'I don't know what I'm going to do if they take my car away, it's my lifeline'
Mr James is referring to the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill (UCPIPB), which would result in cuts to sickness and disability benefits, causing huge concern for those currently receiving those benefits.
According to the latest figures from the DWP, the number of people in receipt of PIP has soared since 2019, with one in 10 working-age people in England and Wales now receiving the benefit.
READ MORE: Contactless card warning issued over scam that's difficult to spot
READ MORE: Liverpool area with country's highest number of people claiming PIP
Three areas of Merseyside have some of the highest percentages of the working-age population who receive personal independence payments (PIP). Most notable is Walton, which has the highest proportion (23%) of any parliamentary constituency in the country – closely followed by Bootle (20%) and Knowsley (21%).
Ahead of a scheduled second reading of the UCPIPB in Parliament next week, the Liverpool ECHO visited Bootle to speak to local residents about the potential impact of the legislation.
Mr James lives on Gardner Avenue in Bootle and he is a recipient of the higher rate PIP benefit, he said: "In spite of my disabilities and going through the pain barrier, I try to do my best in terms of getting out and about.
"I rely on my car to get about, and I have to be on the high rate of the mobility component of PIP to qualify for the use of that car. It's my lifeline, and if that's taken from me, I don't know what I'm going to do or how I'll carry on living independently.
"Those claiming PIP are vulnerable people who are victims of circumstance, relating to ill health and disabilities. A lot of that circumstance is brought about by the sort of governments we had, but for a long time now, people with any sort of vulnerability have been either underfunded, ignored or stigmatised as being 'scroungers'.
"I've suffered from lifelong depression, and I live alone. My house, as you can see, is in a poor state of repair, but I still don't know whether I will be reassessed and I don't think anyone else does - that's the real fear."
Concerns about reassessment pop up numerous times. Steph, 33, from Bootle, does not claim PIP, but both her mum and dad are currently recipients of the benefit. She is worried about the potential changes to eligibility criteria.
Steph's parents both suffer from fibromyalgia, and she is apprehensive about the possibility of them being reassessed: "My mum already experienced a problem where she's even had to go to court to get her entitlement. She won her case, but it left its mark.
"She got into a very depressed state, and we were all very concerned for her. It was a very tough time."
Steph said her dad started working when he was 12 years old and worked hard all his life. An injury and subsequent health diagnosis forced him into early retirement, but she said it was difficult getting him the right support.
She added: "The assessments are so gruelling [for PIP]. I've been to one with my dad which literally reduced him to tears as he admitted he couldn't even wash himself because of the pain he was in. He is such a proud man, but he just broke down crying.
"People need to understand the fact that people on PIP are just scraping by, so for the government to cut some of that benefit for the poorest and most vulnerable, it just shows they don't understand – it's them living in their ivory towers.
"If you're going to make cuts, then where's the support after you've cut that payment? What are people going to do? Because the prices of stuff are going up, but the money is going down. How are people supposed to live?"
Under the proposals in the UCPIPB, eligibility for the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability payment in England, would be limited, and the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC) would be restricted.
Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5bn a year, while the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) projects – by the end of this Parliament – approximately 90% of people currently claiming PIP will continue to receive it following the eligibility changes.
Kenny Ferguson, 49, lives on Hawthorne Road, Bootle, and suffers from depression. Mr Ferguson said he has been unable to work since December last year and was advised by his GP to apply for PIP.
He said: "I was told my application had been refused for not reaching the 12 points needed.
"I intend to appeal against this decision, based on my prescribed and approved medication given to me by an expert.
"I do hope my local MP will show support for people like myself who are not well and tell this Government how wrong it is to be picking on vulnerable people."
Last week, Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, published the government's details of the welfare reform bill, claiming it represented 'a new social contract' that it will bring claimants 'peace of mind'. Since then, there has been a significant fall-out within the ranks of the parliamentary Labour party.
On Tuesday, June 24, the Liverpool ECHO reported on a growing rebellion against the government's plans to cut sickness and disability benefits. At the time of writing, 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1 - including six Merseyside Labour MPs.
A DWP spokesperson told the ECHO: 'The vast majority of people who are currently getting PIP will continue to receive it.
"We're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick or disabled people while always protecting those who need it most.
'At the heart of this is our review of the PIP assessment to ensure it is fit for the future. We will work with disabled people and a range of experts on this as we deliver our Plan for Change.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alexander Isak 'on strike' as Newcastle has new scenario for Liverpool sale
Alexander Isak is reportedly on strike as he looks to force a summer transfer to Liverpool, and Newcastle United is weighing up a fresh scenario before the new Premier League season starts. Newcastle head coach Eddie Howe is keeping Isak away from the rest of the squad due to his conduct, and recently admitted that the transfer saga hasn't been healthy for the club. Liverpool bid $148 million for Isak earlier this summer and is waiting to see if Newcastle will entertain a sale before submitting a new offer. While Newcastle does not wish to sell its prized asset, who is contracted through 2028, Isak has made it clear that he doesn't want to play for the club again. According to the Daily Mail, Newcastle may be forced to play Anthony Gordon at center-forward until January, and Isak may be sold if Yoane Wissa joins the club from Brentford. READ MORE: Alexander Isak could be given transfer lifeline thanks to PSG READ MORE: Liverpool transfer news LIVE: Giovanni Leoni deal confirmed, Guehi 'staying', Isak latest Isak is one of the best strikers in the world, and Newcastle is under no contractual pressure to sell. However, his conduct means that he is a depreciating asset, and while Newcastle has the wealthiest owners in the Premier League, maximum value is essential when considering profit and sustainability rules. However, Newcastle needs to sign a replacement before selling Isak, and Howe is keen to add two strikers to the roster. Newcastle released veteran forward Callum Wilson this summer and has struggled to sign a center-forward after missing out on Hugo Ekitike, Liam Delap, and Benjamin Sesko. Newcastle must sign at least one striker before allowing Isak to leave, and Wissa is the priority. Howe plans to play Wissa and Gordon in the attack and integrate new signing, Anthony Elanga. Newcastle has also reached an agreement with Aston Villa for attacking midfielder Jacob Ramsey, and the club will now focus on a deal for Wissa. Brentford manager Keith Andrews has confirmed that Wissa will miss the season opener against Nottingham Forest on Sunday due to transfer interest. Brentford is demanding $54 million for the 28-year-old, who scored 19 Premier League goals last season. Discussions are ongoing, but Howe is keen to lift the mood at Newcastle following Isak's removal. "I don't think it's been healthy for us," Howe said to the BBC. "I don't deny that's been a big challenge. Alex, for me, is one of the best strikers in the world - if not the best. To miss him from your squad leaves a huge gap." "I think morale was certainly affected early on during pre-season," he added. "There was nothing I could do to affect that - it was always going to be there. "When you have a player that good who is not part of your group, it's difficult for the players to fully understand it and to know what's going on and how to react. But, as time has gone on, there has been an acceptance this is the squad and we have got to make the best of the situation. "That's always been my train of thought. Whatever situation you're in, you have got to find a way, and you can only control what you can control. We have moved forward, and I've got to say the atmosphere of the group has been very good in the last couple of weeks." Howe also said he was happy with the squad, but admitted that there was room for improvement. "I'm still hoping for more (signings). I think we need more. We have got some big gaps within the squad still."


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Premier League chief Richard Masters urges ‘patience' on Manchester City charges case
Premier League CEO Richard Masters refused to be drawn on questions surrounding the apparent delay to the league's ongoing legal case against Manchester City. City were charged with 115 breaches of Premier League regulations in February 2023, with the formal hearing concluding on December 6 last year. Over eight months later, the independent three-person panel has not released any decision. Advertisement Asked at a media event on the eve of the Premier League season whether he was disappointed with the length of the process, Masters replied: 'I really can't comment and there are very good reasons for that. As you know, our rules are very clear. 'I can't talk about the process in any aspect between the period when allegations and charges are announced until a decision is handed down, and it would be wrong for me to speculate about when or whether there are any frustrations in the system.' Two weeks ago, the Premier League's handbook was updated to include a clause that all judicial panel members would be required to devote 'sufficient time, diligence and industry to ensure the expeditious and efficient conduct of the arbitration'. Later, Masters added: 'This is an independent panel independently selected. And they're in charge of the case. They're in charge of the process and the timings. We have no influence over that. So we have to be patient and wait for these things to happen. 'Our rules state when a decision is handed down at some point, it will be made public. And I'm sure that's going to be the case here.' The executive insisted that this update did not reflect the length of the case against City, which is commonly regarded as the most complex and hotly-fought in Premier League history. 'At all times, (and) it's got nothing to do with any particular case going on, it's just about improving the efficiency of our judicial system,' he said. 'As you know, we constantly bend the rulebook to try and make it more efficient whilst preserving all of the things you need in a properly functioning system.' This has been a testing process for Masters, with Premier League clubs seemingly at loggerheads over the process, a feeling of discord heightened by several high-profile battles over updates to the league's profitability and sustainability (PSR) and associated party transaction (APT) regulations. Masters batted away questions over whether a negative outcome for the Premier League would lead to his resignation. 'You're asking me to speculate on the outcome of the case,' he said. 'I'm not going to do it. That's all I can say.' Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Club READY to agree €25m fee with Liverpool
Liverpool could strike a deal for €25m before the transfer window closes. It's not going to be easy to accept, however. Liverpool have already been about four times busier in this transfer window than they were in 2024. Back then, the Reds only added Federico Chiesa to their first-team squad. Even that came late in the window and was opportunistic. Liverpool's overall plan was to avoid overwhelming changes to the squad - but things are different in 2025. Shop the LFC Store LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! 🔴 The club have moved swiftly to upgrade key areas at every turn. They had clear targets and went to get them, paying enormous figures if they had to. We've never seen the like, honestly. And that's with some major player sales, too, as Liverpool lost key figures from last season's title win. The craziest part of it all is that they're not done. Far from it, in fact. Liverpool wan to sign Alexander Isak, while Giovanni Leoni and Marc Guehi could both join. Even with all of that on the table, another potential deal has popped up. Let's see if Liverpool go for it. 🔴 Shop the LFC 2025/26 adidas away range Real Madrid want Ibrahima Konate Sport in Spain claims Real Madrid are now eager to sign Ibrahima Konate. Though, that part isn't exactly news. It's been reported for a while that Konate is their ultimate target at the back. His contract expires in 2026 and they seem an opportunity for yet another free transfer. That's how they like to do their business, after all. Convince players to run their contracts down and join them without a fee. Only, Real Madrid do not like their current centre-back options. They're not working under Xabi Alonso and it has them open to the idea of buying Konate early. The report claims Real Madrid would put up around €25m in order to sign him in this window. It's a lot less clear if Liverpool would go for that. After all, it's not a lot of money for an elite target. However, it's almost certainly more money than Liverpool will get for Konate down the line. So we'll have to see what happens here. Liverpool might fancy cashing in on the Frenchman if possible but there's a strong argument that keeping Konate for a year is worth €25m.