Saturn's Pulling a Stunt That Hasn't Happened Since 2009: How to Watch
This phenomenon is caused by an optical illusion that occurs when the stars line up. Saturn is tilted at 26.73 degrees on its orbit, while Earth is very close to that at a 23.5-degree tilt. When the two planets line up just right, the rings of Saturn are almost entirely horizontal from the perspective of Earth, causing them to mostly vanish.
Read more: Best camera to buy in 2025
So, anyone looking up at the sky this weekend will likely note that the planet won't look very Saturn-like without its trademark rings. However, if you're using a powerful telescope, the rings will still be visible. It'll appear as though a thin line is running through the middle of Saturn, as shown in the graphic above.
The tilt of Saturn and Earth is the main thing. It's like looking at a piece of paper. If you hold it horizontally up to eye level, it'll be practically invisible.
Paper is an apt analogy here because Saturn's rings are very thin. According to NASA, Saturn's rings average about 30 feet in height across the entire length of the ring. That means when viewed from the side at a distance of about 1.5 million kilometers (983,000 miles), you might as well be looking at a sheet of paper from the side.
The rings are still technically visible. Folks with higher-powered telescopes may be able to see the line jutting across Saturn. However, those with low-power telescopes may not see it, making Saturn look naked.
The peak of this little celestial dance will occur over the weekend. So, technically, the rings have already been like this for a week or two and will continue to be difficult to see going into April. By then, Saturn's orbit will begin to tilt the rings again, and they will slowly come back into view over the next month or two.
According to NASA, this happens about every 13 to 15 years on average. It's not an exact science, though, as prior events occurred in 1980, 1995 and 2009. The next one is predicted to come in 2038 or 2039.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
18 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Picking a Spot for NASA's Lunar Nuclear Reactor Is Trickier Than It Sounds
In a bold, strategic move for the U.S., acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy announced plans on Aug. 5, 2025, to build a nuclear fission reactor for deployment on the lunar surface in 2030. Doing so would allow the United States to gain a foothold on the Moon by the time China plans to land the first taikonaut, what China calls its astronauts, there by 2030. Apart from the geopolitical importance, there are other reasons why this move is critically important. A source of nuclear energy will be necessary for visiting Mars, because solar energy is weaker there. It could also help establish a lunar base and potentially even a permanent human presence on the Moon, as it delivers consistent power through the cold lunar night. As humans travel out into the solar system, learning to use the local resources is critical for sustaining life off Earth, starting at the nearby Moon. NASA plans to prioritize the fission reactor as power necessary to extract and refine lunar resources. As a geologist who studies human space exploration, I've been mulling over two questions since Duffy's announcement. First, where is the best place to put an initial nuclear reactor on the Moon to set up for future lunar bases? Second, how will NASA protect the reactor from plumes of regolith—or loosely fragmented lunar rocks—kicked up by spacecraft landing near it? These are two key questions the agency will have to answer as it develops this technology. The nuclear reactor will likely form the power supply for the initial U.S.-led Moon base that will support humans who'll stay for ever-increasing lengths of time. To facilitate sustainable human exploration of the Moon, using local resources such as water and oxygen for life support and hydrogen and oxygen to refuel spacecraft can dramatically reduce the amount of material that needs to be brought from Earth, which also reduces cost. In the 1990s, spacecraft orbiting the Moon first observed dark craters called permanently shadowed regions on the lunar north and south poles. Scientists now suspect these craters hold water in the form of ice, a vital resource for countries looking to set up a long-term human presence on the surface. NASA's Artemis campaign aims to return people to the Moon, targeting the lunar south pole to take advantage of the water ice that is present there. In order to be useful, the reactor must be close to accessible, extractable, and refinable water ice deposits. The issue is we currently do not have the detailed information needed to define such a location. The good news is the information can be obtained relatively quickly. Six lunar orbital missions have collected, and in some cases are still collecting, relevant data that can help scientists pinpoint which water ice deposits are worth pursuing. These datasets give indications of where either surface or buried water ice deposits are. It is looking at these datasets in tandem that can indicate water ice 'hot prospects,' which rover missions can investigate and confirm or deny the orbital observations. But this step isn't easy. Luckily, NASA already has its Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover mission built, and it has passed all environmental testing. It is currently in storage, awaiting a ride to the Moon. The VIPER mission can be used to investigate on the ground the hottest prospect for water ice identified from orbital data. With enough funding, NASA could probably have this data in a year or two at both the lunar north and south poles. Once NASA knows the best spots to put a reactor, it will then have to figure out how to shield the reactor from spacecraft as they land. As spacecraft approach the Moon's surface, they stir up loose dust and rocks, called regolith. It will sandblast anything close to the landing site, unless the items are placed behind large boulders or beyond the horizon, which is more than 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) away on the Moon. Scientists already know about the effects of landing next to a pre-positioned asset. In 1969, Apollo 12 landed 535 feet (163 meters) away from the robotic Surveyor 3 spacecraft, which showed corrosion on surfaces exposed to the landing plume. The Artemis campaign will have much bigger lunar landers, which will generate larger regolith plumes than Apollo did. So any prepositioned assets will need protection from anything landing close by, or the landing will need to occur beyond the horizon. Until NASA can develop a custom launch and landing pad, using the lunar surface's natural topography or placing important assets behind large boulders could be a temporary solution. However, a pad built just for launching and landing spacecraft will eventually be necessary for any site chosen for this nuclear reactor, as it will take multiple visits to build a lunar base. While the nuclear reactor can supply the power needed to build a pad, this process will require planning and investment. Human space exploration is complicated. But carefully building up assets on the Moon means scientists will eventually be able to do the same thing a lot farther away on Mars. While the devil is in the details, the Moon will help NASA develop the abilities to use local resources and build infrastructure that could allow humans to survive and thrive off Earth in the long term. Clive Neal, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Gizmodo
18 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
This Newly Launched Satellite Just ‘Bloomed' a Record-Breaking Antenna in Orbit
A first-of-its-kind satellite recently launched into orbit to monitor Earth's changing surfaces, detecting movement of the planet's crust down to fractions of an inch. The satellite packed a giant radar antenna, folded like an umbrella, and it just unfurled the massive, drum-shaped structure through an intricate process that brought it to full bloom. The NISAR mission, a joint effort between NASA and the Indian space agency ISRO, launched on July 30 from Satish Dhawan Space Centre in India. More than two weeks later, the satellite deployed its antenna reflector, which spans 39 feet (12 meters) wide—the largest ever used on a NASA mission. The team behind the mission began the process on August 9, unfolding the satellite's boom one joint at a time and then firing a series of explosive bolts so that it could be deployed and locked into place in space. 'We were of course eager to see the deployment go well. It's a critical part of the NISAR Earth science mission and has taken years to design, develop, and test to be ready for this big day,' Phil Barela, NISAR project manager at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, said in a statement. 'Now that we've launched, we are focusing on fine-tuning it to begin delivering transformative science by late fall of this year.' NISAR, short for NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar, is designed to produce a three-dimensional view of Earth in unprecedented detail. The mission is equipped with the most sophisticated radar system for a NASA mission. The antenna reflector plays a key role for NISAR's two synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems, which use the motion of the radar antenna over its targeted area to create high-resolution images. 'Synthetic aperture radar, in principle, works like the lens of a camera, which focuses light to make a sharp image,' Paul Rosen, NISAR's project scientist at JPL, said in a statement. 'The size of the lens, called the aperture, determines the sharpness of the image.' The first radar system, L-band, can see through clouds and forest canopy. The second, an S-band system provided by ISRO, can see through clouds as well but is more sensitive to light vegetation and moisture in snow, according to NASA. The reflector weighs about 142 pounds (64 kilograms) and comes with a cylindrical frame made of 123 composite struts and a gold-plated wire mesh. At the beginning of the process, NISAR's boom began unfolding one joint at a time after being tucked in close to the satellite's body. It took four days for it to become fully extended. On August 15, the team fired a series of small explosive bolts that held the reflector assembly in place to begin what NASA calls the 'bloom' process. Through this process, the antenna unfurled by releasing tension stored in its flexible frame while it was tucked away like an umbrella. The team then activated motors and cables that pulled the antenna to its final form, blooming in its full glory. The reflector is as wide as the length of a school bus, enabling NISAR to image Earth's surface down to pixels about 30 feet (10 meters) across. 'Using special interferometric techniques that compare images over time, NISAR enables researchers and data users to create 3D movies of changes happening on Earth's surface,' Rosen said.
Scientific American
2 hours ago
- Scientific American
Can Cosmic Rays Help Alien Life Thrive?
The traditional astrophysical recipe for life as we know it is quite simple: Get a rocky, gas-shrouded world in a ' habitable zone ' orbit around a star so that it's not too hot or too cold. Then just add liquid water to its surface and let the primordial soup simmer for millions of years as energy from starlight gradually cooks up the chemical building blocks of life. But astrophysicists have come to realize this classical habitable zone scenario may overlook opportunities for life farther out from a star. After all, Saturn's moon Enceladus, Jupiter's moon Europa and even Mars are known or believed to harbor vast amounts of water in their dark interior. Life on these worlds would have to lurk underground for reasons other than thirst alone because their surface is scarcely shielded by an atmosphere and constantly bombarded with lethal cosmic rays. A recent study, however, supports the idea that, in such places, cosmic rays can actually benefit life belowground rather than just banishing it from the surface. Led by Dimitra Atri, a researcher at New York University Abu Dhabi, the study team has introduced the concept of a 'radiolytic habitable zone,' a region within a world where the energy unleashed by cosmic rays is enough to sustain life. Published in the International Journal of Astrobiology, the study provides a new framework for calculating how much living matter could be supported at various depths inside Mars, Europa, Enceladus and similar places well outside the standard, starlight-based habitable zone. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Cosmic rays are high-energy particles that move at nearly the speed of light and are typically produced by supernovae and other extreme astrophysical events. They carry so much energy, in fact, that they can break off electrons from, or ionize, atoms and molecules in their path—which damages DNA and other delicate cellular machinery. Earth's substantial atmosphere and geomagnetic field block most (but not all) of this bombardment, and the sunless interiors of worlds without these properties still get protection from overlying material. Atri and his colleagues wondered, however, whether the ionizing effects of cosmic rays could confer additional benefits to those alien environments. In a series of computer simulations, they found that cosmic rays that reach the depths of such places can break apart water molecules that may exist there as liquid or ice. This process, called radiolysis, releases electrons that can then power an organism's biochemistry—that is, its metabolism. 'Galactic cosmic rays are basically cooking food for these microbes,' Atri says. The effect isn't entirely theoretical: Atri and his co-authors cite the real-world example of the bacterium Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator, which was found in a gold mine deep below South Africa and powers its metabolism using electrons released by ionizing radiation from surrounding rocks. This process, Atri notes, is decidedly different from that used by another bacterium, Deinococcus radiodurans, which can endure extreme levels of ionizing radiation. ' D. radiodurans is all about damage control. It lets radiation tear up its DNA, then fixes everything afterward. But the gold-mine bug actually feeds off radiation by-products.... That's the kind of thing that could actually exist on Mars right now,' Atri says. 'It's really two different survival strategies. One repairs the damage; the other turns the damage into dinner.' It's likely that Desulforudis audaxviator is far from the only bacterium on Earth that is reliant on ionizing radiation, according to Lígia F. Coelho, an astrobiologist at Cornell University, who was not involved with the study. 'We still don't know much about the subsurface of our own planet in terms of microorganisms,' she says. 'There is certainly a universe of microorganisms that are tailored to use these secondary energy sources that we still don't know about—because we also don't yet have the technology to detect or to study them very well.' As a next step, Atri and his colleagues plan to move past computer models by testing their theory in the lab using a planetary simulation chamber that can emulate environmental conditions on alien worlds by changing the temperature, pressure and composition of its contents. If those results are positive, they could help shape current investigations and future missions seeking signs of life in the innards of Mars, Europa and Enceladus. Our existing Mars exploration has 'just been scratching the surface—literally,' Atri says, adding that our knowledge of Europa and Enceladus is even more superficial. 'We need a mission which can actually go there and dig a little bit deeper.' According to Atri's calculations, the best place for microbes to live on Mars would be between one and two meters below the surface. That depth is fortuitously within reach of the European Space Agency's Rosalind Franklin ExoMars rover, which is set to launch to the Red Planet no earlier than 2028 and will carry a drill that can penetrate up to two meters below the planet's surface. 'It's important not to be biased by what we believe is good or bad for life based on our own experience in our own planet,' Coelho says. 'I think papers like this really help the modelers in unbiasing their models and opening the possibilities for other kinds of life and other kinds of context.'
