North Korea has 'no interest' in Seoul overtures
Kim Yo Jong says North Korea is "not interested" in any proposal from Seoul, and there is "nothing to discuss." File photo: AFP
North Korea has no interest in any policy or proposals for reconciliation from South Korea, the powerful sister of its leader Kim Jong Un said on Monday in the first response to South Korean liberal President Lee Jae Myung's peace overtures.
Kim Yo Jong, who is a senior North Korean ruling party official and is believed to speak for the country's leader, said Lee's pledge of commitment to South Korea-US security alliance shows he is no different from his hostile predecessor.
"If South Korea expects to reverse all the consequences of (its actions) with a few sentimental words, there could be no greater miscalculation than that," Kim said in comments carried by official KCNA news agency.
Lee, who took office on June 4 after winning a snap election, called after the removal of hardline conservative Yoon Suk Yeol over a failed attempt at martial law, has vowed to improve ties with Pyongyang that had reached the worst level in years.
In one measure aimed at easing tensions, Lee suspended loudspeaker broadcasts blasting anti-North propaganda across the border and banned the flying of leaflets by activists that had angered Pyongyang.
Kim, the North Korean official, said those moves are merely a reversal of ill-intentioned activities by South Korea that should never have been initiated in the first place.
"In other words, it's not even something worth our assessment," she said.
"We again make clear the official position that whatever policy is established in Seoul or proposal is made, we are not interested, and we will not be sitting down with South Korea and there is nothing to discuss." (Reuters)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
34 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Why US alliance didn't save Philippines from Trump's tariffs
Poor optics, lacklustre results and sparse details describe the recent visit of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr to the United States. The outcome of the trip – the first by a Southeast Asian head of state under the second Trump administration – raises questions about whether Manila is able to fully leverage its long-standing alliance with the US. The terms of the trade deal – of 19 per cent tariffs being imposed on Philippine goods entering the US market, compared to no tariffs for US goods bound for the Philippines – were seen as lopsided. Financial services firms Nomura and Fitch initially anticipated that Manila could bring down the rate to the baseline 10 per cent given its strong alliance with the US and the fact it is not a known hub for goods transshipment. Beyond the disappointment, the trade agreement is estimated to cost Manila 27 to 32 billion pesos (US$472.7 to US$560.2 million) in revenue losses during the next five years. According to Nomura's forecast, direct trade losses on account of higher US duties will reduce the Philippines GDP growth this year from 5.3 per cent to 4.9 per cent. Manila's commitments to buy more US soybeans and wheat will benefit American farmers . Last year, the Philippines was the second-largest buyer of US wheat, and this volume is likely to surge further with the new agreement. The exact details of the deal – such as whether Washington will ask Manila to buy more US aircraft and energy products, as it did in the agreement with Indonesia – are still taking shape. The potential influx of more US pork, poultry and beef could give Filipino farmers reason for concern. US suppliers, which face no tariffs, are in a better position than their competitors from Australia, Brazil, Canada and the EU. Meanwhile, Philippine exporters have to compete with producers from Latin America and other Southeast Asian countries while dealing with 19 per cent levies. 03:00 Philippines' Marcos secures trade deal with Trump, but tariffs only drop 1 percentage point Philippines' Marcos secures trade deal with Trump, but tariffs only drop 1 percentage point
RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire
Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire Sealing the ceasefire deal in Putrajaya are, from left, Hun Manet of Cambodia, Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia and Phumtham Wechayachai of Thailand. Photo: Reuters The leaders of Thailand and Cambodia agreed to a ceasefire on Monday effective midnight, in a bid to bring an end to their deadliest conflict in more than a decade after five days of fierce fighting. Amid an international effort to quell the conflict, the Thai and Cambodian leaders held talks in Malaysia hosted by its Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the current chair of the Asean regional bloc, where both sides agreed to halt hostilities and resume direct communications. Anwar said when opening a press conference alongside the Thai and Cambodian leaders that there would be "an immediate and unconditional ceasefire with effect from midnight tonight. This is final." The Southeast Asian neighbours accuse each other of starting the fighting last week, before escalating it with heavy artillery bombardment and Thai air strikes along their 817km land border. Anwar had proposed ceasefire talks soon after a long-running border dispute erupted into conflict on Thursday, and China and the United States also offered to assist in negotiations. US President Donald Trump called both leaders at the weekend urging them to settle their differences, warning he would not conclude trade deals with them unless they ended the fighting. The tension between Thailand and Cambodia has intensified since the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief skirmish late in May. Both sides reinforced border troops amid a full-blown diplomatic crisis that brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse. "Today we have a very good meeting and very good results... that hope to stop immediately the fighting that has caused many lives lost, injuries and also caused displacement of people," Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said, expressing appreciation to China for its efforts in participating in the process and to Trump. "We hope that the solutions that Prime Minister Anwar just announced will set a condition for moving forward for our bilateral discussion to return to normalcy of the relationship, and as a foundation for future de-escalation of forces." Acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, who had earlier expressed doubts about Cambodia's sincerity ahead of the negotiations in Malaysia, said Thailand had agreed to ceasefire that would "be carried out successfully in good faith by both sides". (Reuters)
AllAfrica
4 hours ago
- AllAfrica
EU capitulates to Trump in vassal-state trade deal
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed to a framework deal with the US whereby the EU will be charged 15% tariffs on most imports, commit to purchasing US$750 billion in US energy exports and invest $600 billion in the US economy, some of which will be military purchases. US tariffs on EU steel and aluminum exports will remain at 50% while the EU agreed not to tariff the US at all. The alternative to this lopsided arrangement was for Trump to impose his threatened 30% tariffs by August 1. The EU's macroeconomic strength was greatly weakened over the past 3.5 years as a result of the anti-Russian sanctions that it imposed in solidarity with the US on what had hitherto been its cheapest and most reliable energy supplier. It was therefore already at a critical disadvantage in any prospective trade war. The EU's failure to reach a major trade deal with China since Trump's return to office, evident during their most recent summit late last week, made Sunday's outcome a fait accompli in hindsight. The end result is that the EU just subordinated itself as the US's largest-ever vassal state. The US's 15% tariffs on most imports will reduce EU production and profits, thus making a recession more likely. The bloc's commitment to purchasing more expensive US energy will become more onerous in that event. Likewise, its pledge to buy more US arms will undermine the 'ReArm Europe Plan', with the combined effect of the aforesaid concessions further ceding the EU's already reduced sovereignty to the US. This, in turn, can embolden the US to press for better terms in its ongoing trade negotiations with other countries. On the North American front, Trump envisages reasserting the US' hegemony over Canada and Mexico via economic means, which can enable him to more easily expand 'Fortress America' southward. If he succeeds in subordinating Brazil, then everything between it and Mexico will naturally fall in line. This series of deals, along with last week's one with Japan, would bolster Trump's hand with China and India. He ideally hopes to replicate his Japanese and European successes with those two Asian anchors of BRICS, which together represent around a third of humanity, but it can't be taken for granted that he will. Trump's best chance of coercing them into similarly lopsided arrangements requires him to place the US in the most advantageous geo-economic position possible during their talks; hence, the need to rapidly build 'Fortress America' through a series of trade deals, and then prove that his tariff threats aren't bluffs. As explained in this analysis, this variable and the US's Kissingerian triangulation policy most significantly determine the future of their trade talks. If he fails, then Trump might not impose 100% tariffs on China and/or India, but some would still be expected. Nevertheless, with Japan, the EU and likely 'Fortress America' on his side, this 'Global West' could insulate the US from some of the consequences. The grand strategic importance of the EU subordinating itself as the US's largest-ever vassal state is therefore that it places the US on the path of restoring its unipolar hegemony via sequential trade deals as it likely sets its sights on the Americas next before finally taking on Asia. There's no guarantee that the US will succeed, and a series of lopsided trade deals with major economies would only partially restore US-led unipolarity, but Trump's moves still represent a possibly existential threat to multipolarity. This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
