A dramatic shift in current US trade policy
A dramatic shift in current US trade policy
Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. "Get me to God's country"
Take a look at Thursday's news:
What to know about Trump's long-awaited tariffs
U.S. stock futures pointed to a sharply lower opening on Thursday after the Trump administration announced 10% tariffs on imports from all trading partners outside Canada and Mexico, plus additional reciprocal tariffs on about 60 countries.
Trump says his new tariffs will punish other countries for unfair trade practices. But some economists predict Americans will feel the pain.
National Weather Service in Memphis: 'This isn't routine'
The National Weather Service in Memphis, Tennessee, issued a dire warning to residents in the path of the major spring storm, urging them to prepare for major flooding and widespread travel disruptions. "This isn't routine. This is a rare, high-impact, and potentially devastating event," the statement said. The epicenter of the rain and floods is expected to be in the mid-South, forecasters said, with some of the heaviest rain is projected to fall along the Ohio River between Kentucky and Illinois. Here's where forecasters are warning of "catastrophic" flooding.
More news to know now
What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here.
Who could buy TikTok?
Saturday, April 5 is the new deadline for TikTok to be sold off or face a ban, after President Donald Trump extended the January deadline set by a 2024 law that passed with bipartisan congressional support. Lawmakers have sought to find a non-Chinese buyer for the app over national security concerns. Amazon was among the suitors that submitted a bid on Wednesday, according to Reuters and the New York Times. Meanwhile, cryptocurrency foundation Hbar and Zoop, a startup co-led by the founder of OnlyFans, jointly submitted to the White House a plan to buy the app, company representatives confirmed to USA TODAY Wednesday. Here are the other potential buyers as the clock ticks on TikTok.
Your pineapple vape in the nation's highest court
The Supreme Court has unanimously overturned a lower court's decision that the Food and Drug Administration incorrectly blocked companies from selling fruit and candy-flavored vaping products. The decision is a win for the FDA and for public health groups concerned about the appeal of sweet-flavored e-cigarettes to teens. But vaping companies hope they'll find a friendlier regulatory environment under President Donald Trump, who has promised to 'save' flavored vaping. But the decision did not resolve the companies' complaint that the FDA didn't consider its proposals to keep its products out of the hands of minors.
Today's talkers
These police started a cold case podcast. Then they found a woman's remains after 42 years.
In January, the Elgin Police Department began airing its podcast, 'Somebody Knows Something,' and highlighted the case of a woman who went missing more than four decades ago. Hosts Cold Case Unit Detectives Andrew Houghton and Matt Vartanian spoke to friends of 23-year-old Karen Schepers, who was last seen around 1 a.m. on April 16, 1983. After weighing multiple theories, the detectives thought it'd be a good idea to search the Fox River since it's along the route she may have taken home in 1983. Investigators later found skeletal remains inside a car, which turned out to be a match for the missing woman, police said. Here's how to listen to the department's podcast.
Photo of the day: I think we know that guy?!
A Virginia family's cherry blossoms photoshoot in Washington D.C. didn't go as planned after a bystander walked into a frame meant only to include their two toddlers. The photobomber in question was former President Barack Obama.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Barack Obama Day' Celebration Planned to Clash With Trump's Birthday
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Plans to celebrate a new "Barack Obama Day" have been scheduled to coincide with President Donald Trump's birthday as protests against Trump continue. Posting on social media, Americans encouraged people to celebrate the former president on June 14, despite the 44th president's real birthday being August 4. It comes amid a growing backlash to the current president. Why It Matters The social media action comes as activists are coordinating a protest on June 14, targeting a military-style parade planned by the Trump administration on Flag Day, which coincides with the president's birthday. The parade will kick off at 6:30 p.m. ET and will last for three hours until 9:30 p.m. "The parade will take place on Constitution Ave NW between 15th Street and 23rd Street," according to the America250 website. "Guests are invited to convene along the parade route or view from the Washington Monument Grounds." Former President Barack Obama talks with President-elect Donald Trump before the state funeral for former President Jimmy Carter at Washington National Cathedral in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025. Former President Barack Obama talks with President-elect Donald Trump before the state funeral for former President Jimmy Carter at Washington National Cathedral in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025. AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin Around 200,000 are expected to attend the parade, officials told Business Insider, which reported that 6,700 troops are scheduled to participate, including soldiers on active duty and in reserve, special forces and the National Guard. Some will be wearing the uniforms worn by soldiers in historic battles. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport will be forced to shut down for several hours on June 14 to accommodate the parade, affecting more than 100 flights and thousands of passengers, according to The Washington Post. Concurrently, there are 1,800 protests planned across the country for June 14, with millions expected to attend. What To Know Viral social media posts have suggested Americans support "Barack Obama Day" on June 14. 🚨Spread the Word🚨 On June 14th (Trump's birthday), we're celebrating a REAL President: Barack Obama. — Protect Kamala Harris ✊ (@DisavowTrump20) May 24, 2025 It follows a trend with roots back to 2020 when X, then Twitter, users used the hashtags "All Birthdays Matter" and "Obama Day June 14th," among other similar phrases, to honor Obama on Trump's birthday. Meanwhile, two "Barack Obama Days" already exist, one on his birthday on August 4, which is celebrated in Illinois, where Obama served as a senator before becoming president. The day has been celebrated since 2018, as the Illinois Legislature passed the bill to make it an official day in 2017. The other day takes place on November 10, in Alabama's Perry County and started in 2009 when commissioners passed a measure to close county offices for the new annual holiday and give its some 40 workers a paid day off. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump said on Meet the Press in May about the parade: "I view it for Flag Day, not necessarily my birthday. Somebody put it together. But no, I think we're going to do something on June 14, maybe or somewhere around there. But I think June 14—it's a very important day." White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly previously said in a statement to Newsweek: "President Trump looks forward to this weekend's unifying 250th Birthday Parade for the United States Army, which will honor all of our nation's active-duty servicemembers, Veterans, and fallen heroes. All Americans are invited to take part in thanking our military men and women who put their lives on the line to defend our freedom." What Happens Next There are 1,800 protests planned across the country for June 14, with millions expected to attend. A map shows the cities that are hosting these protests.
7 minutes ago
Hearing on California's challenge to Trump's deployment of troops to LA set for Thursday
A federal hearing is scheduled Thursday over whether the Trump administration can deploy National Guardsmen and Marines to the Los Angeles area to assist with enforcing federal immigration laws. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an emergency request on Tuesday to block expansion of what they called President Donald Trump and the Department of Defense's "unnecessary" and "unlawful militarization." The request, which was filed as part of Newsom and Bonta's lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeks to prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines beyond protecting federal buildings and property. To send thousands of National Guardsmen to Los Angeles, Trump invoked Section 12406 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which allows a federal deployment in response to a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." In his order, Trump said the troops would protect federal property and federal personnel who are performing their functions. Bonta argued in the filing that Trump failed to meet the legal requirements for such a federal deployment. "To put it bluntly, there is no invasion or rebellion in Los Angeles; there is civil unrest that is no different from episodes that regularly occur in communities throughout the country, and that is capable of being contained by state and local authorities working together," Bonta wrote. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer declined California's request to issue a temporary restraining order immediately and instead set the hearing for Thursday afternoon and gave the Trump administration the time they requested to file a response. In their response, Department of Justice lawyers asked the judge to deny Newsom's request for a temporary restraining order that would limit the military to protecting federal buildings, arguing such an order would amount to a "rioters' veto to enforcement of federal law." "The extraordinary relief Plaintiffs request would judicially countermand the Commander in Chief's military directives -- and would do so in the posture of a temporary restraining order, no less. That would be unprecedented. It would be constitutionally anathema. And it would be dangerous," they wrote. They also argued California should not "second-guess the President's judgment that federal reinforcements were necessary" and that a federal court should defer to the president's discretion on military matters. Some 4,000 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines have been deployed to the Los Angeles area following protests over immigration raids. California leaders claim Trump inflamed the protests by sending in the military when it was not necessary. Protests have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Trump on Tuesday defended his decision to send in the National Guard and Marines, saying the situation in LA was "out of control." "All I want is safety. I just want a safe area," he told reporters. "Los Angeles was under siege until we got there. The police were unable to handle it." Trump went on to suggest that he sent in the National Guard and the Marines to send a message to other cities not to interfere with ICE operations or they will be met with equal or greater force. "If we didn't attack this one very strongly, you'd have them all over the country," he said. "But I can inform the rest of the country that when they do it, if they do it, they're going to be met with equal or greater force than we met right here."
Politico
8 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump administration appears to be pausing plans to ramp up Guantanamo transfers
The Trump administration appears to have put on hold plans to dramatically ramp up transfers of undocumented migrants to Guantanamo Bay. As of Monday, the transfers were expected to happen later in the week but were delayed in part because unrest related to immigration crackdowns in Los Angeles 'got in the way,' said an administration official. The official said it's unclear how long the plan may be shelved. The person and others were granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the discussions. At the State Department, where many officials have urged the Department of Homeland Security to abandon the plan, there's now confusion about what comes next, according to a U.S. diplomat familiar with the situation. State Department officials have been told that clarification about the Guantanamo transfer process is coming at some point and not to use previous guidance on what to tell reporters, the U.S. diplomat said. The apparent delay comes after POLITICO reported Tuesday that the administration was vetting at least 9,000 migrants for transfer to the base. The proposal, if it becomes a reality, would be an exponential increase from the roughly 500 migrants who have been held for short periods at the base since February. It would also be a major step toward realizing a plan President Donald Trump announced in January to use the facility to hold as many as 30,000 migrants found to be in the U.S. illegally. On Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X that reports of the plan were incorrect. 'Not happening,' she said. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, when asked Thursday about the apparent delay, said: 'That's not true. It was never a plan to begin with.' The proposal was designed primarily to free up bed space at detention facilities on domestic American soil, as the White House pushes Immigration and Customs Enforcement for higher arrest and deportation numbers. The agency is also tight on detention space and pressing Congress for additional funding to hire more agents and expand domestic detention capacity. Documents obtained by POLITICO on Tuesday noted that the plan had come together only recently and could still change. The expectation was that the detainees would be at Guantanamo Bay temporarily before being deported to their countries of origin, though it's not clear how long they would be held at the U.S. naval base. U.S. diplomats have been particularly worried about plans to include some 800 Europeans in the group to be transferred. They worry it could strain alliances with European nations that are typically cooperative in taking back deportees. Many European officials have been blindsided by the plans. Italy's foreign minister has said his country is doing 'everything' it can to prevent its citizens from being sent there. According to documents seen by POLITICO, at least two Italians are under consideration for a transfer to Guantanamo. The U.S. facility at Guantanamo, which is on Cuban soil but has been a U.S. naval base for many years, grew notorious because it has been used to hold terrorism suspects detained after the 9/11 attacks. Immigrant rights groups have sued the Trump administration in recent months in a bid to block its use of Guantanamo to house immigrant detainees. A federal class-action lawsuit pending in Washington indicates that there are roughly 70 immigrant detainees currently held there and facing 'punitive' conditions, such as insufficient food, weekly changes of clothes and rodent infestation.
