and promote bilateral investments in a mutually beneficial manner. According to the DTIC, South Africa is also seeking, through the Framework Deal, to have some of the key export products exempted from the Section 232 duties, including cars and car parts, as well as steel and aluminium through tariff rate quotas. ALSO READ: Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks SA prepared to settle for maximum US tariffs of 10% South Africa is also seeking the maximum tariff application of 10% as a worst-case situation. The Framework also seeks exemption for small and medium enterprises, counter-seasonal products and products that the US cannot produce itself. The DTIC says South Africa used the meeting with Hamilton in Luanda to continue to raise its concerns about the impact of the reciprocal tariffs on African countries, especially. 'One of the key issues that emerged from the meeting is that the US is developing a trade-matters template, which will be the basis for its engagements with countries in sub-Saharan Africa. 'The template will be shared as soon as it has gone through the internal approval processes in the US administration. South Africa welcomed this indication and expressed a preparedness to engage with the template once it is finalised.' Considering this development, including the limited time between now and the deadline for the expiry of the 90-day pause, African countries, including South Africa, have advocated for the extension of the 90-day deadline to enable countries to prepare their proposed deals according to the new template. ALSO READ: South Africa faces 25% tariff on US car imports, Minister Parks Tau voices concern Tau says SA would like to resubmit deal for US tariffs 'We believe that South Africa may need to resubmit its Framework Deal in accordance with the new template, and therefore, we expect that the deadline may be shifted,' Rau says. 'We urge the South African industry to exercise strategic patience and not take decisions in haste, and that government will continue to use every avenue to engage the US government to find an amicable solution to safeguard South African interests in the US market.'

TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
SA's illegal alcohol trade costs R16bn in lost tax revenue
South Africa's illicit alcohol market has grown by 55% over the past seven years, outpacing growth of the legal alcohol market, and is now worth R25.1bn. This has prompted a call from the Drinks Federation of SA (DF-SA) for collaboration between the government and the private sector to fight the growth of illicit trade in alcohol which has cost the government R16.5bn in lost tax revenue. Benjamin Rideout, research consultant at Euromonitor International, said nearly one in five alcoholic drinks sold in SA is illegal. 'Unlike some countries where home brews are the issue, SA is facing large-scale counterfeiting. The situation demands better control over production inputs like ethanol and much stronger enforcement.' The chair of DF-SA and CEO of SAB, Richard Rivett-Carnac, said illicit alcohol distorts the market and undermines trust in legitimate brands. 'In a tough macroeconomic environment, consumers are looking for bang for buck, goods that are affordable and the price gap of between 37% and 70% between illicit and legal alcohol makes illicit products more appealing, especially in low-income communities. He said 67% of surveyed consumers in the Euromonitor study, for instance, said they would knowingly buy illicit alcohol due to the lower price.' Moreover, he said illegal alcohol is a growing threat to South Africa's economy and public health. 'It drains billions from public funds, threatens jobs, and weakens the formal legal, taxed alcohol industry. Understanding the drivers of illicit alcohol growth and its magnitude is a step in the Right direction but we need stronger collaboration with the industry and government to really start removing the incentives that allow for the illicit market to thrive and intensifying enforcement.' During a panel discussion, Dr Shamal Ramesar, head of research at DF-SA, said 'communities are at risk, and the economy is the biggest loser when we delve into the pervasiveness of illicit alcohol. Recent testing with the University of KwaZulu-Natal found that many illegal products contain dangerous substances like methanol, which can cause serious harm. Unless we shut down illegal producers and educate consumers, lives will continue to be at risk.' DF-SA also announced a new national awareness campaign to help South Africans recognise illegal alcohol and understand the risks. The campaign will include tools for traders and consumers, tips on spotting fake products, and information on how to report them.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
African Rainbow Minerals to close Cato Ridge Works and retrench the employees
Assmang's crushing and screening plant at the Cato Ridge works is being closed permanently, the site remediated, and along with some surrounding land, will be redeveloped into a freight and logistics hub. Image: Ingi Salgado African Rainbow Minerals (ARM) on Tuesday said its Cato Ridge Works operations (CRW) and business would close permanently, and all affected employees would be retrenched on August 31, 2025. Its Malaysia business is also being sold. The CRW joint venture between ARM, which has well known South African businessman Patrice Motsepe as its biggest shareholder, and Assmang employed about 600 employees. ARM stated that a structured and comprehensive consultation process in accordance with Section 189 of the Labour Relations Act had been completed. 'This decision has been reached after a comprehensive review of CRW's operational and financial position. Despite sustained efforts to explore alternatives to closure, the operation has continued to experience significant and unsustainable financial losses,' ARM's directors said in a statement on the JSE's news service. They indicated that the CRW complex would be remediated and, together with the vacant land, redeveloped into a commercial and logistics hub 'that should in future create significant economic activity and employment in the area.' Assmang's board had approved the sale by Assmang to Assore SA PropCo, an Assore subsidiary, of certain land parcels, properties, and houses on the terms a sale agreement signed on June 27, 2025, between Assmang, Assore SA PropCo, Assore, Cato Ridge Development Company (CRDC), Feralloys, and ARM. The so-called 'Cato Ridge Transaction' will be implemented in two phases: Phase 1 comprises the purchase by Assore SA PropCo from Assmang of certain land and houses situated on or close to CRW, which will be developed by Assore SA PropCo, together with a sale by Assore SA PropCo of a portion of those properties to certain host communities for no consideration. Phase 2 will comprise the sale and purchase by Assore SA PropCo from Assmang of the remaining land on which CRW is located. Assore SA PropCo would pay R453.23 million to Assmang. Assmang is responsible for the implementation of the clean-up and remediation, but Assore SA PropCo would accept certain responsibilities regarding the clean-up and remediation of specific portions of the land being sold. Among the conditions were that Assmang complete the construction and installation of a reverse osmosis water plant and brine dam, and Assmang had to comply with applicable environmental law. In addition, Assmang would dispose of its 54.36% interest in Malaysia manganese alloy producer, Sakura, to Assore, following which Assmang was expected to distribute R900m in cash to ARM. ARM's share price gained 0.59% to R173.08 on the JSE Tuesday afternoon, with the price having fallen over 20% over the past 12 months. Visit: