Under-threat bioethanol plant says talks with Government a ‘positive signal'
Hull-based Vivergo Fuels said on Thursday that, given 'the strategic importance of a domestic ethanol supply', the Government has committed to formal negotiations to reach a 'sustainable solution'.
But the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is simultaneously beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided.
An ABF spokesperson said: 'We are extremely pleased to be entering the next phase of formal negotiations with Government over the future of Vivergo.
'We believe it is a very positive signal that Government recognises the strategic importance of a domestic bioethanol industry, and is serious about working with the sector to find a sustainable long-term future.
'We look forward to engaging intensively and constructively with ministers over the coming weeks.'
The statement added: 'ABF cannot continue to absorb losses at the plant. That is why a timely solution is vital.
'Our clear preference is to find that solution through this process and to get back to running a business that can thrive in the long term.'
The firm said that 'in parallel' it has entered into a consultation process with staff, which it said was a necessary step as there is no guarantee that the negotiations with Government will be successful.
It said: 'Our employees are our most important consideration, and we will engage with them properly and transparently about the future.
'Consultation is not a fixed outcome, and closure is not a certainty.
'The outcome depends on the progress we are able to make through negotiations with the Government.'
Last month, Vivergo wrote to the wheat farmers who supply it, telling them it will have to close unless there is quick Government intervention.
It said the removal of a 19% tariff on US ethanol imports, which formed part of the recent UK-US trade deal, was the 'final blow'.
The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products.
Vivergo said the Hull plant can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms.
It described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future.
The firm said it has just signed a £1.25 billion memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy to anchor a 'world-class' Sustainable Aviation Fuel facility at the site.
It said the 'potential ahead is enormous', adding that 'there is a real opportunity for Hull to be home to one of Britain's most exciting clean fuel clusters'.
The plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region.
Following ABF's announcement of a potential shutdown by mid-September, a Government spokesperson said on Thursday: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families and it is disappointing to see this announcement after we entered into negotiations with the company on financial support yesterday.
'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.'
The Government said the bioethanol industry has been facing significant challenges for some time and officials and ministers have met with Ensus and Vivergo consistently over the last few months to address the challenges.
It said both the business and transport secretaries met representatives from the industry on June 10 and engagement with the companies 'will continue at pace' to assess potential solutions, with the help of external consultants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
States of Guernsey to close loop-hole to stop tax avoidance
The States has confirmed it will close a tax loophole as part of plans to help tackle the government's £44m the current law, people are able to create their own personal investment companies, lend them money, and then take it back as loan repayments without paying any guidance has been added to the Statement of Practice M45 "Legal avoidance" to make it clear that if anyone uses this type of company to take money out as a loan repayment, it will be treated as a dividend, and Policy and Resources Committee also approved a proposal to amend the Income Tax (Guernsey) Law, 1978, so the change will be included in the island's 2026 budget. Deputy Lyndon Trott, committee president, said: "When it comes to income tax, we have to ensure that everyone is paying their fair share, including businesses and individuals."But we are even more acutely aware of this at a time when we as a government have a £44 million deficit."This isn't the panacea for our financial woes, but we're taking action to close this loophole to make sure that we're collecting tax that belongs to the public purse."
Leader Live
29 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Welfare reforms: What concessions has the Government made?
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at what the changes are and how Labour MPs and disability groups have reacted. – What had the Government originally planned? In March, reforms to the welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced. The Government said the changes, including restricting access to the main disability benefit known as Pip (personal independence payment) and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), were expected to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30. With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year', the Government argued the current situation was unsustainable. An impact assessment published alongside the Bill included estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules would see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Changes to UC were expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. Overall, as a result of the changes, it was estimated some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, across Great Britain were likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs by the end of the decade. – What concessions have been made? In a late-night letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall conceded two changes she said would 'strengthen the Bill'. In recognition of the 'uncertainty and anxiety' caused by the proposed changes, she said all current Pip recipients would keep their benefits, saying only new claims from November 2026 will come under the tightened eligibility requirements. An impact assessment had stated that 370,000 current recipients were set to lose Pip entitlement across England and Wales. Ms Kendall also vowed all those currently receiving the UC health element, as well as new claimants meeting the severe conditions criteria, will have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'. The Work and Pensions Secretary has also promised a review of the Pip assessment, led by social security and disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, which will have input from disabled people 'to ensure the benefit is fair and fit for the future'. – What are disability groups saying? Mikey Erhardt, from Disability Rights UK, accused the Government of 'playing politics with our lives', insisting the Bill must still be pulled. He said the changes will mean 'a benefits system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today' and added that, in making the original announcement of cuts, the Government had 'prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of disabled citizens'. Mr Erhardt added: 'Despite seemingly rowing back on some of the worst aspects of its plans, the Government is still attempting to slash billions of pounds from a system that doesn't provide enough support as it stands.' The MS Society said the Government was simply 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster', and urged MPs 'not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions'. Food bank network Trussell welcomed the 'significant' concessions but said the proposals 'still present a bleak future for future claimants and still risk placing the Government's commitments to end the need for emergency food and tackle poverty in serious jeopardy'. – What are Labour MPs saying? Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 'a good deal' involving 'massive changes' to protect vulnerable people and involve disabled people in the design of future reforms. She said: 'It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.' Health minister Stephen Kinnock said he is confident the welfare reforms – being brought under the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will pass a vote in the Commons on Tuesday in the wake of the concessions. But some Labour MPs are still not satisfied, with Nadia Whittome saying the concessions are 'nowhere near good enough', vowing to still vote against the Bill unless 'serious' proposals are made to 'protect the dignity of disabled people'. Speaking to the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, she said MPs she had spoken to 'are sticking to their position because we understand that we are answerable to our constituents'. Ms Whittome added: 'If the Government doesn't pull the Bill, doesn't consult properly with disabled people and come back to MPs with a serious proposal that protects the dignity of disabled people, I will vote against and I will be far from the only one.'
Leader Live
30 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government climbdown on welfare Bill marks third U-turn this month
Here, the PA news agency looks at three major policy changes this month. – Welfare reforms The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was put in motion to change who could qualify for certain disability and sickness benefits. The package restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, in a bid to save £5 billion a year by 2030. But a backbench rebellion of more than 120 Labour MPs forced Sir Keir into a U-turn. In an attempt to appease those MPs, planned cuts will now only affect future applications for benefits, rather than existing claimants. – Winter fuel payment The Government scrapped winter fuel payments for pensioners who do not receive pension credits or other means-tested benefits just weeks after it came to power in July. It was described as a 'necessary and responsible' move by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who argued it would help fill the £22 billion fiscal black hole. The Government said that changing the threshold for the payment would save £1.5 billion each year. But at the start of this month, the Prime Minister announced that the Government would reinstate winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. The Government said the change will cost £1.25 billion. – Grooming gangs Sir Keir has also U-turned on holding a national inquiry into grooming gangs. In January, the Prime Minister accused those calling for an inquiry of 'jumping on a far-right bandwagon' after tech entrepreneur Elon Musk criticised the UK for its lack of action on the issue. But following the recommendations of a report by Baroness Louise Casey into the scale of group-based child sexual abuse, Sir Keir announced in June that there would be a full national statutory inquiry. The Prime Minister had initially only promised five local inquiries in the most prevalent areas for grooming gangs. Asked about the change, Sir Keir said: 'I've never said we should not look again at any issue.'
