Law should change to allow review of cases of jailed officers, lawyer says
Mr Campbell, who died in 2004, was found guilty in April 1977 of theft and conspiracy to steal from the Bricklayers' Arms goods depot in south London, where he was a British Rail employee, and jailed for 18 months.
The case against him was led by the discredited British Transport Police (BTP) officer Detective Sergeant Derek Ridgewell, who, along with two colleagues, later pleaded guilty to stealing from the same depot.
The assistant chief constable of the BTP said following the Court of Appeal's ruling that he was 'disgusted' by Ridgewell's actions, and the force was 'sincerely sorry' to those affected.
He also said the force is continuing to 'actively pursue a criminal investigation' into those involved.
Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Wall and Mr Justice Butcher, said on Thursday it was with 'regret' that the court could not undo Mr Campbell's suffering.
But they said they hope clearing his name 'will at least bring some comfort' to his surviving family, including his son, Errol Campbell Jr.
Speaking to the media following the hearing, Mr Foot, who represented Mr Campbell Jr, said: 'In 1980, when Ridgewell was convicted, nothing happened to his cases.
'We are calling for a change in the law that, when a police officer goes to prison, there is an automatic review of their cases to look for miscarriages of justice.
'If that had happened, that would have saved more than 45 years of misery for the Campbell family.'
When asked if he had political support for the law change, Mr Foot said: 'We are talking to the Justice Select Committee, we're talking to the junior minister, and we believe that it is something that could be put into Hillsborough Law, alongside that, as a very simple reform that could stop this sort of thing ever happening again.'
He also called on BTP to name those who 'harboured' Ridgewell, claiming it was 'no secret' in the 1970s that the officer was 'racist and corrupt'.
He added that there were 'bound to be others' who were victims of miscarriages of justice.
Mr Campbell unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 1978, but his son applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), with the help of the charity Appeal, to look at the case in September 2024.
The CCRC had already referred the convictions of Mr Campbell's co-defendants, Saliah Mehmet and Basil Peterkin, whose convictions were quashed in January last year.
Henry Blaxland KC, representing Mr Campbell on Thursday, told the court it was dealing with victims of a miscarriage of justice brought about by 'state crime'.
In a statement read out by Mr Foot outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the ruling, Mr Campbell Jr said that BTP knew that Ridgewell was 'corrupt' but 'let him carry on regardless'.
He continued that his father's conviction 'caused absolute misery', but that his father was 'dapper' and 'a good man'.
He also said that he was 'angry that Ridgewell is not alive for this day'.
In 1980, Ridgewell, along with detective constables Douglas Ellis and Alan Keeling, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to steal from the Bricklayers' Arms Depot, with Ridgewell dying in prison before he had completed his sentence.
In a previous judgment, the court found that their criminal activities between January 1977 and April 1978 resulted in the loss from the depot of goods to the value of about £364,000, 'an enormous sum of money at that time'.
In a statement, BTP Assistant Chief Constable Charlie Doyle said: 'We are sincerely sorry to those affected by the criminal actions of former BTP Detective Sergeant Derek Ridgewell, whose appalling actions in the 1970s and 1980s led to the criminalisation of innocent people.
'We're continuing to review records relating to his corrupt practices, which includes those relating to officers who were associated with DS Ridgewell or may have assisted him in his criminal activity, and the review team has recently been provided with additional resources to support its work.
'I am disgusted by the actions of Derek Ridgewell, and while we know we can't change the past, his actions do not represent the BTP of today.
'We continue to actively pursue a criminal investigation into the actions of those involved and will present a file to the CPS for consideration once we have completed our inquiries.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Nine men who abused girl should have sentences increased, Court of Appeal told
Ashley Darbyshire, Cory Barrett, Jack Poulson, Brandon Harwood, Richard Haslam, Elliot Turner, James Fitzgerald, Ross Corley and Daniel Bainbridge-Flatters were jailed in April for between two and 17 years for dozens of offences against the same victim. Darbyshire first targeted the girl when she was aged 13, and she was then abused by him and the eight other defendants over two years, mainly in the Blackrod and Adlington areas of Bolton, Greater Manchester. The Solicitor General has referred all nine sentences to the Court of Appeal, telling a hearing in London on Tuesday that they are 'unduly lenient' and should be increased. Barristers for the men are resisting the bids to increase the sentences, while Poulson and Harwood are separately seeking to appeal against the length of their jail terms. Lord Justice Edis, Mr Justice Butcher and Judge Angela Morris said they will give their ruling at 11.30am on Wednesday. Benjamin Holt, appearing for the Solicitor General, told the Court of Appeal on Tuesday that the sentences 'did not match the gravity of the case' as the men 'took it in turns to abuse this victim'. He said: 'The broad submission is that when the learned judge came to sentencing in this case, each of these offenders had committed a number of offences against an incredibly vulnerable victim.' Mr Holt continued: 'When passing sentence on the offenders, the learned judge has failed to reflect the entirety of the offending that each of these individuals was convicted of.' He also said that a 'constant theme' of the abuse was the victim being plied with alcohol and drugs. The men were arrested following Operation Pavarotti, Greater Manchester Police's investigation into child sexual exploitation allegations in the area. Bainbridge-Flatters was jailed for seven years (Greater Manchester Police/PA) Darbyshire first contacted the victim on social media in 2016, when she was aged 13 and he was 19. He went on to abuse her until she was 15, raping her twice and introducing her to the other defendants, four of whom also raped her. Much of the abuse took place in a house in Blackrod, which the sentencing judge described as a 'lawless den of iniquity'. Mr Holt said that the offending only came to an end when Bainbridge-Flatters, who gave the victim cocaine on her 15th birthday, stole a car belonging to the father of another of the men and crashed it while under the influence of alcohol, with the girl a passenger in the vehicle. The victim, who was injured in the crash, then disclosed that she had been repeatedly sexually abused. Ahead of his trial, Darbyshire admitted multiple offences against the victim and four other girls aged under 16, one of whom he also raped. Sentencing him at Liverpool Crown Court in April, Judge Simon Medland KC said Darbyshire had a 'crazed attitude to sex' and treated his victim as a 'human sexual commodity'. In her victim personal statement, the girl said: 'I'd rather be dead most days than deal with all this mental torture and memories. 'I shouldn't have had to grow up so young and spend the rest of my life 'healing' from what these monsters did to me, leaving me in my own prison I built for myself in my own mind for the rest of my life.' At the hearing on Tuesday, Damian Nolan, for Darbyshire, said that his client had a brain haemorrhage before he was due to stand trial. He said: 'We submit that the ultimate sentence imposed was within the ambit of discretion afforded to Judge Medland. 'We would urge the court to leave the sentence unaltered.' Ian McLoughlin KC, for Barrett, said that his client's sentence was 'perfectly within the remit of a proper judge exercising his discretion'. Rosalind Emsley-Smith, for Bainbridge-Flatters, said that while her client's jail term 'may be a generous sentence', it was not 'overly generous'. Many of the offenders watched proceedings via video links from various prisons. Darbyshire, 28, from Bolton, was jailed for 15 years after admitting 19 offences, including rape, sexual activity with a child and making indecent images. Barrett, 24, from Wigan, was jailed for 12 years after being convicted of five counts of rape and one of assault by penetration. Poulson, 32, from Bolton, was jailed for 17 years after being convicted of 11 offences, including two counts of rape. Poulson received the longest sentence of the group, being jailed for 17 years (Greater Manchester Police/PA) Harwood, 25, from Bolton, was jailed for 10 years after being convicted of rape, attempted rape and sexual activity with a child. Haslam, 36, from Bolton, was jailed for 16 years after being convicted of seven offences, including three counts of rape. Turner, 27, from Bolton, was jailed for two years after being convicted of two counts of sexual activity with a child. Fitzgerald, 37, from Bolton, was jailed for five-and-a-half years after being convicted of assault by penetration. Corley, 30, from Bolton, was jailed for two years and four months after admitting two counts of sexual activity with a child. Bainbridge-Flatters, 35, from Bolton, was jailed for seven years after being convicted of four counts of sexual activity with a child, and pleading guilty to supplying cocaine and aggravated vehicle taking.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Police seek Tommy Robinson after alleged assault at London station
Police investigating an alleged assault of a man at a London train station are hunting for the far-right activist Tommy Robinson, who is understood to have taken a flight out of Britain shortly after video was put online showing him near the injured man. The video shows Robinson claiming the man had attacked him, and was filmed at London St Pancras station where he had been leafleting earlier in the day. Robinson is 42 and originally from Luton, in Bedfordshire. British Transport Police said they were called just after 8.40pm on Monday to reports of an assault. They said the injured man was in hospital 'with serious injuries, which are not thought to be life-threatening'. The force said: 'Following a report of an assault at St Pancras station last night (28 July), officers have confirmed that the suspect, a 42-year-old man from Bedfordshire, boarded a flight out of the country in the early hours of this morning. 'Detectives are continuing to work closely to progress the investigation and bring him into custody for questioning.' It is not known to where the man flew. In the video, a man can be seen lying face down and motionless, with Robinson pacing near by. Robinson can be heard saying: 'He come at me bruv.' Shortly afterwards, Robinson – whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – tells an onlooker: 'He come at me, you saw that.' The first police statement about the incident said: 'British Transport Police (BTP) were called to St Pancras station just after 8.40pm yesterday (28 July) following reports of an assault. Officers attended and a man was taken to hospital with serious injuries, which are not thought to be life-threatening. 'Overnight the investigation has been ongoing and officers have been making arrest enquiries. Anyone with information or who witnessed what happened can text 61016 quoting reference 655 of 28 July.' The far-right monitoring group Hope Not Hate describes Robinson as the 'best-known far-right extremist in Britain'. In recent years Robinson has claimed to be a journalist focusing on anti-Muslim and anti-migrant causes.
BreakingNews.ie
3 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Laurence Fox ‘paedophile' posts would not have been taken seriously, appeal told
Social media posts by Laurence Fox referring to two people as paedophiles likely would not have been taken 'seriously' by many people, the Court of Appeal has heard. The actor-turned-activist was successfully sued by now-Stonewall CEO Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal over a row on Twitter, now known as X. Advertisement Mr Fox called Mr Blake and the former RuPaul's Drag Race contestant, whose real name is Colin Seymour, 'paedophiles' in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury's to mark Black History Month in October 2020. Mr Fox called for a boycott of the supermarket and was called 'a racist' by the pair, as well as broadcaster Nicola Thorp, before he responded with the 'paedophile' tweets which led to the libel claims. In two judgments in 2024, Mrs Justice Collins Rice ruled in favour of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour and said Mr Fox should pay the pair £90,000 each in damages. The judge dismissed Mr Fox's counter claims against the pair and Ms Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism. Advertisement The 47-year-old is now challenging the rulings at the Court of Appeal in London, attending the first day of the hearing on Monday. Laurence Fox and his partner Elizabeth Barker attended Monday's hearing. Photo: Ben Whitley/PA. Patrick Green KC, for Mr Fox, said in written submissions that the judgment which found Mr Fox had libelled the pair should be quashed due to 'errors of approach' by the judge, including over whether Mr Blake and Mr Seymour were caused serious harm. Mr Green said: 'Her conclusions were in any event, plainly wrong, on any fair consideration of the evidence.' The barrister added that Mrs Justice Collins Rice had wrongly decided damages for the two men, who, along with Ms Thorp, are opposing the appeal. Advertisement Mr Green said that the decision on damages did not consider the actual words Mr Fox used 'and the likelihood that many or the vast majority of readers would have not have taken them seriously, particularly in their context'. The barrister said that in one of her rulings, the judge 'ignores the actual words used, or their all important context'. He also said the judge 'failed to account adequately or at all' for an apology Mr Fox made, or alleged misconduct by Mr Blake and Mr Seymour in 'exaggerating' the harm and distress caused. Mr Fox told the original trial in November 2023 that his use of the term was 'rhetorical', and 'there was no inference at any point that I thought they were a paedophile'. Advertisement 'I was diminishing the ridiculousness of calling me a racist,' he said. And on Monday, Mr Green said it was clear Mr Fox was being rhetorical. The barrister told appeal judges: 'He's not saying 'I am a racist and they are paedophiles' and everyone understood it in that way.' Adrienne Page KC, for Mr Blake, Mr Seymour and Ms Thorp, said in written submissions that Mr Fox's appeal was 'lacking in merit'. Advertisement Simon Blake (left), Nicola Thorp and Colin Seymour (right) attended the trial in November 2023 (Lucy North/PA) She continued: 'The 'paedophile' tweets did not embody the appellant's opinions about Mr Blake and Mr Seymour. 'They conveyed factual imputations of the most serious defamatory character.' The barrister added there was 'no meaningful retraction or apology' by Mr Fox. She later said: 'Whichever way one looks at it, the judge was fully entitled to reach the factual conclusions that she did on the serious, real-world, reputational impact of the appellant's tweets, for the reasons which she gave. 'There was nothing wrong with her analysis in fact or law.' Ms Page added that Mr Fox's case at trial had been 'largely devoted to hypothesising, as already noted, a series of different scenarios as to the various ways or settings in which his tweets may have appeared to different readers'. 'After very careful and conscientious evaluation, the judge was, unsurprisingly, not persuaded of this on the facts,' she continued. Ms Page continued that the sums of £90,000 in damages awarded to the pair were 'unexceptionable'. The hearing before Lord Justice Dingemans, Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing and Lord Justice Warby is expected to conclude on Tuesday.
