Why Trump has invited five African leaders to the White House
Trump's choice of guests include the leaders of Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal - none of whom represent the major economies of the continent.
The three-day summit is expected to concentrate on Trump's "trade, not aid" policy and with all of them facing 10% tariffs on goods exported to the US, they may be hoping to do deals to negotiate this rate down.
Those up for grabs may include ones over critical minerals, with maritime security, migration and hosting deportees also likely to be on the table.
With the exception of Gabon, they lie along routes used by migrants, as well as drug traffickers from Latin America.
Some of the nations are also potentially vulnerable to the southward spread of the Islamist insurgencies that affect their neighbours further inland - so discussions on co-operation in tackling this threat are also likely.
Earlier this year Gen Michael Langley, who heads the US Africa Command (Africom), warned that one of the jihadists' new objectives was gaining access to West Africa's coast - and that that also raised "the chance of threats reaching US shores".
Senegal's former ambassador to Washington, Babacar Diagne, said the invitations to the African leaders reflected the recent "paradigm shift" in US policy towards the continent.
After taking office in January for his second term, Trump cut US aid to the continent, saying it was wasteful and incompatible with his "America First" policy.
With Trump and the Republican Party at the helm, there is also doubt about whether the US will renew later this year its African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), which guarantees duty-free access for certain goods from Africa.
"It's not like before with the Democrats. There were two strong points with them: poverty reduction and development issues, through Agoa and other initiatives. All that is over," Mr Diagne told the BBC.
According to the former diplomat, the Trump administration's position will mirror how it has dealt with Ukraine war-time leader Volodymyr Zelensky.
"Pure trade. It's give and take, win and win. We saw it with Ukraine. You sign the agreement on minerals and you'll have us on your side, otherwise, you forget everything," Mr Diagne said.
Last month's peace deal signed in Washington between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic is a case in point - trade diplomacy that will potentially see the US gain lucrative mineral access.
Indeed Nicaise Mouloumbi, head of a leading non-governmental organisation in oil-rich Gabon, said the Trump administration's focus on Africa was down to increasing competition from rival powers - including China and Russia - for its prized resources.
"All these [invited] countries have important minerals: gold, oil, manganese, gas, wood and zircon - Senegal, Mauritania and Gabon, in particular," he told the BBC.
Gabon holds around a quarter of the global known reserves of manganese - and it provides 22% of China's of the mineral, which is used in the production of batteries and stainless steel.
Mr Mouloumbi added that the US might be most keen to strengthen ties with Gabon not only because it had "strategic" minerals like manganese and uranium, as well as oil, but also because it was strategically located along the Gulf of Guinea, with a coastline of about 800km (500 miles).
It could host a US military base that America plans to build in the region, Mr Mouloumbi said.
Mr Diagne made a similar point about piracy, saying that "maritime terrorism in the Gulf of Guinea has become an extremely important issue" for the US.
Many tankers carrying oil and gas travel through the Gulf of Guinea, which has been known as a piracy hot spot for several years.
For Mauritania and Senegal, migration will be central to discussions, according to Ousmane Sene, the head of the West African Research Centre (WARC),
"Let's not forget that between 2023 and 2025, no fewer than 20,000 young Mauritanians left for the US via Nicaragua, along with hundreds of young Senegalese," the analyst told the BBC.
"All these countries are also departure points for illegal emigration," he added.
"That's an extremely important point in his [Trump's] migration policy, and every day people are turned back at the borders."
Mauritania is the only one of the five countries that does not have diplomatic ties with US ally Israel - cutting them in 2009 over an offensive in Gaza - and sources have told Semafor that restoring them may be a sticking point for any would-be White House deal.
Visa overstay rates are another issue to be settled - especially for Gabon and Liberia, which both have higher ones than Burundi, which last month became subject to US travel restrictions with visa overstays cited as a key reason.
Liberia may also be considering a US proposal to accept people deported by the US, including criminals. The country, which has close historical links to America, was reportedly included on a proposed list of countries that the US had approached.
Guinea-Bissau, which has suffered a series of coups and attempted coups over the years, is reportedly keen for the US embassy to reopen in the capital, Bissau, following its closure after the army mutinied in 1998.
President Umaro Cissoko Embaló was clearly proud of the White House's invite for Guinea-Bissau, which several years ago was labelled a "narco-state" by the US and UN as it was once a major transit hub for cocaine from Latin America to Europe and North America.
"Guinea-Bissau has now emerged from a state of disorder to become a real state. The Americans do not invite just any state to their country - only a well-structured state," he was quoted as saying at the airport before he left for Washington.
He and his counterparts - Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema of Gabon, Joseph Boakai of Liberia, Mohamed Ould Ghazouani of Mauritania and Bassirou Diomaye Faye of Senegal - will be hoping they hold some cards to do a deal with Trump.
They certainly do not want a replay of May's infamous high-stakes meeting between South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump in the Oval Office, which did little to ease relations.
In fact, it seems to have completely backfired as this week Africa's biggest economy found out that from next month its exports to the US are being slapped with a 30% tariff.
How Trump's Africa strategy may become a double-edged sword
'My wife fears sex, I fear death' - impacts of the USAID freeze
How Africa's 'narco-state' is trying to kick its habit
Why Gabon's coup leader is bucking a trend by embracing democracy
Four sons set out on a perilous migration route. Only one came home
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Focus on Africa
This Is Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a cornerstone of American culture for three generations, announced Friday it would take steps toward its own closure after being defunded by Congress — marking the end of a nearly six-decade era in which it fueled the production of renowned educational programming, cultural content and even emergency alerts. The demise of the corporation, known as CPB, is a direct result of President Donald Trump's targeting of public media, which he has repeatedly said is spreading political and cultural views antithetical to those the United States should be espousing. The closure is expected to have a profound impact on the journalistic and cultural landscape — in particular, public radio and TV stations in small communities across the United States. CPB helps fund both PBS and NPR, but most of its funding is distributed to more than 1,500 local public radio and television stations around the country. The corporation also has deep ties to much of the nation's most familiar programming, from NPR's 'All Things Considered' to, historically, 'Sesame Street,' 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood' and the documentaries of Ken Burns. The corporation said its end, 58 years after being signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, would come in an 'orderly wind-down.' In a statement, it said the decision came after the passage through Congress of a package that clawed back its funding for the next two budget years — about $1.1 billion. Then, the Senate Appropriations Committee reinforced that policy change Thursday by excluding funding for the corporation for the first time in more than 50 years as part of a broader spending bill. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' said Patricia Harrison, the corporation's president and CEO. As part of Thursday's committee deliberations, Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., authored but then withdrew an amendment to restore CPB funding for the coming budget year. She said she still believed there was a path forward 'to fix this before there are devastating consequences for public radio and television stations across the country.' 'It's hard to believe we've ended up in the situation we're in,' she said. 'And I'm going to continue to work with my colleagues to fix it.' But Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, sounded a less optimistic tone. 'I understand your concerns, but we all know we litigated this two weeks ago,' Capito said. 'Adopting this amendment would have been contrary to what we have already voted on.' CPB said it informed employees Friday that most staff positions will end with the fiscal year on Sept. 30. It said a small transition team will stay in place until January to finish any remaining work — including, it said, 'ensuring continuity for music rights and royalties that remain essential to the public media system.' 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life, providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country,' Harrison said. 'We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.' The impact will be widespread NPR stations use millions of dollars in federal money to pay music licensing fees. Now, many will have to renegotiate these deals. That could impact, in particular, outlets that build their programming around music discovery. NPR President and CEO Katherine Maher estimated recently, for example, that some 96% of all classical music broadcast in the United States is on public radio stations. Federal money for public radio and television has traditionally been appropriated to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes it to NPR and PBS. Roughly 70% of the money goes directly to the 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations across the country, although that's only a shorthand way to describe its potential impact. Trump, who has called the CPB a 'monstrosity,' has long said that public broadcasting displays an extreme liberal bias, helped create the momentum in recent months for an anti-public broadcasting groundswell among his supporters in Congress and around the country. It is part of a larger initiative in which he has targeted institutions — particularly cultural ones — that produce content or espouse attitudes that he considers 'un-American.' The CPB's demise represents a political victory for those efforts. His impact on the media landscape has been profound. He has also gone after U.S. government media that had independence charters, including the venerable Voice of America, ending that media outlet's operations after many decades. Trump also fired three members of the corporation's board of directors in April. In legal action at the time, the fired directors said their dismissal was governmental overreach targeting an entity whose charter guarantees it independence.
CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trade adviser says Trump has "real concerns" about jobs data after president fires labor statistics chief
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer defended President Trump's decision to fire a key official responsible for employment reports, telling CBS News on Friday that Mr. Trump has "real concerns" about the accuracy of federal economic data. Greer spoke to "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" hours after the monthly jobs report showed a hiring slowdown in July and revised down earlier reports for May and June. Mr. Trump reacted by firing Commissioner of Labor Statistics Erika McEntarfer, claiming — without evidence — Friday's jobs numbers were "RIGGED." "You know, even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so it sounds to me like the president has real concerns," Greer told CBS News, adding that Mr. Trump's issues with government labor data extend beyond Friday's report. "You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers. There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways," said Greer. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' reports are based on surveys of households and businesses. It's common for the agency to revise prior months' figures up or down as more data comes in. The May and June revisions — which cut the number of new jobs by a combined 258,000 — were the largest downward change in employment figures since 1979, excluding pandemic-era jobs reports, though that doesn't mean the data was manipulated, as Mr. Trump claims. Greer defended Mr. Trump's right to fire McEntarfer, an economist who was nominated to the post by former President Joe Biden. "The President is the President. He can choose who works in the executive branch," Greer said. The firing drew staunch criticism, with McEntarfer's predecessor William Beach — who was first nominated in Mr. Trump's first term — calling it "groundless" and a "dangerous precedent." "This rationale for firing Dr. McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers," Beach said in a statement. Friday's report showed the economy added 73,000 jobs in July, below the 115,000 predicted by economists. The unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.2%, up from 4.1% a month earlier. The jobs report also showed a slight drop in manufacturing jobs last month. Mr. Trump's tariff hikes are intended in part to boost American manufacturing — though critics warn some U.S.-based factories that rely on foreign-made inputs will be hurt by tariffs. When asked about July's manufacturing data, Greer — one of Mr. Trump's trade negotiators — told CBS News he doesn't "read tariff policy into that number." Instead, Greer argued that the numbers reflect conditions prior to the Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill Act that passed through Congress last month. He argued businesses were "waiting to see" if some of the bill's tax provisions would pass, including parts that GOP lawmakers believe will encourage more business investment. "I think that we're going to see a big increase in manufacturing jobs now that we have the 'one big, beautiful bill' passed," Greer said. "And I think that … our manufacturers know that they have a clear and certain path forward on that now."
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What we know about who's paying for new White House golden ballroom
In late July and early August 2025, a claim (archived) circulated online that U.S. President Donald Trump would build a $200 million golden ballroom at the White House paid for by himself and private donors. The X account Libs of TikTok shared this claim along with an illustration of the alleged room, captioned "BREAKING: Trump is building a 90,000 square foot White House ballroom and it's being funded mainly by Trump himself!" The news — widely reported in national and international media — also circulated on Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived), Reddit (archived) and Bluesky (archived), where some posters claimed the Trump administration would actually use taxpayer money to fund the construction of the ballroom. Snopes readers also wrote in about the topic. However, we found no credible evidence that the Trump administration's proposed $200 million ballroom would be paid for using taxpayers' money. Rather, both Trump and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump and private donors would pay for the project. The Rapid Response 47 X account, an official account of the Trump administration, wrote (archived) in a July 31 post that the project would be "fully funded by President Trump and other private donors — not taxpayers." It was unclear at the time of this writing whether the $200 million amount included costs for "enhancements and modifications" that the White House statement said the U.S. Secret Service, a taxpayer -unded government agency, would provide. We reached out to the White House for clarification on this point and await a reply. Karoline Leavitt and the White House announced the project, called the White House State Ballroom, on July 31, 2025. According to the White House statement, the room would sit near the current East Wing and seat 650 people — more than three times as many as the current East Room, which seats 200 people. The White House statement described the new ballroom as an "exquisite addition of approximately 90,000 total square feet of ornately designed and carefully crafted space." On funding, the White House statement said, "President Trump, and other patriot donors, have generously committed to donating the funds necessary to build this approximately $200 million dollar structure. The United States Secret Service will provide the necessary security enhancements and modifications." Trump himself also spoke about the ballroom while signing an executive order on July 31 (time code 21:46, our emphasis): Reporter: Mr. President, can you talk about your plans for the new ballroom that was announced today? The $200 million, that's going to be paid for by yourself — Trump: By me, yeah. Reporter: — private donations? Trump: It's a private thing, yeah, I'll do it and we'll probably have some donors or whatever, but it's about $200 million. We've been planning it for a long time, they've wanted a ballroom at the White House for more than 150 years but there's never been a president that was good at ballrooms. (unintelligible) really good. In fact, I looked at one we just built in Turnberry in Scotland and it's incredible. We're good at building, I'm good at building things and we'll get it built quickly and on time, it'll be beautiful, top of the line. Nearly two months earlier, on June 6, 2025, Trump posted on his social media network Truth Social, "Just inspected the site of the new Ballroom that will be built, compliments of a man known as Donald J. Trump, at the White House." Days before the White House announcement, Trump teased the idea while meeting with Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, at his Trump Turnberry resort in Scotland (which, he said, had recently had its own ballroom fitted). Trump said (video time code 1:43), "We're building a great ballroom at the White House. The White House has wanted a ballroom for 150 years, but they never had a real estate person, you know, nobody, no president knew how to build a ballroom." Trump did not mention the financing of the project while speaking at Turnberry. Trump has floated ideas for a ballroom at the White House since at least 2010, according to former U.S. President Barack Obama's senior adviser David Axelrod. According to Axelrod, Trump offered to build "a ballroom you can assemble and take apart" in 2010. Trump recounted the encounter to ABC News in 2011, according to a New York Post article. At that time, Trump reportedly priced the project at $100 million, half the 2025 ballroom estimate. The idea surfaced again in 2016, when Obama's press secretary Josh Earnest laughed off (video time code 36:53) another Trump offer of a ballroom as "not something that was at all seriously considered." "I'm not sure that it would be appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House," Earnest said. The White House's July 2025 announcement included illustrations of the proposed exterior and interior of the White House State Ballroom by McCrery Architects. The illustrations showed plans for a gold-accented dining room, though they did not include any gold Trump signs. Campanile, Carl. Trump's W. House Ballroom. 20 Apr. 2011, Janssen, Kim. "Will Trump Now Build His $100 Million White House Ballroom?" Chicago Tribune, 24 May 2019, The Obama White House. "2/1/16: White House Press Briefing." YouTube, 1 Feb. 2016, The White House. "President Trump Meets with the President of the European Commission." YouTube, 27 Jul. 2025, ---. "President Trump Signs an Executive Order, July 31, 2025." YouTube, 31 Jul. 2025, ---. "Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, July 31, 2025." YouTube, 31 Jul. 2025, "The White House Announces White House Ballroom Construction to Begin." The White House, 31 Jul. 2025,
