IAF chief's frustration over defence procurement delays is valid. It should be a national wake-up call
Pakistan's Bitcoin Reserve and AI energy allocation, severe power shortages notwithstanding, is a shrewd geopolitical move. Partnering with Trump-affiliated World Liberty Financial shows Islamabad is leveraging crypto to gain influence with him. It's a dangerous blurring of personal business and governance. Pakistan sure knows how to play up to Trump.
IAF chief's frustration over defence procurement delays is valid. It should be a national wake-up call
IAF chief's frustration over persistent delays and broken promises in defence procurement should serve as a national wake-up call. A piecemeal approach to critical military acquisitions undermines operational readiness. What India needs is accountability, efficiency, and urgency. A strong and modern military isn't about seeking war—it's about deterring one.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Harvard asks judge for fast ruling in $2.6 bn Trump funding freeze case
By David Voreacos and Janet Lorin Harvard University lawyers urged a federal judge to rule quickly that the Trump administration's freeze on about $2.6 billion in federal funding is illegal and that it violated the school's free speech and regulatory rights. In a court filing Monday, Harvard argued that the US has not produced enough evidence to show that the administration's action was a legally justified response to address antisemitism and a perceived liberal bias on campus. The school asked US District Judge Allison Burroughs to grant summary judgment, meaning to move more quickly than she might in a typical lawsuit to reinstate Harvard's funding. 'The government's rush to freeze and terminate billions of dollars in current and future federal funding to Harvard for critical research lacks the basic requisites of reasoned decisionmaking,' Harvard's lawyers wrote in the filing in Boston federal court. As the richest and oldest US university, Harvard has become the main target of President Donald Trump's attempts to force schools to crack down on antisemitism, remove perceived political bias and eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Trump also wants to cap Harvard's foreign student enrollment at 15 per cent, revoke its tax-exempt status and cancel its remaining federal contracts. Burroughs has temporarily blocked both the funding freeze and a US bar on letting Harvard enroll international students, which is the subject of a separate lawsuit. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Harvard claims that the US violated the Administrative Procedure Act and its First Amendment rights by seeking to dictate decisions on faculty hiring, academic programs and student admissions. It also claims Trump retaliated against Harvard for refusing his demands to make sweeping changes at the school. The school, which sued the US on April 21 over funding, demanded then that the Justice Department provide 'all formal and informal communications between and among any federal agency employees involved in the decision to freeze grants to and contracts with Harvard.' Those records should 'include directions by White House officials,' attorney Steven Lehotsky wrote. The government provided those records, which aren't publicly available, to Harvard in heavily redacted form. In its filing, Harvard's lawyers wrote that the federal records confirm 'the government's rush to judgment' and that they are 'devoid of any individualized assessments of Harvard's funded projects, the University's efforts to confront antisemitism, or any connection between the two.' Rather, the records make clear that 'the directive to freeze and terminate every dollar of Harvard's research funds came directly from the White House, which dictated the form that such terminations would take and set arbitrary deadlines for particular terminations,' the school's lawyers wrote. 'That blunt-force punishment is the antithesis of reasoned agency decisionmaking.' Burroughs has ordered lawyers on both sides to file legal motions before she holds a July 21 hearing on the matter. The school made similar procedural and free-speech claims in its May 23 lawsuit over the foreign student ban that the US imposed. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem shocked the campus a day earlier by immediately revoking Harvard's ability to enroll international students, despite the school participating in a US program for more than 70 years. Noem said the school failed to answer questions about foreign students and discipline. To regain permission, Harvard was given 72 hours to provide information about foreign students, including disciplinary records and video of those engaged in protests. After Harvard sued, Noem's investigators issued a 'notice of intent to withdraw' Harvard from its Student and Exchange Visitor Program ahead of a May 29 hearing. That notice appeared to address Harvard's claim that Noem's revocation failed to follow procedures or let the school fix its problems. Under those procedures, Harvard has 30 days to submit written materials to persuade Noem's department to forgo bouncing it from the program. Harvard is also entitled to administrative appeals if it loses. Harvard and its president, Alan Garber, refuted some of the government's allegations, such as denying it is a partisan institution. He has said the university improved its disciplinary procedures, and efforts to encourage diversity of thought. In a scathing report about antisemitism, Garber apologized for failing 'to meet the high expectations we rightfully set for our community.' 'The government fails to acknowledge, let alone engage with, the dozens of steps Harvard has taken and committed to take to address antisemitism and bias,' the lawyers wrote in the filing on Monday.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Top Trump officials visit Alaska oil field amid push to expand drilling
President Donald Trump wants to double the amount of oil coursing through Alaska's vast pipeline system and build a massive natural gas project as its "big, beautiful twin," a top administration official said Monday while touring a prolific oil field near the Arctic Ocean. The remarks by US Energy Secretary Chris Wright came as he and two other Trump Cabinet members Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin visited Prudhoe Bay as part of a multiday trip aimed at highlighting Trump's push to expand oil and gas drilling, mining and logging in the state that drew criticism from environmentalists. During the trip, Burgum's agency also announced plans to repeal Biden-era restrictions on future leasing and industrial development in portions of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska that are designated as special for their wildlife, subsistence or other values. The petroleum reserve is west of Prudhoe Bay and Deadhorse, the industrial encampment near the starting point of the trans-Alaska pipeline system. The pipeline, which runs for 800 miles (nearly 1,300 kilometres), has been Alaska's economic lifeline for nearly 50 years. Government and industry representatives several Asian countries, including Japan, were expected to join a portion of the US officials' trip, as Trump has focused renewed attention on the gas project proposal, which in its current iteration would provide gas to Alaska residents and ship liquefied natural gas overseas. Matsuo Takehiko, vice minister for International Affairs at Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, was among those at Prudhoe Bay on Monday. For years, state leaders have dreamed of such a project but cost concerns, shifts in direction, competition and questions about economic feasibility have hindered progress. US tariff talks with Asian countries have been seen as possible leverage for the Trump administration to secure investments in the proposed gas project. Oil and natural gas are in significant demand worldwide, Wright told a group of officials and pipeline employees in safety hats and vests who gathered near the oil pipeline on a blustery day with 13-degree Fahrenheit (-10 Celsius) windchills. The pipeline stretched out over the snow-covered landscape. "You have the big two right here," he said. "Let's double oil production, build the big, beautiful twin, and we will help energise the world, and we will strengthen our country and strengthen our families." Oil flow through the trans-Alaska pipeline peaked at about 2 million barrels in the late 1980s. In 2011 a year in which an average of about 583,000 barrels of oil a day flowed through the pipeline, then-Governor Sean Parnell, a Republican, set a goal of boosting that number to 1 million barrels a day within a decade. It's never come close in the years since: last year, throughput averaged about 465,000 barrels a day. The Trump officials were joined Monday by a group that included US Sen. Dan Sullivan and Gov. Mike Dunleavy, both Republicans, who also took part in meetings Sunday in Anchorage and Utqiagvik. In Utqiagvik, an Arctic community that experiences 24 hours of daylight at this time of year, many Alaska Native leaders support Trump's push for more drilling in the petroleum reserve and to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil development. They lauded the visit after lamenting that they felt ignored by former President Joe Biden's administration. Alaska political leaders have long complained about perceived federal overreach by the US government, which oversees about 60% of lands in Alaska. Sullivan, Dunleavy and Alaska's senior US senator, Lisa Murkowski, often complained that Biden's team was too restrictive in its approach to many resource development issues. Murkowski, an at-times vocal critic of Trump, joined for the Sunday meeting in Anchorage, where she said Alaska leaders "want to partner with you. We want to be that equal at the table instead of an afterthought." Environmentalists criticised Interior's planned rollback of restrictions in portions of the petroleum reserve. While Sullivan called the repeal a top priority, saying Congress intended to have development in the petroleum reserve, environmentalists maintain that the law balances allowances for oil drilling with a need to provide protections for sensitive areas and decried Interior's plans as wrong-headed. Erik Grafe, an attorney with Earthjustice, called the Trump administration's intense focus on oil and gas troubling, particularly in a state experiencing the real-time impacts of climate change. He called the continued pursuit of fossil fuel development "very frustrating and heartbreaking to see." The Interior Department said it will accept public comment on the planned repeal. The three Trump officials also plan to speak at Dunleavy's annual energy conference Tuesday in Anchorage.
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
India should be cautious about Pakistan's false claims: Op Sindoor
While India is struggling to protect the common man living on the borders against Pakistan army-supported terrorists, some international powers are keen on testing the sophistication of Pakistan's imported arsenal. However, the results proved far from decisive. India carried out precision airstrikes on nine terrorist sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). It was very close to war, but India acted with restraint and targeted only terrorist camps and military bases, and not civilians. India can target every system at Pakistan's base, but Air Marshal AK Bharti explained that the country has maintained restraint despite its high capability. Our military operation, Operation Sindoor, targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and PoK, especially militant camps in Muzaffarabad, Kotli, and Bahawalpur. Despite these setbacks, Pakistan breached the ceasefire within hours after the May 10 agreement. It was an attack from Pakistan! On May 8-9, Pakistan launched a massive drone attack using around 300-400 drones, targeting 36 locations in India, including military bases and religious sites like those in Srinagar and Naliya. India suffered serious human losses because of mindless terror. Still, the IAF's response was directed only at military installations, avoiding civilians and collateral damage. Pakistan launched a massive drone attack on Indian cities, while our fully prepared air defence forces successfully countered the drone attacks, preventing any damage to the intended targets. Pakistan launched its own military operation, targeting several key bases in India. They allowed civilian aircraft to fly out of Lahore during the drone attacks, including international passenger aircraft, which posed a significant challenge for India's response. Yes. Indian air defence shot down most of the drones, and no major damage occurred. Japan Times' report Well-known columnist, Brahma Chellaney wrote in his column, 'The Japan Times,' that the J-10Cs launched multiple PL-15E missiles at Indian targets, but there is no independent verification of successful hits. India's integrated air defences withstood the onslaught, gaining air superiority'. Every Indian, and our army, felt proud 'by the conflict's end, Indian airstrikes had crippled major Pakistani air bases — including Nur Khan and Bholari — without suffering any confirmed retaliatory damage. Nur Khan, near Pakistan's nuclear command and army headquarters, was particularly symbolic. Its precise targeting by Indian cruise missiles signaled a calibrated message: Even high-value, well-defended assets are not beyond reach.' And 'Pakistan reportedly launched 300 to 400 drones in a single night, yet satellite imagery showed little damage on Indian soil. India, by contrast, relied on precision standoff weapons — especially the supersonic BrahMos cruise missile, codeveloped with Russia, which successfully hit high-value targets in Pakistan with minimal risk to Indian military personnel.' The Japan Times wrote that India and China remain locked in a military standoff at the Himalayas and this was triggered in 2020 by Chinese encroachments on Indian border lands. Despite diplomatic moves to ease tensions, both countries continue to mass troops and weaponry along the disputed frontier. The combat data generated from the conflict with Pakistan offers India an invaluable edge in anticipating Chinese capabilities and countermeasures. Meanwhile, Pakistan claimed that they had shot down at least five Indian fighter jets on the first day. But there was no proof, no wreckage photos and satellite imagery to corroborate the claim. The Indian military dismissed the allegation, stating that all its pilots had returned safely. It was a major embarrassment for Pakistan. Its Defence Minister Khawaja Asif was under fire for promoting misinformation in the wake of Operation Sindoor. False and fake Readers should use fact-checkers like Factly. Fact: This video showing visuals of a crashed fighter jet being lifted by a helicopter is AI-generated. It was uploaded on May 3, before the start of 'Operation Sindoor'. Hence, the claim made in the post is FALSE'. 'Factly' explained, 'We found discrepancies in the viral video, prompting suspicion that it might have been generated using AI. To gather more information, we conducted a reverse image search of the key frames, which led us to the same video uploaded on a YouTube channel on May 3, three days before Operation Sindoor. In that video, it is described as an AI-generated scene showing a crashed fighter jet being lifted by a helicopter'. BrahMos: Standout performer It is called Brahmastra against our rivals 'The BrahMos missile, already exported by India, emerged as the standout performer during the conflict. Further, the newspaper commented, ''This was not a conventional border conflict, but a high-tech showdown featuring drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, and long-range air defences. While India and Pakistan were the primary belligerents, a third power — China — played a pivotal, if indirect, role…. Beijing's involvement via the supply of advanced weapon systems and real-time satellite reconnaissance data to Pakistan turned the engagement into a revealing trial run for Chinese arms in a live combat setting. It was reported by the media that IAF Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan had on May 31 rejected Pakistan's claims that it had shot down six Indian warplanes during Operation Sindoor, calling the information 'absolutely incorrect'. The CDS added, 'what is important is not the jet being down, but why they were being downed'. General Chauhan clarified that the good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake, which was made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and fly our jets again, targeting at long range'. He stated that 'the backbone of Pakistan' was badly damaged. Congress questions: Congress leaders like Mallikarjun Kharge and Jairam Ramesh wanted to know why the Prime Minister did call for an all-party meeting on the issue 'Why did people learn about the operation through an interview with General Chauhan in Singapore?' 'Were some Indian jets destroyed in the early stages? Why no clear info? Some Telangana leaders accused the Centre of giving in to pressure from the US President Donald President Trump and hastily rushing into a ceasefire. Jairam Ramesh said on X that the Centre had not taken Parliament into confidence even as the nation gets to know of the first phase of Operation Sindoor. The Chief Minister of Telangana claimed that the Centre was afraid of Trump's pressure and had surrendered to the ceasefire. Citizens should verify India is under threat not just from terrorists and enemy countries, but also from fake news and social media rumours. Criticism is welcome in a democracy, but it must be responsible and based on facts. National security should come before politics. Let's support our armed forces, verify information, and stay united. Pakistan can never be trusted. (The writer is Professor of the Constitution of India and founder-Dean, School of Law, Mahindra University, Hyderabad)
